-
03-06-2012, 11:21 PM
#2131
Registered User
Can someone tell me if I did this properly? I'm trying to figure out just BMR right now.
Body Fat: 26%
Total Weight = 170 lbs = 77.1107029 kg
KATCH MCARDLE EQUATION
BMR = 370 + (21.6 x LBM)Where LBM = [total weight (kg) x (100 - bodyfat %)]/100
BMR = 370 + (21.6 x [(77.1107029 kg x (100- 26%)] / 100
370 + (21.6 x [(77.1107029 kg x (74%)] / 100
370 + (21.6 x [(5706.1920146) / 100
370 + (21.6 x [(5706.1920146 / 100)
370 + (21.6 x [(57.061920146)
370 + 1232.54
= 1602.54
1602.54 x 1.7 = 2723.4 BMR
2723.4 - 20% = 2178.72? TO LOSE WEIGHT 2178 CALS?
Someone mind telling me if I did this properly? If not, someone please show me where I went wrong =P.
-
03-07-2012, 08:53 AM
#2132
Registered User
Originally Posted by Yeti06
I have tried to get my macro's to see where I am at and if im doing it right, these are the numbers I came up with:
height 6'6"
weight 255lbs
~30% bf
BMR 3200
protein 172g
fat 190g
carbs 162g
My current daily intake looks like this
2000cal
200g protein
150g fat
85g carbs
any recommendations? if you don't want to clutter the thread a PM would work
thanks!
Your macros add up to 2,490 calories, not 2,000
Here are my calculations and recommendations:
BMR 255/2.2*21.6*.70+370 = 2,123
It looks like you confused BMR with TDEE because when I divide 3,200 by 2,123 I get about 1.50 so I think you used an activity factor of 1.50.
In that case 3,200 is your TDEE (maintenance calories).
Looks like you're cutting. It is generally recommended not to go below a 20% deficit, which would put your target calories at 2,560. If you want to go slightly lower that's probably OK, but you risk losing more muscle. In other words, as your caloric deficit is greater, the ratio of fat:muscle lost decreases.
I'd go with 2,500 calories. Macros above look fine for 2,500 calories. You could decrease fat about 35 grams if you wish, while increasing protein or carbs. But that's not necessary. If some days you want more carbs, you could decrease fat on those days only if you choose.
-
03-07-2012, 08:54 AM
#2133
Registered User
Originally Posted by Mudbert
Can someone tell me if I did this properly? I'm trying to figure out just BMR right now.
Body Fat: 26%
Total Weight = 170 lbs = 77.1107029 kg
KATCH MCARDLE EQUATION
BMR = 370 + (21.6 x LBM)Where LBM = [total weight (kg) x (100 - bodyfat %)]/100
BMR = 370 + (21.6 x [(77.1107029 kg x (100- 26%)] / 100
370 + (21.6 x [(77.1107029 kg x (74%)] / 100
370 + (21.6 x [(5706.1920146) / 100
370 + (21.6 x [(5706.1920146 / 100)
370 + (21.6 x [(57.061920146)
370 + 1232.54
= 1602.54
1602.54 x 1.7 = 2723.4 BMR
2723.4 - 20% = 2178.72? TO LOSE WEIGHT 2178 CALS?
Someone mind telling me if I did this properly? If not, someone please show me where I went wrong =P.
Looks right except that your 2,723 number is your TDEE (maintenance calories), not BMR.
-
03-07-2012, 12:19 PM
#2134
Registered User
Am I doing this right?
TEE = 2600 cals
LBM = 135lbs
Protein = 135g (1g/pound)
Fats = 78g (.5g/pound)
Carbs = 335g ( (135 x 4) + (78 x 9) / 4)
So then if I want to start a Bulk (+500) phase I'd go to 3100 cals. But this is where I am most confused as to where these extra 500 cals should go.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks
-
03-07-2012, 12:23 PM
#2135
Registered User
^ Carbs would be 340
(2600 - 135*4 - 78*9)/4
But 340 is not necessary. Hit your protein and fat minimums, then fill your remaining calories with any combination of carbs, protein, and fat that you desire, while ensuring micronutrient sufficiency.
-
03-07-2012, 12:33 PM
#2136
Registered User
Originally Posted by FitnessCPA
^ Carbs would be 340
(2600 - 135*4 - 78*9)/4
But 340 is not necessary. Hit your protein and fat minimums, then fill your remaining calories with any combination of carbs, protein, and fat that you desire, while ensuring micronutrient sufficiency.
