ITT I prove why IFFYM is stupid (srs)(prepare to be owned)

[Scofield]

Here is a diet I constructed with IIFYM principles for a 180lb man trying to stimulate muscular hypertrophy.

Micro nutrients - Check
1g protein - Check
At least 0.45g fat - Check
Impending cancer, heart disease, liver disease etc - Check

[Scofield]

fast

[Bucher15]

180 pound man eating >3700 calories? Um what?

[crazed31]

what website u using?

[Just Live]

luls looks almost exactly like what I eat on a daily basis. guess I'm going to die of cancer, heart disease and liver disease. better go to the store and live off processed frozen garbage

[jake1224]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20071648


argument is full of ****, on to the next one

[FisterRoboto]

intredasting results op.

[AdamDTX]

looks pretty good

[Scofield]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20071648


argument is full of ****, on to the next one

LOL, You missed the point completely. More proof IFFYM breeds morons who will hurt themselves by following advice they don't understand.

The study you quoted:

Meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies evaluating the association of saturated fat with cardiovascular disease.
Siri-Tarino PW, Sun Q, Hu FB, Krauss RM.
Source
Children's Hospital, Oakland Research Institute Oakland, CA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
A reduction in dietary saturated fat has generally been thought to improve cardiovascular health.
OBJECTIVE:
The objective of this meta-analysis was to summarize the evidence related to the association of dietary saturated fat with risk of coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke, and cardiovascular disease (CVD; CHD inclusive of stroke) in prospective epidemiologic studies.
DESIGN:
Twenty-one studies identified by searching MEDLINE and EMBASE databases and secondary referencing qualified for inclusion in this study. A random-effects model was used to derive composite relative risk estimates for CHD, stroke, and CVD.
RESULTS:
During 5-23 y of follow-up of 347,747 subjects, 11,006 developed CHD or stroke. Intake of saturated fat was not associated with an increased risk of CHD, stroke, or CVD. The pooled relative risk estimates that compared extreme quantiles of saturated fat intake were 1.07 (95% CI: 0.96, 1.19; P = 0.22) for CHD, 0.81 (95% CI: 0.62, 1.05; P = 0.11) for stroke, and 1.00 (95% CI: 0.89, 1.11; P = 0.95) for CVD. Consideration of age, sex, and study quality did not change the results.
CONCLUSIONS:
A meta-analysis of prospective epidemiologic studies showed that there is no significant evidence for concluding that dietary saturated fat is associated with an increased risk of CHD or CVD. More data are needed to elucidate whether CVD risks are likely to be influenced by the specific nutrients used to replace saturated fat.

[Hrcules]

here we go again.jpg

[romanjr]

Iffym.

[kyble]

how is that even IFFYM?

i eat apple pie, brownies all types of shiit and aint got any problems. the diet you posted is 10x better than mine

[jake1224]

LOL, You missed the point completely. More proof IFFYM breeds morons who will hurt themselves by following advice they don't understand.

The study you quoted:

LOL, You missed the point completely. More proof your parents breed morons who will hurt themselves by following advice they don't understand.

Unless it's too early and I'm not reading properly, you had some pseudo-argument about the type of foods you selected causing heart disease. The type of foods you selected were high in saturated fats.

pretty sure i owned you bro




Edit: IIFYM*

Edit 2: OP doesn't understand the philosophy in the first place

[frank112]

I may be alone here but I don't see the problem other than 3,700 cals may be too much. Food looks pretty good and he's getting good vitamins and minerals probably on top of his multi and gallon of water a day.

[Scruffy77]

saw 3700 calories. left thread

[Scofield]

LOL, You missed the point completely. More proof your parents breed morons who will hurt themselves by following advice they don't understand.

Unless it's too early and I'm not reading properly, you had some pseudo-argument about the type of foods you selected causing heart disease. The type of foods you selected were high in saturated fats.

pretty sure i owned you bro




Edit: IIFYM*

Edit 2: OP doesn't understand the philosophy in the first place

You just insta pasted the study from Krauss like a clueless IIFYMbot. The point I was making had nothing to do with saturated fat.












































Next

[SSK]

200G OF FAT FROM OIL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



























Edit: on r/c you are on lucky kunt mate.

[Scofield]

saw 3700 calories. left thread

Estimating Requirements
The simplest method of estimating needs is to base your intake on a standard 'calories per unit of weight (usually kilograms)'. Typically:
- 26 to 30 kcals/kg/day for normal, healthy individuals with sedentary lifestyles doing little physical activity [12.0-14 kcal/pound]
- 31 to 37 kcal/kg/day for those involved in light to moderate activity 3-5 x a week with moderately active lifestyles [14-16 kcal/ pound]
- 38 to 40 kcals/kg/day for those involved in vigorous activity and highly active jobs [16-18 kcal/ pound].

For those involved in HEAVY training (eg: athletes) - the demand is even greater:
- 41 to 50 kcals/kg/day for those involved in moderate to heavy training (for example: 15-20 hrs/ week training) [18.5-22 kcal/ pound]
- 50 or above kcals/kg/day for those involved in heavy to extreme training [> 22 kcal/ pound]

http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showth...hp?t=121703981

[strongecto]

pretty sure that diet doesn't fit anyone's macro's, hence not IIFYM

[TrainInsane1987]

saw 3700 calories. left thread

this

[knox07]

Why is it always these guys trying to prove everyone wrong?

came in to post this

left satisfied

[chupalo]

lol at idiots not noticing the oil

[Acesopro]

I really don't think you're in any position to be making these claims OP.

[kyble]

you cheeky kunt, totally missed the oil, only read it as corn...

[ICanEat50Eggs]

Can one of you kunts explain to me how IIFIYM works? How do you know what your "macros" are? I want to eat crap all day and look good.

[ilivonsports]

saw 3700 calories. left thread

this

You both posted so you didn't really leave after seeing that.

on a serious note, whats wrong with bulking on 3700 cals? or is he cutting on 3700 cals? fuk i'm bulking on 4k and not adding fat

[Huke]

1800 cals from CORN oil. Sounds good.

[Scofield]

I really don't think you're in any position to be making these claims OP.

IIFYM crew looks like **** compared to "clean eaters". Just sayin.

[johnpagnolo]

Every time there is a FYM hate thread the OP NEVER understands the principle of the theory.

[sarodr44]

what website u using?

nutritiondata.com