Reply
Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1
    Just the tip PGSPCB's Avatar
    Join Date: Feb 2011
    Age: 36
    Posts: 455
    Rep Power: 1066
    PGSPCB is a jewel in the rough. (+500) PGSPCB is a jewel in the rough. (+500) PGSPCB is a jewel in the rough. (+500) PGSPCB is a jewel in the rough. (+500) PGSPCB is a jewel in the rough. (+500) PGSPCB is a jewel in the rough. (+500) PGSPCB is a jewel in the rough. (+500) PGSPCB is a jewel in the rough. (+500) PGSPCB is a jewel in the rough. (+500) PGSPCB is a jewel in the rough. (+500) PGSPCB is a jewel in the rough. (+500)
    PGSPCB is offline

    sarcoplasmic vs. myofibrillar hypertrophy

    If I were to do 8-12 reps in order to acheive sarcoplasmic hypertrophy, my muscles will grow but I wont get stronger? And similarly, if i do 2-6 reps in order to be in the myofibrillar hypertrophy range, I will increase strength with only a small increase in muscle growth? Is this correct?

    If this theory is right, and I did 8-12 reps, then I would never be able to increase the weight I'm doing because I'm not getting stronger?

    Also, do I have to pick one or the other? Or can I say do, for example, 2 sets of 5 reps and 2 sets of 10 reps, and therefore gain size and strength?

    Please help me understand this.
    Reply With Quote

  2. #2
    Just the tip PGSPCB's Avatar
    Join Date: Feb 2011
    Age: 36
    Posts: 455
    Rep Power: 1066
    PGSPCB is a jewel in the rough. (+500) PGSPCB is a jewel in the rough. (+500) PGSPCB is a jewel in the rough. (+500) PGSPCB is a jewel in the rough. (+500) PGSPCB is a jewel in the rough. (+500) PGSPCB is a jewel in the rough. (+500) PGSPCB is a jewel in the rough. (+500) PGSPCB is a jewel in the rough. (+500) PGSPCB is a jewel in the rough. (+500) PGSPCB is a jewel in the rough. (+500) PGSPCB is a jewel in the rough. (+500)
    PGSPCB is offline
    Or what if I wanted to target a specific muscle for growth but didnt want to sacrifice my strength. Could I train it twice a week and have one session be 5x5 and the other session be 3x10?
    Reply With Quote

  3. #3
    Uplift ThickAsABrick's Avatar
    Join Date: May 2006
    Posts: 39,246
    Rep Power: 122608
    ThickAsABrick has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) ThickAsABrick has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) ThickAsABrick has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) ThickAsABrick has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) ThickAsABrick has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) ThickAsABrick has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) ThickAsABrick has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) ThickAsABrick has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) ThickAsABrick has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) ThickAsABrick has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) ThickAsABrick has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000)
    ThickAsABrick is offline
    You are going to gain both strength and size with both rep ranges, assuming overall volume is sufficient and diet is in order. Combining them is a great approach.

    Work in both high and low rep ranges and don't worry so much about all the details.
    Who was this love of yours?
    Reply With Quote

  4. #4
    Registered User bixbysnyder's Avatar
    Join Date: Feb 2011
    Age: 35
    Posts: 252
    Rep Power: 1267
    bixbysnyder is just really nice. (+1000) bixbysnyder is just really nice. (+1000) bixbysnyder is just really nice. (+1000) bixbysnyder is just really nice. (+1000) bixbysnyder is just really nice. (+1000) bixbysnyder is just really nice. (+1000) bixbysnyder is just really nice. (+1000) bixbysnyder is just really nice. (+1000) bixbysnyder is just really nice. (+1000) bixbysnyder is just really nice. (+1000) bixbysnyder is just really nice. (+1000)
    bixbysnyder is offline
    This article is nice. http://www.t-nation.com/article/body...ked_and_loaded. To summarize, there's overlap in the zones, and yes you can mix and match. Check the table that names the zones and their effects.
    Reply With Quote

  5. #5
    MAGA Orlando1234977's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2006
    Location: Wisconsin, United States
    Posts: 13,896
    Rep Power: 84889
    Orlando1234977 has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) Orlando1234977 has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) Orlando1234977 has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) Orlando1234977 has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) Orlando1234977 has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) Orlando1234977 has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) Orlando1234977 has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) Orlando1234977 has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) Orlando1234977 has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) Orlando1234977 has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) Orlando1234977 has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000)
    Orlando1234977 is offline
    Originally Posted by PGSPCB View Post
    If I were to do 8-12 reps in order to acheive sarcoplasmic hypertrophy, my muscles will grow but I wont get stronger? And similarly, if i do 2-6 reps in order to be in the myofibrillar hypertrophy range, I will increase strength with only a small increase in muscle growth? Is this correct?

