Oh I wonder why lol. This administration is a joke.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110511/...pphu-container
"WASHINGTON – President Barack Obama's main idea for getting quality health care at less cost was in jeopardy Wednesday after key medical providers called his administration's initial blueprint so complex it's unworkable.
Just over a month ago, the administration released long-awaited draft regulations for "accountable care organizations," networks of doctors and hospitals that would collaborate to keep Medicare patients healthier and share in the savings with taxpayers. Obama's health care overhaul law envisioned quickly setting up hundreds of such networks around the county to lead a bottom-up reform of America's bloated health care system.
But in an unusual rebuke, an umbrella group representing premier organizations such as the Mayo Clinic wrote the administration Wednesday saying that more than 90 percent of its members would not participate, because the rules as written are so onerous it would be nearly impossible for them to succeed.
"It's not just a simple tweak, it's a significant change that needs to be made," said Donald Fisher, president of the American Medical Group Association, which represents nearly 400 large medical groups around the country providing care for roughly 1 in 3 Americans. Its members, including the Cleveland Clinic, Intermountain Healthcare in Utah, and Geisinger Health System in Pennsylvania, had been seen as the vanguard for accountable care.
The medical groups say they are worried they will be left holding the bag for losses, that the government has designed things so there is no easy way to tell which patients are part of the program, and that there's no reliable way to adjust for patients who are sicker and require closer follow-up and more expensive treatments.
The deadline for public comments on the proposed regulations is still weeks away, but Fisher said "we needed to get their attention early on, so (the administration) could be thinking about how major changes are needed to make these regulations viable."
Medicare spokesman Brian Cook said the agency is doing extensive outreach to explain and take feedback on the regulations and hat "we will carefully consider this input."
"We are confident that providers' decisions on whether to participate in the program will be made on the basis of the final rule, which will reflect the feedback we receive," added Cook.
Many in the health care industry were silent partners backing Obama's overhaul law, but disappointment over the accountable care rules has put a chill into the relationship. During the congressional debate, Obama extolled Mayo and Geisinger, holding them up as a model of what he wanted to achieve for the nation. Industry criticism of his administration's proposal has been building up for weeks in online forums.
"This has all the hallmarks of a party that nobody comes to, unless there is a serious rethinking," said former Medicare administrator Gail Wilensky, who ran the agency under President George H.W. Bush.
Wilensky said the idea of coordinating care isn't the problem, but "it sounds like (the administration) really overshot the mark."
The regulations are "overly prescriptive, operationally burdensome, and the incentives are too difficult to achieve to make this voluntary program attractive," the medical group association said in its letter. One of the major problems seems to be that medical groups have little experience in managing insurance risk, and the administration blueprint rapidly exposes them to potential financial losses.
Without major changes, "we fear that very few providers will enroll ... and that (Medicare) and the provider community will miss the best opportunity to inject value and accountability into the delivery system."
Private insurers are also experimenting with versions of the accountable care idea, but successful adoption by Medicare is seen as the key to spreading it across the country. The Obama administration had estimated as much as $960 million in savings from the first three years of the program, and bigger amounts thereafter.
Fisher, the medical association head, said he does not think the administration will easily back off its approach, because on paper it saves the government money."
|
-
05-12-2011, 05:49 AM #1
- Join Date: Jul 2009
- Location: New Jersey, United States
- Age: 35
- Posts: 6,837
- Rep Power: 17316
ObamaCare Set Back Major Medical Providers Say it Won't Work
-
05-12-2011, 05:50 AM #2
-
05-12-2011, 05:53 AM #3
-
05-12-2011, 05:53 AM #4
-
-
05-12-2011, 05:54 AM #5
-
05-12-2011, 05:56 AM #6
-
05-12-2011, 05:56 AM #7
If I buy a hamburger, I pay up front and know the posted price....
If I get a medical procedure, I consume the good, then am told the price.... pure bull****......
If I could shop around better, that would be beneficial....Nobody panics when things go according to plan, even if the plan is horrifying.
-- The Joker
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=132717543 - My broke pro athlete listing...
-
05-12-2011, 05:59 AM #8
-
-
05-12-2011, 06:01 AM #9
-
05-12-2011, 06:04 AM #10
-
05-12-2011, 06:05 AM #11
-
05-12-2011, 06:07 AM #12
-
-
05-12-2011, 06:07 AM #13
-
05-12-2011, 06:08 AM #14
-
05-12-2011, 06:08 AM #15
-
05-12-2011, 06:09 AM #16
No, they really don't brah. Longer waiting times and less personalised care is grossly over exaggerated by Americans.
