How many eggs is it actually safe to eat daily? Whole eggs not just the Whites, because I'm basically seeing eggs as my quickest way for protein but I don't want to over do it-.- and will I get the full amount of protein raw? I just find it quicker raw with milk.. Thanks!
Thread: How Many eggs a day is safe?
09-19-2011, 12:15 PM #1
How Many eggs a day is safe?
09-19-2011, 12:18 PM #2
- Join Date: Jul 2009
- Location: Texas, United States
- Age: 21
- Stats: 5'9", 168 lbs
- Posts: 16,779
- Rep Power: 37631
about tree fitty.
raw eggs are NOT as bioavailable as cooked eggs. it takes like 2 minutes to cook.Follow me on instagram! @Hyruliangoat
KING OF TMISC
BEST LOOKING MISCER
CUTEST POSTER OF ALL TIME
GIRLS WANNA BE ME GUYS WANNA DATE ME CREW
CANT RESIST ME CREW
PEOPLE ASK FOR MY AUTOGRAPH AND PICTURE EVERYDAY CREW
09-19-2011, 12:19 PM #3
- Join Date: Aug 2011
- Location: Dallas, Texas, United States
- Stats: 5'8", 170 lbs
- Posts: 4,420
- Rep Power: 6598
I don't think there's a clear, solid consensus on what that number is, but it's definitely better to eat them cooked.
I personally eat 5. Crack 'em into a bowl, scramble then up, then microwave.The more that you read, the more things you'll know.
The more that you learn, the more places you'll go.
09-19-2011, 12:24 PM #4
09-19-2011, 12:26 PM #5
- Join Date: Feb 2008
- Location: Texas, United States
- Age: 26
- Stats: 5'10", 182 lbs
- Posts: 2,336
- Rep Power: 523
well my uncles Cardiologist makes him eat atleast 2 eggs a day to for his heart... I went to the dr about 3 weeks ago and had bloodwork done and he said my cholesterol was a little high and I told him I eat 4 eggs a day and he said to cut it down or only eat eggbeaters.
I was confused because I had always read that the cholesterol in eggs in associated with the cholesterol that is considered bad. He just told me to do cardio, a lot.When you see it, you'll sh** bricks.
09-19-2011, 12:26 PM #6
09-19-2011, 12:31 PM #7
- Join Date: May 2011
- Location: Texas, United States
- Age: 24
- Stats: 6'0", 186 lbs
- Posts: 3,701
- Rep Power: 1252
I usually eat 3-4 in the morning, depending on how hungry I am. Cooked is definitely better (protein wise) than raw, but you'll also decrease the risk of you getting sick and being out for a week. But, other than that, eat away! You'll have to make sure your hitting your caloric/macro needs in other foods, though.
09-19-2011, 12:35 PM #8
- Join Date: Apr 2011
- Location: Tallinn, Estonia (EST), Estonia
- Stats: 6'1", 196 lbs
- Posts: 4,228
- Rep Power: 25541
I think you'll reach your own tolerance level before you reach the "dangerous" levels off egg consumption.(cooked eggs - don't recommend uncooked at all) Even if you could eat 30+ eggs a day, I'm pretty sure you'd get real sick of them, real fast.
I suggest any quantity that allows you to keep them in your menu for an extended period of time if you plan on getting a portion of your nutrients from them.
I used to eat 10 eggs a day. After about a month I got so sick of them, that I had to literally quit for a few months before I could tolerate the taste again. Now I cap myself at about 5 large eggs a day and this way I like them just fine and actually enjoy them.
Another user is trying 24 eggs a day at another thread. Might follow his progress and see how crappy he feels after a while. I don't think many people have tried an almost all Egg diet before.“The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn, and relearn. ”
― Alvin Toffler
09-19-2011, 12:47 PM #9
- Join Date: Dec 2008
- Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Age: 30
- Stats: 6'0", 200 lbs
- Posts: 2,165
- Rep Power: 3211
09-19-2011, 12:49 PM #10
- Join Date: Sep 2010
- Location: Virginia, United States
- Age: 23
- Stats: 5'8", 184 lbs
- Posts: 2,859
- Rep Power: 2934
09-19-2011, 01:03 PM #11
- Join Date: Jan 2010
- Location: San Diego, California, United States
- Stats: 5'10", 165 lbs
- Posts: 49,668
- Rep Power: 38355
Your eating them raw?
