Gay Marriage: For, against or neutral?

[windupzenmaioh]

Gay Marriage: For, against or neutral?

[gottk2x]

I only hate the gay dudes that act like they have more estrogen than most females. So..neutral I guess.

[lucious]

For.

bigots/religious/general idiots have held the human race back long enough.

[Koop21]

[ReecesNikka]

Pretty much this. Its not like them being married is going to prevent them from being out in public together and such, so it doesn't effect me at all.

[McBlouster]

for
it's a shame we even question it

gooby pls

[windupzenmaioh]

for
it's a shame we even question it

gooby pls

It's already legal in Canada.

[whitedoor]

For


but gay adoption on the other hand.......

[cmeis90]

I don't understand homosexuality and am not exactly perfectly ok with it either.

BUT the US government shouldn't be involved with that. I guess technically then:

For: legally
Against: personally
Neutral: overall

[SuperBrah69]

For. 2 gays getting married has as much impact on me as another pair of strangers getting married. 0.

[windupzenmaioh]

For


but gay adoption on the other hand.......

..........should be legal too.

[DK_82]

Pretty much this. Its not like them being married is going to prevent them from being out in public together and such, so it doesn't effect me at all.

For. But even if I wasn't, it wouldn't be any of my business anyway.

for
it's a shame we even question it

gooby pls

These. I'm generally a "live and let live" type guy. If two dudes/two women want to have a piece of paper defining their relationship, it makes no sort of difference to me.

[Anomie2029]

Another thread on this?

For... It's got nothing to do with me or anyone else. It will not ruin the 'sanctity of marriage' and will not force churches to conduct the ceremonies.
There is no logical or rational reason to oppose it.

[ryan36_1]

For, because of this:



(not srs on view of marriage)

[DizzySmalls]

Ron Paul style. Government should stob subsidizing marriage and punishing legally single people, let anybody get into any contractual relationship they want. Why is the government deciding this kind of **** O_o

In a realistic world, For. Equal rights and such

[FeFocus]

Neutral. I have many gay friends and straight friends that are very passionate about the issue. I just cannot for my life give a turdlet of a sh*t.

[ReecesNikka]

for the record, im for polygamy too. if 2 *******s and a woman, or 2 dykes and a beta ******* want to get married, i dont give a chit.

[SmithMachineGuy]

Against. I am against all marriage.
Having special rules for married people (almost always beneficial rules) makes society less fair for single people. Is it not enough that we are lonely, but we need to be financially punished as well? Then there is the unjust divorce laws as well. I say the entire institution of marriage should end.
Any family related legalities should be relevant parent to child. If two people want to live together, that's their business.They can create private contracts with each other to iron out the terms. There's no reason for the state to sponsor this outdated institution.

[StayPerfect4Me]

I'm Christian but I can't stand that people talk about the sanctity of marriage. While I don't agree with homosexuality, you can't force your beliefs on others and legislate Christian morality to non-Christians. Also, if we based our marriage laws on what Jesus said, people wouldn't be able to get divorced except in cases of abuse and infidelity, so US law already violates biblical law.

Let gay people get married. They have the freedom to live how they want to live. I personally feel they'll pay for it later but I don't see any reason why it should be outlawed.

[footmenrow]

For. I don't give a fck if bob down the street likes to get butt****ed.

The only issue, flamboyantness. Your still a man, act like it.

[changetostay]

meh

i'm indifferent

[fmylife4real]

For. Let them be as miserable as married straight couples can be.

[WillBrah]

for, let people be happy.

[Archangel_Lost]

don't care

[McBlouster]

It's already legal in Canada.

indeed

I don't understand homosexuality and am not exactly perfectly ok with it either.

BUT the US government shouldn't be involved with that. I guess technically then:

For: legally
Against: personally
Neutral: overall

are you ****in kidding me? i don't even get how you can be against it. why would you get to approve or disapprove of something that doesn't affect you and doesn't hurt anyone?

[foyt20]

For.

If two people are happy and want to ruin their lives (see what I did ther ) and they are two dudes, or two chicks? Who the fuark am I to say they shouldnt.

[D0omsdayPrime]

Once you understand the fact that marriage is not by defintition between a man and a woman and the fact that two gay guys or girls who love eachother want to be married, the government should make it permissible. As a libertarian I see it as a way to maximize freedom and really if you dont like gay marriage then dont get gay married. If it does not pinch my arm nor pick my wallet what problem is it for me. I hope one day even the religious right can understand that.

[D0omsdayPrime]

I'm Christian but I can't stand that people talk about the sanctity of marriage. While I don't agree with homosexuality, you can't force your beliefs on others and legislate Christian morality to non-Christians. Also, if we based our marriage laws on what Jesus said, people wouldn't be able to get divorced except in cases of abuse and infidelity, so US law already violates biblical law.

Let gay people get married. They have the freedom to live how they want to live. I personally feel they'll pay for it later but I don't see any reason why it should be outlawed.

Repped for being understanding.

[autrefois]

OP how many more accounts and threads are you gonna make until you get what you want? Are you just gonna keep spamming the misc until you catch AIDS?

[McBlouster]

I'm Christian but I can't stand that people talk about the sanctity of marriage. While I don't agree with homosexuality, you can't force your beliefs on others and legislate Christian morality to non-Christians. Also, if we based our marriage laws on what Jesus said, people wouldn't be able to get divorced except in cases of abuse and infidelity, so US law already violates biblical law.

Let gay people get married. They have the freedom to live how they want to live. I personally feel they'll pay for it later but I don't see any reason why it should be outlawed.

buddy went full retard