Yes, the entire post was craptacular. Made even worse by the fact that you bumped this thread that died 2 years ago.Originally Posted by Mega61487
|
|
Results 61 to 69 of 69
-
08-09-2013, 10:12 AM #61Encyclochuzzle
- Join Date: Jan 2006
- Location: Lakeland, Florida, United States
- Age: 39
- Posts: 55,577
- Rep Power: 179271
-
Alchemist of Alcohol
-
-
-
Journal: http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=126418493
-
08-09-2013, 10:23 AM #62Not Aware
- Join Date: Jan 2009
- Location: United States
- Posts: 9,784
- Rep Power: 155335
this.Originally Posted by chazzy1864
Not sure if it's better or worse than starting a new one lolAugust 2023:
BW: 194
B: 315 x 3, 225 x 14 (PR: 335)
S: 315 x 2, 225 x 18 (PR's)
DL: 405 x 1 (PR); Trap Bar DL: 405 x 1
OHP: 185 x 3 (PR), 135 x 16
Chins: 22(PR) Pushups: 83 (PR: 101)
1 Mile: 6:45 (PR: 5:52)
-
08-09-2013, 10:49 AM #63Bootless Errand
- Join Date: Feb 2008
- Location: United States
- Posts: 85,695
- Rep Power: 1682162
Yes; what about it? Anything else you mentioned is irrelevant to the statement I quoted.Originally Posted by Mega61487
This forum is over-run with bull****, myths, and plain untruths. No small wonder why so many noobs can't seem to get a handle on what's right and what's not.
Telling someone they can "shape" their muscles by using "light weights" isn't helping the situation.No brain, no gain.
"The fitness and nutrition world is a breeding ground for obsessive-compulsive behavior. The irony is that many of the things people worry about have no impact on results either way, and therefore aren't worth an ounce of concern."--Alan Aragon
Where the mind goes, the body follows.
Ironwill Gym:
https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showpost.php?p=629719403&postcount=3388
Ironwill2008 Journal:
https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=157459343&p=1145168733
-
08-09-2013, 10:53 AM #64Registered User
- Join Date: Feb 2013
- Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Posts: 1,924
- Rep Power: 1239
I wouldn't bother with the gym if all I did was lift 'light' weights; lifting light is boring.Originally Posted by ironwill2008
Cut done with - basically unsuccessful first bulk as I did put on a lot of fat to go with the little muscle I added. I know what I did wrong first time round and won't be repeating it. Looking forwards to being able to eat a few hundred more calories!! At least I know I can cut fat efficiently: went from 143lbs to 120lbs and from 35in to 29in waist.
-
-
08-10-2013, 09:01 AM #65Not Aware
- Join Date: Jan 2009
- Location: United States
- Posts: 9,784
- Rep Power: 155335
Dude, don't you know this is how women are suppose to workout so they don't end up built like men?Originally Posted by ironwill2008
(Swear to God heard a trainer at my local gym tell a girl that... and no, he clearly did not even attempt to lift)August 2023:
BW: 194
B: 315 x 3, 225 x 14 (PR: 335)
S: 315 x 2, 225 x 18 (PR's)
DL: 405 x 1 (PR); Trap Bar DL: 405 x 1
OHP: 185 x 3 (PR), 135 x 16
Chins: 22(PR) Pushups: 83 (PR: 101)
1 Mile: 6:45 (PR: 5:52)
-
08-10-2013, 01:56 PM #66Endorphin Junkie
- Join Date: Jul 2013
- Location: London, Ohio, United States
- Age: 33
- Posts: 1,854
- Rep Power: 550
As long as you progressively overload, you will see results regardless of what rep range you use...
heavy weight is great for quick gains in the short term, but I've never been able to sustain workouts in the 1-11 rep range. Something always gets injured.Follow my quest for 100,000 pull ups this year
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Asj9kQZoAthCdEwyN3JWdEE3cFdnOC1YcTRZR01kVVE#gid=0
-
03-09-2015, 12:30 PM #676'3"Originally Posted by CaptainGorgeous
-
03-09-2015, 12:45 PM #68
Bodybuilders can lift heavy if they want, but they focus on the stretch and contraction, according to Kai Greene
-
-
03-09-2015, 06:28 PM #69Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2014
- Location: California, United States
- Age: 36
- Posts: 123
- Rep Power: 622
Clearly you've never watched Ronnie train. It's all LIGHT WEIGHT BAYBAAAAYOriginally Posted by scarboro
Bookmarks