100 million $ a day for...

[strongecto]

brb causing inflation, brb crashing the economy, brb ruining the entire world, brb also killing an innocent 7 yo girl

brb letting thousands of 7 year old girls die to appease your own conscience

[Ken-O]

the pros in would FAR outweigh the cons in my scenario

In your scenario it does, brb buying a lambo here and there, paying some dude to chose some charitys and donate some random money to them that i wont even notice its gone, etc. But what about the scenario of the 150 babies and their families?

[terion]

So let's say the button is gone. You have 150 innocent newborns lined up in front of you. You have a gun and 150 bullets. Are you saying you would go down the line and shoot each baby to get the money?

in that case, for me, it would definitely be a no. the way i interpreted the button the OP was talking about is a mechanism for systematic murder; one that removes the emotional aspect of murdering a person. if i actually had to stare down my victim as i killed them i'd probably **** my pants from the guilt/pressure/stress/etcetc lol

[Ken-O]

brb letting thousands of 7 year old girls die to appease your own conscience

Im sure the little girl thats gonna die will understand why you need to kill her in order to get some million dollars that you will spend in cars bitches and houses, and also wink wink help other random girls that she doesnt know.

Sure she doesnt mind about the fact that she only has one life, and she was lucky enough to be born and experience such a thing, and that once you push that button and get those millions she would be gone from the earth, she will cease to exist, just because some guy decided to.

[jagboy]

can the button kill me?

[sydneyalysse]

Yeah i bet the 7 yo girl will understand why she needs to die so you guys can get rich and help some other kids just like her. Well then who is gonna help the 7 yo girl when she is 6 ft under? WHO?

so she no longer needs to feel the suffering of the world? win-win.

[Fabreeze13]

can the button kill me?

It is random so maybe

[terion]

Im sure the little girl thats gonna die will understand why you need to kill her in order to get some million dollars that you will spend in cars bitches and houses, and also wink wink help other random girls that she doesnt know.

Sure she doesnt mind about the fact that she only has one life, and she was lucky enough to be born and experience such a thing, and that once you push that button and get those millions she would be gone from the earth, she will cease to exist, just because some guy decided to.

why do you keep bringing up the fact its going to be a little girl.. it can be anyone. could be a 90 y/o grandpa who's one day from dying naturally anyways

[752]

yes, 100 million dollars can easily save thousands of lives.

[nextyearsharks]

yeah considering odds are it'll kill some fukwit douchebag.

Then again preesing the button would make me a fukwit douchebag.

I'll send for Philosoraptor

[Ken-O]

so she no longer needs to feel the suffering of the world? win-win.

Oh yeah? Well what if now you are the one that dies when you push the button, and when you do some random guy gets the money to help strangers and buy cars bitches and houses?

Win win situation right? It'd be unselfish to not give the guy all that money right?

[circusmidget]

We're a plague, I'd do it once without question.

[Ken-O]

why do you keep bringing up the fact its going to be a little girl.. it can be anyone. could be a 90 y/o grandpa who's one day from dying naturally anyways

it can, but chances are it wont be.

[Fabreeze13]

why do you keep bringing up the fact its going to be a little girl.. it can be anyone. could be a 90 y/o grandpa who's one day from dying naturally anyways

Or it could be ur daddy

[Fabreeze13]

yeah considering odds are it'll kill some fukwit douchebag.

Then again preesing the button would make me a fukwit douchebag.

I'll send for Philosoraptor

Isn't that called a paradox?

[James0208]

id push it 7 billion times, mad?

you just went full retard, with 7 billion people dead, money wouldn't worth shet, you would have no where to spend your money lol

[Marzden]

I'd do it, it has just as much chance as killing me as it does anyone else. I wont care or neither will they, they'll be dead. Poor 7 year old girl, she's going to be so upset when she realises shes dead.

[CULTLEADER]

Pushing a button that randomly kills a person each day... Would you do it?

Anyone who says no is an idiot. Even using a million of the hundred million could be used to save infinitly more lives than one random person dying. Not saying I'd do it, as the world is already overpopulated and if anything I'd use my money to sterilize and kill more people than save them, but anyone who argues the morals is beyond retarded, as it could be put to good use.

I'd be more worried about inflation if I did it everyday. Or explaining it lol.

[circusmidget]

it can, but chances are it wont be.

Given population ageing, I'd like to see how you justify your perspective.

[CULTLEADER]

So let's say the button is gone. You have 150 innocent newborns lined up in front of you. You have a gun and 150 bullets. Are you saying you would go down the line and shoot each baby to get the money?

Without question yes. Newborns would actually make it easier. No real memories or experiences lost forever, just potential.

[terion]

it can, but chances are it wont be.

chances are it wont be a 7 year old girl either

Approximately 26.3% of the global population is aged under 15, while 65.9% is aged 15–64 and 7.9% is aged 65 or over.[66]
www . indexmundi . com/world/demographics_profile. html
(remove spaces)

not the best source but im not spending time researching this lol. chances are it will kill someone who is NOT a 7 year old girl. so stop using that unfounded example

[TooAnabolic]

the only logical (and moral) conclusion is to press the button and then use the money
to save countless others

Basically the only issue at hand is: are you willing to sacrifice 1 life to save 100+ others?
If you don't press the button, you may as well be killing 100+ other people.

[Psyllius]

Yeah Id only need to push it once

this.

[TheDude1987]

A better question is how little money would be enough to make you do it? Because $100 million doesn't even require any thought on my part. I think $10k would be the point that makes me question it.

[CULTLEADER]

the only logical (and moral) conclusion is to press the button and then use the money
to save countless others

Basically the only issue at hand is: are you willing to sacrifice 1 life to save 100+ others?
If you don't press the button, you may as well be killing 100+ other people.

I use the same logic for the hypothetical bombing of africa. You kill millions, but save exponentially more from being born into a **** life of starvation and death anyways.

[Fabreeze13]

A better question is how little money would be enough to make you do it? Because $100 million doesn't even require any thought on my part. I think $10k would be the point that makes me question it.

How bout $3.50?

[Ken-O]

Given population ageing, I'd like to see how you justify your perspective.

More people are born everyday than people who die. That means there are more kids than old people. Its pretty simple actually.

chances are it wont be a 7 year old girl either

Approximately 26.3% of the global population is aged under 15, while 65.9% is aged 15–64 and 7.9% is aged 65 or over.[66]
www . indexmundi . com/world/demographics_profile. html
(remove spaces)

not the best source but im not spending time researching this lol. chances are it will kill someone who is NOT a 7 year old girl. so stop using that unfounded example

15-64 strong ranges lol. And killing an innocent teenager is no worse than killing a 7 yo girl. I just used her as an example.

[TooAnabolic]

I use the same logic for the hypothetical bombing of africa. You kill millions, but save exponentially more from being born into a **** life of starvation and death anyways.

similar, but the fundamental difference is that the people in my scenario actually exist in reality.

[ABCT]

lulz

Lol let's face it, the culmination of your whole lives effort, your hellbound path, is insane profits for 1. arms manufacturers and 2. world elite oligarchs like George Soros, Henry Kissinger, the Rockefeller's, Rothschild's etc., all of whom would consider you and your entire family nothing more than useless eaters. You're a pathetic worm.

[circusmidget]

More people are born everyday than people who die. That means there are more kids than old people. Its pretty simple actually.

No, it means that the population is increasing because people are living longer. Thus, the average age of the population is getting higher. For example (strong wiki quote):

Asia and Europe are the two regions where a significant number of countries face severe population ageing in the near future. In these regions within twenty years many countries will face a situation where the largest population cohort will be those over 65 and average age will be approaching 50.