Brb salmonella..lulzMy Log: http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=153626131
Food Challenges: (19-1)
30,000 Calorie "Cheat Day" Challenge https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r5tYhDv-gLE
12.5lbs Soul Food Challenge http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uZ5uZzIx97k
IHOP 35 Pancake Challenge http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DRUVGlafeQQ
9lb Burger Challenge (The Lamkinator) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uveJQDWbDG0
9,000 Calorie Cereal Challenge https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pekCAogNa64
09-19-2011, 01:18 PM #12
- Join Date: Mar 2006
- Location: Seattle, Washington, United States
- Age: 29
- Stats: 6'0", 168 lbs
- Posts: 6,427
- BodyPoints: 56
- Rep Power: 13506
I would assume you could eat just as many eggs and you could chicken, beef, or fish to the tune of the same macro-nutrient content..
IE - if you can eat a 30oz t-bone steak, you can probably eat 20 eggs all the same.. no they are not the same macros, but they both have a lot of fat and high calorie counts..
For myself, if I eat more than 3 per day i get terrible gas..My head weighs in excess of 85 pounds.
09-19-2011, 01:38 PM #13
09-19-2011, 01:41 PM #14
Thanks everyone for your advice! Its always good when people give actual advice, not cocky ignorant comments -.- I think ill just stick to eating around about 5 eggs a day, I do prefer raw but if i can get , more protein out of them cooked then its a no brainer ain't it! and then after time maybe up my intake, theyre just a lot more convenient when theres no quick alternative in!
09-19-2011, 01:43 PM #15
09-19-2011, 06:39 PM #16
09-19-2011, 06:43 PM #17
09-19-2011, 07:25 PM #18
- Join Date: Mar 2009
- Location: Melville, New York, United States
- Age: 29
- Stats: 5'8", 190 lbs
- Posts: 9,058
- Rep Power: 16404
Are the Current Dietary Guidelines Regarding Egg Consumption Appropriate?
CONCLUSION: If judged as a whole food, and not simply as a source of dietary cholesterol, the positive contribution of eggs to a healthy diet becomes apparent. Because eggs are a conventional food containing nutrients that play fundamental roles beyond basic nutrition, their promotion as a functional food should be considered. This discussion has examined the possible role of egg nutrients in the prevention and treatment of specific symptoms associated with chronic age-related diseases. Furthermore, evidence has been presented showing that the current blanket recommendations regarding dietary cholesterol and egg intake are unwarranted for the majority of people and are not supported by scientific data.
Fernandez ML. Dietary cholesterol provided by eggs and plasma lipoproteins in healthy populations. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2006 Jan;9(1):8-12.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Extensive research has not clearly established a link between egg consumption and risk for coronary heart disease. The effects of egg intake on plasma lipids and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) atherogenicity in healthy populations need to be addressed. RECENT FINDINGS: The lack of connection between heart disease and egg intake could partially be explained by the fact that dietary cholesterol increases the concentrations of both circulating LDL and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol in those individuals who experience an increase in plasma cholesterol following egg consumption (hyperresponders). It is also important to note that 70% of the population experiences a mild increase or no alterations in plasma cholesterol concentrations when challenged with high amounts of dietary cholesterol (hyporesponders). Egg intake has been shown to promote the formation of large LDL, in addition to shifting individuals from the LDL pattern B to pattern A, which is less atherogenic. Eggs are also good sources of antioxidants known to protect the eye; therefore, increased plasma concentrations of lutein and zeaxanthin in individuals consuming eggs are also of interest, especially in those populations susceptible to developing macular degeneration and eye cataracts. SUMMARY: For these reasons, dietary recommendations aimed at restricting egg consumption should not be generalized to include all individuals. We need to acknowledge that diverse healthy populations experience no risk in developing coronary heart disease by increasing their intake of cholesterol but, in contrast, they may have multiple beneficial effects by the inclusion of eggs in their regular diet.