Thanks.
So my Bulk phase may look like this?
Protein = 160g
Fat = 85g
Carbs = 424g
So this all equals 3101cals.
It just seems like a lot of carbs to me and I want make sure I'm doing this correctly before I start eating this much on workout days.
-
03-07-2012, 01:08 PM
#2137
Registered User
Originally Posted by Flow04
Thanks.
So my Bulk phase may look like this?
Protein = 160g
Fat = 85g
Carbs = 424g
So this all equals 3101cals.
It just seems like a lot of carbs to me and I want make sure I'm doing this correctly before I start eating this much on workout days.
Certainly nothing wrong with that at all.
-
03-08-2012, 08:39 AM
#2138
Registered User
What's the deal with people calculating different macros based on workout/rest days? I don't remember reading that anywhere in the stickies, so what gives? Did I miss something?
*Misc Wetshaving Crew*
*Misc Wristwatch Crew*
Starting Strength after 10+ years away from lifting
All-time PRs at <169 lbs
Bench - 335 x 1
C&J - 325 x 1
Dead - 565 x 1
-
03-08-2012, 10:50 AM
#2139
Not Swimming.
Originally Posted by flvinny521
What's the deal with people calculating different macros based on workout/rest days? I don't remember reading that anywhere in the stickies, so what gives? Did I miss something?
A lot of people 'cycle' their calories based on work / rest days. A lot of people don't.
It depends on how you want to do things, and what you feel comfortable with.
You don't HAVE to - and, indeed, the body is actually still recovering from your workout for the 24-36 hrs after you train anyway.... So in a way there really is no point in doing so (sure, you have a jacked up response in the first 4-16 hrs, and then it tapers off, but there is still SOME recovery going on the day after you train too).
*perfer et obdura; dolor hic tibi proderit olim*
"The greatest rewards are always reserved for those who bring great value to themselves and the world around them as a result of whom and what they have become." - Jim Rohn
It's your call. DRIV.... E.
Reps for protein powder, puppies, or anyone who buys me a house.
-
03-08-2012, 10:57 AM
#2140
Not Swimming.
Originally Posted by Flow04
Am I doing this right?
TEE = 2600 cals
LBM = 135lbs
Protein = 135g (1g/pound)
Fats = 78g (.5g/pound)
Carbs = 335g ( (135 x 4) + (78 x 9) / 4)
So then if I want to start a Bulk (+500) phase I'd go to 3100 cals. But this is where I am most confused as to where these extra 500 cals should go.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks
Firstly - at your baseline I'd probably jack the protein up a bit more. [1g / pound total weight]
Secondly - I'd probably not have gone with the simple '+500 cals' thing - although it works for you know as +500 cals is roughly 15% for you -- it doesn't always work that way.
Thirdly - macro's are usually added to carbs/ fats when bulking... But you can add protein too (it is just less efficient). Personally I'd go for something like -
160g protein at the minimum - and you'll probably find you go over this easily. Up toward 200g would be fine.
80g fat ish....
That leaves you with around 400g carb....
*perfer et obdura; dolor hic tibi proderit olim*
"The greatest rewards are always reserved for those who bring great value to themselves and the world around them as a result of whom and what they have become." - Jim Rohn
It's your call. DRIV.... E.
Reps for protein powder, puppies, or anyone who buys me a house.
-
03-08-2012, 02:05 PM
#2141
Registered User
Originally Posted by Emma-Leigh
A lot of people 'cycle' their calories based on work / rest days. A lot of people don't.
It depends on how you want to do things, and what you feel comfortable with.
You don't HAVE to - and, indeed, the body is actually still recovering from your workout for the 24-36 hrs after you train anyway.... So in a way there really is no point in doing so (sure, you have a jacked up response in the first 4-16 hrs, and then it tapers off, but there is still SOME recovery going on the day after you train too).
So is there a "real" purpose to carb cycling? Martin recommends it for Leangains, which I follow. My goal is to achieve 6-7% bf, from my current 12%. Should I be worried about it?
