Tonight his show blatantly tried to undermine the AZ immigration law that SIMPLY requires CRIMINALS to have their citizenship checked.
That should be mandatory NATIONWIDE. Not just in AZ.
Yet the Daily show tried to compare that to the constitutional loving citizens UPSET about Arizonas speed cameras set up on thier highways.
THEY ARE WRONG!! You have the right AS A CITIZEN to be judged by your PEERS....not constantly surveilanced by goddamn ROBOTS mailing you tickets.
PHUCK Jon Stewart and PHUCK the goddamn daily show.
07-08-2010, 11:27 PM #1
It's official...I phucking HATE the Daily Show.
07-08-2010, 11:28 PM #2
07-08-2010, 11:29 PM #3
07-08-2010, 11:32 PM #4
07-08-2010, 11:37 PM #5
- Join Date: Mar 2006
- Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Age: 27
- Posts: 2,414
- Rep Power: 0
07-08-2010, 11:42 PM #6
07-08-2010, 11:44 PM #7
07-08-2010, 11:45 PM #8
07-08-2010, 11:46 PM #9
07-08-2010, 11:47 PM #10
07-08-2010, 11:48 PM #11
Stewart is a socialist. just the other day he compared Obama telling the Nasa head that his main goal should be improving US Muslim relations to Reagan working with the Soviets on space missions. he's a dumb*ss.Incorrecting the record
Baltimore Orioles , Dallas Cowboys, Washington Wizards, Washington Capitals, DC United
Victim of sexual assault
**Stats on request**
07-09-2010, 12:15 AM #12
Tonight he HONESTLY pushed the ideal that we shouldn't crack down on immigration.
He pushed FEDERAL opression over States rights.
And he pushed that we should SUPPORT the govts all seeing eye prying into EVERY aspect of our lives.
He seriously SUPPORTED the unconstitional traffic cameras mailing you tickets.
PHUCK JON STEWART.
07-09-2010, 12:17 AM #13
07-09-2010, 12:17 AM #14
07-09-2010, 12:18 AM #15
07-09-2010, 12:31 AM #16
07-09-2010, 12:32 AM #17
07-09-2010, 12:34 AM #18
07-09-2010, 12:35 AM #19
07-09-2010, 12:37 AM #20
Section 2. Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.
Section 3. No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may, by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
Section 4. The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.
Section 5. The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
What part of that states that you can't check to see if CRIMINALS are legal citizens? What part of that states that you can't expect people DRIVING on our highways to have LEGIT insurance and be LEGIT citizens?
07-09-2010, 12:38 AM #21
07-09-2010, 12:40 AM #22
07-09-2010, 12:43 AM #23
"against all that?
You mean against enforcing border policy and controlling immigration? You're AGAINST that?
You mean against Federal usurpation of civil rights....You're AGAINST that?
Or are you a typical phucking moron that has NO idea wtf he's talking about?
07-09-2010, 12:45 AM #24
07-09-2010, 12:46 AM #25
07-09-2010, 12:47 AM #26
07-09-2010, 12:49 AM #27
- Join Date: Feb 2010
- Location: Arizona, United States
- Age: 24
- Posts: 1,031
- Rep Power: 291
07-09-2010, 12:53 AM #28
07-09-2010, 12:54 AM #29
What if you HAVE to run a red light when NO ONE is coming the other way because you're headed to the hospital?? And the robot mails you a ticket.
What if you're speeding because.....you're going to the hospital.
What if you just plain forgot to use your blinker once.....should you expect the govt to be WATCHING you ALL the phucking time like a hawk just WAITING for you to phuck up so they can steal more of your money?
Will ANY of that actually make you a better citizen??
07-09-2010, 12:59 AM #30
- Join Date: May 2009
- Location: Long Beach, California, United States
- Age: 28
- Posts: 3,695
- Rep Power: 1908
People may think they get their news from there, but Jon Daily always said you guys who watch the show know the news from one place or another. No matter your view, gjdm for knowing what's going on. Either way, I enjoy watching it and Colbert since they hit some good current topics to look into (and don't forget the guests, srs.)Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of Death, I shall fear no evil, because I'm the baddest motherf#*%er in the valley.
Reps for life: Mattw30
Note: The posts by this account do not represent the views of any institution or organization, and in some cases the author himself.
By zxcvnm in forum Misc.Replies: 0Last Post: 03-10-2005, 07:22 PM
By zxcvnm in forum Misc.Replies: 0Last Post: 02-25-2005, 11:13 PM
By (o)./^\.(o) in forum Religion and PoliticsReplies: 8Last Post: 10-07-2004, 11:04 PM
By tiger20 in forum Religion and PoliticsReplies: 1Last Post: 08-19-2004, 06:12 PM
By darkforce in forum Religion and PoliticsReplies: 12Last Post: 08-04-2004, 01:29 PM