|
-
03-14-2011, 05:28 PM #61
-
03-14-2011, 05:29 PM #62
-
03-14-2011, 05:34 PM #63
-
03-14-2011, 06:25 PM #64
-
-
03-14-2011, 06:38 PM #65
-
03-14-2011, 07:07 PM #66
-
03-15-2011, 03:17 AM #67
-
03-15-2011, 03:24 AM #68
-
-
03-15-2011, 03:24 AM #69
The competitors got bigger and less conditioned as a result (obvious a lot more goes into that equation ). What i want to know is, what happened better the early 2000's and now. For a while we had a string of conditoned mass monsters that were dominating, then 05-08 rolled over and we had mainly bloated messes and dexter
-
03-15-2011, 03:26 AM #70
-
03-15-2011, 05:24 AM #71
-
03-15-2011, 05:35 AM #72
Dumbest opinion on here, Levrone is and always will be bitter towards the IFBB because he never got his Mr.o he thinks he deserved.
Nothing went wrong, everyone else moved ahead and Levrone didn't. Why not? Because he trained for like 4 months out of the year. How are you going to improve by doing that?
I guess, Cutler, Heath, Jackson, Centaponi, Wolf, branch, etc.. all suck?
-
-
03-15-2011, 05:43 AM #73
Then I guess you think Dave P's opinion is dumb too as he obviously completely agrees with Levrone..
In that list you mention none really hold up IMO. Heath would almost except his bone structure is not quite as good, but it is certainly very close. Wolf has "promise" but lacks the overall package at this point in time.
-
03-15-2011, 06:05 AM #74
-
03-15-2011, 06:19 AM #75
mm... tough topic... few people have shat a nappy over it so far in the thread.
I think the shapes back then were a lot more pleasing.
You had Flex, Kevin, Shawn.... i mean.. these 3 all looked amazing.
No phyisiques flow like that at the moment... Just think about it... Sure Kai and Phil are huge, but they don't have the flow to their physiques that those 3 had, neither of those two have a waist like a bodybuilder from the 90's. And yeah, conditioning is tougher to come by these days.
Let's be serious here people... Diuretics are still used, but I think people took heed of the warnings that Andreaz munzer and Paul Dillet sent them. They don't use them as heavily nowadays. I know competitors in Amatuer ranks who say they're not necessary, you can do it without them. I'm sure these guys would tend to use them more often than not, but I think they would be more careful about it.
Bodybuilding right now... Is just not as competitive... Not enough guys bring the conditioning needed to win. And if they do... there usually isn't enough guys who bring it that were front runners to start with.
I think bodybuilding needs a slight revamp. A bit more publicity, and continuing to find some fresh new faces.
A final point, I think the lighting of these 90s shows is often better than some of todays shows... Especially the minor shows these days.
-
03-15-2011, 06:21 AM #76
-
-
03-15-2011, 07:19 AM #77
- Join Date: Apr 2007
- Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Age: 33
- Posts: 10,415
- Rep Power: 7651
I honestly think Phil, Jay and Kai at their very best would beat Levrone and Shawn, I think Wheeler might give them a run for their money though. I'm not saying they weren't all incredible because they're some of the best of all time, I just think they were missing things which these 3 aren't.
EPO all in my veins; Lately things just don’t seem the same; Actin’ funny, but I don’t know why; ’Scuse me while I pass this guy.
-
03-15-2011, 07:33 AM #78
-
03-15-2011, 07:37 AM #79
-
03-15-2011, 09:52 AM #80
-
-
03-15-2011, 10:06 AM #81
-
03-15-2011, 11:45 AM #82
Heath and Kai would hold up just fine.. Kai has striations all over and is very heavy for his height.. Heath is very complete and aestetic, he'd keep up with Flex Wheeler, Flex was narrow too. Heath has a little more freak factor and thickness than Flex did though, kinda mix between Kevin and Flex's physiques.. Kevin was just never very complete. Wolf is a poor mans Paul Dillet from the front if anything. He can at least pose tho lol.
-
03-15-2011, 02:29 PM #83
-
03-15-2011, 04:07 PM #84
-
-
03-15-2011, 04:11 PM #85
ur statement is dumb, leverone did that type of trainning ONCE, That was when he tore his chest, and only had a few months to train after recovery.......him doing that every year is a myth.
this is what we know about cutler, cutler is champ due to lack of CONSISTANT competition,
culters first 2 mr.O were very question, beating an Injured Ronnie coleman, who was agruably still in better condition during the night show and should have won
the second titles well belonged to Victor, Even Jay said himself that he was off and didnt know how he managed to pull it off,
09 MR.O i was there, and that was Jay's only undisputed victory, even his most current victory at the Mr.O was debated as many felt Heath could have won.
the biggest problem with the guys that compete today is lack of consistancy.
the only acception to this is ( dexter,heath, branch)
outside of those names, most guy have BIG problems comming in shape consistantly example: Victor,kai, even Jay at times,Roelly
this is a huge problem why? those are the biggest names in the sport had they have had conditioning issues as far as bringing it consistantly
thats like Kobe, lebron, wade,melo being the top stars in the NBA and there play is inconsistance................IF YOUR A STAR, YOUR PLAY SHOULD ALWAYS BE CONSISTANT THAT WHAT MAKES YOU STAR.
