Reply
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 31 to 45 of 45
  1. #31
    Registered User Pump Freak 86's Avatar
    Join Date: Jan 2004
    Location: United States
    Posts: 4,623
    Rep Power: 6411
    Pump Freak 86 is a name known to all. (+5000) Pump Freak 86 is a name known to all. (+5000) Pump Freak 86 is a name known to all. (+5000) Pump Freak 86 is a name known to all. (+5000) Pump Freak 86 is a name known to all. (+5000) Pump Freak 86 is a name known to all. (+5000) Pump Freak 86 is a name known to all. (+5000) Pump Freak 86 is a name known to all. (+5000) Pump Freak 86 is a name known to all. (+5000) Pump Freak 86 is a name known to all. (+5000) Pump Freak 86 is a name known to all. (+5000)
    Pump Freak 86 is offline
    Originally Posted by banky41 View Post
    you guys have me looking forward to my next back workout. I will start with pull ups, and try to get the most out of them. old balls, I will be dreaming tonight of that day in the gym when I have a 45 lb plate around my waist while doing pull ups

    what do you guys think of this workout for my back. (I also do traps that day)

    5 sets pull ups
    3 sets seated rows
    3 sets Lat pull
    3 sets bent over rows w/BB
    4 sets deadlifts

    is there any glaring omissions that I should be doing?

    thanks again for all the chatter.
    That's close to what I do on my back/shoulder hypertrophy day
    3 sets weighted pullups
    3 sets tbar rows (bb rows would fulfill the same function)
    3 sets Lat pulldown
    3 sets seated rows
    2-3 sets smith machine "deads" (more like rack pulls)

    I like to start out with a whole bunch of weight with moderate reps (8-12) in my first 2 movements (a vertical and a horizontal pull) and then follow up with some lighter weights for higher reps (12-15, sometimes 15-20). It lets me blitz the muscle by dropping major bombs on it, and then I send in a small battalion of foot soldiers to kill off all the survivors. Then I drop one more bomb with the dead lifts so I can walk away from the explosion without looking back (like a badass action star, )
    Reply With Quote

  2. #32
    Registered User _OZ_'s Avatar
    Join Date: Apr 2009
    Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
    Age: 45
    Posts: 1,019
    Rep Power: 2099
    _OZ_ is just really nice. (+1000) _OZ_ is just really nice. (+1000) _OZ_ is just really nice. (+1000) _OZ_ is just really nice. (+1000) _OZ_ is just really nice. (+1000) _OZ_ is just really nice. (+1000) _OZ_ is just really nice. (+1000) _OZ_ is just really nice. (+1000) _OZ_ is just really nice. (+1000) _OZ_ is just really nice. (+1000) _OZ_ is just really nice. (+1000)
    _OZ_ is offline
    Originally Posted by banky41 View Post
    was wondering how much of a difference there is between the two as far as muscles used is. the reason I ask, tried some pull ups during my last back work out and found I needed a lot of assistance (like 140lbs) where as doing the lat pull downs I can do two reps at my own body weight (250lbs). while doing pull ups I could feel it a lot more in the arm pit area.

    thanks
    Get the best of both worlds, do sets of pull ups until your strength declines preventing you from getting sufficient reps, then finish off your quota of sets for the back with pulldowns and rows.

    Further to what everyone else has already said, here are some latissimus dorsi EMG readings from an experiment done by Bret Contreras on various back exercises which show chins up and pullups generate more electrical activity within the muscles than pulldowns.

    Pullldown, pronated wide grip, peak 63.5, mean 108
    Pulldown, supinated grip, peak 71.2, mean 129
    Chin up - supinated grip, weighted, peak 108, mean 159
    Pull up - pronated wide grip, weighted, peak 102, mean 167

    Source: http://www.t-nation.com/free_online_...ceps_exercises

    Explanation of terms peak, mean and EMG: http://www.t-nation.com/free_online_...trap_exercises
    Reply With Quote

  3. #33
    Registered User banky41's Avatar
    Join Date: Apr 2011
    Age: 49
    Posts: 14
    Rep Power: 0
    banky41 has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0)
    banky41 is offline
    if you guys don't mind, I think I will update this thread in a month or so with any gains, Strength or size that I get. I feel my back is on the small side so hopefully pulls ups can add a little mass that I can see.

