Reply
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 31 to 60 of 110
  1. #31
    Registered User VEight's Avatar
    Join Date: May 2010
    Location: Canada
    Posts: 829
    Rep Power: 711
    VEight is a jewel in the rough. (+500) VEight is a jewel in the rough. (+500) VEight is a jewel in the rough. (+500) VEight is a jewel in the rough. (+500) VEight is a jewel in the rough. (+500) VEight is a jewel in the rough. (+500) VEight is a jewel in the rough. (+500) VEight is a jewel in the rough. (+500) VEight is a jewel in the rough. (+500) VEight is a jewel in the rough. (+500) VEight is a jewel in the rough. (+500)
    VEight is offline
    Originally Posted by Starkk View Post
    Agreed.

    Fish oil is a much better at controlling blood pressure, IMO, plus there are the other numerous health benefits to consider...
    Wasn't talking about BP. Aspirin is supposed to reduce stimulant resistance, not sure if this has been proven though.
    Reply With Quote

  2. #32
    Registered User Illadelphia's Avatar
    Join Date: Sep 2006
    Posts: 17,449
    Rep Power: 111926
    Illadelphia has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Illadelphia has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Illadelphia has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Illadelphia has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Illadelphia has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Illadelphia has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Illadelphia has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Illadelphia has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Illadelphia has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Illadelphia has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Illadelphia has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000)
    Illadelphia is offline
    Originally Posted by VEight View Post
    Wasn't talking about BP. Aspirin is supposed to reduce stimulant resistance, not sure if this has been proven though.
    Broscience
    "What value is there in the grace that I profess if it leaves me unchanged?"
    -Spurgeon
    Reply With Quote

  3. #33
    Registered User VEight's Avatar
    Join Date: May 2010
    Location: Canada
    Posts: 829
    Rep Power: 711
    VEight is a jewel in the rough. (+500) VEight is a jewel in the rough. (+500) VEight is a jewel in the rough. (+500) VEight is a jewel in the rough. (+500) VEight is a jewel in the rough. (+500) VEight is a jewel in the rough. (+500) VEight is a jewel in the rough. (+500) VEight is a jewel in the rough. (+500) VEight is a jewel in the rough. (+500) VEight is a jewel in the rough. (+500) VEight is a jewel in the rough. (+500)
    VEight is offline
    Glad to hear that. Do you suggest ECY then or just EC?
    Reply With Quote

  4. #34
    Registered User Illadelphia's Avatar
    Join Date: Sep 2006
    Posts: 17,449
    Rep Power: 111926
    Illadelphia has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Illadelphia has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Illadelphia has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Illadelphia has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Illadelphia has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Illadelphia has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Illadelphia has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Illadelphia has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Illadelphia has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Illadelphia has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Illadelphia has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000)
    Illadelphia is offline
    Originally Posted by VEight View Post
    Glad to hear that. Do you suggest ECY then or just EC?
    yohimbe is horrible. I've never felt worse in my entire life.

    EC (pure eph) and a basic caff pill (4everfit or prolab) works best imo.

    I'd toss around the idea of ECRK but i've not seen anything significant enough in my research to prove synergy between the 3.
    "What value is there in the grace that I profess if it leaves me unchanged?"
    -Spurgeon
    Reply With Quote

  5. #35
    You don't surf Starkk's Avatar
    Join Date: Oct 2008
    Location: Wisconsin, United States
    Posts: 14,576
    Rep Power: 185105
    Starkk has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Starkk has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Starkk has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Starkk has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Starkk has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Starkk has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Starkk has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Starkk has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Starkk has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Starkk has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Starkk has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000)
    Starkk is offline
    Originally Posted by VEight View Post
    Glad to hear that. Do you suggest ECY then or just EC?
    Don't mix ephedrine and yohimbine

    Just EC is fine. If you want to add something, Lean Xtreme compliments it quite effectively.
    self-proclaimed huguenot

    live, laugh, send nudes
    Reply With Quote

  6. #36
    Repartitioning Nutrients whitesox23's Avatar
    Join Date: Dec 2010
    Age: 30
    Posts: 2,465
    Rep Power: 2217
    whitesox23 is just really nice. (+1000) whitesox23 is just really nice. (+1000) whitesox23 is just really nice. (+1000) whitesox23 is just really nice. (+1000) whitesox23 is just really nice. (+1000) whitesox23 is just really nice. (+1000) whitesox23 is just really nice. (+1000) whitesox23 is just really nice. (+1000) whitesox23 is just really nice. (+1000) whitesox23 is just really nice. (+1000) whitesox23 is just really nice. (+1000)
    whitesox23 is offline
    Originally Posted by Starkk View Post
    I take EC mainly because it aids in retaining lean mass when dieting via caloric deficit
    Originally Posted by slimwealthy1 View Post
    EC was first medically used in aid of rapid fat loss on bedridden hospitalized fat asses. it was used so there wasn't a debilitating amount of muscle loss with such rapid weight loss.
    Does anyone know exactly how EC aids in retaining muscle in a defecit? Also less muscle loss=more fat loss in the same defecit. We all know EC murders appetite, and the caffeine boosts metabolism slightly, but is there anymore fatloss pathways? I've heard one of the other (E or C) are beta-2 agonists, but I could be wrong...
    Originally Posted by wayprotein View Post
    sounds pretty crappy 2lbs per month? thats pretty much withing the margin of error you can easily lose 2lbs more a month just if you exercise slightly harder or ate a little less calories. also its says weightloss not fatloss so you wont lose two coffee-cup sized blobs of nasty yellow fat you will lose 2lbs of water,muscle,fat. i thought ECA stack results were supposed to be alot better then this.
    ^Has never used EC
    Originally Posted by Illadelphia View Post
    yohimbe is horrible. I've never felt worse in my entire life.

    EC (pure eph) and a basic caff pill (4everfit or prolab) works best imo.

    I'd toss around the idea of ECRK but i've not seen anything significant enough in my research to prove synergy between the 3.
    Yohimbe is awful. Sides>>>benefits for sure but Yohimbine HCL and Alpha Yohimbine are both much cleaner and basically side free...
    X-Factor http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=131209743

    X-Factor Advanced http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?s=22250e76e637b39a81a83250f1d349cf&p=682117991#post682117991

    "Success is never final. Failure never fatal."
    Reply With Quote

  7. #37
    Justified Ancient Romac's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2004
    Location: SE States
    Age: 54
    Posts: 1,488
    Rep Power: 245
    Romac has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) Romac has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) Romac has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) Romac has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) Romac has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) Romac has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) Romac has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) Romac has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) Romac has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) Romac has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) Romac has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0)
    Romac is offline
    to the people saying 2lbs per month isn't significant - i think you are missing the point - the point is that when you cut for a month you shed an extra 2.2lbs for free

    when you get down to 8% bodyfat after cutting for 2 months come back here and tell me how insignificant an extra 4.4lbs of fat would be to you at that point - it's pretty huge considering how hard it is for most people to lose any fat at that point

    2 months of ECwhatever = 4 times this (for free - well free as far as effort goes):

    Fatloss thread: http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=311486
    Fatloss post with attached diary: http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showpost.php?p=657290963&postcount=117
    Reply With Quote

  8. #38
    Justified Ancient Romac's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2004
    Location: SE States
    Age: 54
    Posts: 1,488
    Rep Power: 245
    Romac has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) Romac has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) Romac has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) Romac has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) Romac has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) Romac has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) Romac has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) Romac has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) Romac has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) Romac has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) Romac has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0)
    Romac is offline
    while we're on the subject - i just found a study that was performed on professional soccer players (super-fit sobs!) that showed an average additional body fat% drop of 3% vs a placebo group in 21 days purdy darned significant also

    http://imbodybuilding.com/articles/yohimbe/?p=1 (page 2 mentions the study but does not give raw results which i found on another bb forum but i don't wish to break rules by linking here)

    i think i might try that since i don't feel like paying $18 to ship $14 worth of ephedrine from canada - i've always purchased the vasopro stuff from bbing.com - god damned weaklings dying and ****ing everything up for the rest of us.
    Last edited by Romac; 04-06-2011 at 02:58 PM.
    Fatloss thread: http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=311486
    Fatloss post with attached diary: http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showpost.php?p=657290963&postcount=117
    Reply With Quote

  9. #39
    Repartitioning Nutrients whitesox23's Avatar
    Join Date: Dec 2010
    Age: 30
    Posts: 2,465
    Rep Power: 2217
    whitesox23 is just really nice. (+1000) whitesox23 is just really nice. (+1000) whitesox23 is just really nice. (+1000) whitesox23 is just really nice. (+1000) whitesox23 is just really nice. (+1000) whitesox23 is just really nice. (+1000) whitesox23 is just really nice. (+1000) whitesox23 is just really nice. (+1000) whitesox23 is just really nice. (+1000) whitesox23 is just really nice. (+1000) whitesox23 is just really nice. (+1000)
    whitesox23 is offline
    Originally Posted by Romac View Post
    2 months of ECwhatever = 4 times this (for free - well free as far as effort goes)
    Actually less effort as it makes eating in a defecit MUCH easier...
    Originally Posted by Romac View Post
    god damned weaklings dying and ****ing everything up for the rest of us.
    Dyings for amateurs
    X-Factor http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=131209743

    X-Factor Advanced http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?s=22250e76e637b39a81a83250f1d349cf&p=682117991#post682117991

    "Success is never final. Failure never fatal."
    Reply With Quote

  10. #40
    10 30 10 shadar's Avatar
    Join Date: Jul 2009
    Location: Daytona Beach, Florida, United States
    Age: 42
    Posts: 13,532
    Rep Power: 15433
    shadar is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) shadar is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) shadar is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) shadar is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) shadar is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) shadar is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) shadar is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) shadar is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) shadar is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) shadar is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) shadar is a splendid one to behold. (+10000)
    shadar is offline
    Originally Posted by wayprotein View Post
    sounds pretty crappy 2lbs per month? thats pretty much withing the margin of error you can easily lose 2lbs more a month just if you exercise slightly harder or ate a little less calories. also its says weightloss not fatloss so you wont lose two coffee-cup sized blobs of nasty yellow fat you will lose 2lbs of water,muscle,fat. i thought ECA stack results were supposed to be alot better then this.
    2lb isn't much???? Wtf??? That's huge! You clearly have been led astray reading way too many supp adds promoting 16lb muscle gain and loss etc per month. 2lb of additional loss from EC is crazy good.


    Originally Posted by slimwealthy1 View Post
    2.2 extra pounds per month is pretty significant, especially because EC is muscle sparing. Also, this is just adding in EC. Over the typical 8-16 week cut, that is a 4.4-8.8 pound difference. That saves you 4-8 weeks alone. If that is pure fat, that is quite substantial. (assuming you started your cut around 15-18% bodyfat)
    Originally Posted by cjwav34 View Post
    I thought EC was not muscle sparing?
    Originally Posted by cjwav34 View Post
    Interesting, I thought I saw somthing NO HYPE said that contradicted that, but I may have misunderstood.

    EC is not muscle sparing, this has been covered before. I do not have the thread it was brought up in but I believe in10city, pinch and nohype have all weighed in on it numerous times.
    Latest Reviews:

    My huge list of informative links: http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=132306613

    Xtreme Formulations UP2 Multi-Flavor Review!
    http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=129562583
    Reply With Quote

  11. #41
    Banned BIGOGW90's Avatar
    Join Date: Nov 2010
    Age: 36
    Posts: 646
    Rep Power: 0
    BIGOGW90 will become famous soon enough. (+50) BIGOGW90 will become famous soon enough. (+50) BIGOGW90 will become famous soon enough. (+50) BIGOGW90 will become famous soon enough. (+50) BIGOGW90 will become famous soon enough. (+50) BIGOGW90 will become famous soon enough. (+50) BIGOGW90 will become famous soon enough. (+50) BIGOGW90 will become famous soon enough. (+50) BIGOGW90 will become famous soon enough. (+50) BIGOGW90 will become famous soon enough. (+50) BIGOGW90 will become famous soon enough. (+50)
    BIGOGW90 is offline
    Originally Posted by jw58 View Post
    dude. If you ever question the sheer awesomeness of eca again. Askem will hunt you down and kill you in your sleep.


    In before fish oil prescription
    ^this!
    Reply With Quote

  12. #42
    Grendel! 32gOfNattyPB's Avatar
    Join Date: Sep 2010
    Posts: 898
    Rep Power: 497
    32gOfNattyPB has a spectacular aura about. (+250) 32gOfNattyPB has a spectacular aura about. (+250) 32gOfNattyPB has a spectacular aura about. (+250) 32gOfNattyPB has a spectacular aura about. (+250) 32gOfNattyPB has a spectacular aura about. (+250) 32gOfNattyPB has a spectacular aura about. (+250) 32gOfNattyPB has a spectacular aura about. (+250) 32gOfNattyPB has a spectacular aura about. (+250) 32gOfNattyPB has a spectacular aura about. (+250) 32gOfNattyPB has a spectacular aura about. (+250) 32gOfNattyPB has a spectacular aura about. (+250)
    32gOfNattyPB is offline
    Why not use clen rather than ephedrine. They both hit the same receptors and clen is WAY cheaper and only has to be taken once a day.
    Best pre-workout ever:
    http://www.bodybuilding.com/store/legal/anadraulic-state-gt.html

    Best protein products:
    Muscle Feast

    Best Egg white product:
    pending :)
    Reply With Quote

  13. #43
    Justified Ancient Romac's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2004
    Location: SE States
    Age: 54
    Posts: 1,488
    Rep Power: 245
    Romac has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) Romac has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) Romac has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) Romac has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) Romac has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) Romac has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) Romac has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) Romac has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) Romac has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) Romac has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) Romac has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0)
    Romac is offline
    Originally Posted by 32gOfNattyPB View Post
    Why not use clen rather than ephedrine. They both hit the same receptors and clen is WAY cheaper and only has to be taken once a day.
    clen is cheaper than ephedrine? ephedrine is 4.99 a bottle, but now that's about double since we have to get it shipped from canuckica

    i'd partake in clen in a heartbeat if i could figure out a reputable place to get it from - that stuff works miracles - maybe alberto contador can hook me up (TDF winner that got pinched for it recently)
    Fatloss thread: http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=311486
    Fatloss post with attached diary: http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showpost.php?p=657290963&postcount=117
    Reply With Quote

  14. #44
    Verified Aesthetic rhadam's Avatar
    Join Date: Mar 2009
    Posts: 43,399
    Rep Power: 400180
    rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000)
    rhadam is offline
    ITT: Things we already know about ephedrine.

    Thanks.
    Psych & handcuffs
    Current reading: Vonnegut, Theodor Adorno
    House, Techno, and 4Runners
    Reply With Quote

  15. #45
    Fulk of peace FunkymonkAW's Avatar
    Join Date: Jan 2009
    Location: United States
    Age: 34
    Posts: 9,017
    Rep Power: 4828
    FunkymonkAW is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) FunkymonkAW is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) FunkymonkAW is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) FunkymonkAW is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) FunkymonkAW is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) FunkymonkAW is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) FunkymonkAW is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) FunkymonkAW is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) FunkymonkAW is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) FunkymonkAW is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) FunkymonkAW is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500)
    FunkymonkAW is offline
    Originally Posted by 32gOfNattyPB View Post
    Why not use clen rather than ephedrine. They both hit the same receptors and clen is WAY cheaper and only has to be taken once a day.
    Clen isn't legal for human consumption, and long term sides are potentially greater.
    PRs - Sq / B / D / Total
    Gym - 425 / 255 / 463 / -
    Meet - 413 / 248 / 463 / 1124 @ 220
    Meet - 391 / 242 / 468 / 1102 @ 181
    Reply With Quote

  16. #46
    Justified Ancient Romac's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2004
    Location: SE States
    Age: 54
    Posts: 1,488
    Rep Power: 245
    Romac has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) Romac has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) Romac has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) Romac has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) Romac has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) Romac has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) Romac has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) Romac has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) Romac has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) Romac has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) Romac has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0)
    Romac is offline
    Originally Posted by rhadam View Post
    ITT: Things we already know about ephedrine.

    Thanks.
    lol sorry man - next time i have a question about anything bb related i'll just send you a pm
    Fatloss thread: http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=311486
    Fatloss post with attached diary: http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showpost.php?p=657290963&postcount=117
    Reply With Quote

  17. #47
    Registered User LightForce's Avatar
    Join Date: Aug 2010
    Age: 35
    Posts: 1,094
    Rep Power: 501
    LightForce has a spectacular aura about. (+250) LightForce has a spectacular aura about. (+250) LightForce has a spectacular aura about. (+250) LightForce has a spectacular aura about. (+250) LightForce has a spectacular aura about. (+250) LightForce has a spectacular aura about. (+250) LightForce has a spectacular aura about. (+250) LightForce has a spectacular aura about. (+250) LightForce has a spectacular aura about. (+250) LightForce has a spectacular aura about. (+250) LightForce has a spectacular aura about. (+250)
    LightForce is offline
    Originally Posted by Romac View Post
    lol sorry man - next time i have a question about anything bb related i'll just send you a pm
    I appreciate you bumping this old thread, i learned something from reading it.

    People will complain whether you bump an old thread or ask a question, so what exactly are the forums for then?

    Q: I thought EphedRA was the one to get not EphedRINE. Am I missing something, I read somewhere EphedrINE isn't as good as EphedRA.
    Reply With Quote

  18. #48
    Verified Aesthetic rhadam's Avatar
    Join Date: Mar 2009
    Posts: 43,399
    Rep Power: 400180
    rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000)
    rhadam is offline
    Originally Posted by Romac View Post
    lol sorry man - next time i have a question about anything bb related i'll just send you a pm
    My post was directed at the original post/study and the forthcoming comments. I didn't see it was from last year, and in no way was i posting @ you.
    Psych & handcuffs
    Current reading: Vonnegut, Theodor Adorno
    House, Techno, and 4Runners
    Reply With Quote

  19. #49
    Fulk of peace FunkymonkAW's Avatar
    Join Date: Jan 2009
    Location: United States
    Age: 34
    Posts: 9,017
    Rep Power: 4828
    FunkymonkAW is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) FunkymonkAW is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) FunkymonkAW is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) FunkymonkAW is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) FunkymonkAW is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) FunkymonkAW is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) FunkymonkAW is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) FunkymonkAW is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) FunkymonkAW is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) FunkymonkAW is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) FunkymonkAW is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500)
    FunkymonkAW is offline
    Originally Posted by LightForce View Post
    I appreciate you bumping this old thread, i learned something from reading it.

    People will complain whether you bump an old thread or ask a question, so what exactly are the forums for then?

    Q: I thought EphedRA was the one to get not EphedRINE. Am I missing something, I read somewhere EphedrINE isn't as good as EphedRA.
    You want ephedrine
    PRs - Sq / B / D / Total
    Gym - 425 / 255 / 463 / -
    Meet - 413 / 248 / 463 / 1124 @ 220
    Meet - 391 / 242 / 468 / 1102 @ 181
    Reply With Quote

  20. #50
    Banned Mr.Cooper69's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2009
    Posts: 20,302
    Rep Power: 0
    Mr.Cooper69 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Mr.Cooper69 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Mr.Cooper69 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Mr.Cooper69 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Mr.Cooper69 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Mr.Cooper69 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Mr.Cooper69 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Mr.Cooper69 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Mr.Cooper69 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Mr.Cooper69 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Mr.Cooper69 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000)
    Mr.Cooper69 is offline
    Don't feel like reading (on phone), can someone please clarify. They say an extra 2 pounds were lost a month when compared to placebo. But one thing is notably missing: did the test subjects track their calories, and were they all eating at the same caloric deficit? Point being I think the extra 2 lbs of fat loss is simply due to appetite suppression, and since most subjects don't track their calories, the results were evident. For serious bodybuilders who track their calories and eat at a set deficit on a cut, I see no such benefit as you will be hitting the same caloric deficit each day, with or without appetite suppression.
    Reply With Quote

  21. #51
    Banned Mr.Cooper69's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2009
    Posts: 20,302
    Rep Power: 0
    Mr.Cooper69 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Mr.Cooper69 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Mr.Cooper69 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Mr.Cooper69 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Mr.Cooper69 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Mr.Cooper69 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Mr.Cooper69 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Mr.Cooper69 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Mr.Cooper69 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Mr.Cooper69 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Mr.Cooper69 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000)
    Mr.Cooper69 is offline
    Originally Posted by shadar View Post
    EC is not muscle sparing, this has been covered before. I do not have the thread it was brought up in but I believe in10city, pinch and nohype have all weighed in on it numerous times.
    Eh? Please find it if you can, you've piqued my interest.
    Reply With Quote

  22. #52
    Verified Aesthetic rhadam's Avatar
    Join Date: Mar 2009
    Posts: 43,399
    Rep Power: 400180
    rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000)
    rhadam is offline
    Originally Posted by Mr.Cooper69 View Post
    Don't feel like reading (on phone), can someone please clarify. They say an extra 2 pounds were lost a month when compared to placebo. But one thing is notably missing: did the test subjects track their calories, and were they all eating at the same caloric deficit? Point being I think the extra 2 lbs of fat loss is simply due to appetite suppression, and since most subjects don't track their calories, the results were evident. For serious bodybuilders who track their calories and eat at a set deficit on a cut, I see no such benefit as you will be hitting the same caloric deficit each day, with or without appetite suppression.
    No need to clarify, you nailed it. Appetite suppression will only have an effect on those that don't track calories.
    Psych & handcuffs
    Current reading: Vonnegut, Theodor Adorno
    House, Techno, and 4Runners
    Reply With Quote

  23. #53
    Banned Mr.Cooper69's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2009
    Posts: 20,302
    Rep Power: 0
    Mr.Cooper69 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Mr.Cooper69 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Mr.Cooper69 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Mr.Cooper69 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Mr.Cooper69 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Mr.Cooper69 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Mr.Cooper69 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Mr.Cooper69 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Mr.Cooper69 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Mr.Cooper69 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Mr.Cooper69 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000)
    Mr.Cooper69 is offline
    Originally Posted by rhadam View Post
    No need to clarify, you nailed it. Appetite suppression will only have an effect on those that don't track calories.
    Yes I understand that, just wondering, in the full study, do they mention anything about maintaining a constant deficit among all subjects? I'm trying to see if the extra 2.2 lbs is from appetite suppression or EC's effects on metabolism and fatloss pathways.
    Reply With Quote

  24. #54
    Verified Aesthetic rhadam's Avatar
    Join Date: Mar 2009
    Posts: 43,399
    Rep Power: 400180
    rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000)
    rhadam is offline
    Originally Posted by Mr.Cooper69 View Post
    Yes I understand that, just wondering, in the full study, do they mention anything about maintaining a constant deficit among all subjects? I'm trying to see if the extra 2.2 lbs is from appetite suppression or EC's effects on metabolism and fatloss pathways.
    Ah, rgr. Here's copy/paste regarding diet.

    2.5. Diet
    Prior to attendance for the study, each participant’s daily energy expenditure within the calorimeter was predicted using an estimate of BMR from the regression equations of Schofield [19] scaled to account for sedentary activity, and with an addition for the cost of programmed exercise. Diets were prescribed to match these individual predictions. Diets were presented as three meals of equal energy content and composition, with 35% of energy as fat, 13% as protein, and 52% as carbohydrate. Decaffeinated drinks were provided ad libitum, but the associated energy was fixed by the provision of a standardised milk allowance and low-energy sweeteners.

    BUT, it also says this at the beginning:

    2.3. Study Design
    Participants attended on two occasions separated by 2 weeks. The days of the study visits are identified as follows: Day 1, Day 1, Day 2, Day 14, and Day 15. Two participants were studied at each visit. Alcohol, caffeine, and strenuous exercise were prohibited 48 hours prior to the first visit and throughout the study.

    Participants arrived fasting at 08:00 on Day 1. Breakfast was given at 09:45 and lunch at 13:30. Following lunch, body composition was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA; GE Lunar Prodigy, GE Healthcare, Madison, WI, USA) and by BOD POD (Life Measurement Inc., Concord, CA). Dinner was served at 19:00. After dinner, participants were fitted with an ActiHeart combined activity and heart rate monitor (CamNtech Ltd., Cambridge, UK). The ActiHeart monitors were worn until the end of the visit. At 20:00, each participant entered a room calorimeter, where he remained until 09:00 on Day 2.


    Which leads me to believe the only times their diets were mandated were the few days they went in to be studied/tested. If i'm reading this right.
    Psych & handcuffs
    Current reading: Vonnegut, Theodor Adorno
    House, Techno, and 4Runners
    Reply With Quote

  25. #55
    Dedicated. xlb57's Avatar
    Join Date: Nov 2004
    Location: Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States
    Age: 40
    Posts: 1,749
    Rep Power: 1448
    xlb57 is just really nice. (+1000) xlb57 is just really nice. (+1000) xlb57 is just really nice. (+1000) xlb57 is just really nice. (+1000) xlb57 is just really nice. (+1000) xlb57 is just really nice. (+1000) xlb57 is just really nice. (+1000) xlb57 is just really nice. (+1000) xlb57 is just really nice. (+1000) xlb57 is just really nice. (+1000) xlb57 is just really nice. (+1000)
    xlb57 is offline
    Originally Posted by Starkk View Post
    Don't mix ephedrine and yohimbine

    Just EC is fine. If you want to add something, Lean Xtreme compliments it quite effectively.
    Agreed. LX + EC = Good things.
    I'm just a man.
    Reply With Quote

  26. #56
    fortes fortuna adiuvat itzDodge's Avatar
    Join Date: Aug 2010
    Age: 32
    Posts: 7,987
    Rep Power: 19278
    itzDodge is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) itzDodge is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) itzDodge is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) itzDodge is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) itzDodge is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) itzDodge is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) itzDodge is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) itzDodge is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) itzDodge is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) itzDodge is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) itzDodge is a splendid one to behold. (+10000)
    itzDodge is offline
    Originally Posted by cjwav34 View Post
    I thought EC was not muscle sparing?
    Originally Posted by Mr.Cooper69 View Post
    Yes I understand that, just wondering, in the full study, do they mention anything about maintaining a constant deficit among all subjects? I'm trying to see if the extra 2.2 lbs is from appetite suppression or EC's effects on metabolism and fatloss pathways.
    From my knowledge a large benefit of EC is it's impact on cAMP, obviously appetite suppression being right up there too. It's boost in calories burned throughout the day would be no more then 100 at best.

    Edit: Although I could be going full retard and confusing something else I heard.
    Last edited by itzDodge; 04-06-2011 at 05:17 PM.
    NSCA CSCS

    Online Coach and Brofessor
    http://www.biggerfastersmarter.com/
    Reply With Quote

  27. #57
    Registered User halberstram's Avatar
    Join Date: Nov 2010
    Posts: 2,692
    Rep Power: 6441
    halberstram is a name known to all. (+5000) halberstram is a name known to all. (+5000) halberstram is a name known to all. (+5000) halberstram is a name known to all. (+5000) halberstram is a name known to all. (+5000) halberstram is a name known to all. (+5000) halberstram is a name known to all. (+5000) halberstram is a name known to all. (+5000) halberstram is a name known to all. (+5000) halberstram is a name known to all. (+5000) halberstram is a name known to all. (+5000)
    halberstram is offline
    I though anything that was beta agonist atomically makes it muscle sparing?
    Reply With Quote

  28. #58
    Repartitioning Nutrients whitesox23's Avatar
    Join Date: Dec 2010
    Age: 30
    Posts: 2,465
    Rep Power: 2217
    whitesox23 is just really nice. (+1000) whitesox23 is just really nice. (+1000) whitesox23 is just really nice. (+1000) whitesox23 is just really nice. (+1000) whitesox23 is just really nice. (+1000) whitesox23 is just really nice. (+1000) whitesox23 is just really nice. (+1000) whitesox23 is just really nice. (+1000) whitesox23 is just really nice. (+1000) whitesox23 is just really nice. (+1000) whitesox23 is just really nice. (+1000)
    whitesox23 is offline
    Originally Posted by halberstram View Post
    I though anything that was beta agonist atomically makes it muscle sparing?
    That makes sense as more % fat burned = less % muscle burned, in the same caloric defecit correct? Also, my above question wasn't answered. EC is NOT muscle sparing? Also, are the only pathways it hits the slight metabolism boost and appatite supression? Sorry if this is an old question...
    X-Factor http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=131209743

    X-Factor Advanced http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?s=22250e76e637b39a81a83250f1d349cf&p=682117991#post682117991

    "Success is never final. Failure never fatal."
    Reply With Quote

  29. #59
    Registered User Nailbomb9's Avatar
    Join Date: Feb 2006
    Location: Reality (Seriously..some people)
    Posts: 4,433
    Rep Power: 2357
    Nailbomb9 is just really nice. (+1000) Nailbomb9 is just really nice. (+1000) Nailbomb9 is just really nice. (+1000) Nailbomb9 is just really nice. (+1000) Nailbomb9 is just really nice. (+1000) Nailbomb9 is just really nice. (+1000) Nailbomb9 is just really nice. (+1000) Nailbomb9 is just really nice. (+1000) Nailbomb9 is just really nice. (+1000) Nailbomb9 is just really nice. (+1000) Nailbomb9 is just really nice. (+1000)
    Nailbomb9 is offline
    Originally Posted by User6763672 View Post
    u guys mad I live in Canada and can get it for $5 at the local supp store

    Where do you think I order mine from?
    Go ahead and wake up, it's a brand new day
    Angel's wings gunna carry you away...
    Reply With Quote

  30. #60
    Registered User Cryptic's Avatar
    Join Date: Apr 2007
    Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    Age: 39
    Posts: 1,874
    Rep Power: 5076
    Cryptic is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Cryptic is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Cryptic is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Cryptic is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Cryptic is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Cryptic is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Cryptic is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Cryptic is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Cryptic is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Cryptic is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Cryptic is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500)
    Cryptic is offline
    most of the ECA crap i see says Ephedra Extract (leaves)


    what brand/lab can I get that isint this?
    Reply With Quote

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-28-2009, 12:31 AM
  2. New study debunks the benefits of 6 meals a day
    By solyntjes in forum Nutrition
    Replies: 55
    Last Post: 05-28-2008, 09:24 AM
  3. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-03-2006, 09:00 PM
  4. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-20-2006, 03:50 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts