The subject of this thread is the ingredient in the chocolate coating on most protein supp bars: Partially Hydrogenated Palm Kernel Oil.
I understand this stuff really clogs your arteries. Granted, we all hear to stay away from this or that, but consider for a moment how many bars do you eat per week? Or per day for that matter. I would agree with all who say that a little indulgence here or there in moderation of most anything won't kill you, but it's the things we do on a daily basis we really need to take a look at.
I hear a lot of people talking about how they eat bars alot when they can't eat how they want or to stay away from junk food. I suggest that these bars, eaten on a daily basis, is a cause for concern. Once I realized they (most of them) contain Partially Hydrogenated Palm Kernel Oil I stopped eating them. I stick with my shakes now.
Anyway, just want to hear what people have to say about this. Thanks to all who reply!
The average protein bar is nothing more than a twix bar with protein and a smidget of vitamins/minerals. As for the so called low carb bars, the majority of them use glycerin and/or polydextrose. They do not impact the blood sugar as much as sugar, but they can still be classified as carbs nontheless. Most, bars as well contain trans-fatty acids via partially of fully hydrogented oils. As for the occation, bars are not bad, but they are generally nothing more than glorified candy bars.
As a side note, I think that Atkins spits against his own theory that carbs are the culprit, and therefore, should be kept low. If he was consistant in his theory, he would not use glycerin of polydextrose, since they can be classified as carbs, albeit with minor impact on blood sugar. So, as Atkins proves, but dares not say, it is not the carbs that matter per say, it is the TYPE and quantity that really matters.
I wouldn't so much call glcerin a carb, I relate it more with fats since it is a breakdown product of tri glycerides, is it processed like ethanol since it is an alcohol?
Originally posted by Manteca I wouldn't so much call glcerin a carb, I relate it more with fats since it is a breakdown product of tri glycerides, is it processed like ethanol since it is an alcohol?
I agree, which is why the majority of companies excluded it from their carb content,although glycerin does seem to have a small impact on blood sugar, which is why there was uncertainty as to its clasification. I am not for certain with regards to your last question ( process manner), so hopefully someone else may help us with this.
As far as the bars are concerned, I agree that most of them (well, pretty much all of them) are trash. I think you can do a lot better in terms of portable nutrition, but a bar here or there probably won't hurt.
Originally posted by British IronWrk I used to use Pro42 bars. At 42 grams of carbs per bar I think they are a good source of protein.
Why glorified candy bars?
Because of the fact that either they use too much sugar, or for the ones that don't, they use glycerin, but glycerin is not bad, like sugar. So excluding the problem with sugar, there is also the problem with fat. Most bars use partially/fully hydrogenated oils, which, unlike their natural counterparts, are thought to exert bad effects upon the body (pro-oxidant damage, clogged arteries). That may be an unfound exaggeration, perhaps, but I have never seen a study which said that trans-fats (proccesed) where with health properties, like their natural counterparts.
So either a bar has too much sugar, or too much bad fat. The Atkins bar is an exception, as it does have high fat levels, but not of the trans-fat variety. It with the Atkins bar, it is not helpful when you are looking for a good,clean , source of carbs. So, with most bars, there is not very much thought that goes behind it.
Bookmarks