-
03-08-2012, 03:28 PM
#2142
Inspired by Shades
Originally Posted by matt27gd
So is there a "real" purpose to carb cycling? Martin recommends it for Leangains, which I follow. My goal is to achieve 6-7% bf, from my current 12%. Should I be worried about it?
no
at 16 you could end up burning more due to lifestyle regardless of WO schedule on a day to day basis
Founder of MMDELAD
"Micros Matter Dont Eat Like A Dumba**" (hydrogenated oils, shortening, mono and di-glycerides don't fit in my macros)
Forever grateful to: emma-leigh, markVI, scooter
and inspired by: Riaden
"Think in terms of limits and the result is limitation
Think in terms of progress and the result is progression"
Check out my articles :
http://shreddedrevolution.com/carb-loading-cycling/
-
03-08-2012, 11:14 PM
#2143
Equity & Options
i am so confused with all of this. can someone give me an example of how to calculate everything? say a guy who is 175 pounds with around 16% bodyfat.
Age 28
BJJ : blue belt (RGA)
judo/wrestling: yellow
boxing: RGA
2012 spy ~13.5%, me ~4%
2011: spy ~1% , me ~43%
http://twitter.com/#!/nirzhark
follow me. i will post all my stock/option trades there in real time.
Ron Paul 2012
-
03-08-2012, 11:25 PM
#2144
Inspired by Shades
Originally Posted by NiR
i am so confused with all of this. can someone give me an example of how to calculate everything? say a guy who is 175 pounds with around 16% bodyfat.
get at least 175g protein, 80g fat
for calories, figure out how much you have been eating to maintain weight
add 10-15% to gain and the opposite to lose
Founder of MMDELAD
"Micros Matter Dont Eat Like A Dumba**" (hydrogenated oils, shortening, mono and di-glycerides don't fit in my macros)
Forever grateful to: emma-leigh, markVI, scooter
and inspired by: Riaden
"Think in terms of limits and the result is limitation
Think in terms of progress and the result is progression"
Check out my articles :
http://shreddedrevolution.com/carb-loading-cycling/
-
03-10-2012, 09:47 PM
#2145
Registered User
Hey guys, so I think I have this right. Would someone quickly skim over my calculations and advise/suggest anything if needed or pickup on anything I have done incorrectly. Cheers!
370 + (21.6 x 64.47kg) x (100 - 10%)]/100
370 + 1392.552 x 90 /100
BMR = 1623.29
TEF = 15% of 1623.29
= 243.49
TEE
1623.29 x 1.5 + (TEF of 243.49)
2434.93 + 243.49
= 2678.42
Mass gain add 15% ontop of TEE
2678.425 x 15 / 100
= 401.76
Total calories in order to gain weight = TEE of 2678.42 + 401.76
= 3080.18
Macronutrients
Protein = LBM of 141.85lb x 1.5 = 212.77g
Fat = LBM of 64.47kg x 1.2 = 77.36g
Carbs =
(212.77g x 4) + (77.36 x 9) = 851.08 + 696.24 = 1547.32
1547.32 / 4 = 386.83g
-
03-10-2012, 09:56 PM
#2146
Inspired by Shades
Originally Posted by pudgey01
pickup on anything I have done incorrectly
nope
adjust cals based on progress
Founder of MMDELAD
"Micros Matter Dont Eat Like A Dumba**" (hydrogenated oils, shortening, mono and di-glycerides don't fit in my macros)
Forever grateful to: emma-leigh, markVI, scooter
and inspired by: Riaden
"Think in terms of limits and the result is limitation
Think in terms of progress and the result is progression"
Check out my articles :
http://shreddedrevolution.com/carb-loading-cycling/
-
03-11-2012, 04:45 AM
#2147
Registered User
Originally Posted by determined4000
nope
adjust cals based on progress
Cheers dude! repped!
-
03-11-2012, 10:52 AM
#2148
Not Swimming.
Originally Posted by pudgey01
Hey guys, so I think I have this right. Would someone quickly skim over my calculations and advise/suggest anything if needed or pickup on anything I have done incorrectly. Cheers!
370 + (21.6 x 64.47kg) x (100 - 10%)]/100
370 + 1392.552 x 90 /100
BMR = 1623.29
TEF = 15% of 1623.29
= 243.49
TEE
1623.29 x 1.5 + (TEF of 243.49)
2434.93 + 243.49
= 2678.42
Mass gain add 15% ontop of TEE
2678.425 x 15 / 100
= 401.76
Total calories in order to gain weight = TEE of 2678.42 + 401.76
= 3080.18
Macronutrients
Protein = LBM of 141.85lb x 1.5 = 212.77g
Fat = LBM of 64.47kg x 1.2 = 77.36g
Carbs =
(212.77g x 4) + (77.36 x 9) = 851.08 + 696.24 = 1547.32
1547.32 / 4 = 386.83g
Originally Posted by determined4000
nope
adjust cals based on progress
Except for the fact that you:
1/ don't look like you're 10% in your pics
2/ are not meant to add in a TEF (this is 'factored' in to your lifestyle adjustment already).
3/ and we have no idea if that lifestyle adjustment is adequate for you.
*perfer et obdura; dolor hic tibi proderit olim*
"The greatest rewards are always reserved for those who bring great value to themselves and the world around them as a result of whom and what they have become." - Jim Rohn
It's your call. DRIV.... E.
Reps for protein powder, puppies, or anyone who buys me a house.
-
03-11-2012, 11:48 AM
#2149
Registered User
(If you rep me, I rep you back)
Bulk to 165lbs [X]
Cut to 10% [ ]
Bench 150kg[ ]
-
03-11-2012, 12:43 PM
#2150
Registered User
Hows this look people, im pretty rubbish when it comes too math, a bit of background info, Male - 5ft10in - 5ft11. BF Of 15% And Weight Of 154lbs (69.85KG).......
370 + (21.6 x 69.8kg) x (100 - 15%)]/100
370 + 1507.68 x 85 /100
BMR = 1596.28
TEF = 15% of 1623.29= 239.42
TEE = 1596.28 x 1.5 + (TEF of 239.42) ------ 2633.84
1596.28 + 239.42
= 1835.7
Mass gain add 15% on top of TEE
2633.84 x 15 / 100
= 395.7
Total calories in order to gain weight = TEE of 2633.84 + 395.7
= 3029.54
Mass Loss minus 15% From TEE
2633.84 x 30 / 100 = 780
Total Calorie Defict = 2633.84 – 780
= 1853 (Give or take a few)
Macronutrients
Protein = LBM of 154lb x 1.5 = 231g
Fat = LBM of 69.85kg x 1.2 = 83.82g
Carbs = (protein of 231g x 4) + ( Fat of 83.82 x 9) = 924 + 754.38 = 1678.38
1678.38 / 4 = 419.59g
(If you rep me, I rep you back)
Bulk to 165lbs [X]
Cut to 10% [ ]
Bench 150kg[ ]
-
03-11-2012, 10:43 PM
#2151
Registered User
Ok I have a question about trying to calculate my macros. I'm 5'8'' 173lbs 18.5% body fat. I'm trying to cut my body fat % down while putting on some lean muscle mass. Should I calculate my caloric intake and macros for weight loss(fat loss) or gaining mass?
-
03-11-2012, 10:49 PM
#2152
Inspired by Shades
Originally Posted by RSerda7
Ok I have a question about trying to calculate my macros. I'm 5'8'' 173lbs 18.5% body fat. I'm trying to cut my body fat % down while putting on some lean muscle mass. Should I calculate my caloric intake and macros for weight loss(fat loss) or gaining mass?
you cant put on mass and cut bf at the same time
Pick one of the other
Personally I would suggest cutting if you are already at 18.5%bf
Founder of MMDELAD
"Micros Matter Dont Eat Like A Dumba**" (hydrogenated oils, shortening, mono and di-glycerides don't fit in my macros)
Forever grateful to: emma-leigh, markVI, scooter
and inspired by: Riaden
"Think in terms of limits and the result is limitation
Think in terms of progress and the result is progression"
Check out my articles :
http://shreddedrevolution.com/carb-loading-cycling/
-
03-11-2012, 10:57 PM
#2153
Registered User
Originally Posted by determined4000
you cant put on mass and cut bf at the same time
Pick one of the other
Personally I would suggest cutting if you are already at 18.5%bf
Thanks! Should I cycle between cutting and bulking? I'd still like to add more size but keep my bf% relatively low.
-
03-11-2012, 11:04 PM
#2154
Registered User
Originally Posted by Emma-Leigh
MEN: BMR = [9.99 x weight (kg)] + [6.25 x height (cm)] - [4.92 x age (years)] + 5
Quick question on this equation. What is the order of operations here? I mean, is it just adding the terms straight from left to right? Or do we have to first add the weight term with the height term with the age term, THEN add 5 to that number? Or does the order of addition not matter here? Thanks!