I've lived in England brah, and the healthcare quality provided by the NHS was top notch. Yes, perhaps I did have to wait a little longer for my operation but there are long waiting times in the US too depending on what surgery.
Until you've lived in both America and a country that provides universal healthcare no-one should comment.
Besides, in England you have the option to take out PRIVATE healthcare too which gives you two options.
Why can't there be two options in America?
-
-
05-12-2011, 06:10 AM #17
- Join Date: Feb 2010
- Location: Jacksonville, Florida, United States
- Age: 45
- Posts: 4,711
- Rep Power: 0
Again. Completely baseless lies. Buddy broke his leg while snowboarding in Whistler. Absolutely no wait time, it cost him nothing but $5 for a pain pill prescription. There are people from every civilized nation ON THIS VERY SITE. Do you ever hear any of them complain about the horsesh!t you mentioned?
How do you *******s sleep at night?
READ, FOR F&CK'S SAKE.
Your actions are treasonous.
-
05-12-2011, 06:12 AM #18
-
05-12-2011, 06:13 AM #19
-
05-12-2011, 06:15 AM #20
-
-
05-12-2011, 06:15 AM #21
-
05-12-2011, 06:15 AM #22
-
05-12-2011, 06:17 AM #23
-
05-12-2011, 06:17 AM #24
Wrong. Stop believing everything the News tells you.
Wait times are based on severity of injury/illness. If you have torn acl of course you are going to wait a bit longer then someone who needs major surgery to save their life. Its stupid to not do it this way. Its not based on who has the most money which clearly has not been working as American healthcare is ranked 37th in the world when rankings were last performed.
Health care is not just for the rich.
-
-
05-12-2011, 06:21 AM #25
You people are all delusional thinking its going to be better. It's going to ruin this country. This is coming from someone who's a health insurance broker.
Don't get me wrong...i cannot STAND health insurance companies. They don't pay me. They don't pay doctors. They DEFINITELY don't pay their subscribers. However, watch what happens when this comes into effect. Do you REALLY think you're going to force doctors to accept this coverage? Have any of you actually READ the bill? No.
I go to meetings at least once a month for this. Every month its something new about "Healthcare Reform". Since this bill has gone into effect. So i've been to probably 14-18 meetings so far. This is all supposed to narrow the gap between the upper class and lower class and provide quality care.
It will do neither.
It's going drive the gap apart. Just like India you'll have your "socialized medicine" doctors and your "private sector" doctors. Right next to the public hospital will be a private one. Doctors may only accept cash there. That's where the people who want the best quality care will go. They'll pay out of pocket.
The people on "socialized healthcare" will have to pay $500 before they're even touched by a Dr. This is the initial fee. Furthermore, lots of preventative care is NOT covered.
Lots of ObGyn stuff isn't covered for women. Prostate exams for men. So on.
So then instead of heading the problem off before it becomes a bigger (more expensive) one...they'll just throw treatment at it when its a lost cause.
-
05-12-2011, 06:22 AM #26
Americans spend more because our government does not cap spending. When spending is capped then the citizens pay for it. All of these people talking about how easy it was when they broke their legs ect, are in their 20's or younger, so of course that age group is going to get better care. What about the 60 year old who needs a knee replacement??
-
05-12-2011, 06:23 AM #27
-
05-12-2011, 06:24 AM #28
-
-
05-12-2011, 06:25 AM #29
-
05-12-2011, 06:26 AM #30
This isn't R/P filled with mindless conservatives.
Health care in socialized HC countries >>> American health care, despite your age/race or whatever. 60 year olds get everything they need, as do 10 year olds. Go back to your conservative friends who'll high-5 you for wanting to privatize everything.
Similar Threads
-
Huge Loss-Major set back
By fitn2b40 in forum JournalingReplies: 4Last Post: 09-22-2006, 04:24 PM -
ANother Possibley Home Made Training Principle Which Inevitabely Won't Work...
By To(V) in forum Teen BodybuildingReplies: 9Last Post: 03-25-2002, 05:11 PM -
the last one won't work, here's a pic
By pmatt in forum Post Your Pictures and Introduce YourselfReplies: 3Last Post: 02-15-2002, 05:05 PM -
set back
By Kevbo13 in forum Teen BodybuildingReplies: 12Last Post: 01-30-2002, 10:35 PM
Bookmarks