Stop the fda ban ******** page

[fibercarbon]

Like this page now to Help Spread the Word. Thanks!

https://www.********.com/StopFDA

[Ramrod2615]

Liked

[fibercarbon]

Liked

repped for your support

[itzDodge]

Liked

[Ramrod2615]

repped for your support

On recharge Ill get you back when Im not. Repping anybody who likes the ******** page as well.

[RobbieBoy672]

Can someone try and clear this up for me? It says that New Dietary Ingredients (NDI) must be cleared by the fda before hitting the market, but what I don't get is if this means new ingredient or new product. For instance under the FDA's definition of a NDI whey protein is not classified as a New Dietary Ingredient, so would releasing a new product containing whey protein without asking the FDA be illegal? Hopefully that made sense.

[TheGilmore]

Also liked

[fibercarbon]

Ok so here is the Deal. The FDA office in Rockville MD is about 30 minutes from where I live. If i can get 1,000 people to LIKE the page to show support I will HAND Deliver the Petition to the FDA office!!

[itzDodge]

Can someone try and clear this up for me? It says that New Dietary Ingredients (NDI) must be cleared by the fda before hitting the market, but what I don't get is if this means new ingredient or new product. For instance under the FDA's definition of a NDI whey protein is not classified as a New Dietary Ingredient, so would releasing a new product containing whey protein without asking the FDA be illegal? Hopefully that made sense.

It's for ingredients after 1994. If the product contained something post 1994 that wasn't DSHEA compliant then it would need to be cleared.

[Ramrod2615]

Ok so here is the Deal. The FDA office in Rockville MD is about 30 minutes from where I live. If i can get 1,000 people to LIKE the page to show support I will HAND Deliver the Petition to the FDA office!!

If you do that, I will rep you for life.

[RobbieBoy672]

It's for ingredients after 1994. If the product contained something post 1994 that wasn't DSHEA compliant then it would need to be cleared.

so in my example a new product containing whey protein and nothing else would not have to go through clearance?

[fibercarbon]

If you do that, I will rep you for life.

I stand behind my offer 100% so Spread the word to get people to "LIKE" The page and i will take photos of the FDA office and all as proof!

[Hyruliangoat]

Likeded

[RobbieBoy672]

ok i'm probably about to get negged like crazy and start a sh*t storm by saying this, but here me out first. Firstly I want to say that I disagree with THIS guidance draft, and I did follow the link on the ******** page and sent a message protesting it. But that being said I believe that there should be more regulation on the supplement industry then there currently is. There are many products that are for sale legally that have many harmful side effects, and because of there legal status many unaware, and teenage consumers buy these products. However that being said I believe that this draft is going about it the wrong way. The FDA's definition for an NDI is far too broad and does need adjustments, so even though I believe more regulation is required, I don't agree with the new guidance draft.

[itzDodge]

so in my example a new product containing whey protein and nothing else would not have to go through clearance?

Correct.

ok i'm probably about to get negged like crazy and start a sh*t storm by saying this, but here me out first. Firstly I want to say that I disagree with THIS guidance draft, and I did follow the link on the ******** page and sent a message protesting it. But that being said I believe that there should be more regulation on the supplement industry then there currently is. There are many products that are for sale legally that have many harmful side effects, and because of there legal status many unaware, and teenage consumers buy these products. However that being said I believe that this draft is going about it the wrong way. The FDA's definition for an NDI is far too broad and does need adjustments, so even though I believe more regulation is required, I don't agree with the new guidance draft.

I agree that companies should be required to prove their product contains what it says is in it. Other than that I should be allowed to take/use whatever I want.

[xGetJackedx]

Correct.


I agree that companies should be required to prove their product contains what it says is in it. Other than that I should be allowed to take/use whatever I want.

Basicly it means then can ban almost everything because it only ingredients that were widely used before 1994 can stay and with that logic they can ban just about anything they want to.

[Joe D]

Liked

[Ramrod2615]

Basicly it means then can ban almost everything because it only ingredients that were widely used before 1994 can stay and with that logic they can ban just about anything they want to.

As well as supplement companies having to go above and beyond any necessary measures to get a new product/ingredient onto the market, this will most likely mean alot more testing and trials, which means companies having to spend even more money producing supplements, thus forcing the consumers to shell out the extra money.

[josh001122]

Post this thread in the misc, theres way more people in there than any other section.

[itzDodge]

Post this thread in the misc, theres way more people in there than any other section.

To bad they all think supps are stupid

[Ramrod2615]

Post this thread in the misc, theres way more people in there than any other section.

Yeah and a whole lot more bull**** and threads being posted every 2 seconds. Doubt anyone there would take it seriously.

[RobbieBoy672]

To bad they all think supps are stupid

and half of them don't even lift

[fibercarbon]

To bad they all think supps are stupid

i bet they will all cry if supps disappeared ..

[J_Bo]

Liked

[Problem]

done

[danmanxx]

FDA = Joke.

[Ramrod2615]

FDA = Joke.

FDA = Used to serve a legitimate purpose but that was so long ago that no one remembers what that purpose was.

[josh001122]

To bad they all think supps are stupid

True, but if someone with a decent rep power posts it everyone will do it for reps

[fibercarbon]

True, but if someone with a decent rep power posts it everyone will do it for reps

i have had maybe 3 people rep me for all of this, and that's ok by me as long as it shuts up the FDA.

[josh001122]

i have had maybe 3 people rep me for all of this, and that's ok by me as long as it shuts up the FDA.

No I mean if someone with a high rep power posts this thread in the misc and says they will rep posters for doing it then a bunch of random miscers will do it even if they don't lift.