|
-
04-10-2012, 02:57 PM #61
-
04-10-2012, 05:07 PM #62
-
04-10-2012, 05:18 PM #63
-
04-10-2012, 05:22 PM #64
-
-
04-10-2012, 05:25 PM #65
- Join Date: Jul 2005
- Location: California, United States
- Posts: 40,935
- Rep Power: 85703
Does that now mean that if we elect Romney he will wave his magic wand and fix all our problems?
🎥
Site oldest post: [url]https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=172072283&p=1540411941&viewfull=1#post1540411941[/url]
Filmmaker Thread: https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=165304201&p=1534834621#post1534834621
-
04-10-2012, 05:28 PM #66
-
04-10-2012, 05:33 PM #67
-
04-10-2012, 05:37 PM #68
-
-
04-10-2012, 05:43 PM #69
- Join Date: Jul 2005
- Location: California, United States
- Posts: 40,935
- Rep Power: 85703
-
04-10-2012, 06:08 PM #70
-
04-10-2012, 06:08 PM #71
I can see very clearly that it's a vicious cycle.
Obama claims to be so much more different than Bush, but what policies of Bush did he do away with? Guantanamo Bay - still open. Patriot Act - extended tenfold and now we can be detained with no due process so Obama took Bush's policies and expanded upon them. He is also assassinating citizens such as teenage boys and pretty soon he will be tracking out internet activity with the new bills that are making their way through congress. He signed ACTA as well. Obama claimed to be against SOPA, but he was the one who requested the provisions in SOPA. Romney at least spoke out against SOPA as being too intrusive and I haven't heard Romney propose any sort of tracking or privacy invasions yet. War on Iraq - Obama followed Bush's timetable. War in Afghanistan - no change. War in Iran - Obama taking more pages out of the Bush playbook with sanctions and threats of war. Bush tax cuts - still in place, Obama making excuses saying it was necessary so taxes wouldn't be raised on people. Obamacare - death panels, even worse than what Bush was doing.
-
04-10-2012, 06:09 PM #72
If you're implying Obama wants to take care of us. I must ask who is 'us'. Because he's not taking care of my buddies in construction who can't stand him, he's not taking care of my dad because he busted his ass off for 40 years at the same job and made a excellent salary(taxed 48%-- Oh and may I add he's not a millionaire. So we aren't exactly living off Cape Cod with yachts all day). Who is us? Because I think Obama is a di-ck. Seems like a whiney, crabby bitch-y as shole. Oh wait, that's the reputation he had here in Chciago before everyone rode him for President.
-
-
04-10-2012, 06:10 PM #73
-
04-10-2012, 06:14 PM #74
-
04-10-2012, 06:30 PM #75
-
04-10-2012, 06:37 PM #76
Romney still needs around 500 delegates to be the nominee.
There is another 22 states/areas who have not voted yet. Around 950 delegates, many of which are proportional so the winner doesn't get them all.
Paul is expected to win Texas and California. And also win New Mexico, Oregon and South Dakota which combined should collect him 300 of those 950 remaining delegates.
Also likely to pick up delegates by being 2nd in Kentucky and a few other proportionally distributed delegate States. Which would give him another 50-100 delegates.
Paul could pick up enough to still go to a brokered convention. If Gingrich drops out soon then it is possible.
-
-
04-10-2012, 06:40 PM #77
You wanna make a bet ?
Santorum Suspends: A Nomination Race in Context
Well, FHQ will add its two cents. And not surprisingly, we'll look at Rick Santorum's decision to suspend his presidential campaign through the lens of the delegate count.
All too often delegate counts don't matter in the grand scheme of things in most presidential nomination races. To the extent that they do, it is fleeting. Counting up delegates is only consequential and/or necessary in a couple of instances:
After the race has progressed far enough that one candidate has effectively taken all/most of the momentum -- or continued riding it from the invisible primary portion of the campaign -- and thus stretched out to a large enough lead to make a comeback unlikely if not impossible.
