24/7 Customer Service 1-866-236-8417 Need Help? 1-866-236-8417

Reply
Results 1 to 16 of 16
  1. #1
    Registered User h3358571's Avatar
    Join Date: Apr 2011
    Posts: 2
    Rep Power: 0
    h3358571 has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0)
    h3358571 is offline

    Question How many calories does burned per rep?

    Hi all

    am wondering how many calories does weight lifting burn per rep? I heard 3 calories per

    rep??! For example, if am lifting 20 kg 20 reps (1 set) in 20 seconds thatís mean

    3x20 =60 burned calories?


    thanks
    Reply With Quote

  2. #2
    It's Over 9000!!! rdferguson's Avatar
    Join Date: Nov 2008
    Location: A house on a hill, Australia
    Stats: 5'7", 148 lbs
    Posts: 6,148
    Rep Power: 10443
    rdferguson is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) rdferguson is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) rdferguson is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) rdferguson is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) rdferguson is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) rdferguson is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) rdferguson is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) rdferguson is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) rdferguson is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) rdferguson is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) rdferguson is a splendid one to behold. (+10000)
    Visit rdferguson's BodySpace
    rdferguson is online now
    Depends on the exercise and the intensity (%1RM). Supposedly a 1RM clean and jerk is up to about 15kcal. I'd be willing to bet a strict bicep curl is significantly less.
    SQ 2x150kg BP 95kg DL 190kg OHP 60kg @ 70kg

    My personality is a brooding pit of despair...with unicorns! My hobbies include singing karaoke sober, buying Magikarp outside Mt Moon and staring directly at the sun. Fitness geek + theology nerd.

    The noob effect, as explained by Greg Everett: "You take someone who's totally sedentary and you can get 'em stronger by making them pick their nose vigorously for an hour a day."

    Sometimes I write things about fitness: paragonelite.wordpress.com
    Reply With Quote

  3. #3
    Registered User alexb650's Avatar
    Join Date: Nov 2006
    Location: California, United States
    Age: 35
    Stats: 5'11", 205 lbs
    Posts: 560
    BodyPoints: 45
    Rep Power: 211
    alexb650 will become famous soon enough. (+50) alexb650 will become famous soon enough. (+50) alexb650 will become famous soon enough. (+50) alexb650 will become famous soon enough. (+50) alexb650 will become famous soon enough. (+50) alexb650 will become famous soon enough. (+50) alexb650 will become famous soon enough. (+50) alexb650 will become famous soon enough. (+50) alexb650 will become famous soon enough. (+50) alexb650 will become famous soon enough. (+50) alexb650 will become famous soon enough. (+50)
    Visit alexb650's BodySpace
    alexb650 is offline
    You're gonna go crazy trying to calculate at that level of detail. That's like counting each grain of rice.

    Try to look at it as cals per hour. For my size, intensity, rest periods, etc, I figure I burn 350 an hour on average. At least that's what I do. But, whatever works for you.
    Reply With Quote

  4. #4
    Minister for Propoganda gomez26's Avatar
    Join Date: Mar 2007
    Stats: 6'2", 212 lbs
    Posts: 3,947
    BodyPoints: 4810
    Rep Power: 16353
    gomez26 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) gomez26 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) gomez26 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) gomez26 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) gomez26 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) gomez26 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) gomez26 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) gomez26 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) gomez26 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) gomez26 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) gomez26 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000)
    Visit gomez26's BodySpace
    gomez26 is offline

    Post

    if you're taking the latest high tech cutting supplements, this goes up to 3.25 cal per rep.

    never sell yourself short.




    "Though the concept is not scientifically validated in detail (it should be considered as a hypothesis rather than a scientific theory), it is useful from a practical standpoint. When training athletes, it is impossible to wait until scientific research provides all of the necessary knowledge." Vladmir M. Zatsiorsky, Ph.D.
    Reply With Quote

  5. #5
    JosefRakichFitness.com JOSEF RAKICH's Avatar
    Join Date: Apr 2009
    Location: Auckland, New Zealand
    Stats: 5'10", 180 lbs
    Posts: 12,077
    Rep Power: 59732
    JOSEF RAKICH has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) JOSEF RAKICH has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) JOSEF RAKICH has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) JOSEF RAKICH has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) JOSEF RAKICH has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) JOSEF RAKICH has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) JOSEF RAKICH has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) JOSEF RAKICH has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) JOSEF RAKICH has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) JOSEF RAKICH has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) JOSEF RAKICH has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000)
    Visit JOSEF RAKICH's BodySpace
    JOSEF RAKICH is offline
    Not sure if serious..
    ✔ ISSA Certified Personal Trainer, Fitness Model & Sponsored Athlete!

    ✔ Personalized Meal Plans & Workout Programs for Males & Females! (PM me for details)

    ✔ 12 WEEK TRANSFORMATION PROGRAM NOW AVAILABLE! (PM me for details)

    ✔ Follow me on FaceBook (Search: Josef Rakich Fitness)

    ✔ Follow me on Instagram (@JosefRakich)

    ✔ Follow me on Snapchat (Josef_Rakich)

    ✔ Subscribe to my Youtube Channel for Workout Vids (Search: Josef Rakich)
    Reply With Quote

  6. #6
    Registered User Greco-Roman's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2008
    Location: United States
    Age: 22
    Stats: 5'3", 145 lbs
    Posts: 1,354
    Rep Power: 2089
    Greco-Roman is just really nice. (+1000) Greco-Roman is just really nice. (+1000) Greco-Roman is just really nice. (+1000) Greco-Roman is just really nice. (+1000) Greco-Roman is just really nice. (+1000) Greco-Roman is just really nice. (+1000) Greco-Roman is just really nice. (+1000) Greco-Roman is just really nice. (+1000) Greco-Roman is just really nice. (+1000) Greco-Roman is just really nice. (+1000) Greco-Roman is just really nice. (+1000)
    Visit Greco-Roman's BodySpace
    Greco-Roman is offline
    It would be highly inaccurate, for multiple reasons to try and calculate this, but you can get a rough estimate, using physics.

    Let's say you lift 100kg Let's make it a clean and jerk.

    Force of gravity = 9.81m/s^2
    (100)(9.81)=981 Newtons of Force lifted.
    Now, a clean and jerk moves the weight, like, let's say 2.2 meters?
    (981)(2.2)= 2158.2 Joules.
    Now that is 515.82218 calories.
    Now, human body calories usage is measured in the thousands of calories, so that's really 0.51582218 calories. That is the physical amount of energy required to clean and jerk 100kg 2.2 meters. However, this does not factor in muscle efficiencies, and metabolism changes, and facts like even if you just hold a weight, you are burning calories, however, no actual work is being done. (Like, with physical calculations, holding a weight = 0 joules, it moves 0 meters, so the equation is multiplied by 0. However, it does require energy to just hold something.)

    So, it's very hard to accurately tell. Muscles, on average, are about 20% efficient, so that means it requires 5x the energy to move an object, so now 0.51582218*5 = 2.5791109 calories. Now, the only assumption made was about muscles thus far. If we assume that is correct, a clean and jerk of 100kg would require atleast that many calories, as we are not accounting for other things.
    Reply With Quote

  7. #7
    Trance Brah chrsschb's Avatar
    Join Date: Dec 2010
    Location: Florida, United States
    Age: 30
    Stats: 5'10", 162 lbs
    Posts: 6,510
    Rep Power: 15134
    chrsschb is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) chrsschb is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) chrsschb is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) chrsschb is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) chrsschb is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) chrsschb is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) chrsschb is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) chrsschb is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) chrsschb is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) chrsschb is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) chrsschb is a splendid one to behold. (+10000)
    Visit chrsschb's BodySpace
    chrsschb is online now
    The cardio/workout trainer I bought for my phone (Cardio Trainer) says 1 hour of medium intensity weightlifting is around 200-250 calories. Sounds good to me
    soundcloud.com/djzenoth || facebook.com/djzenoth || twitter.com/djzenoth || mixcloud.com/zenoth
    Reply With Quote

  8. #8
    Banned Tyciol's Avatar
    Join Date: Oct 2004
    Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    Stats: 5'11", 215 lbs
    Posts: 11,693
    BodyPoints: 4085
    Rep Power: 0
    Tyciol has a spectacular aura about. (+250) Tyciol has a spectacular aura about. (+250) Tyciol has a spectacular aura about. (+250) Tyciol has a spectacular aura about. (+250) Tyciol has a spectacular aura about. (+250) Tyciol has a spectacular aura about. (+250) Tyciol has a spectacular aura about. (+250) Tyciol has a spectacular aura about. (+250) Tyciol has a spectacular aura about. (+250) Tyciol has a spectacular aura about. (+250) Tyciol has a spectacular aura about. (+250)
    Visit Tyciol's BodySpace
    Tyciol is offline
    OP, the calories burned per exercise rep is something that varies on too many factors, it seems like a waste of time to calculate it to me. Just know that, the more reps you do, or the more resistance you use, you will generally be burning more calories.

