I've been doing dumbbell bent-over rows as part of my routine for a while, but find the form difficult. I have issues such as trouble keeping my stabilising leg still, not rotating the torso too much and making sure my back does the work.
My gym does have seated row stations, both with cable and lever. (I'd post pics but need 50 posts for that.) Could I do either of them instead, or would I be missing out?
I suppose this is differnet form the general free weights vs machines war, since there aren't many important stabilisers involved in the row. (correct me if I'm wrong)
|
-
05-16-2012, 09:35 AM #1
Is there a point ot bent-over rows if my gym has seated row stations?
-
05-16-2012, 09:42 AM #2No brain, no gain.
"The fitness and nutrition world is a breeding ground for obsessive-compulsive behavior. The irony is that many of the things people worry about have no impact on results either way, and therefore aren't worth an ounce of concern."--Alan Aragon
Where the mind goes, the body follows.
Ironwill Gym:
https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showpost.php?p=629719403&postcount=3388
Ironwill2008 Journal:
https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=157459343&p=1145168733
-
05-16-2012, 10:02 AM #3
-
05-16-2012, 10:10 AM #4No brain, no gain.
"The fitness and nutrition world is a breeding ground for obsessive-compulsive behavior. The irony is that many of the things people worry about have no impact on results either way, and therefore aren't worth an ounce of concern."--Alan Aragon
Where the mind goes, the body follows.
Ironwill Gym:
https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showpost.php?p=629719403&postcount=3388
Ironwill2008 Journal:
https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=157459343&p=1145168733
-
-
05-16-2012, 10:12 AM #5
-
05-16-2012, 10:43 AM #6
-
05-16-2012, 02:03 PM #7
Bookmarks