    thanks again
    Reply With Quote

  4. #34
    Registered User Pump Freak 86's Avatar
    Join Date: Jan 2004
    Location: United States
    Posts: 4,623
    Rep Power: 6411
    Pump Freak 86 is a name known to all. (+5000) Pump Freak 86 is a name known to all. (+5000) Pump Freak 86 is a name known to all. (+5000) Pump Freak 86 is a name known to all. (+5000) Pump Freak 86 is a name known to all. (+5000) Pump Freak 86 is a name known to all. (+5000) Pump Freak 86 is a name known to all. (+5000) Pump Freak 86 is a name known to all. (+5000) Pump Freak 86 is a name known to all. (+5000) Pump Freak 86 is a name known to all. (+5000) Pump Freak 86 is a name known to all. (+5000)
    Pump Freak 86 is offline
    Originally Posted by banky41 View Post
    if you guys don't mind, I think I will update this thread in a month or so with any gains, Strength or size that I get. I feel my back is on the small side so hopefully pulls ups can add a little mass that I can see.

    thanks again
    Don't get too caught up in the whole "wide grip = lat width" thing either. It doesn't actually work like that. You wind up recruiting more of your rotator cuff muscles that way (which are important muscles to train of course). A shoulder width or slightly wider grip is optimal because it gives your lats a longer ROM. When I do my pulldowns, I actually go with a close grip to get a deeper contraction down in the lower lats. A lot of people don't believe in the whole upper/lower thing, but given the changes in ROM, it makes sense that more fibers would work on the close grip relative to the standard grip. It's not an issue of isolation so much as it involves including more fibers, particularly those that aren't as heavily recruited in other movements.
    Reply With Quote

  5. #35
    Registered User GeneralSerpant's Avatar
    Join Date: Feb 2011
    Location: United States
    Posts: 18,342
    Rep Power: 72391
    GeneralSerpant has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) GeneralSerpant has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) GeneralSerpant has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) GeneralSerpant has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) GeneralSerpant has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) GeneralSerpant has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) GeneralSerpant has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) GeneralSerpant has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) GeneralSerpant has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) GeneralSerpant has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) GeneralSerpant has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000)
    GeneralSerpant is offline
    Originally Posted by Tyciol View Post
    I was guessing this type of assistance pulley might be what the OP's using to explain the huge difference in strength. Being able to lift your bodyweight on a pulldown and needing over half your weight in assistance to get a pull up is a huge difference, a halfing pulldown seems like it could explain it.
    So you're thinking someone was smart enough to make a lat pull-down, and failed to notice this mechanic design difference?

    These aren't the same at all, these exercises contain incredibly different factors. First off: pushing and pulling are very different movements and have very different stability components. Believing what applies to a pressing movement would apply to a pulling movement is a bad assumption.
    You don't know what you're talking about.


    Real pull-ups which are disciplined call for you to not let your body sway forward. Doing L Shape is an additional ab exercise to the pull-up, and isn't a natural tendency. He said he could do 240 lb twice. It's not a very big mystery.

    I'm not going to explain to you when you don't know practical experience of stabilizers.
    Reply With Quote

  6. #36
    Registered User DrunkParkRanger's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2011
    Age: 32
    Posts: 150
    Rep Power: 187
    DrunkParkRanger is on a distinguished road. (+10) DrunkParkRanger is on a distinguished road. (+10) DrunkParkRanger is on a distinguished road. (+10) DrunkParkRanger is on a distinguished road. (+10) DrunkParkRanger is on a distinguished road. (+10) DrunkParkRanger is on a distinguished road. (+10) DrunkParkRanger is on a distinguished road. (+10) DrunkParkRanger is on a distinguished road. (+10) DrunkParkRanger is on a distinguished road. (+10) DrunkParkRanger is on a distinguished road. (+10) DrunkParkRanger is on a distinguished road. (+10)
    DrunkParkRanger is offline
    W/ pullups your using your bodyweight (or more if adding weight) against gravity and moving your torso thru space, it is a superior compound lift for recruiting muscle fiber
    That's not to say there isn't a place for pulldowns tho, im just not big on them personally
    im not a bb'er tho, so definition/more localized back work isn't as important to me
    Reply With Quote

