Bodybuilding.com Information Motivation Supplementation
in:

    The World’s #1 Bodybuilding And Fitness Forum - Save Up To 50% Off Retail Prices In Our Bodybuilding.com Store!

Reply
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Registered User matt_marozick's Avatar
    Join Date: Jul 2007
    Location: Watertown, Wisconsin, United States
    Age: 23
    Stats: 5'5", 145 lbs
    Posts: 220
    BodyPoints: 1547
    Rep Power: 26
    matt_marozick is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) matt_marozick is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) matt_marozick is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) matt_marozick is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) matt_marozick is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) matt_marozick is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) matt_marozick is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) matt_marozick is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) matt_marozick is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) matt_marozick is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) matt_marozick is a splendid one to behold. (+10000)
    Visit matt_marozick's BodySpace
    matt_marozick is offline

    60-65% heart rate for Burning fat. T or F?

    So there seems to be a pretty consistent(magazines, BB.com articles) idea that 60 to 65% of max heart rate is best for burning fat. true or false?

    second question. Are the treadmills/ ellipticals that read your heart rate accurate? waht is their method? Do they just base it off your age, weight and what speed/incline you're using? If you're much more or less athletic than average, than I would assume this to be less accurate.
    *I rep back*

    tuna
    eggs
    chicken
    whey
    cottage cheese
    Reply With Quote

  2. #2
    Registered User ejthomp's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2009
    Location: Vancouver, Washington, United States
    Age: 51
    Stats: 6'1", 200 lbs
    Posts: 4,414
    Rep Power: 593
    ejthomp has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) ejthomp has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) ejthomp has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) ejthomp has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) ejthomp has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) ejthomp has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) ejthomp has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) ejthomp has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) ejthomp has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) ejthomp has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) ejthomp has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000)
    Visit ejthomp's BodySpace
    ejthomp is offline
    The max heart rate for burning fat is kind of true.... If you plan to do cardio for over an hour and don't want to risk burning muscle, then you may want to keep your heart rate in that range...key word "may"

    The information is abused though. If you are doing cardio at that intensity, you aren't burning many calories so you'd better be giving it an hour and you'd better have your diet under control or you're likely to be going backwards.

    Many would argue that you are better off giving your cardio an all-out effort for 15 minutes. You'll burn just as many calories in 1/4 the time and have a greater impact on your metabolism. If you keep the all-out effort short, you wont' burn muscle.

    But for many people giving 100% effort for 15 minutes is more difficult than giving an hour of low intensity.

    Are the heart rate monitors on the treadmills accurate? Generally..yes..they tell you your heart rate when they work. Buy yourself a chest strap monitor and use that. It is much better. The calorie counters are bogus though..... Don't trust them at all. And you're right..they make a lot of assumptions in regards to your individual condition so the odds are that they are way off.

    Also, the heart rate zone they give is an approximation and usually very conservative as they don't want to be accused of pushing some fat slob into cardiac arrest. The only way to find out your maximum heart rate is to do a maximum heart rate test...... Do the 100% all-out cardio effort for 15 minutes and take your pulse just as you finish. If you push yourself hard.... you should be approaching YOUR max heart rate. Then base your exercise exertion level off that.
    Reply With Quote

  3. #3
    Registered User jay24k's Avatar
    Join Date: May 2008
    Location: Florida, United States
    Age: 37
    Stats: 6'2", 200 lbs
    Posts: 2,492
    Rep Power: 2267
    jay24k has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) jay24k has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) jay24k has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) jay24k has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) jay24k has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) jay24k has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) jay24k has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) jay24k has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) jay24k has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) jay24k has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) jay24k has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000)
    Visit jay24k's BodySpace
    jay24k is offline
    They read your heart rate when you grab the handles by testing the electrical impulses. I would say most are accurate. You can always buy a watch to do it or just test it yourself over 10 seconds.

    As far as burning fat, there are many different views out there. I tend to just bust my butt doing it for no more then 30 min and see results.
    I Rep back always. Put it in comment.

    500+ will 100% get repped back.

    Life Progress
    ___________

    Started: 279lb 43% body fat
    1st Cut: 191lb 16% body fat
    1st Bulk: 231lb 26% body fat
    2010 Summer Cut: 193 10% body fat
    Bulking Currently 202 13% body fat.
    Reply With Quote

  4. #4
    Registered User matt_marozick's Avatar
    Join Date: Jul 2007
    Location: Watertown, Wisconsin, United States
    Age: 23
    Stats: 5'5", 145 lbs
    Posts: 220
    BodyPoints: 1547
    Rep Power: 26
    matt_marozick is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) matt_marozick is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) matt_marozick is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) matt_marozick is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) matt_marozick is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) matt_marozick is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) matt_marozick is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) matt_marozick is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) matt_marozick is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) matt_marozick is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) matt_marozick is a splendid one to behold. (+10000)
    Visit matt_marozick's BodySpace
    matt_marozick is offline

    Thumbs up

    Originally Posted by ejthomp View Post
    The max heart rate for burning fat is kind of true.... If you plan to do cardio for over an hour and don't want to risk burning muscle, then you may want to keep your heart rate in that range...key word "may"

    The information is abused though. If you are doing cardio at that intensity, you aren't burning many calories so you'd better be giving it an hour and you'd better have your diet under control or you're likely to be going backwards.

    Many would argue that you are better off giving your cardio an all-out effort for 15 minutes. You'll burn just as many calories in 1/4 the time and have a greater impact on your metabolism. If you keep the all-out effort short, you wont' burn muscle.

    But for many people giving 100% effort for 15 minutes is more difficult than giving an hour of low intensity.

    Are the heart rate monitors on the treadmills accurate? Generally..yes..they tell you your heart rate when they work. Buy yourself a chest strap monitor and use that. It is much better. The calorie counters are bogus though..... Don't trust them at all. And you're right..they make a lot of assumptions in regards to your individual condition so the odds are that they are way off.

    Also, the heart rate zone they give is an approximation and usually very conservative as they don't want to be accused of pushing some fat slob into cardiac arrest. The only way to find out your maximum heart rate is to do a maximum heart rate test...... Do the 100% all-out cardio effort for 15 minutes and take your pulse just as you finish. If you push yourself hard.... you should be approaching YOUR max heart rate. Then base your exercise exertion level off that.
    Thanks bro. I think ill stick to some HIIT 2 times a week and 2 slow cardio a week. (cardio is done 4 times a week in my workout) this way I wont be bias and get the benefits of both hopefully.
    *I rep back*

    tuna
    eggs
    chicken
    whey
    cottage cheese
    Reply With Quote

  5. #5
    Registered User scoresman's Avatar
    Join Date: Dec 2008
    Age: 40
    Posts: 68
    Rep Power: 6
    scoresman will become famous soon enough. (+50) scoresman will become famous soon enough. (+50)
    scoresman is offline
    Think of it like this..... There is no way you will be able to do cardio for 1 hour at 90+ MHR so in a sense the fat burning zone is true. 60-80% is the sweet spot for doing cardio over 30 minutes and getting the most bang for your buck (far as fat burning goes).
    Reply With Quote

  6. #6
    Registered User xAlphax's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2009
    Posts: 655
    Rep Power: 0
    xAlphax is the lowest scum of the boards. (Worst Rank) xAlphax is the lowest scum of the boards. (Worst Rank) xAlphax is the lowest scum of the boards. (Worst Rank) xAlphax is the lowest scum of the boards. (Worst Rank) xAlphax is the lowest scum of the boards. (Worst Rank) xAlphax is the lowest scum of the boards. (Worst Rank) xAlphax is the lowest scum of the boards. (Worst Rank) xAlphax is the lowest scum of the boards. (Worst Rank) xAlphax is the lowest scum of the boards. (Worst Rank) xAlphax is the lowest scum of the boards. (Worst Rank) xAlphax is the lowest scum of the boards. (Worst Rank)
    Visit xAlphax's BodySpace
    xAlphax is offline
    The 60%+/- 10 looks like a good starting point if your goal is fat loss (adjust accordingly to your results/preference), as for the truth to the fat burning zones, I'll put these two up as an ex. and you make of it what it's worth.

    http://www.ajcn.org/cgi/content/full/72/2/558S

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anaerobic_threshold

    Yeah the wiki seems simple but that's not the point here.
    http://img36.imageshack.us/img36/5223/1279510613512.jpg
    Reply With Quote

Reply

Similar Threads

  1. 60-65% heart rate for Burning fat. T or F?
    By jbannach in forum Losing Fat
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-03-2008, 12:40 PM
  2. optimum heart rate for burning fat??
    By warbird00 in forum Workout Programs
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 07-27-2006, 08:14 PM
  3. Target heart rate for burning fat....
    By shan1784 in forum Losing Fat
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 03-17-2006, 10:47 AM
  4. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-04-2003, 02:25 PM
  5. Target heart rate and burning fat???
    By Tiggis in forum Losing Fat
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-26-2003, 07:59 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Home Store Products Careers Help Contact Us Terms of Use Checkout