How many times are you going to pretend that was the only new spending bill signed by Obama? You're a blind partisan shill, highlighted every time you use this deception.
Someday, pathetic people like you who need to define others by their skin color will be a thing of the past. Until then, take your false claims of racism and shove them up your ass. I've never made a single racist comment, but that's the best you can come up with every time your lies are revealed? I'm not wasting any more time with you.If you can't deal with the fact that a black liberal president ...
|
-
07-18-2012, 10:02 PM #241
-
07-18-2012, 11:07 PM #242
-
07-18-2012, 11:09 PM #243
-
07-19-2012, 03:26 AM #244
I don't know how that contributes to this thread but OK?!?!?
Can any of you conservatards please list the spending by Obama that led to the deficit.
If not than fawkoff............stop posting in this thread.I have posted actual spending by Bush and the Republicans but non of you have posted spending by Obama.
Just rhetoric and hyperbole.Just shiite from Limbaugh's and Levine's shows!!!!!!!!!
Stop posting here until you have real facts you freaking trolls.
Michelle Obama 2016!!!!!!!!!!!!!
http://www.********.com/
-
-
07-19-2012, 03:41 AM #245
-
07-19-2012, 06:32 PM #246
-
07-23-2012, 03:07 AM #247
Some more food for thought.
This post has the actual numbers!!!!!!!!!
http://www.njdc.org/blog/post/Newspending072511
Highlights............
Based on the figures from the chart, Bush spent $5.07 trillion on new expenditures from fiscal years 2002-2009. Obama will have spent only $1.44 trillion through 2017, including saving $126 billion through spending cuts.
-
07-23-2012, 04:19 AM #248
-
-
07-23-2012, 05:51 AM #249
I'm not wrong. I stop in and shake my head every now and then at the dumb in this thread. There is a reason Paul Ryan was afraid 2009 would be the benchmark and it is because that is how presidential spending is always measured (by the increase term over term). What the GOP wants to do here is break tradition to make Obama look excessive by crediting him with all spending, including Bush's. Frankly they desperately need to do this because they have spent his entire term demonizing the guy for spending (while ignoring Bush when he did it). Beyond that obvious point there isn't much to be said. Oh, and I'm tired of being negged (I received 5 negs from the usual GOP shills). I wanted to have conversation and instead got a neg train.
-
07-23-2012, 05:53 AM #250
-
07-23-2012, 06:36 AM #251
growth, GROWTH of the federal govt.
can't you ****ers read?
of course when the govt is already this inflated there is little left to increase: education? check. air travel? check. food safety? check. social security? check...etc etc
seriously, what is else there left to create besides the ministry of truth?Check your privilege, *******!
-
07-23-2012, 06:44 AM #252
-
-
07-23-2012, 07:05 AM #253
-
07-23-2012, 02:42 PM #254
Some people (liberals) will believe anything as long as you use facts/logic/and reason.Some people (conservatives/christians) will only believe what they want to believe.
That's been the point of my participation in this thread.People want to blame Obama for the national debt while ignoring the fact that he inherited a 1.3 trillion dollar deficit his first year in office with another 8 trillion over the next 10 years.
OK...............
-
07-23-2012, 03:15 PM #255
-
07-23-2012, 03:20 PM #256
Sure, he is the smallest government spender since Eisenhower, for contemporary presidents. All these presidents have been controlled by Israeli lobbyists.
Your sensationalist Pro-Obama writing forgot to mention his ObamaCare (a joke and supporting the Corrupt Medical Industry ) and plus his unconstitutional act of war on Libya to support the Israeli's in setting up a central bank.
-
-
07-23-2012, 04:46 PM #257
-
07-23-2012, 05:46 PM #258
-
07-23-2012, 06:54 PM #259
-
07-23-2012, 08:57 PM #260
-
-
07-23-2012, 09:16 PM #261
lol the 'projected cost' was doubled within 24 hours of when it was presented. Nothing ever costs anywhere near government estimates, and that is using official numbers. Since there's no way to actually audit the government its impossible to say what the actual cost is.
But when uncle sam bends you over, you don't complain. Not if you know what's good for you.Official misc attaché to the Kremlin
Наше дело правое.
Враг будет разбит.
Победа будет за нами!
-
08-19-2012, 11:01 AM #262
It's rather bizarre that someone needs to "prove" easily researched facts. Every spending bill enacted after Jan 2009 was signed into law by Barack Obama.
Feb 17, 2009: $787 Billion stimulus bill (partial spending in FY09)
Mar 11, 2009: $410 Billion omnibus spending bill (all spent during FY09)
Apr 21, 2009: $5.7 Billion Americorps spending bill
Jun 24, 2009: $106 Billion Supplemental Appropriations Act http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/111/hr2346/text (To fund the continued Iraq War and expanded Afghanistan War, and a few unrelated things - supposedly the last "Supplemental" for War spending - yet another promise that he later broke).
