If you had the choice between saving a burning orphanage with 20 kids or 2 million$

[triglyceride]

which would you choose

[TTexasTT]

honestly Id save the kids... but id think about the money daily

[RPLL]

The money for sure.

[JamesPhoenix]

Depends, do the kids have dat potential?

[someone123]

which would you choose

didn't even think twice, the kids.

[Fred87nc]

take the money, millions are dying in Africa and theres nothing we can do about it. Whats 20 more

[KANOU9]

legends and heroes live forever.

money goes

[DrHouse]

could save more than 20 people with 2mil plus you'd have some left over

[nvrstopworking]

ITT: We test for sociopaths

[Jesse_l_g]

take the money, millions are dying in Africa and theres nothing we can do about it. Whats 20 more

YOU can do something about the 20 *******

I pick the kids

[arnoldoe]

if i got the 2 million dollars i could use 1 million to save even more then 20 kids

[TreyTrey]

2 million

who's to say that if i didn't take the money someone else would?













































not srs




































































maybe srs



























































































not srs

[LatvianLifter]

I'd take the money then spend 100,000 on dragon balls and wish them back to life.

[chashma0]

I'd save the 2 million

[Bramble]

money defiantly

really dont give a **** about people i dont know yet alone the kids of crack whores

[stasgolbom]

FUK the kids....




















































literally

[POOHBEARx3]

didn't even think twice, the money

i'd save 20 juggalos before i'd save 20 orphans

[chashma0]

money defiantly

really dont give a **** about people i dont know yet alone the kids of crack whores

This. Srs.

[Pad264]

if i got the 2 million dollars i could use 1 million to save even more then 20 kids

While absolutely true, it's just rationalizing an immoral act. I think it's easy to pretend that we'd take the money -- and in a rational state, I absolutely would -- but in the moment, if children were literally dying and I could help, it would be impossible to ignore them.

[Teenytinyboo]

ITT: We test for sociopaths

lol this

[Pham96]

i'd take the money and dn8 it to africa to save 200 kids NOM SAIYAN

[planalto]

2 million.
Growing up as an orphan must be far worse than burning to death.

[niahmas]

If the kids were black I'd take the money (srs).

[mg42]

Would want the money but would not be able to stop myself from saving the kids. Burning to death is not a pleasant way to go.

[ricbig]

id take the money

[jantelo]

don't even have to think twice


the kids srs

[NapBizzy]

I need dem dividends.

This is how I calculated the result:

20 people dieing vs. $2,000,000

My goals in life:

1) Sex with thousands of bishes
2) Travel all over the world
3) Video games
4) Level 1000 aesthetics

I simply cross referenced "20 children burning to death" with my list of goals in my life and it came up with nothing, however when I cross referenced the large sum of money I got many hits on every single one of my goals.

The choice here is very clear.

[sproles134]

2 million...lol.

[agm1984]

2 mil. like we need more humans.

[determined594]

Def the money, prolly could bump the number of kids up to triple digits and id still take the money. Most of those kids are gonna be drug addicts, rapists, criminals. (yes strong stereotypes). Known too many of them to justify them over money I could use for the rest of my life.