  7. #37
    Registered User JichaelMordan's Avatar
    Join Date: Jan 2014
    Posts: 858
    Rep Power: 0
    JichaelMordan is not very helpful. (-500) JichaelMordan is not very helpful. (-500) JichaelMordan is not very helpful. (-500) JichaelMordan is not very helpful. (-500) JichaelMordan is not very helpful. (-500) JichaelMordan is not very helpful. (-500) JichaelMordan is not very helpful. (-500) JichaelMordan is not very helpful. (-500) JichaelMordan is not very helpful. (-500) JichaelMordan is not very helpful. (-500) JichaelMordan is not very helpful. (-500)
    JichaelMordan is offline
    Originally Posted by nateridesbikes View Post
    I used to to lat pull down before i could do pull ups. Now i only do pull ups. moral of the story.... pullups ftw.
    That's what I'm doing right now, using pull-downs to build up strength for pull-ups
    Lifts @ 999lbs

    Squat 1300lbs/590kg
    Bench Press 700lbs/317.5kg
    Deadlift 1000lbs/453.5kg

    Clean&Jerk 600lbs/272kg
    Snatch 500lbs/227kg

    Lifts all Raw (no suits or wraps)
    Reply With Quote

  8. #38
    Watchoutyourcommentsbro krease's Avatar
    Join Date: Oct 2008
    Age: 32
    Posts: 2,128
    Rep Power: 1448
    krease is just really nice. (+1000) krease is just really nice. (+1000) krease is just really nice. (+1000) krease is just really nice. (+1000) krease is just really nice. (+1000) krease is just really nice. (+1000) krease is just really nice. (+1000) krease is just really nice. (+1000) krease is just really nice. (+1000) krease is just really nice. (+1000) krease is just really nice. (+1000)
    krease is offline
    There is some research showing open-chain exercises are better for hypertrophy and strength (i.e. pull-ups)

    However I would recommend a combination.
    For example a couple of sets of jumping negatives with pull ups (where you jump up to the top position of a pullup, then descend slowly), then carry on to a few sets of pull downs.
    RevolutionFitness.ae <---- take a look at my fitness company's website
    instagram = revolutionfitnessdxb
    ******** /revolutionfitness.ae

    Masters Degree in Sports and Physical Activity Interventions
    Bachelors Degree in Psychology (Dissertation in Sports Psychology)
    CYQ: level 2 & 3 gym instructor, level 3 nutrition and weight management, i-combat
    BJJ blue belt

    2012 Lifts: Deads= 463lbs (210kg), Squat= 331lbs (150kg), Bench= 265lbs (120kg), Total= 1058lbs (480kg)
    Reply With Quote

  9. #39
    Registered User dualspace's Avatar
    Join Date: Jan 2014
    Posts: 61
    Rep Power: 371
    dualspace will become famous soon enough. (+50) dualspace will become famous soon enough. (+50) dualspace will become famous soon enough. (+50) dualspace will become famous soon enough. (+50) dualspace will become famous soon enough. (+50) dualspace will become famous soon enough. (+50) dualspace will become famous soon enough. (+50) dualspace will become famous soon enough. (+50) dualspace will become famous soon enough. (+50) dualspace will become famous soon enough. (+50) dualspace will become famous soon enough. (+50)
    dualspace is offline
    Originally Posted by Tyciol View Post
    Have you looked closely at the pulley mechanism used in your machine? Basic lat pulldowns are equivalent, you're pulling down with the force needed to move that amount, meaning if you can do a pulldown with your bodyweight, doing a pull up should be not problem. The basic pulley is this type:

    (btw, the force on the pulley in that left pic would be 200N, and basically invert the blue pulley on the right to match left illustration)
    With this much of a discrepency (you're talking about needing assistance with over half your weight) it makes me suspicious you might have a mobile pulley system which assists using the weight. Like perhaps you're only lifting half as much on the stack (125) which would explain the pull ups difficulty.

    If it resembles the above, that's an example of how you could be pulling with half the force of the weight, which sounds like the simplest approximation to explain your issue. Basically: 125+140=265.

    This is doubtful, gravity pulls the body straight down. You'd be using more 'core' muscles and all that if you weren't keeping straight, because they'd be actively using extra energy to contort you into strange positions.

    Try different grips widths, and check out the difference in lat involvements compared to shoulder and body firmness.

    Muscles do work to hold the body together and fight the traction forces in a pull up, but this occurs in lat pulldowns in the same way.

    I have no idea what this means. The anchoring comes into play as you approach your body weight, and it simulates doing a pull up with yours knees raised, there's not much of a difference besides that.

    Why? Beats it how?

    That's not a moral, pull ups are just more fun to do because moving yourself through space feels awesome, it's a more exclusive club because the lat pulldown's something a wider variety of people can use. That doesn't make it inferior, it just means you need to be exceptional to do pull ups and it feels good to show it off. That doesn't mean we should pretend it has magic properties.

    To turn 200 into 150 would be a rather odd mechanism. Pulleys themselves do not inherently reduce the force needed to pull, they can actually increase resistance via friction. It's only certain pulley designs (which the pictures above explain) which aid the lift.

    Cool story bro.
    Good to see someone else here seems to understand that lat pulldowns and pull ups are equivalent on physical grounds, you cant change the laws of dynamics.
    Reply With Quote

  10. #40
    Registered User cviji's Avatar
    Join Date: Dec 2013
    Age: 35
    Posts: 15
    Rep Power: 0
    cviji has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) cviji has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) cviji has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) cviji has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) cviji has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) cviji has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0)
    cviji is offline
    Originally Posted by ManVsIron View Post
    Same for me. It's just a whole different ball game when you pack on well over 50 lbs of muscle (my normal weight would probably be around 185-190). Jay Cutler can hardly do pull ups at all. Maybe 3 or 4... then he needs an assist. Totally fresh, he might be able to do more... but not all that many. He couldn't do 10 to save his life. This is something that's hard to appreciate, unless you've actually experienced it.
    Do you know this or are you guessing? So your saying I can out pull up Jay Cutler because i'm currently doing 5x5 weighted with 55lbs? Puts it at 289lbs total. I Find it hard to believe..
    Reply With Quote

  11. #41
    Lift till the pains gone. Livestrong7's Avatar
    Join Date: Jul 2010
    Location: Houston, Texas, United States
    Posts: 203
    Rep Power: 188
    Livestrong7 is on a distinguished road. (+10) Livestrong7 is on a distinguished road. (+10) Livestrong7 is on a distinguished road. (+10) Livestrong7 is on a distinguished road. (+10) Livestrong7 is on a distinguished road. (+10) Livestrong7 is on a distinguished road. (+10) Livestrong7 is on a distinguished road. (+10) Livestrong7 is on a distinguished road. (+10) Livestrong7 is on a distinguished road. (+10) Livestrong7 is on a distinguished road. (+10) Livestrong7 is on a distinguished road. (+10)
    Livestrong7 is offline
    Originally Posted by tyciol View Post
    have you looked closely at the pulley mechanism used in your machine? Basic lat pulldowns are equivalent, you're pulling down with the force needed to move that amount, meaning if you can do a pulldown with your bodyweight, doing a pull up should be not problem. The basic pulley is this type:
    (btw, the force on the pulley in that left pic would be 200n, and basically invert the blue pulley on the right to match left illustration)
    with this much of a discrepency (you're talking about needing assistance with over half your weight) it makes me suspicious you might have a mobile pulley system which assists using the weight. Like perhaps you're only lifting half as much on the stack (125) which would explain the pull ups difficulty.

    if it resembles the above, that's an example of how you could be pulling with half the force of the weight, which sounds like the simplest approximation to explain your issue. Basically: 125+140=265.

    This is doubtful, gravity pulls the body straight down. You'd be using more 'core' muscles and all that if you weren't keeping straight, because they'd be actively using extra energy to contort you into strange positions.

    Try different grips widths, and check out the difference in lat involvements compared to shoulder and body firmness.

    Muscles do work to hold the body together and fight the traction forces in a pull up, but this occurs in lat pulldowns in the same way.

    I have no idea what this means. The anchoring comes into play as you approach your body weight, and it simulates doing a pull up with yours knees raised, there's not much of a difference besides that.

    Why? Beats it how?

    That's not a moral, pull ups are just more fun to do because moving yourself through space feels awesome, it's a more exclusive club because the lat pulldown's something a wider variety of people can use. That doesn't make it inferior, it just means you need to be exceptional to do pull ups and it feels good to show it off. That doesn't mean we should pretend it has magic properties.

    To turn 200 into 150 would be a rather odd mechanism. Pulleys themselves do not inherently reduce the force needed to pull, they can actually increase resistance via friction. It's only certain pulley designs (which the pictures above explain) which aid the lift.

