|
Thread: 100 million $ a day for...
-
05-07-2012, 12:22 AM #61
-
05-07-2012, 12:23 AM #62
-
05-07-2012, 12:26 AM #63
in that case, for me, it would definitely be a no. the way i interpreted the button the OP was talking about is a mechanism for systematic murder; one that removes the emotional aspect of murdering a person. if i actually had to stare down my victim as i killed them i'd probably **** my pants from the guilt/pressure/stress/etcetc lol
-
05-07-2012, 12:26 AM #64
Im sure the little girl thats gonna die will understand why you need to kill her in order to get some million dollars that you will spend in cars bitches and houses, and also wink wink help other random girls that she doesnt know.
Sure she doesnt mind about the fact that she only has one life, and she was lucky enough to be born and experience such a thing, and that once you push that button and get those millions she would be gone from the earth, she will cease to exist, just because some guy decided to.
-
-
05-07-2012, 12:26 AM #65
-
05-07-2012, 12:28 AM #66
-
05-07-2012, 12:30 AM #67
-
05-07-2012, 12:30 AM #68
-
-
05-07-2012, 12:31 AM #69
-
05-07-2012, 12:32 AM #70
-
05-07-2012, 12:32 AM #71
-
05-07-2012, 12:32 AM #72
-
-
05-07-2012, 12:32 AM #73
-
05-07-2012, 12:34 AM #74
-
05-07-2012, 12:35 AM #75
-
05-07-2012, 12:36 AM #76
-
-
05-07-2012, 12:36 AM #77
-
05-07-2012, 12:36 AM #78
Anyone who says no is an idiot. Even using a million of the hundred million could be used to save infinitly more lives than one random person dying. Not saying I'd do it, as the world is already overpopulated and if anything I'd use my money to sterilize and kill more people than save them, but anyone who argues the morals is beyond retarded, as it could be put to good use.
I'd be more worried about inflation if I did it everyday. Or explaining it lol.
-
05-07-2012, 12:36 AM #79
-
05-07-2012, 12:38 AM #80
-
-
05-07-2012, 12:39 AM #81
chances are it wont be a 7 year old girl either
Approximately 26.3% of the global population is aged under 15, while 65.9% is aged 15–64 and 7.9% is aged 65 or over.[66]
www . indexmundi . com/world/demographics_profile. html
(remove spaces)
not the best source but im not spending time researching this lol. chances are it will kill someone who is NOT a 7 year old girl. so stop using that unfounded example
-
05-07-2012, 12:40 AM #82
-
05-07-2012, 12:41 AM #83
-
05-07-2012, 12:41 AM #84
-
-
05-07-2012, 12:42 AM #85
-
05-07-2012, 12:43 AM #86
-
05-07-2012, 12:43 AM #87
-
05-07-2012, 12:44 AM #88
-
-
05-07-2012, 12:45 AM #89
- Join Date: Jul 2011
- Location: 51st State of America, Australia
- Age: 36
- Posts: 1,377
- Rep Power: 549
Lol let's face it, the culmination of your whole lives effort, your hellbound path, is insane profits for 1. arms manufacturers and 2. world elite oligarchs like George Soros, Henry Kissinger, the Rockefeller's, Rothschild's etc., all of whom would consider you and your entire family nothing more than useless eaters. You're a pathetic worm.
-
05-07-2012, 12:47 AM #90
- Join Date: May 2010
- Location: Australia
- Age: 42
- Posts: 3,144
- Rep Power: 5715
No, it means that the population is increasing because people are living longer. Thus, the average age of the population is getting higher. For example (strong wiki quote):
Asia and Europe are the two regions where a significant number of countries face severe population ageing in the near future. In these regions within twenty years many countries will face a situation where the largest population cohort will be those over 65 and average age will be approaching 50.Interstellar bears climb back to save the enemas.
Similar Threads
-
Would you live in this cage for 1 year for $100 million???
By SpiderWolf in forum Misc.Replies: 149Last Post: 03-17-2011, 01:09 PM
Bookmarks