George Bush 2009 budget proposal: $3,107 Billion
Barack Obama's actual 2009 spending: $3,518 Billion
I don't give a fiddlers fawk about '09 or '08 or '07 etc when Bush's ass sat in the White House!!!I want them to list the actual spending(not bi-partisan spending like the stimulus for the fawking luv of what ever God you pray to) that was initiated by Obama himself.So retards like nutsy54 understand what I mean list programs or laws signed by Obama in no way connected to Bush or the Republicans.Can I make this anymore simple?
Here...........I'll do it anyways.
Obama wins election.
Obama sits in oval office for the first time.
Obama says "here's how I want to spend money".
Now list this money and the exact amount for each law he signed or shut the fawk up!!!!!!!!
And I mean post the freaking programs or policies and there cost or don't ever post in one of my threads again!!!!
-
08-19-2012, 11:22 AM #263
-
08-19-2012, 11:49 AM #264
I didn't say it was "spending".
And what's included in the chart has nothing to do with the request made by Ecto: To list all spending bills signed into law by Barack Obama in 2009 - and their effect on the deficit. Not to mention, the OP chart pretends that Obama had no control over any 2009 spending - a position which has been solidly disproven multiple times.
So, your post was completely irrelevant to the questions I directly responded to. But thanks for Trolling what's been a failed Troll thread anywayLast edited by nutsy54; 08-19-2012 at 12:04 PM.
-
-
08-19-2012, 11:51 AM #265
-
08-19-2012, 12:03 PM #266
Government spending is going to increase if the economy is growing, that will never change.
Check Federal Expenses as a percentage of GDP, that will give you a better idea of having control of spending. You can't blame Obama for the loss of revenue over the past years but you will see that spending as a percentage of the US economy is the highest its been in modern times and there has yet to be viable solution on how to prevent it from getting exponentially worse.
I suppose pointing at the guy before Obama is probably a much easier defense.
-
08-19-2012, 03:12 PM #267
Sad little Canuck... still can't comprehend that Barack Obama and a Democrat-controlled Congress are actually responsible for spending bills written by a Democrat-controlled Congress and signed into law by Barack Obama in 2009
Thanks for proving, again, your complete ignorance about a topic you keep ranting about. I never said a damn thing about 2008 or 2007 - but I very clearly highlight OBAMA'S NEW SPENDING IN 2009. $400 Billion more than Bush's budget request (all of which delivered to him by legislation from the Pelosi/Reid Democrat-controlled Congress). I even listed the major spending bills for you - with Barack Obama's signature in early and mid 2009.
The fact that you want to blindly ignore the facts you wish weren't true really highlights that you're either a Troll, or a pathetic partisan hack.
You are aware that Obama inherited a $1.3 Trillion deficit from Bush and the Republicans aren't you?
So, if you're just going to keep posting lies that have been repeatedly disproven, I'll keep pointing out that you're a liar who intentionally ignores cited facts.
-
08-19-2012, 03:29 PM #268
-
-
08-19-2012, 03:58 PM #269
When you say partial spending you are being disinegnuous, considering that much of it was tax cuts it would be more reasonable to detail what was spent but I understand you would have to know what you were talking about to do that so I will move on.
Mar 11, 2009: $410 Billion omnibus spending bill (all spent during FY09)
Apr 21, 2009: $5.7 Billion Americorps spending bill
Jun 24, 2009: $106 Billion Supplemental Appropriations Act http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/111/hr2346/text (To fund the continued Iraq War and expanded Afghanistan War, and a few unrelated things - supposedly the last "Supplemental" for War spending - yet another promise that he later broke).
George Bush 2009 budget proposal: $3,107 Billion
Barack Obama's actual 2009 spending: $3,518 Billion
At least attribute bush's projected to him and then start from there with obama which would at a minimum give you something liek 6.5% increase for bush in 09 and 13% for obama 09 over bush 09. Alternately you could do obama 10 over projected bush 09 which would be something like 16% tops but since you are a partisan hack and honestly a pretty reprehensible person to argue/debate, you would rather lay it all at the feet of your political opponent even though you know its bull****.
Wow, really tense this morning. "How Obama wants to spend money" was clearly detailed in his first budget proposal - which requested $3,591 Billion for 2010: To include a $1,258 Billion deficit, and was $600 Billion more than Federal spending the year before he took office (a 20% increase)."I'm not like most girls." -most girls
-
08-19-2012, 04:08 PM #270
Bookmarks