Im 5'4 145 pounds and benching 225. People always tell me that "its because your short,and thats why you can bench more then me" So my question to you guys is, Do shorter people have an advantage at the bench??? If so Why ???
|
-
04-28-2011, 10:31 PM #1
-
04-28-2011, 10:38 PM #2
-
04-28-2011, 10:38 PM #3
Well yes, but I woudn't use "YOUR SHORTER SO THAT MUST BE THE ONLY REASON YOUR STRONGER" excuse.
Maybe your just stronger (Your CNS recruits more muscle fibres)
You have a better routine
etc,etc,etc,.
Lots of variables
But the shorter your arms are, yes, that does serve an advantage for bench press.
Is it the only reason your stronger? Not at all
EDIT: strong chest for your weight btwSo if i pick this weight up, then put it down. I will obtain the swole?
-
04-28-2011, 10:43 PM #4
-
-
04-28-2011, 10:47 PM #5
Yeah, I think that's just because since your arms are normally shorter you don't have to make the weight travel as far.
It's the same thing with deads and squat
Squat especially, if you have good form, the bar shouldn't be moving that far. It's the people who lean forward and stuff that are making the bar have to much of a ROM.
-
04-28-2011, 11:04 PM #6
- Join Date: May 2009
- Location: Florida, United States
- Age: 32
- Posts: 7,079
- Rep Power: 8402
Your arms are shorter so the bar doesn't have as much distance to travel. Their arms are longer so they have more room to load muscle.
Tell them to stop being weak and making excuses.★★★USF MISC CREW★★★
**MISC Strength Crew**
"If thou wilt make a man happy, add not unto his riches but take away from his desires." - Epicurus
PRs
500/405/615
Training Log: http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=159250211
-
04-28-2011, 11:11 PM #7
-
04-28-2011, 11:27 PM #8
-
-
04-29-2011, 03:44 AM #9
-
04-29-2011, 04:54 AM #10
-
04-29-2011, 04:55 AM #11
-
04-29-2011, 05:05 AM #12
-
-
04-29-2011, 05:07 AM #13
-
04-29-2011, 05:14 AM #14
- Join Date: Feb 2009
- Location: Misc City, BBington, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Posts: 3,131
- Rep Power: 955
No I should have made that clearer then.
I should have said: 'When I train with my friends that have been going for the same amount of time as me I get called out, for instance I go with someone who joined exactly the same time as me and can just get out 154lbs. His excuse is that im shorter and have an advantage, however if you see the way he trains you will realise he never puts in the same effort and quits as soon as it starts getting hard. The only thing he works out is his mouth. Then again I have another friend who joined at the same time again who is about 6ft 3 and he can do the same figures as me but he trains with as much effort as me.'
I can tell Mr.B1g that you train hard and most probably alot harder than I do.
I didn't really want to write an essay, but I guess I had to clear that one up.
-
04-29-2011, 05:19 AM #15
-
04-29-2011, 05:23 AM #16
-
-
04-29-2011, 05:28 AM #17
A friend (5'6 asian) and I use to work out together in high school during football and wrestling, and we pushed each other pretty hard, but his lifts always were higher than mine... for example he only had a rom on hang clean, and bench that was about half of mine.
don't forget about squats as well.[June] - 245
[July] - 244
[August] -
Squats- 375 for 8 reps
Deads- 315 for 5
-
04-29-2011, 06:16 AM #18
So all muslcles pull right? When you pull, the longer the bar (your bone) the more torque you have, the more torque you have the more force there is that can be applied. Think of it like using a short wrench and a long wrench, you would always choose the long wrench when something is on very tightly (I may have used a few terms wrong, but I think you get the idea). Therefore the TALLER you are, the more you can bench. ROM is just a bull**** excuse that tall skinny people use when they want to feel better about themselves
"Moderation in discipline is failure"
*all pics and stats are at least 3 years old...just ignore them
-
04-29-2011, 06:28 AM #19
-
04-29-2011, 06:44 AM #20
-
-
04-29-2011, 06:46 AM #21
-
04-29-2011, 06:47 AM #22
leverage? when your lifting a weight straight up, the same force must be applied no matter how long the supports are. on lifts that dont travel strictly vertically, leverage would be an excuse, such as lateral raises or front raises. even then, it would be harder for a tall person because the weight is farther away from the fulcrum of the lever.
-
04-29-2011, 06:47 AM #23
- Join Date: Jul 2009
- Location: North yorkshire, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Age: 32
- Posts: 1,172
- Rep Power: 1606
I think he's staying; all muscles pull =/= muscles contract, which is not really correct. Contracting is more of a stacking movement. As bench is in essence an up and down press distance (ROM) does play a part.
Work = Force X Distance, which means that someone with shorter arms has a lower rate of work than someone with longer arms. I think this is true to some extent but someone with longer arms has the potential to build bigger triceps and delts so it balances out in the long run. The idea of having longer arms that will produce more torque would be true in terms of hammer throw and discus, assuming the rate your spinning at is the same as a person with shorter arms.
Edit: the lateral raise is a better example of torqueLast edited by Got_tickets; 04-29-2011 at 06:49 AM. Reason: Better explanation provided by mmafighter1294
To embed pictures: [img]url of the picture[/img]
To embed youtube videos: [youtube]delete everything up to and including the = in the url[/youtube]
-
04-29-2011, 06:52 AM #24
What do you even mean 'all muscles pull'?
Just going to go with good old Wikipedia for the second point:
'Torque, also called moment or moment of force, is the tendency of a force to rotate an object about an axis, fulcrum, or pivot. Just as a force is a push or a pull, a torque can be thought of as a twist.'
You're pushing the barbell up and down.
Stop trying to overcomplicate this.
I don't know why you quoted me, it seems like you're correcting him.
Edit: And I don't agree with some ballpark statement saying they have the potential to build bigger triceps and deltoids therefore strength balances out.
In that case, I should be stronger at benchpress then anyone with smaller triceps then me, which is obviously not true. Muscular size is not a good indicator of strength. At all.
-
-
04-29-2011, 06:53 AM #25
-
04-29-2011, 07:13 AM #26
If there was a 5'6 guy and a 6'2 guy, and they were both perfectly proportioned in terms of weight to height ratio, surely there'd be no real difference in their strength? By this I mean if each man was working to '100%' or some theoretical bull like that, he'd logically be able to bench more due to being taller, having a larger frame and having filled out more than his smaller friend.
No?
-
04-29-2011, 07:16 AM #27
-
04-29-2011, 07:22 AM #28
-
-
04-29-2011, 07:26 AM #29
-
04-29-2011, 07:27 AM #30
Similar Threads
-
Are taller people just better people?
By Richie_Awesome in forum Misc.Replies: 306Last Post: 05-08-2016, 10:32 AM -
shorter people are superior (PROOF INSIDE)
By Wowstrongcut in forum Misc.Replies: 123Last Post: 11-05-2013, 02:22 PM
Bookmarks