ITT op learns about genetics.
|
Thread: Would you marry a womanlet?
-
06-15-2012, 11:09 AM #91
-
06-15-2012, 11:12 AM #92
-
-
06-15-2012, 11:13 AM #93
-
06-15-2012, 11:15 AM #94
-
06-15-2012, 11:26 AM #95
No. But, for me it's a automatic turn off. If you're consciously having to reject someone because of their height, you're doing it wrong. You shouldn't care about it. Who cares if your son won't be a basketball player? There are many respectable careers he can enter from engineering to politics. Sports aren't all that.
-
06-15-2012, 11:27 AM #96
-
-
06-15-2012, 12:20 PM #97
-
06-15-2012, 12:23 PM #98
-
06-16-2012, 02:52 AM #99
-
06-16-2012, 02:57 AM #100
-
-
06-16-2012, 03:00 AM #101
-
06-16-2012, 03:02 AM #102
-
06-16-2012, 03:05 AM #103
-
06-16-2012, 03:07 AM #104
ive only dated women 6ft+ (Long slender legs on a beautiful slender frame), 5'8 would be a visible limit mentally for my eyes to scan over in a social setting with women
(none of which ever wore heels), heels are for short sluts
so 5'7 even 5'8 would never happen realistically
good luck with your genetics...
-
-
06-16-2012, 03:08 AM #105
-
06-16-2012, 03:11 AM #106
-
06-16-2012, 03:13 AM #107
-
06-16-2012, 03:19 AM #108
-
-
06-16-2012, 03:21 AM #109
-
06-16-2012, 03:30 AM #110
-
06-16-2012, 03:40 AM #111
-
06-16-2012, 09:15 AM #112
-
-
06-16-2012, 09:18 AM #113
It's often the dumb, falsely entitled, delusional scum sloots (ironically especially the short ones) that set height requirements for men. I lol at 5'2 girls that say a guy has to be at least 5'9 et cetera. It's time to put them back in their place and make these midget dogs bow down to the master race which is man.
Last edited by multipleorgasm; 06-16-2012 at 09:49 AM.
-
06-16-2012, 09:20 AM #114
-
06-16-2012, 09:22 AM #115
-
06-16-2012, 09:23 AM #116
-
-
06-16-2012, 09:26 AM #117
- Join Date: Jun 2010
- Location: Canberra, Australia
- Age: 33
- Posts: 6,589
- Rep Power: 1995
Genetics are a funny thing, me and my oldest brother are both manlets. Middle brother is 6'3. All the same father (srs dna tested because it was shady as fawk and it would of been a really awkward question to ask mum, he also has dark colourings where we are both light) TBH i'd be more worried about fat genetics/how they age.
Dad is 5'5 mum is barely 5 ft.
That being said, current gf is 5'1 and she is columbian. Her mum looks like her older sister and she doesn't have a spare ounce of fat anywhere with perfect t to a ratio, I can't wait to impregnate that. If we have manlet children, so be it.
-
06-16-2012, 09:55 AM #118
I'm not surprised to see a lot of what appears to be second generation type guys talking about how much taller they are than their manlet parents. This is a different case imo, because there's a decent chance that if given proper nutrition, medicine and environment, your parents would have been much taller, and their shortness isn't exactly due to genetics, but environmental factors.
A true manlet/womanlet would be if for example, your family has been living in a modern-industrialized country for at least 100 years and yet most of the people in your family are still short.
For example: If you're the child of poor/working class immigrant parents from Nepal and they are 5'2 and you're 5'8...then I wouldn't really classify you as having manlet genetics and your offspring will probably increase in height with each generation.
On the other hand, if you're American of British heritage and you're 5'6, then you probably carry short genes and your chances of having manlet/womanlet children is pretty high despite favorable environmental factors.
-
06-16-2012, 10:03 AM #119
-
06-16-2012, 10:09 AM #120
Similar Threads
-
Insert creative thread title here- Cassie's Workout log
By Airror in forum Teen Workout LogsReplies: 1921Last Post: 07-31-2012, 06:37 PM
Bookmarks