if i am on a 500 caloric deficit is it alright to run 45mins to 1 hour, several nights a week like 4 or more times? will this cause muscle loss due to the lowered calories?
and my other question is at what point do we go from burning our fat, or the carbs we've eaten, to burning muscle
|
-
11-24-2010, 03:57 AM #1
question about running and muscle loss
-
11-24-2010, 04:11 AM #2
-
11-24-2010, 04:13 AM #3
-
11-24-2010, 04:41 AM #4
-
-
11-24-2010, 04:50 AM #5
-
11-24-2010, 05:14 AM #6
neither wll 5k sprint run make you muscular shaped guy. It's just a suggestion in which direction to look. I know by my own experience, after a while, that 1h of running wont be enough anymore, so he will extend it eventually to 1:15, 1:30, 2 hours, etc.. seamlessly becoming a marathon runner. Well, day is too short to spend it all on running.
-
11-24-2010, 05:26 AM #7
Marathon runners are traditionally skinny because they train themselves into that advantageous body habitus. It's why you'll never see them in the gym benching, curling, squatting, dead lifting ... power lifting in general. Big muscles in the gym = big muscles slowing you down. Distance running in and of itself will not give you the marathoner body. Just like bodybuilding requires strict focus and dedication, so does building your body for this sport.
Short duration running is great.
High intensity running is great.
Moderate intensity distance running is great.
Lower intensity longer distance running is great.
They all serve a purpose, and none other in moderation will stand in the way of the OP reaching his goals unless he wants the Mr Olympia title.
If taken to extremes you could (as you put it) eat up all your training time with running, but that's more a failure in priorities and planning.
To me, lifting time trumps all. If I don't have the time to do both, my ass is in the gym.
-
11-24-2010, 05:28 AM #8
-
-
11-24-2010, 05:28 AM #9
-
11-24-2010, 05:51 AM #10
-
11-24-2010, 06:04 AM #11
-
11-24-2010, 08:19 AM #12
-
-
11-24-2010, 08:22 AM #13
-
11-24-2010, 08:29 AM #14
-
11-24-2010, 08:57 AM #15
impossible lol.. 5 months is a long time bro. thats only 2 pounds of muscle a month. that is very doable for a beginner whos eating right and going 150% in the gym. ive seen tons of people post stuff on this site like 6 month and 1 year transformations, where they appear to have put on even more than that.
and what would u know about putting on muscle. ur barely 140lbs
also, can you inform me what "lean muscle" is? i think i have a lot of fat muscle, but i want to swap it for lean.
lold
-
11-24-2010, 09:09 AM #16
- Join Date: Jul 2006
- Location: Kings Park, New York, United States
- Posts: 17,891
- Rep Power: 92051
no need to be a dick, bro. he's a good poster, who's contributing to your thread.
he obviously meant lean mass, but i do disagree that 2lb/month is impossible. It's probably best case scenerio, but possible.
http://www.bodyrecomposition.com/mus...potential.html
-
-
11-24-2010, 09:25 AM #17
i read a whole article on this site talking about how its only physiologically possible to put on 1 pound of muscle a week, and no more. not sure if this meant naturally or not. but 1 pound with ideal conditions...perfect training, prefect diet, etc.
so it seems pretty reasonable to me that a beginner could put on .5 pounds a week for 5 months
-
11-24-2010, 09:28 AM #18
I may be 140lb but I sure as fck can lift a lot more than your chubby ass. I'd apologize for getting so lowbrow but you stepped in it.
Lean mass = muscle, not fat. You can easily bulk 10lbs of fat per month by pigging out. Even as a beginner 2 pounds of raw muscle a month isn't that possible (for 99.9% of people). Your assertion that you can or did only solidifies my opinion of you: idiot.
Pro bodybuilders may be lucky to get a couple of pounds a year naturally. Beginners have an easier time ... but not 10pm per 5months. The most likely scenario is that you gained something less than 10lb raw muscle and significantly more fat ... especially since your lifts compared to your body weight are complete ass. If you think you can go from 150lbs of lean mass to 175 lean mass in a year, you're a retard. Building lean mass takes time and months/years of training. Most people just get overfat and falsely claim a portion of those gains to be muscle.
Idiot.Last edited by msm00b; 11-24-2010 at 09:33 AM.
-
11-24-2010, 09:30 AM #19
-
11-24-2010, 09:38 AM #20
-
-
11-24-2010, 09:41 AM #21
-
11-24-2010, 09:42 AM #22
-
11-24-2010, 09:47 AM #23
-
11-24-2010, 10:30 AM #24
You will open a can of worms with this question.
It really depends on your goals dude. What are you looking to accomplish?
Yes it will cause a loss in lean mass. The diet alone will do that. The trick is how much lean mass. It really depends on your nutritional support for that activity.
You can also loose lean mass in the weight room, on the elyptical trainer, the bike, walking to your car or even doing a mile or two on your Mrs! It comes down to how compatible your nutrition is with your work load. Where people in bodybuilding run into trouble is with the simple fact that nutrition that supports a heavy aerobic work load does not always favor the Asthetic goals.
I'll tell you this though. If being in good shape is your goal, nothing will rip you into shape like a good running program will."The best gift that you can give your children is to Love their Mother"
Similar Threads
-
Question about ILLNESS and MUSCLE LOSS
By RC2008 in forum Injury Recovery And PreventionReplies: 2Last Post: 12-02-2008, 11:44 AM -
Question about cardio and muscle loss
By Raul1975 in forum Losing FatReplies: 3Last Post: 07-31-2008, 05:46 PM -
Question about calories and muscle loss
By klue85 in forum NutritionReplies: 2Last Post: 03-24-2007, 11:06 PM -
Question about HIIT and muscle loss...
By thejunkaccount in forum Losing FatReplies: 1Last Post: 04-04-2005, 03:16 PM
Bookmarks