    If this theory is right, and I did 8-12 reps, then I would never be able to increase the weight I'm doing because I'm not getting stronger?

    Also, do I have to pick one or the other? Or can I say do, for example, 2 sets of 5 reps and 2 sets of 10 reps, and therefore gain size and strength?

    Please help me understand this.
    Actually, 8-12 reps tends to be the sweet spot for myofibrillar hypertrophy. (Which is often misunderstood)

    Myofibrillar hypertrophy is the breakdown/buildup process and contributes to cells getting stronger (regardless of if it's a large or small), sarcoplasmic is the fluid etc.. Don't confuse stronger with equaling stonger for your largest power output, or your largest cells only..

    Cumulative myofibrillar hypertrophy of ALL your muscle cells (large, medium, small) will be greater than myofibrillar hypertrophy of large only. If that makes sense.
    Reply With Quote

  6. #6
    Squat or remove thy self caerus13's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2010
    Location: Illinois, United States
    Age: 35
    Posts: 5,075
    Rep Power: 1412
    caerus13 is just really nice. (+1000) caerus13 is just really nice. (+1000) caerus13 is just really nice. (+1000) caerus13 is just really nice. (+1000) caerus13 is just really nice. (+1000) caerus13 is just really nice. (+1000) caerus13 is just really nice. (+1000) caerus13 is just really nice. (+1000) caerus13 is just really nice. (+1000) caerus13 is just really nice. (+1000) caerus13 is just really nice. (+1000)
    caerus13 is offline



    There is overlap.
    Reply With Quote

  7. #7
    MAGA Orlando1234977's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2006
    Location: Wisconsin, United States
    Posts: 13,896
    Rep Power: 84889
    Orlando1234977 has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) Orlando1234977 has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) Orlando1234977 has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) Orlando1234977 has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) Orlando1234977 has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) Orlando1234977 has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) Orlando1234977 has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) Orlando1234977 has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) Orlando1234977 has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) Orlando1234977 has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) Orlando1234977 has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000)
    Orlando1234977 is offline
    Originally Posted by caerus13 View Post



    There is overlap.
    But just fyi, that chart's wrong, its been debunked many times on here.. From from Rips book right?
    Reply With Quote

  8. #8
    Just the tip PGSPCB's Avatar
    Join Date: Feb 2011
    Age: 36
    Posts: 455
    Rep Power: 1066
    PGSPCB is a jewel in the rough. (+500) PGSPCB is a jewel in the rough. (+500) PGSPCB is a jewel in the rough. (+500) PGSPCB is a jewel in the rough. (+500) PGSPCB is a jewel in the rough. (+500) PGSPCB is a jewel in the rough. (+500) PGSPCB is a jewel in the rough. (+500) PGSPCB is a jewel in the rough. (+500) PGSPCB is a jewel in the rough. (+500) PGSPCB is a jewel in the rough. (+500) PGSPCB is a jewel in the rough. (+500)
    PGSPCB is offline
    Originally Posted by Orlando1234977 View Post
    Actually, 8-12 reps tends to be the sweet spot for myofibrillar hypertrophy. (Which is often misunderstood)

    Myofibrillar hypertrophy is the breakdown/buildup process and contributes to cells getting stronger (regardless of if it's a large or small), sarcoplasmic is the fluid etc.. Don't confuse stronger with equaling stonger for your largest power output, or your largest cells only..