Kritchevsky SB. A review of scientific research and recommendations regarding eggs. J Am Coll Nutr. 2004 Dec;23(6 Suppl):596S-600S.
For much of the past 40 years, the public has been warned away from eggs because of a concern over coronary heart disease risk. This concern is based on three observations: 1. eggs are a rich source of dietary cholesterol; 2. when fed experimentally, dietary cholesterol increases serum cholesterol and; 3. high serum cholesterol predicts the onset of coronary heart disease. However, data from free-living populations show that egg consumption is not associated with higher cholesterol levels. Furthermore, as a whole, the epidemiologic literature does not support the idea that egg consumption is a risk factor for coronary disease. Within the nutritional community there is a growing appreciation that health derives from an overall pattern of diet rather than from the avoidance of particular foods, and there has been a shift in the tone in recent dietary recommendations away from "avoidance" messages to ones that promote healthy eating patterns. The most recent American Heart Association guidelines no longer include a recommendation to limit egg consumption, but recommend the adoption of eating practices associated with good health. Based on the epidemiologic evidence, there is no reason to think that such a healthy eating pattern could not include eggs.
Herron KL, Lofgren IE, Sharman M, Volek JS, Fernandez ML. Metabolism. 2004 Jun;53(6):823-30. High intake of cholesterol results in less atherogenic low-density lipoprotein particles in men and women independent of response classification.
The influence of a high-cholesterol diet on the atherogenicity of the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particle was examined by measuring LDL peak diameter and composition, LDL susceptibility to oxidation, and the distribution of cholesterol between LDL subclasses. The crossover intervention randomly assigned 27 premenopausal women and 25 men (18 to 50 years) to an egg (640 mg/d additional dietary cholesterol) or placebo (0 mg/d additional dietary cholesterol) diet for 30 days, followed by a 3-week washout period. Subjects were classified as either hyperresponders (>2.5 mg/dL increase in plasma cholesterol for each 100 mg additional dietary cholesterol consumed) or hyporesponders to dietary cholesterol. Sex was found to have a significant effect on 3 of the parameters examined. LDL peak diameter was significantly larger (P <.005) in females (26.78 +/- 0.59 nm, n = 27) as compared with males (26.52 +/- 0.49 nm, n = 25), regardless of response to dietary cholesterol. The LDL particles of the male participants also had a higher number of triglyceride (TG) and cholesteryl ester (CE) molecules (P <.01); however, cholesterol ester transfer protein (CETP) activity was higher in females (P <.05). Response classification also revealed significant differences in the determination of LDL subclasses. Independent of sex, the LDL-1 particle (P <.05), which is considered to be less atherogenic, was predominant in hyperresponders and this finding was associated with increased cholesterol intake (interactive effect, P <.001). In addition, CETP and lecithin: cholesterol acyltransferase (LCAT) activities were higher in hyperresponders during the egg period (interactive effect, P <.05). Sex, response to cholesterol intake, and diet were not found to affect the susceptibility of LDL to oxidation (P > 0.5). Because LDL peak diameter was not decreased and the larger LDL-1 subclass was greater in hyperresponders following egg intake, these data indicate that the consumption of a high-cholesterol diet does not negatively influence the atherogenicity of the LDL particle.
Herron KL, Vega-Lopez S, Conde K, Ramjiganesh T, Shachter NS, Fernandez ML. Men classified as hypo- or hyperresponders to dietary cholesterol feeding exhibit differences in lipoprotein metabolism. J Nutr. 2003 Apr;133(4):1036-42.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the differences that occur within the plasma compartment of normolipidemic men, classified on the basis of their response to prolonged consumption of additional dietary cholesterol. Using a crossover design, 40 men aged 18-57 y were randomly allocated to an egg (640 mg/d additional dietary cholesterol) or placebo group (0 mg/d additional dietary cholesterol), for two 30-d periods, which were separated by a 3-wk washout period. Subjects were classified as hypo- [increase in plasma total cholesterol (TC) of <0.05 mmol/L for each additional 100 mg of dietary cholesterol consumed] or hyperresponders (increase in TC of > or =0.06 mmol/L for each additional 100 mg of dietary cholesterol consumed) on the basis of their plasma reaction to the additional dietary cholesterol provided. Male hyporesponders did not experience an increase in LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) or HDL cholesterol (HDL-C) during the egg period, whereas both lipoproteins were significantly (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.05, respectively) elevated in hyperresponders. Although the LDL/HDL ratio was increased in male hyperresponders after the high cholesterol period, the mean increase experienced by this population was still within National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines. Furthermore, male hyperresponders had higher lecithin cholesterol acyltransferase (P < 0.05) and cholesteryl ester transfer protein (P < 0.05) activities during the egg period, which suggests an increase in reverse cholesterol transport. These data suggest that additional dietary cholesterol does not increase the risk of developing an atherogenic lipoprotein profile in healthy men, regardless of their response classification.
Eggs and heart disease risk: perpetuating the misperception
"The fact that no studies in the past decade have reported a significant relation between either egg consumption or dietary cholesterol intakes and heart disease risk (5) is consistent with the view that the hypothesis that dietary cholesterol is a risk factor for heart disease should be dismissed."
Conclusion: Whole eggs = gooooood.
09-19-2011, 08:16 PM #19
09-19-2011, 08:36 PM #20
- Join Date: Aug 2006
- Location: United States
- Stats: 6'0", 193 lbs
- Posts: 9,669
- BodyPoints: 4887
- Rep Power: 2559
09-19-2011, 10:12 PM #21
09-19-2011, 11:07 PM #22
09-20-2011, 12:02 AM #23
- Join Date: Apr 2006
- Location: United States
- Stats: 5'9", 180 lbs
- Posts: 5,975
- BodyPoints: 14939
- Rep Power: 2505
09-20-2011, 12:21 AM #24
- Join Date: Aug 2011
- Location: South Australia, Australia
- Age: 21
- Stats: 5'6", 143 lbs
- Posts: 137
- Rep Power: 114
09-20-2011, 02:07 AM #25
- Join Date: Jul 2010
- Location: Tallahassee, Florida, United States
- Stats: 6'2", 236 lbs
- Posts: 33,623
- Rep Power: 54627
09-20-2011, 02:12 AM #26
09-20-2011, 02:26 AM #27
09-20-2011, 02:52 AM #28
- Join Date: Aug 2008
- Location: Scotland, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Age: 29
- Stats: 6'2", 197 lbs
- Posts: 1,768
- Rep Power: 4684
I eat 10-12 whole eggs a day. 6 in the morning scrambled and then 4-6 at night with dinner.http://www.half-the-man.com - My new blog dedicated to my experiences with weight loss. Helpful hints, tips and articles that may facilitate your fat loss.
30 Stone(420 pounds) -> 14.5 stone(203 pounds) in 3 years. Come at me bro!
₪ ₪ ₪TRUE MI$CER₪ ₪ ₪
[A]lpha [B]eard [C]rew
09-20-2011, 02:56 AM #29
Our best bet: wait for that guy who eats 24 eggs a day to follow the diet for a prolonged period - say 6 weeks, then get a blood test - then we will know how many eggs a day is safe.
Being dead serious, no ethics committee would allow studies to force feed participant eggs just to determine the maximum amount of eggs that can be safely consumed a day, this is the best chance we've got .
Last edited by FourToEight; 09-20-2011 at 03:04 AM.Start: 18/8/2011 = 145lbs
Current: 3/11/2011 = 160.05560234631lbs
I don't even lift, I just eat loads and pray it all turns into muscle
09-20-2011, 03:31 AM #30
Eggs are good.
Eggs with no other fats in the diet is not best.
Also bloodwork and checking with your doc about familial hypercholesterolemia is a plus.Distraction is an obstruction for the construction.
“The Korova milkbar sold milk-plus, milk plus vellocet or synthemesc or drencrom, which is what we were drinking. This would sharpen you up and make you ready for a bit of the old ultraviolence.”
By RBP92 in forum Teen BodybuildingReplies: 14Last Post: 04-06-2010, 09:48 PM