Real Sex in Movies

[lanterns]

heres hoping the scene in Deliverence wasnt real..

[Staberella]

Another movie with a real sex scene is Pink Flamingos. I dunno if you guys wanna see that one though. Unless you like big fat tranny incest fantasy scenes. Divine also eats fresh dog$hit at the end of the movie too.

The rest of the movie is a cross between lulz and WTF.

[Just4Misc]

bump for interesting thread lol.


I always wondered if the actors (if married IRL) would actually perform.

From True Blood, "Bill" and "Sookie" are married IRL, and fuking each other in the movie.
Turns out he wears a sock to "respect her" lol.. yet he fuks her probably everyday outside filming?





Also heard that "Eric" doesn't wear a sock, or anything for that matter.
Strong notasinglefuk

chest - 4/10
ass - 9/10

[StudzMcSexy]

lol ya the movie was ridic

Ah, Ken Park's guide to fatherhood^^^. This was an odd movie.

[kineticforce]

Meh, whether she was proud of it or not, the ass to ass scene appears to be real, and not simulated.

The article I read said that the business men were just a bunch of dudes that the casting director found at a bar down the street from the shoot, and that Connelly says she tries to not think about shooting that scene.

Because it's so hard to believe that a fairly unknown actress at the time would do a shocking real sex scene in an indie film which propelled her career.

Watch the uncut version and tell me that there was no penetration going on there.

ok - so again just try to not make sh0t up please

http://aronofksy.tripod.com/interview6.html

DR: The film is now unrated. For what scenes did the MPAA want to give you an NC-17?

Aronofsky: I think that the problem was the three-minute climax of the film, the psychological intensity of that coupled with some of the sexual imagery. Even though there isn't any penetration, I think any time you have a double-headed dildo with condoms going on it and KY Jelly may be a little too much for the MPAA, even though that's really not that messed up, I don't think. The sexuality coupled with the violence, coupled with the pain, with the racism, with all the intense spiraling of all that stuff out of control was a little bit overwhelming to the MPAA.

[DOSENTEVENLIFT]

Opened wikipedia link to Ken Park

Saw movie cover

Got a chubby

Now looking for Ken Park on netflix

good luck bro netflix has had that movie unavailable for like 4 years now

[AlleyBoy]

Antichrist.
Shower scene is slow mo porno called "art"
The girl is married, but has sex with some actor about 5 times....it is art tho.

[Staberella]

ok - so again just try to not make sh0t up please

http://aronofksy.tripod.com/interview6.html

I am not making sh!t up. I dun told you that I was just relaying what I read when the movie first came out. The huge controvery surrounding it was that the ass to ass scene was real. The director might have stated that it was fake to shut the morality police up, because they were all over his nuts after the original uncut movie was shown.

[Mr.Creatine]

just saw jennifer connely's azz to azz.. WTF MAN.. mind exploded.






cawk too.

[Staberella]

just saw jennifer connely's azz to azz.. WTF MAN.. mind exploded.






cawk too.

So in your opinion, real penetration or no?

[kineticforce]

I am not making sh!t up. I dun told you that I was just relaying what I read when the movie first came out. The huge controvery surrounding it was that the ass to ass scene was real. The director might have stated that it was fake to shut the morality police up, because they were all over his nuts after the original uncut movie was shown.

I can understand you wanting to defend your position, even though you've been disproven twice. Its been over 10 years since it came out - so IT MIGHT BE POSSIBLE you might have something incorrect BUT since you're being stubborn about it.... I'll wait for you to FIND something and prove yourself correct.

Hollywood has been making things appear real for a long time....

I'll wait............

[bitrep]

it aint hardcore

[jro9999]

I can understand you wanting to defend your position, even though you've been disproven twice. Its been over 10 years since it came out - so IT MIGHT BE POSSIBLE you might have something incorrect BUT since you're being stubborn about it.... I'll wait for you to FIND something and prove yourself correct.

Hollywood has been making things appear real for a long time....

I'll wait............

dont bother waiting

she'll offer no proof and continue to stubbornly argue her opinion as if it is fact

[Stopdroproll]

dont bother waiting

she'll offer no proof and continue to stubbornly argue her opinion as if it is fact

She only has 200% chance of being right anyway... kineticforce has 800% chance of being right.

[godsangina2]

I am not making sh!t up. I dun told you that I was just relaying what I read when the movie first came out. The huge controvery surrounding it was that the ass to ass scene was real. The director might have stated that it was fake to shut the morality police up, because they were all over his nuts after the original uncut movie was shown.

On the other hand they might have spread rumors it was real to drum up interest in the movie. You really never know.

edit: Says here they used body doubles, maybe two whores took a dildo up the ass?
http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/...it-sex-scenes/

[momo5]

If the movie has any real sex in it, it would automatically be given an X-rating and shelved. I remember reading an article saying that the production team in I, Robot had to tape Will Smith's cock to his leg in that shower scene to avoid trouble from the studio.

I've always wondered how the male actors don't get hard-ons when they're pseudo-fuking their hot costars. With their luscious tits bouncing on their faces n sht.

you said it yourself, dick is taped down brah thats how they prevent hard dick, super duct taped there dick in the butt cracks o it won't come out.

[Staberella]

I can understand you wanting to defend your position, even though you've been disproven twice. Its been over 10 years since it came out - so IT MIGHT BE POSSIBLE you might have something incorrect BUT since you're being stubborn about it.... I'll wait for you to FIND something and prove yourself correct.

Hollywood has been making things appear real for a long time....

I'll wait............

Disproven, not really. You posted 1 interview where Connelly states that she is proud of her scenes from the film, and 1 interview from the director where he says that it was faked, because it appears that he didn't like the NC-17 rating that the MPAA gave the movie. NC-17 ratings makes it harder for a film to go mainstream, and cuts down on box office revenues, but I'm sure you know that already.

The movie came out in 2000, and now that Connelly is an A-list actress, of course it's going to be hard to find the articles saying that she took a big one up da azz in a $60K budget film.

Everyone that is interested in the fake vs. real argument should just DL the UNCUT original ass to ass scene, and decide for themselves.

Kinda hard to fake a sideshot scene of a double dong dildo going in and out of 2 chicks.

[Staberella]

On the other hand they might have spread rumors it was real to drum up interest in the movie. You really never know.

edit: Says here they used body doubles, maybe two whores took a dildo up the ass?
http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/...it-sex-scenes/

Watch the uncut version, the camera shows both actresses in a side and overhead shot during the dildo scene. Connelly's face is not cut out of the shot. You can clearly see her face in the overhead shot bumping asses with the other chick, and you can see a dildo sliding in and out.

[MyLastSerenade]

Opened wikipedia link to Ken Park

Saw movie cover

Got a chubby

Now looking for Ken Park on netflix

There are clips on Motherless

[jro9999]

Disproven, not really. You posted 1 interview where Connelly states that she is proud of her scenes from the film, and 1 interview from the director where he says that it was faked, because it appears that he didn't like the NC-17 rating that the MPAA gave the movie. NC-17 ratings makes it harder for a film to go mainstream, and cuts down on box office revenues, but I'm sure you know that already.

The movie came out in 2000, and now that Connelly is an A-list actress, of course it's going to be hard to find the articles saying that she took a big one up da azz in a $60K budget film.

Everyone that is interested in the fake vs. real argument should just DL the UNCUT original ass to ass scene, and decide for themselves.

Kinda hard to fake a sideshot scene of a double dong dildo going in and out of 2 chicks.

lol

you critique what the other guy is saying as he posts links

you post nothing but your opinion

your argument is based on how something looks........ in a ficticious movie........ made for entertainment.......

[kineticforce]

Disproven, not really. You posted 1 interview where Connelly states that she is proud of her scenes from the film, and 1 interview from the director where he says that it was faked, because it appears that he didn't like the NC-17 rating that the MPAA gave the movie. NC-17 ratings makes it harder for a film to go mainstream, and cuts down on box office revenues, but I'm sure you know that already.

The movie came out in 2000, and now that Connelly is an A-list actress, of course it's going to be hard to find the articles saying that she took a big one up da azz in a $60K budget film.

Everyone that is interested in the fake vs. real argument should just DL the UNCUT original ass to ass scene, and decide for themselves.

Kinda hard to fake a sideshot scene of a double dong dildo going in and out of 2 chicks.

Watch the uncut version, the camera shows both actresses in a side and overhead shot during the dildo scene. Connelly's face is not cut out of the shot. You can clearly see her face in the overhead shot bumping asses with the other chick.

EGO EGO EGO - just drop it - sh*t I post an article from the DIRECTOR aronsky on his fan website and you still dont get it. Why are you so GD stubborn?

I've been watching it on different sites from metacafe to xvids to some other sites. It shows a side shot sure but it doesnt mean they cant "edit" in sh*t. And you have further proof above they used body doubles. SURPRISE

all the face shots of connelly are from the front - face - not at angle where you can see her + the other girl and the dildo...

Would it be so difficult to just bow out and admit you MIGHT be wrong....

I guess not that would be too easy....

btw nail in coffin ... probably what you were referring to (http://www.jenniferconnelly.net/vanity.html)

Here is part of a Vanity Fair article:

Ultimately, Connelly's character performs in a brutal sex show for the entertainment of leering businessmen in exchange for drugs -- a scene difficult to watch, but much more so to play. "There was no sex, of course. but there was ... interaction," Aronofsky says. "All professional, but unbelievably emotional and intense. We don't really talk about what went on that night."

[allenalexisalexander]

lol'd hard at this thread.

[Staberella]

btw nail in coffin ... probably what you were referring to (http://www.jenniferconnelly.net/vanity.html)

I'm not trying to be egotistical. I just think that Connelly did the ass to ass scene, and that it was not a body double. That is just my own opinion. As for the overhead shot, there is a part where she turns her head and it appears to be her. Body doubles for a $60K budget film with an actress that was unknown at the time? I have my doubts.

Aronofsky comes off a bit vague when he says, ""There was no sex, of course. but there was ... interaction."

Did he ever explain what that "interaction" was? For him sex might mean penis in vag, and that dildos do not count as sex. His statement can be taken either way.

[kineticforce]

I'm not trying to be egotistical. I just think that Connelly did the ass to ass scene, and that it was not a body double. That is just my own opinion. As for the overhead shot, there is a part where she turns her head and it appears to be her. Body doubles for a $60K budget film with an actress that was unknown at the time? I have my doubts.

Aronofsky comes off a bit vague when he says, ""There was no sex, of course. but there was ... interaction."

Did he ever explain what that "interaction" was? For him sex might mean penis in vag, and that dildos do not count as sex. His statement can be taken either way.

well you can ride unicorns I will live in reality

whatever helps you sleep at night she-brah

[Kick_Sprint45]

In for later.

[Staberella]

well you can ride unicorns I will live in reality

whatever helps you sleep at night she-brah

The ass to ass debate will go on forever, on many forums with some people thinking it's real, and some thinking that a heavenly blessed like Connelly would never do a scene so degrading and shocking. So I shall drop it, but I do not think that you have proven without a doubt that it is fake.

Now back to real sexors in movies.

Caligula. Tons of sex scenes in this one.

[irollurmom]

you said it yourself, dick is taped down brah thats how they prevent hard dick, super duct taped there dick in the butt cracks o it won't come out.

I just think it would be awkward as fawk to get hard during a simulated sex scene. I would imagine the actors doing their best to stay flaccid during it.

[209manny]

Old 70s raunchy films had a sh*t ton of it.

I have a huge collection of them, the 70s were the best era for these types of films.

Especially if you are like me and love 70s bush.


here are just a few that I've got
just watch Caligula
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0080491/

and the Emmanuelle movies

cheeky
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0200192/

Salon kitty
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0075163/

Miranda
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0089598/

Beneath the Valley of the Ultra-Vixens

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0078846/

[ThundaHawk]

Another movie with a real sex scene is Pink Flamingos. I dunno if you guys wanna see that one though. Unless you like big fat tranny incest fantasy scenes. Divine also eats fresh dog$hit at the end of the movie too.

The rest of the movie is a cross between lulz and WTF.

go on...

[SUSprinter]

Old 70s raunchy films had a sh*t ton of it.

I have a huge collection of them, the 70s were the best era for these types of films.

Especially if you are like me and love 70s bush.


here are just a few that I've got
just watch Caligula
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0080491/

and the Emmanuelle movies

cheeky
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0200192/

Salon kitty
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0075163/

Miranda
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0089598/

Beneath the Valley of the Ultra-Vixens

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0078846/

brb downloading