    There isn't even a formula to tell you how many calories will be burned barbell curling 50lbs for 10 reps. That's because people will burn different amounts depending on their anatomical differences (lever length, tendon attachment sites) as well as their skill in the lift.
    Reply With Quote

  9. #9
    Registered User woodstein's Avatar
    Join Date: Apr 2011
    Location: Dublin, Ireland
    Age: 26
    Stats: 5'7", 174 lbs
    Posts: 383
    Rep Power: 186
    woodstein will become famous soon enough. (+50) woodstein will become famous soon enough. (+50) woodstein will become famous soon enough. (+50) woodstein will become famous soon enough. (+50) woodstein will become famous soon enough. (+50) woodstein will become famous soon enough. (+50) woodstein will become famous soon enough. (+50) woodstein will become famous soon enough. (+50) woodstein will become famous soon enough. (+50) woodstein will become famous soon enough. (+50) woodstein will become famous soon enough. (+50)
    Visit woodstein's BodySpace
    woodstein is offline
    impossible to say for sure bro, because of factors such as your metabolism, intensity of training, exercise in question, weight used etc: too many variables.

    You will probably on a good training day be burning somewhere between 15 to 20 calories per pound of body weight, according to a recent issue of Flex magazine or MD or something.

    again, this is strongly dependent on all of the factors i have listed above.
    Reply With Quote

  10. #10
    Registered User ger2oo5's Avatar
    Join Date: May 2010
    Age: 35
    Posts: 663
    Rep Power: 127
    ger2oo5 will become famous soon enough. (+50) ger2oo5 will become famous soon enough. (+50) ger2oo5 will become famous soon enough. (+50) ger2oo5 will become famous soon enough. (+50) ger2oo5 will become famous soon enough. (+50) ger2oo5 will become famous soon enough. (+50) ger2oo5 will become famous soon enough. (+50) ger2oo5 will become famous soon enough. (+50) ger2oo5 will become famous soon enough. (+50) ger2oo5 will become famous soon enough. (+50) ger2oo5 will become famous soon enough. (+50)
    Visit ger2oo5's BodySpace
    ger2oo5 is offline
    Originally Posted by Tyciol View Post
    There isn't even a formula to tell you how many calories will be burned barbell curling 50lbs for 10 reps. That's because people will burn different amounts depending on their anatomical differences (lever length, tendon attachment sites) as well as their skill in the lift.
    I would have thought that total body weight, lean body mass & intensity would be the most important variables when considering calories burnt during any activity?
    Reply With Quote

  11. #11
    mirin jobra? rxrocko's Avatar
    Join Date: Jul 2010
    Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
    Age: 23
    Stats: 5'11"
    Posts: 928
    Rep Power: 3720
    rxrocko is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) rxrocko is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) rxrocko is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) rxrocko is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) rxrocko is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) rxrocko is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) rxrocko is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) rxrocko is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) rxrocko is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) rxrocko is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) rxrocko is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500)
    Visit rxrocko's BodySpace
    rxrocko is offline
    bout tree fiddy OP.
    500+
    Reply With Quote

  12. #12
    Off the wagon PeterGibbons316's Avatar
    Join Date: Sep 2010
    Stats: 5'10", 199 lbs
    Posts: 12,290
    Rep Power: 42141
    PeterGibbons316 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PeterGibbons316 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PeterGibbons316 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PeterGibbons316 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PeterGibbons316 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PeterGibbons316 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PeterGibbons316 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PeterGibbons316 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PeterGibbons316 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PeterGibbons316 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PeterGibbons316 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000)
    Visit PeterGibbons316's BodySpace
    PeterGibbons316 is offline
    You actually can calculate it pretty easily. A calorie is a measure of energy, which is just force times distance, which is just mass times acceleration times distance. So if you lift a 100 kg weight 1 m, thats 980 joules of energy used, which is 0.234 calories.

    This is a gross oversimplification. Your body is not 100% efficient, so while the energy required to move the weight is only 0.234 calories, you will actually need to spend much more than that to complete the movement. As you can see, the amount of energy required to actually lift weights is relatively small. The real calorie burn from weight lifting occurs during recovery, when your body uses energy to rebuild and repair the muscle broken down while lifting.
    My Journal (RIP 05/11 - 09/13):
    http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=134256491

    DIY Plyo Boxes:
    http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=151765733
    Reply With Quote

  13. #13
    The BACKMAN DJAuto's Avatar
    Join Date: Aug 2005
    Location: Louisiana, United States
    Posts: 26,675
    BodyPoints: 33004
    Rep Power: 29687
    DJAuto has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) DJAuto has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) DJAuto has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) DJAuto has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) DJAuto has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) DJAuto has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) DJAuto has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) DJAuto has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) DJAuto has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) DJAuto has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) DJAuto has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000)
    Visit DJAuto's BodySpace
    DJAuto is offline
    There are way too many variables to quantify.
    Bodybuilding is 60% training and 50% diet. Yes that adds up to 110%, because that's what you should be giving it. Change the inside, and the physique will follow.
    Reply With Quote

  14. #14
    Registered User h3358571's Avatar
    Join Date: Apr 2011
    Posts: 2
    Rep Power: 0
    h3358571 has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0)
    h3358571 is offline
    Thanks all really helpful information ^_*
    Reply With Quote

  15. #15
    Registered User tysonclarke's Avatar
    Join Date: Mar 2015
    Age: 34
    Posts: 1
    Rep Power: 0
    tysonclarke has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0)
    tysonclarke is offline
    Dude...thank you.

    I've been going crazy trying to figure this out for a few days now.

    It makes the most sense to me to work this way. Most exercises are going to be 1 or 2 meters for a person my height, and I used to be a delivery driver and I delivered about 3.5 tonnes per day, a little over 1 meter off the ground. Stayed in pretty good shape.

    Right now, I'm not in the greatest shape, but I feel like I get a pretty good workout lifting 3~4 tonnes , 1 meter, per day.

    I know it doesn't sound like much, but with the added calories burned post workout, it might be something that works for me.


    Originally Posted by Greco-Roman View Post
    It would be highly inaccurate, for multiple reasons to try and calculate this, but you can get a rough estimate, using physics.

    Let's say you lift 100kg Let's make it a clean and jerk.

    Force of gravity = 9.81m/s^2
    (100)(9.81)=981 Newtons of Force lifted.
    Now, a clean and jerk moves the weight, like, let's say 2.2 meters?
    (981)(2.2)= 2158.2 Joules.
    Now that is 515.82218 calories.
    Now, human body calories usage is measured in the thousands of calories, so that's really 0.51582218 calories. That is the physical amount of energy required to clean and jerk 100kg 2.2 meters. However, this does not factor in muscle efficiencies, and metabolism changes, and facts like even if you just hold a weight, you are burning calories, however, no actual work is being done. (Like, with physical calculations, holding a weight = 0 joules, it moves 0 meters, so the equation is multiplied by 0. However, it does require energy to just hold something.)

    So, it's very hard to accurately tell. Muscles, on average, are about 20% efficient, so that means it requires 5x the energy to move an object, so now 0.51582218*5 = 2.5791109 calories. Now, the only assumption made was about muscles thus far. If we assume that is correct, a clean and jerk of 100kg would require atleast that many calories, as we are not accounting for other things.
    Reply With Quote

  16. #16
    Registered User fitMarkku's Avatar
    Join Date: May 2009
    Age: 56
    Stats: 198 lbs
    Posts: 16
    Rep Power: 0
    fitMarkku has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) fitMarkku has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) fitMarkku has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) fitMarkku has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) fitMarkku has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) fitMarkku has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) fitMarkku has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) fitMarkku has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) fitMarkku has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) fitMarkku has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) fitMarkku has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0)
    Visit fitMarkku's BodySpace
    fitMarkku is offline

    what about body weight

    Originally Posted by Greco-Roman View Post
    It would be highly inaccurate, for multiple reasons to try and calculate this, but you can get a rough estimate, using physics.

    Let's say you lift 100kg Let's make it a clean and jerk.

    Force of gravity = 9.81m/s^2
    (100)(9.81)=981 Newtons of Force lifted.
    Now, a clean and jerk moves the weight, like, let's say 2.2 meters?
    (981)(2.2)= 2158.2 Joules.
    Now that is 515.82218 calories.
    Now, human body calories usage is measured in the thousands of calories, so that's really 0.51582218 calories. That is the physical amount of energy required to clean and jerk 100kg 2.2 meters. However, this does not factor in muscle efficiencies, and metabolism changes, and facts like even if you just hold a weight, you are burning calories, however, no actual work is being done. (Like, with physical calculations, holding a weight = 0 joules, it moves 0 meters, so the equation is multiplied by 0. However, it does require energy to just hold something.)

    So, it's very hard to accurately tell. Muscles, on average, are about 20% efficient, so that means it requires 5x the energy to move an object, so now 0.51582218*5 = 2.5791109 calories. Now, the only assumption made was about muscles thus far. If we assume that is correct, a clean and jerk of 100kg would require atleast that many calories, as we are not accounting for other things.
    How about your weight.. don't you also lift yourself up.. and doesn't that take calories too?
    Reply With Quote

Reply

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-11-2011, 09:56 AM
  2. Replies: 36
    Last Post: 05-07-2009, 04:25 PM
  3. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 02-11-2008, 09:41 AM
  4. Replies: 13
    Last Post: 04-18-2005, 02:06 PM
  5. How many calories are burned per hour per lb. of fat and muscle?
    By HuskerPaulie in forum Teen Bodybuilding
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-15-2002, 12:15 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts