anyone have an opinion on which is better?
|
|
Results 1 to 12 of 12
Thread: 17-HD vs E-bol
-
02-12-2007, 06:26 PM #1Step Up
- Join Date: Jun 2005
- Location: Hawaii
- Age: 36
- Posts: 714
- Rep Power: 231
17-HD vs E-bol
"There are no boundaries in my world, not even genetic potential, a man can never cease to grow."
Phillipians 4:13 Motivates My Every Breath
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/photo/showphoto.php?photo=43926&cat=506
^Me at 140 Pounds^
Height: 5'9"
Current Phase: Cut
Current Weight: 180
Post Cut Goal Weight: 170
AIM: Ace of 1Spades1
-
02-12-2007, 06:28 PM #2Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2006
- Location: Texas, United States
- Age: 38
- Posts: 4,683
- Rep Power: 1773
Definitely not 17hd.
-
02-12-2007, 06:39 PM #3"...maybe when im tick"
- Join Date: Aug 2005
- Location: Kailua, Hawaii
- Age: 37
- Posts: 415
- Rep Power: 983
sawp hawaiian..i tried 17hd didnt really do much for me just some energy and faster recovery..shoots den
Quoted by :Wendel_Clark_17
"I don't know. If I saw a guy on the street with cauliflower ears and scars through his eye brows, I don't think I'd ask him if he picked flowers for a living."
-
02-12-2007, 06:58 PM #4Step Up
- Join Date: Jun 2005
- Location: Hawaii
- Age: 36
- Posts: 714
- Rep Power: 231
ey wassup. u from hawaii too ah. thanks for your input. appreciate it. shootz.
"There are no boundaries in my world, not even genetic potential, a man can never cease to grow."
Phillipians 4:13 Motivates My Every Breath
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/photo/showphoto.php?photo=43926&cat=506
^Me at 140 Pounds^
Height: 5'9"
Current Phase: Cut
Current Weight: 180
Post Cut Goal Weight: 170
AIM: Ace of 1Spades1
-
-
02-12-2007, 07:04 PM #5Re-Born
- Join Date: Apr 2006
- Location: United States
- Posts: 7,648
- Rep Power: 2393
no contest
EBolChew Crew
MFC
-
02-12-2007, 07:11 PM #6Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2007
- Posts: 204
- Rep Power: 0
17hd was horrible
-
02-12-2007, 07:23 PM #7Lets Go Dbacks!
- Join Date: Feb 2006
- Posts: 6,064
- Rep Power: 70430
17-HD is junk. I've heard good things about E-bol though
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face - forever.
$ BMBC $
-Misc Scotch Crew-
-
02-12-2007, 11:28 PM #8
While by nature I would opt for E-BOL / ecdysterone, I think that for a fair comaprison one would need try BOTH.
However, I am rather unimpressed by the ingredients of 17HD (Androgenic some time ago did a breakdown on the ingredients in 17HD, please search for this thread), so I don't see me trying it out in the forseeable future.
-
-
02-12-2007, 11:39 PM #9Registered User
- Join Date: Feb 2007
- Location: United States
- Age: 40
- Posts: 307
- Rep Power: 213
Im thinking about buying E-BOL....any comments on it and what to stack with it for MASSIVE gains?
-
02-13-2007, 12:24 AM #10Registered User
- Join Date: Dec 2006
- Age: 43
- Posts: 29
- Rep Power: 0
I've use 17 HD and it just gives you some energy before workouts nothing special.
-
02-13-2007, 01:23 AM #11attempting to cut...
- Join Date: Sep 2005
- Age: 36
- Posts: 814
- Rep Power: 561
X-factor would be the consensusOriginally Posted by Benched
Many are liking the results of an X-factor/E-bol/Activate stack as well
Creatine and bcaa's wouldn't be a bad idea either IMOhttp://bodyspace.bodybuilding.com/Boxer757/
1.Diet
2.Exercise
3.Sleep
4.Staple-supplements
5.Fancy-schmancy supplements
-
02-13-2007, 02:40 AM #12"MASSIVE" (whatever this means) gains are being reported in many people who take Anabolic Pump by USPLabs. however, it appears that those gains are mainly intracellular water / glycogen, which is not bad by itself, but it should definitely be even better if stacked with something that additionally could further improve protein synthesis in muscles (such asecdysterone).Originally Posted by Benched
Bookmarks