-
03-11-2012, 11:26 PM
#2155
Inspired by Shades
Originally Posted by mathzero
Quick question on this equation. What is the order of operations here? I mean, is it just adding the terms straight from left to right? Or do we have to first add the weight term with the height term with the age term, THEN add 5 to that number? Or does the order of addition not matter here? Thanks!
calculate the values of each of the three bracketed terms
then add/subtract those 3 figures and add 5
Founder of MMDELAD
"Micros Matter Dont Eat Like A Dumba**" (hydrogenated oils, shortening, mono and di-glycerides don't fit in my macros)
Forever grateful to: emma-leigh, markVI, scooter
and inspired by: Riaden
"Think in terms of limits and the result is limitation
Think in terms of progress and the result is progression"
Check out my articles :
http://shreddedrevolution.com/carb-loading-cycling/
-
03-12-2012, 04:19 AM
#2156
Registered User
I have a question about the calories intake in training days and non-training days.
I have 180lbs, 5´9", with 15/16%bf.
I made the equations to calculate my calories needs, and i´m eating around 3600kcal in training days and around 3200/3300kcal in non-training days.
But i still have problems to gain weight.
So my question is, if calories intake should be the same in training days and in non-training days, or if in non training days, i should continues to eating less calories.
-
03-12-2012, 10:37 PM
#2157
Registered User
I am 157 lbs (71.4 kg)
15% bodyfat
Am having trouble with the the equation
BMR = 370 + (21.6 x LBM)Where LBM = [71.4 (kg) x (100 -.15)]/100
Totaling 1909.864?
times 1.5?
is 2864.7
This seems too high.
-
03-12-2012, 11:01 PM
#2158
Inspired by Shades
Originally Posted by f33db4ck
I am 157 lbs (71.4 kg)
15% bodyfat
Am having trouble with the the equation
BMR = 370 + (21.6 x LBM)Where LBM = [71.4 (kg) x (100 -.15)]/100
Totaling 1909.864?
times 1.5?
is 2864.7
This seems too high.
Maybe your activity isnt enough to dictate a 1.5 multiplier
Founder of MMDELAD
"Micros Matter Dont Eat Like A Dumba**" (hydrogenated oils, shortening, mono and di-glycerides don't fit in my macros)
Forever grateful to: emma-leigh, markVI, scooter
and inspired by: Riaden
"Think in terms of limits and the result is limitation
Think in terms of progress and the result is progression"
Check out my articles :
http://shreddedrevolution.com/carb-loading-cycling/
-
03-12-2012, 11:38 PM
#2159
Registered User
Originally Posted by Emma-Leigh
Except for the fact that you:
1/ don't look like you're 10% in your pics
2/ are not meant to add in a TEF (this is 'factored' in to your lifestyle adjustment already).
3/ and we have no idea if that lifestyle adjustment is adequate for you.

Thanks for the insight. I agree I dont think im 10%, I cant get an accurate reading with my caliper and I also posted in the "Fat% Estimation" thread and im getting no bites ... What % would you personaly think I was from my images?
Woops, I'll go back and take away that TEF silly me.
Before I started eating this much I was hanging around 157-158lb... im assuming I found maintenance???
-
03-12-2012, 11:47 PM
#2160
Registered User
Originally Posted by f33db4ck
I am 157 lbs (71.4 kg)
15% bodyfat
Am having trouble with the the equation
BMR = 370 + (21.6 x LBM)Where LBM = [71.4 (kg) x (100 -.15)]/100
Totaling 1909.864?
times 1.5?
is 2864.7
This seems too high.
I think your math is incorrect, Im getting this.
BMR = 370 + (21.6 x 71.4 (kg) x (100 -15)]/100
370 + (1542.24 x 85)/100
1680.904 x 1.5
= 2521.356
Correct me if im wrong?
Similar Threads
-
By Emma-Leigh in forum Nutrition and Supplements
Replies: 535
Last Post: 06-17-2013, 04:37 PM
-
By dthanfitness in forum Nutrition
Replies: 101
Last Post: 02-14-2013, 08:36 PM
-
By Mtguy8787 in forum Nutrition
Replies: 17
Last Post: 11-17-2012, 07:53 PM
-
By mattbru in forum Losing Fat
Replies: 2
Last Post: 09-13-2011, 03:30 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules
|
Bookmarks