If the race has progressed to a point where two or more candidates are trading primary and caucus wins and staying within range of each other in terms of the delegate count.
These are the extremes and throughout much of the post-reform era the process has moved ever closer to the former rather than the latter. A constantly frontloading calendar gave, for much of that period, frontrunning candidates a greater and better opportunity to effectively wrap up the nomination early if they had established themselves as the clear frontrunner heading into the contest portion of the race. The nomination races in both parties in 2000 and for the Democrats in 2004 are good examples. But if 2008 demonstrated anything it was that if the invisible primary (fundraising, poll position and endorsement) has proven inconclusive, then true delegate counting may ensue. Certainly, this was more the case on the Democratic side in 2008 than among the Republican candidates.
One easy way of describing the 2012 Republican nomination race is to say that despite all the rules changes and all the calendar movement, it still played out pretty much like 2008. Super Tuesday came and went with one candidate well ahead of the others in the delegate count and a month later it was over. Of course, John McCain was way out in front of his rivals in 2008 after the February 5 Super Tuesday series of contests, but a month later -- after wins in Ohio, Rhode Island, Texas and Vermont -- the Arizona senator wrapped up the nomination. And that's just as it was in 2012. Romney emerged from Super Tuesday on March 6 with a sizable enough delegate lead and eliminated his final viable opponent a month later after wins in Maryland, Washington, DC and Wisconsin.
Now, the explanation is more complex than that. After all McCain surpassed the 1191 delegate mark to officially clinch the nomination a month after Super Tuesday, whereas Romney will continue to march toward 1144 in a semi-contested to uncontested way for the rest of the calendar. The point here is not to minimize that distinction. Rather, the intent is to point out that while delegate counting is fun -- more so for some of us than others -- often these contests for a party's nomination are more a process of elimination. Presumptive nominees don't often have to concern themselves with the sorts of gain-deficit ratios and other delegate calculations Barbara Norrander (2000) so eloquently describes in discussing the end game of nomination contests. No, more often than not, it is simply a matter of a frontrunner eliminating his or her final viable opponent (Norrander 1996).
We counted delegates for a while in 2012, but this one ended like so many other presidential nomination races of the post-reform era ended: with the runner-up withdrawing. In this case, Mitt Romney had established enough of a delegate lead that a Santorum comeback was unlikely if not impossible.I ALWAYS rep back(srs)
ModNegged 06-12-2012
<;,>< Official Evolutionist Federation <;,><
SYRIANKID: So to reiterate, I'm presenting evidence, it's not peer-reviewed in any scientific journal.
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=109235951&p=192635491#post192635491
-
04-10-2012, 06:44 PM #78
-
04-10-2012, 06:46 PM #79
-
04-10-2012, 06:48 PM #80
-
-
04-10-2012, 06:50 PM #81
Obama v. Romney it might as well be Obama v. Obama or Romney v. Romney... here's to another 4 years of the same old **** no matter the outcome yay!
-"More guns, less crime. A well armed society is a polite society."
-No negs unless I'm negged first.
-I always rape back.
-Negs on sight for extreme stupidity: lovebbing
✪ Fandango Crew ✪
-
04-10-2012, 08:16 PM #82
-
04-10-2012, 08:36 PM #83
-
04-10-2012, 08:49 PM #84
- Join Date: May 2005
- Location: United States
- Age: 43
- Posts: 12,862
- Rep Power: 10722
-
-
04-10-2012, 08:49 PM #85
-
04-10-2012, 09:04 PM #86
-
04-10-2012, 09:18 PM #87
-
04-10-2012, 09:45 PM #88
-
-
04-10-2012, 11:18 PM #89
Obama is the best thing ever happened to the GOP. Had McCain won, the GOP would be finished b/c the GOP would get the blame for this mess. In 2 short years, Obama single handedly destroyed the Democrats, resurrected the GOP and restallled them back into power. No GOP could have achieved that. yet Obama did it! Obama is god's gift to the GOP.
-
04-10-2012, 11:44 PM #90
Bookmarks