|
Thread: the truth about natty lifting...
-
07-17-2012, 02:13 PM #91
-
07-17-2012, 02:16 PM #92
-
-
07-17-2012, 02:16 PM #93
-
07-17-2012, 02:17 PM #94
-
07-17-2012, 02:18 PM #95
-
07-17-2012, 02:18 PM #96
-
-
07-17-2012, 02:19 PM #97
Hmmm. I dont know about this. If you continue to lift using progressive overload why couldn't you keep putting on muscle? Sure the gains would slow down A LOT after the first few years but I don't think they just freeze. I'll get back to you in 3 or 4 years and let you know whether I'm on your side.
-
07-17-2012, 02:19 PM #98
-
07-17-2012, 02:20 PM #99
-
07-17-2012, 02:21 PM #100
-
-
07-17-2012, 02:21 PM #101
-
07-17-2012, 02:23 PM #102
-
07-17-2012, 02:25 PM #103
-
07-17-2012, 02:27 PM #104
but it sucks for me brah.
brb genetics are disposed to respond well to DHT..
brb i look like a pizza face during puberty. finally managed to get my hormones under control
brb afraid of hair loss eventhough my dad still has all his hair.
my hormones are finally coming down and finally having morning wood again etc. would be stupid to mess it up again...
-
-
07-17-2012, 02:28 PM #105
-
07-17-2012, 02:28 PM #106
-
07-17-2012, 02:28 PM #107
Ahhh ok. Thanks for clearing that up. But what I don't get is how you guys decide who is natural and who isn't. Even if someone LOOKS like their body is attainable that doesn't mean that they're not on anything. For all we know this guy could be taking something even though his size and leanness doesn't necessarily require it.
And with something like BBing isnt it possible that some people would respond a lot better than others?
-
07-17-2012, 02:30 PM #108
-
-
07-17-2012, 02:31 PM #109
da fuk is this real life? I want to start when im 21 but i heard youre fukked for life if you do it before 30. definitely gonna do more research but your post is good news.
But brah every single site ive researched cell tech on says its bad to run it before age 25. So what do you mean theirs no evidence? Also what are women's opinions on you taking cell tech?
And bro you should write a cell tech bible. It would help out a lot of ppl. superturk was gonna write one but he never did :/
-
07-17-2012, 02:34 PM #110
-
07-17-2012, 02:35 PM #111
- Join Date: Apr 2012
- Location: Georgia, United States
- Age: 32
- Posts: 1,316
- Rep Power: 1986
Don't quote me on this, but I think I read somewhere that the HPTA is essentially fully developed by age 21; maybe earlier in some individuals. But that it fluctuates until age 25. Again, I don't how true this is, but I clearly remember reading it. Also, I've joined several of those forums and all say I have a great diet and training and the second I tell them my age they flame the fuk outta me.
***Georgia Crew***
"I saw a woman wearing a sweatshirt with Guess on it. I said, thyroid problem?" Arnold Schwarzenegger
"We're not through yet." Patrick Bateman
-
07-17-2012, 02:35 PM #112
Well youre very much right, that guy could be on cell tech and we wouldnt know or think it. If someone told me ViperGQ was on cell tech I wouldnt believe it.
But their are times when its very evident that someones juicing. For example:
Dat mass, dat thickness, dat hardness, all while being shredded.
-
-
07-17-2012, 02:35 PM #113
You're 17. I think you're going to regret it if you hop on the sauce anytime soon. Realize that Money Shot doesn't ever come off. Hes not cycling like most of the other juicers here. If you cycle you are not going to retain most of your gains when you come off and at your age there is a good chance you're doing more harm than good. If you're going to do this you should be prepared to use for the rest of your life. Its not going to be just once. One of the reasons I'm going to stay natural at least for now.
EDIT: Thats another question. For the people on here considering using steroids. Do you plan on continuing to use them for the rest of your life?
-
07-17-2012, 02:37 PM #114
-
07-17-2012, 02:38 PM #115
-
07-17-2012, 02:39 PM #116
Yeah its weird ive seen a ton of cases where after someones first cycle their test lvls end up higher than before(cell tech jump starting their test) which is why a lot of miscers recommend guys on here with test lvls in the 200-300 range to do a cycle.
But there are also ppl who cycle and their natural test is srsly decreased so they need to keep going at it dont they? OBV not after 1 cycle but still it's big risk at a young age to mess with your endocrine system IMO.
-
-
07-17-2012, 02:46 PM #117
- Join Date: Apr 2012
- Location: Georgia, United States
- Age: 32
- Posts: 1,316
- Rep Power: 1986
I don't think you can screw up your natty test with one cycle, unless you completely skip PCT. Just noticed you're 17, so I wouldn't recommend you doing it. However, I think you should be g2g in a few years if that's the route you want to take. And yes, I've also heard of people's natty test rising after a cycle, but I think they usually have very low test to begin with.
***Georgia Crew***
"I saw a woman wearing a sweatshirt with Guess on it. I said, thyroid problem?" Arnold Schwarzenegger
"We're not through yet." Patrick Bateman
-
07-17-2012, 02:47 PM #118
Again it's a hard question to answer. Sometimes I disagree with the people posted that users MoneyShot say arent natty and sometimes I agree. None of us(or very few) know what they look like irl either.
if you take a look at PlasmaBrahh's thread of bodybuilders and fitness models in regular photos its a pretty good indicator of the size and conditioning which = steroids.
But I mean if someone has 18 inch or larger arms shredded(layne norton) then I would automatically assume not natty. IMO not even with freaky genetics can give you have that size.
-
07-17-2012, 02:48 PM #119
-
07-17-2012, 02:50 PM #120
Similar Threads
-
Lets face the truth about being Natty and average Genetics
By AceHigh03 in forum Misc.Replies: 129Last Post: 05-01-2023, 08:15 AM -
The truth about Repetition Ranges and Muscular Hypertrophy (Srs Thread)(Good Info)
By ThCweights in forum Misc.Replies: 179Last Post: 08-30-2013, 05:23 AM
Bookmarks