I'm small and so are my legs but I wanted to get criticism on whether they're at least in proportion to my upper body. Just started training legs about 2 months ago, there's still like no definition but working on it, also lighting wasn't great for my legs in this photo (they're actually tensed and still look flat, fml).
p.s. upper body is relaxed.
p.s.s. calves are miniscule and timer on phone so I can't really get a photo of them anyway.
|
|
Results 1 to 2 of 2
Thread: Proportional Legs?
-
03-31-2012, 04:23 AM #1Registered User
- Join Date: Dec 2011
- Location: Victoria, Australia
- Age: 31
- Posts: 3,595
- Rep Power: 994
Proportional Legs?
Workout Log: http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=168292533&p=1378041213#post1378041213
---
☢☢☢☢ Tall Guy Crew ☢☢☢☢
☆☆☆MISC INK CREW☆☆☆
-
03-31-2012, 08:01 AM #2I'm not really a horse
- Join Date: Aug 2011
- Posts: 2,635
- Rep Power: 267
They aren't necessarily small but work to get good definition and strength in them
Similar Threads
-
The classic bodybuilder physiques looked perfect because legs were proportional
By proton_pump in forum Misc.Replies: 107Last Post: 04-16-2010, 10:21 PM
Bookmarks