    Cool story bro.
    wtf
    KEEP Calm and ... LIFT On★★★★★
    ~
    Every time you skip legs.. a puppy dies
    ~
    ***"NO CREW" CREW***
    ~
    99 problems but a bench ain't one
    Reply With Quote

  12. #42
    Registered User ConP83's Avatar
    Join Date: Aug 2011
    Age: 40
    Posts: 302
    Rep Power: 2778
    ConP83 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) ConP83 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) ConP83 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) ConP83 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) ConP83 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) ConP83 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) ConP83 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) ConP83 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) ConP83 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) ConP83 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) ConP83 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500)
    ConP83 is offline
    Originally Posted by banky41 View Post
    if you guys don't mind, I think I will update this thread in a month or so with any gains, Strength or size that I get. I feel my back is on the small side so hopefully pulls ups can add a little mass that I can see.

    thanks again
    When you get to about 220 i reckon you will be able to do a set of 6-10 reps

    edit: that is if you keep training to do them
    Reply With Quote

  13. #43
    Tea Bag oldballs's Avatar
    Join Date: Nov 2010
    Location: Snap City, Canada
    Posts: 3,009
    Rep Power: 7407
    oldballs is a name known to all. (+5000) oldballs is a name known to all. (+5000) oldballs is a name known to all. (+5000) oldballs is a name known to all. (+5000) oldballs is a name known to all. (+5000) oldballs is a name known to all. (+5000) oldballs is a name known to all. (+5000) oldballs is a name known to all. (+5000) oldballs is a name known to all. (+5000) oldballs is a name known to all. (+5000) oldballs is a name known to all. (+5000)
    oldballs is offline
    Originally Posted by ConP83 View Post
    When you get to about 220 i reckon you will be able to do a set of 6-10 reps

    edit: that is if you keep training to do them
    Why don't you ask him if he kept training them? He posted that almost 3 years ago.
    Reply With Quote

  14. #44
    Registered User ConP83's Avatar
    Join Date: Aug 2011
    Age: 40
    Posts: 302
    Rep Power: 2778
    ConP83 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) ConP83 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) ConP83 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) ConP83 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) ConP83 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) ConP83 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) ConP83 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) ConP83 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) ConP83 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) ConP83 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) ConP83 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500)
    ConP83 is offline
    Originally Posted by oldballs View Post
    Why don't you ask him if he kept training them? He posted that almost 3 years ago.

    fking lol, who the f revives all these old threads lately
    Reply With Quote

  15. #45
    Registered User 1883's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2013
    Location: United States
    Posts: 513
    Rep Power: 283
    1883 will become famous soon enough. (+50) 1883 will become famous soon enough. (+50) 1883 will become famous soon enough. (+50) 1883 will become famous soon enough. (+50) 1883 will become famous soon enough. (+50) 1883 will become famous soon enough. (+50) 1883 will become famous soon enough. (+50) 1883 will become famous soon enough. (+50) 1883 will become famous soon enough. (+50) 1883 will become famous soon enough. (+50) 1883 will become famous soon enough. (+50)
    1883 is offline
    Originally Posted by banky41 View Post
    was wondering how much of a difference there is between the two as far as muscles used is. the reason I ask, tried some pull ups during my last back work out and found I needed a lot of assistance (like 140lbs) where as doing the lat pull downs I can do two reps at my own body weight (250lbs). while doing pull ups I could feel it a lot more in the arm pit area.

    thanks
    I do both. Usually in the same workout. I do ToNS of pull-ups tho. Twice a week. Weighted and body weight.
    Reply With Quote

Similar Threads

  1. Lat pull downs vs. Pull ups
    By schlopster in forum Exercises
    Replies: 74
    Last Post: 10-29-2007, 06:29 AM
  2. For those who lat pull downs and wide grip pull ups dont work for.
    By tatortotajigalo in forum Teen Bodybuilding
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 07-12-2007, 08:47 PM
  3. Lat pull ups or pull downs using weights?
    By ViperGTS500 in forum Exercises
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 06-22-2007, 09:07 AM
  4. Lat pull downs same as pull ups????
    By newb-to-lifting in forum Exercises
    Replies: 47
    Last Post: 07-20-2006, 01:09 PM
  5. pull ups vs. lat pull downs vs. close grip
    By thatdamngood in forum Teen Bodybuilding
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-15-2003, 05:46 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts