http://www.bodybuilding.com/store/san/tri.html
$17.00 for 60 capsules? Why so expensive?
Optimum has a similar product priced at $12.00 for 200 capsules.
http://www.bodybuilding.com/store/opt/fish.html
What's so special about SAN's fish oil? Does the "Highly Concentrated Nordic Fish Oil" really justify the price?
Just curious....
|
-
04-03-2010, 04:41 PM #1
Why is SAN Fish Fats so expensive?
-
04-03-2010, 04:48 PM #2
- Join Date: Aug 2008
- Location: Newport, Kentucky, United States
- Posts: 2,271
- Rep Power: 5196
Did you actually look at the labels? The products are not similar at all. Its called triple strength fish fats because one pill contains 3 times the omega 3s as a normal fish oil pill (ie the optimum). One SAN TSFF has 580.5 mg of EPA and 297 mg of DHA. The ON has a combined 300 mg of EPA/DHA. Both good products, some people just want alot more than 300 mgs of EPA/DHA a day. I prefer using 2 triple str a day as opposed to 6 regular. But the ON ones have an enteric coating while the SAN ones dont. You shouldnt get any burps from the ON. Hopefully this helps.
-
04-03-2010, 04:57 PM #3
What I gathered from your post is that you need 6 ON Fish Oil capsules to ingest the equivalent amount of fish oil and EPA/DHA that 2 SAN Fish Oil capsules will give you. Did I get that right?
In that case, ON is still cheaper basically, right? If you take 6 ON Fish Oil capsules for 30 days that will amount to 180 capsules per month and you will still have some left over, all this for $12/month. On the other hand, you would need to take two capsules of SAN Fish Fats per day for a month, equating to $17/month.
It's still over priced, wouldn't you say? Or am I missing something? It still seems expensive, are they charging for convenience?Last edited by sam_swift; 04-03-2010 at 05:03 PM.
-
04-03-2010, 05:04 PM #4
-
-
04-03-2010, 05:05 PM #5
-
04-03-2010, 05:06 PM #6
-
04-03-2010, 05:08 PM #7
-
04-03-2010, 05:08 PM #8
-
-
04-03-2010, 05:10 PM #9
- Join Date: Jul 2009
- Location: Daytona Beach, Florida, United States
- Age: 42
- Posts: 13,532
- Rep Power: 15433
So you only have to take 2 a day instead of 6.
Though honestly I would get the ON in this case since they are enteric coated.
Check out NOW Ultra Omega, NOW Super EPA, CL's Oximega Fish Oil.
Heck, if you just want super cheap fish oil you can find 1000 fish oil caps for $20 if you look hard enough.
I personally find the best deal at warehouse clubs. $13 for 150 1.2g gels with 684 combined EPA/DHA.Latest Reviews:
My huge list of informative links: http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=132306613
Xtreme Formulations UP2 Multi-Flavor Review!
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=129562583
-
04-03-2010, 05:11 PM #10
-
04-03-2010, 05:18 PM #11
Technically, it was true.
SDA = Stearidonic Acid.
"Results: Dietary SDA increased EPA and docosapentaenoic acid concentrations but not DHA concentrations in erythrocyte and in plasma phospholipids. The relative effectiveness of the tested dietary fatty acids in increasing tissue EPA was 1:0.3:0.07 for EPA:SDA:ALA."
So put it this way. By ingesting SDA, you actually end up converting it to EPA. I don't know of any impact to DHA levels. ALA by contrast, is about 1/4 as effective (a 1:.07 conversion like that is pretty bad). The net result is the EPA content of SAN's product raises a bit.
I find SDA cool, because it can be sourced from plants - it does not have to come from fish. In terms of a sustainable future, I doubt that fish oil is going to be the way to go. Stearidonic acid, or similar, may help shoulder some of the demand for omega-3 products.
In the end, SAN's product does cost more, and there's no way around it. If you go by price per gram, ON is the more cost-effective product. SAN's is more convenient, as you have less pills to take (that's one of the reasons I use it - the other one being I'm a fanboy, having worked for them for 2.5 years) - but honestly, it's really just that. It's more convenient, and I like the people at SAN far more than any experience I've had with the ON employees (personal preference).I remember being relevant.
-
04-03-2010, 05:26 PM #12
- Join Date: Sep 2007
- Location: New Jersey, United States
- Age: 40
- Posts: 23,220
- Rep Power: 46677
think of it this way. why would you want to ingest more fat than you really have to? if you get 300mg of epa/dha, that's 700mg that doesn't do anything. you need at least 1.5g of combined epa/dha for it to even be worth it to take omega-3s.
not to mention there are much cheaper fish oils than ON if you don't care about that sort of thing.MISC STRENGTH CREW
Rugby training log
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=125605233
World Rugby S&C Level 1 coach.
-
-
04-03-2010, 05:29 PM #13
-
04-03-2010, 05:30 PM #14
-
04-03-2010, 05:40 PM #15
-
04-03-2010, 05:42 PM #16
-
-
04-03-2010, 05:53 PM #17
-
04-03-2010, 06:11 PM #18
-
04-03-2010, 06:24 PM #19
sans triple fats and CL orange oximega fish oil are the best two on the market imo, both are solid choices and high potency
Specials & insider info
https://www.********.com/controlledlabs
www.bodybuilding.com/store/clabs/clabs.htm
FREE CL stuff for your labels
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=6654831
-
04-03-2010, 07:04 PM #20
-
-
04-04-2010, 04:58 AM #21
-
04-04-2010, 05:26 AM #22
glad to hear it: PCB test also complete, only company on bb.com that I am aware of to publish this:
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showpo...&postcount=203Specials & insider info
https://www.********.com/controlledlabs
www.bodybuilding.com/store/clabs/clabs.htm
FREE CL stuff for your labels
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=6654831
Similar Threads
-
San Fish Fats
By simpledude in forum SupplementsReplies: 7Last Post: 02-14-2008, 10:59 PM -
SAN Triple Fish Fats?
By kingpin8399 in forum SupplementsReplies: 16Last Post: 06-13-2006, 12:35 PM -
San Fish Fats
By mike929 in forum SupplementsReplies: 8Last Post: 05-04-2005, 10:00 PM -
Has anyone tried SAN's Fish Fats?
By aceman0920 in forum SupplementsReplies: 1Last Post: 05-04-2005, 06:26 AM -
Why is SAN Bolt so expensive?!
By Beachbum1546 in forum SupplementsReplies: 13Last Post: 06-29-2004, 03:54 PM
Bookmarks