So if your sports biggest stars are inconsistant at the TOP shows then what does that say about the rest of the competition in the sport.
back in the 90's and early 2000 you could count on your TOP 6 star ALWAYS bringing the best conditioning to the biggest show without the GUT and huge waist even Nasser who was bigger then anyone competing now had a tight waist for massive man
example: shawn ray,corimer,Ronnie,Levrone,dorian,nasser,vince taylor, paul dilluet could be counted on to always bring their absolute best to the biggest shows were it counted the most
only Flex had problems with conditioning, and he normally finished no less then second or fourth at the mr.O with 4 arnold classic victories.
to top it off, most these guys competed way more then the top guys of today excluding dorian,
the only guys today that can hang with those guys would be Heath,jay, maybe branch but i dont see him doing much better then paul or nasser
-
03-15-2011, 04:11 PM #86
There is a combination of factors that separate the 90s bodybuilders from the 00's bodybuilders.
Firstly, something which has nothing to do with bodybuilding, is that the economy was better in the 90s than in the 00s (and this isn't even comparing the 90s to the late 00's, as the economy now is even worse). In addition, social stigma to bodybuilders was better back then (it was televised, less negativity around steroids, etc). In the grand scheme of things, these play a role in every little factor that affects current bodybuilders and potential "would bes". Food prices, supplement "supplies" and prices, real value of prize money and sponsor contracts, other potential job opportunities, all probably went for the worse in terms of bodybuilding. Not to mention if people are getting poorer, they won't be spending as much on luxury items like protein powder and supplements, which hurts the revenue flowing into the bodybuilding industry, and only further damages the pay of the athlete sponsors.
If its harder to live as a professional bodybuilder because of the costs (more expensive "stuff" needed like drugs and food as well as better job opportunities, not to mention meager payday for what they do, perceived health risks, social stigma) outweigh the benefits (getting to be big and a pro bodybuilder?), your just not going to have as gifted and motivated a talent pool, plain and simple. In addition, and this is my own guess, but the baseball steroid scandals in the mid 00s could have affected the drug supplies getting into bodybuilding. Current bodybuilders also have to devote an enormous amount of time to living their lives as pseudo criminals and not get caught with illegal substances. The drug scandal certainly rocked the underground supplement industry, and with not as good as drugs or at least access to for bodybuilders, there won't be as good as performances, unfortunately. I guarantee you that if all drugs related to bodybuilding were 100% legal, current bodybuilders would be 50% better than were they are now. There would be much more research on drugs which would aid bodybuilders/gurus and prevent mishaps in contest preps, not to mention their prices would be astronomically lower.
Relating to bodybuilding itself, the judges have definitely placed emphasis on mass over conditioning in the past 10 years. Regardless of how people think about Ronnie, during his reign all aspiring bodybuilders had only one goal, which was to get as big as humanly possible while in condition. This must have made it harder to get in condition and further damage the social stigma surrounding bodybuilding, since most of these people did not look pleasing at all to look at. Also, I do believe that bodybuilders back then did experiment more with drugs (I'm no drug guru, but everyone here says diuretics). I'm not saying people now don't use them at all, but at least not as much, or not in the same proportion to the mass they carry.Frustrated at bodybuilding? Read my rant:
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=148817673&page=1
-
03-15-2011, 04:17 PM #87
this is wrong also..........the prize money at shows have dramatically increased, especially the mr.O and Arnold and what about supp contract..thats an excuse
guys make more on contracts and guest posing then actual prize money things are better for the athletes now more then ever..the supp industries is still big biz
-
03-15-2011, 04:28 PM #88
Notice how I said "real" value of prize money. Nominally they have gone up, I do not deny this. My guess though is that real value they have gone down, just like most jobs. If wages/job growth on the whole experienced little growth (if at all) in the past ten years, something tells me that for bodybuilders, they same thing (or even worse) has occurred. Also, just because supplement industries are booming does not necessarily mean that bodybuilders are. If more people are interested in becoming leaner athletes and not as bulky, then chances are the supplement industry is going to pay less to the huge 280-300 lb athletes and more to the leaner guys because they really aren't bringing in the cash. Businesses won't just pay bodybuilders for no reason, they estimate how much revenue they are bringing to the firm and compare that to how much they can pay them (to see if they can get a profit). If less people are interested in bulking up but instead losing weight, showcasing huge bulky men wouldn't be in a supplement companies best interest.
Frustrated at bodybuilding? Read my rant:
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=148817673&page=1
-
-
03-15-2011, 04:36 PM #89
-
03-15-2011, 04:39 PM #90
Bookmarks