    Cumulative myofibrillar hypertrophy of ALL your muscle cells (large, medium, small) will be greater than myofibrillar hypertrophy of large only. If that makes sense.
    so your saying the sum of the total muscle cells achieving myofibrillar hypertrophy is greatest in the 8-12 range?
    Reply With Quote

  9. #9
    Just the tip PGSPCB's Avatar
    Join Date: Feb 2011
    Age: 36
    Posts: 455
    Rep Power: 1066
    PGSPCB is a jewel in the rough. (+500) PGSPCB is a jewel in the rough. (+500) PGSPCB is a jewel in the rough. (+500) PGSPCB is a jewel in the rough. (+500) PGSPCB is a jewel in the rough. (+500) PGSPCB is a jewel in the rough. (+500) PGSPCB is a jewel in the rough. (+500) PGSPCB is a jewel in the rough. (+500) PGSPCB is a jewel in the rough. (+500) PGSPCB is a jewel in the rough. (+500) PGSPCB is a jewel in the rough. (+500)
    PGSPCB is offline
    Originally Posted by Orlando1234977 View Post
    But just fyi, that chart's wrong, its been debunked many times on here.. From from Rips book right?
    I was going to say, i've seen that table posted on here and have hear people arguing against it..
    Reply With Quote

  10. #10
    Squat or remove thy self caerus13's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2010
    Location: Illinois, United States
    Age: 35
    Posts: 5,075
    Rep Power: 1412
    caerus13 is just really nice. (+1000) caerus13 is just really nice. (+1000) caerus13 is just really nice. (+1000) caerus13 is just really nice. (+1000) caerus13 is just really nice. (+1000) caerus13 is just really nice. (+1000) caerus13 is just really nice. (+1000) caerus13 is just really nice. (+1000) caerus13 is just really nice. (+1000) caerus13 is just really nice. (+1000) caerus13 is just really nice. (+1000)
    caerus13 is offline
    Originally Posted by Orlando1234977 View Post
    But just fyi, that chart's wrong, its been debunked many times on here.. From from Rips book right?

    Yeah, what exactly is wrong with it?
    Reply With Quote

  11. #11
    I'm 12 and what is this? _oscars's Avatar
    Join Date: Feb 2011
    Location: Texas, United States
    Age: 28
    Posts: 1,853
    Rep Power: 3710
    _oscars is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) _oscars is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) _oscars is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) _oscars is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) _oscars is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) _oscars is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) _oscars is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) _oscars is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) _oscars is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) _oscars is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) _oscars is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500)
    _oscars is offline
    read the sticky on /fit/
    I can't post links yet, so thats the best advice I have :3
    Reply With Quote

  12. #12
    Registered User Ron390's Avatar
    Join Date: Jul 2013
    Age: 33
    Posts: 20
    Rep Power: 0
    Ron390 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) Ron390 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) Ron390 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) Ron390 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) Ron390 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) Ron390 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) Ron390 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) Ron390 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10)
    Ron390 is offline
    More like myofibrillar is to give the muscle dense and that whole look, sarcoplasmic is the size of the muscle. So what I started to do when I first end worked out was train for strength all the time then I got to learning about the muscles and how they work so no I would do a strength day and a myofribrillar day to make my muscles dense and look big, cause the only way to get big is to lift heavy weight.
    Reply With Quote

  13. #13
    Moderator SuffolkPunch's Avatar
    Join Date: Jan 2007
    Location: Suffolk, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
    Posts: 54,513
    Rep Power: 1338185
    SuffolkPunch has the mod powerz SuffolkPunch has the mod powerz SuffolkPunch has the mod powerz SuffolkPunch has the mod powerz SuffolkPunch has the mod powerz SuffolkPunch has the mod powerz SuffolkPunch has the mod powerz SuffolkPunch has the mod powerz SuffolkPunch has the mod powerz SuffolkPunch has the mod powerz SuffolkPunch has the mod powerz
    SuffolkPunch is offline
    You can't train for one or the other, they always increase (or decrease) in proportion to one another. Read:
    http://www.higher-faster-sports.com/...ionalmyth.html
    Reply With Quote

Similar Threads

  1. sarcoplasmic and myofibrillar hypertrophy
    By qdiddy69 in forum Powerlifting/Strongman
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 12-29-2008, 08:34 PM
  2. Synergism between sarcoplasmic + myofibrillar hypertrophy?
    By Passion4Pump in forum Workout Programs
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 10-03-2008, 03:16 PM
  3. grow quicker.>sacroplasmic or myofibrillar hypertrophy?
    By strong_pl\ in forum Teen Bodybuilding
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 08-26-2005, 11:49 AM
  4. Sacroplasmic/myofibrillar hypertrophy
    By mt127158 in forum Teen Misc.
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-16-2005, 03:05 PM
  5. Sarcomplasmic and Myofibrillar Hypertrophy
    By Woden in forum Teen Bodybuilding
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-27-2004, 04:55 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts