Chinese Military General says he will start WW3 if the US attacks Iran

[Ashton117]

**** is getting too real for me

[griepes]

lets do this ****

[cheeezles]

might as well happed when im on the uni break so it won't interupt anything

[40InchVert]

intredasting

[Addthefun123123]

US history: comfortable with nuking asians
Chinese history: we build walls to keep people out

[Ashton117]

US history: comfortable with nuking asians
Chinese history: we build walls to keep people out

they would nuke back

[batmanman]

they would nuke back

can't nuke us if we nuke their nukes

[ne12o]

Please get more articles from the local Anti Communist Party paper.

[Ashton117]

can't nuke us if we nuke their nukes

They have nuclear submarines

[Mephisto91]

If anyone uses a nuke the whole world is f*cked, it's not unique anymore.

[pashtokid]

finally! lets get this chit over with already.

[MarauderBB]

can't nuke us if we nuke their nukes

Is this a joke?
You've been watching too many movies.

If a nuke flies, that's it - you will be dead. You won't be around to live out your mad max fantasy.

[AlwaysAware]

Lol at people who think China doesn't have second strike capabilities. If a single nuke is fired world = ****ed. Let's just hope there aren't any crazies with a top security clearance.

[jakobi]

if the war does happen, they should fight on US soil...

[clamps121]

If anyone uses a nuke the whole world is f*cked, it's not unique anymore.

this, no one would use nukes in ww3, and china would be obliterated. Not only do we have a HUGE technologically advanced army, we have the logistics to go with it. China has neither really. Hell, we could send a few battle groups and some nuclear subs toward china and start killing. The United States is a force to be reckoned with, and no country has even seen 10% of what we can throw at them.

brb sr-71 in the 60s
brb more aircraft carriers than the rest of the world combined
brb 1/2 of all world military expenditure
brb would have europe, australia, canada, isreal which consist of over 75% of world expenditure, while russia, middle east and china have less than 20%.

It wouldn't even be a fair fight. It would be a 6-12 month, mainly air and sea battle that ended in probably millions of casualties for the other side. They know what's what. We do what we want. Don't like it. COME AT US (oh wait, you can't because you can't transport your troops in any meaningful, efficient way)

[Shangius]

Nukes? Jakes on them we already have secret orbital weapons.

[Floridatrainer]

if the war does happen, they should fight on US soil...

Canada would be the first go from invading troops looking to gain a border with the US.

[Scyz]

Imo flatten China and Iran with nukes, genocide ftw?

[iLoLd]

let them try, we will ****ing rape them literally, bend them over and **** their nation like a gaping ass

[ErectBrah]

ib4 we use haarp to send a million tsunamis at them

[Ace Thedics]

I'm of the belief that if nukes are used might as well completely destroy the nation they are used against.

Let's start fresh. Should have listened to Patton and nuked them too.

We help their sh!tty, pussy country during the second World War and they get all crafty now.

[ScatGuzzler]

this, no one would use nukes in ww3, and china would be obliterated. Not only do we have a HUGE technologically advanced army, we have the logistics to go with it. China has neither really. Hell, we could send a few battle groups and some nuclear subs toward china and start killing. The United States is a force to be reckoned with, and no country has even seen 10% of what we can throw at them.

brb sr-71 in the 60s
brb more aircraft carriers than the rest of the world combined
brb 1/2 of all world military expenditure
brb would have europe, australia, canada, isreal which consist of over 75% of world expenditure, while russia, middle east and china have less than 20%.

It wouldn't even be a fair fight. It would be a 6-12 month, mainly air and sea battle that ended in probably millions of casualties for the other side. They know what's what. We do what we want. Don't like it. COME AT US (oh wait, you can't because you can't transport your troops in any meaningful, efficient way)

6-12 months? are you retarded?

[iLoLd]

6-12 months? are you retarded?

we took baghdad in 1 week... dip****

[HelloDurr]

Nuke the whole world already! The world is doomed anyways

[ScatGuzzler]

Canada would be the first go from invading troops looking to gain a border with the US.

yea they'll choose a country with $22.5B in military expenditure over mexico
strong logic/10

we took baghdad in 1 week... dip****

brb comparing baghdad to Russia, China, and Iran
evenstrongerlogic/10

[terzter]

China's rocket soldiers fight for China!

[d0d2200]

lol no way that'd happen. the u.s. is worth more to china than iran is. it's nice to know though that some people in china are taking a strong position on this because it makes it less likely that the u.s. will bother with yet another costly military engagement.

[ThomasBlake]

I've already began digging. I'm like that crazy guy under the house in War of the Worlds.

[xSwiftx]

lol no way that'd happen. the u.s. is worth more to china than iran is. it's nice to know though that some people in china are taking a strong position on this because it makes it less likely that the u.s. will bother with yet another costly military engagement.

I kinda figured it's the other way around. China's a pretty big player when it comes to making the world go round.

InB4 "america is better than everyone" bull****

[AwkwardRetard]

Can they show enough consideration to start WW3 AFTER I get my forth girlfriend and leave her? For f--k's sake.