Im a non responder to creatine and am wanting to try a CEE.
Which kind do you recommended?
|
-
09-19-2011, 12:03 PM #1
-
09-19-2011, 12:07 PM #2
Skip the CEE it is no better than creatine monohydrate. Why do you think you are a non responder?
http://issnblog.blogspot.com/2009/02...perior-to.html
-
09-19-2011, 12:18 PM #3
-
09-19-2011, 12:42 PM #4
-
-
09-19-2011, 12:49 PM #5
- Join Date: Jun 2009
- Location: Honolulu, Hawaii, United States
- Age: 39
- Posts: 5,846
- Rep Power: 7556
I took mono before and got some results. But also got cramps. And yes I was drinking 1 gal of water a day, but not so much bloating. Then I tried creatine HCL and got even more results, no bloat or cramps. So for me HCL works the best. Ive tried CEE and got ZERO results or side effects. Ive tried BSN Cell Mass and at the time MRI's CE2. Which were all CEE products.
BPI Brand Ambassador
Proud member of the 1000lbs club
-
09-20-2011, 04:28 AM #6
-
09-20-2011, 04:38 AM #7
-
09-20-2011, 05:45 AM #8
-
-
09-20-2011, 06:01 AM #9
- Join Date: Sep 2007
- Location: Florida, United States
- Age: 51
- Posts: 22,582
- Rep Power: 91685
Go ahead and try it out. Seems like you have your mind made up, but I am unaware of any research showing that CEE is effective for anyone, but maybe you are aware of some research showing it is more effective for people with MS? If so, post it. Otherwise, IMO you are wasting your time and money.
Don't take my word for it. Do a search with "CEE" or "creatine ethyl ester" in the subject line and read threads in the last couple years and I think you might do a 180.
-
09-20-2011, 06:04 AM #10
Dont buy CEE
Controlled Labs Warder
Email: Powercage [at] ControlledLabs.com
Free Controlled Labs supps for your CL labels: goo.gl/kylDte
I'm pretty sure your wrong, but care to elaborate...
Disclaimer: The above post is my personal opinion and does not represent the official position of any company or entity. It does not constitute medical advice.
-
09-20-2011, 06:29 AM #11
-
09-20-2011, 07:36 AM #12
-
-
09-20-2011, 08:06 AM #13
- Join Date: Sep 2007
- Location: Florida, United States
- Age: 51
- Posts: 22,582
- Rep Power: 91685
OP, do you understand what a creatine nonresponder is? It is basically when an individual already has their initial total creatine concentration already relatively high, and therefore, neither an appreciable uptake of creatine nor an effect on phosphocreatine resynthesis or performance will be found after creatine supplementation. Greenhaff et al. observed that approximately 20–30% of participants following a creatine loading regime did not respond with an increase in intracellular creatine. In 2004, Syrotuik and Bell conducted a descriptive profile of individuals portraying Greenhaff's classification of "responder" and "non-responder" characteristics. Results of this study concluded that the responders generally:
1) possessed a lower initial quantity of intramuscular creatine and were able to absorb and take up a greater amount through supplementation;
2) had a greater percentage of type II fibers;
3) had a greater fiber cross sectional area; and
4) possessed more fat-free mass.
If you are truly a non responder to creatine mono, please explain to me how you will respond to a different type of creatine?
That being said, how exactly did you determine that YOU are a non responder to creatine mono? Did your doctor run some tests and tell you that? Did you chart your body weight during the entire saturation period? Did it change at all? Did you chart your lifts during the entire saturation period? Were you unable to increase either total work production during exercise or peak power?
-
09-20-2011, 10:58 AM #14
Unfortunately, I doubt this particular case has anything to do with a lower distribution of fast twitch/Type II muscle fibers and the resultant greater basal Cr and PCr concentrations. Tarnopolsky et al, 2001 & Lambert et al, 2003 suggested that individuals with MS and/or similar diseases, likely suffer from low skeletal muscle creatine transporter activity/expression.
Muscle Nerve. 2001 May;24(5):682-8.
Tarnopolsky MA, Parshad A, Walzel B, Schlattner U, Wallimann T.
Creatine transporter and mitochondrial creatine kinase protein content in myopathies.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 Aug;84(8):1206-10.
Lambert CP, Archer RL, Carrithers JA, Fink WJ, Evans WJ, Trappe TA
Influence of creatine monohydrate ingestion on muscle metabolites and intense exercise capacity in individuals with multiple sclerosis.
.~
Wherever progression lacks.... regress can be found in abundance.
-
09-20-2011, 11:15 AM #15
snorkelman - thanks for the information, I see what your saying now.
I was under the impression that since I have had no luck using mono and now having MS that my body would not accept creatine.
I was thinking of using a diffrent kind hoping my body might accept it in a diffrent way if that makes since
-
09-20-2011, 12:05 PM #16
-
-
10-12-2011, 08:00 AM #17
Similar Threads
-
Which is better creatine mono or ethyl ester?
By robby67 in forum SupplementsReplies: 353Last Post: 03-13-2007, 04:38 PM -
First post, Introduction, Comprehensive Creatine Questions and Usage.
By tombstone3@cox.net in forum SupplementsReplies: 15Last Post: 06-13-2006, 01:14 AM -
Creatine Mono - No success
By ps2cho in forum SupplementsReplies: 22Last Post: 05-06-2006, 04:24 PM -
Creatine: Ethyl-Ester or Monohydrate?
By hvit in forum SupplementsReplies: 84Last Post: 05-02-2006, 04:45 PM -
Creatine Ethyl Esther question
By Jsorb8997 in forum Teen BodybuildingReplies: 4Last Post: 06-29-2005, 07:19 PM
Bookmarks