Grab some whiskey before you read the health care legislation

[ElMariachi]

....

The King James version of the Bible runs more than 600 pages and is crammed with celestial regulations. Newton's Principia Mathematica distilled many of the rules of physics in a mere 974 pages.

Neither have anything on Nancy Pelosi's new fiendishly entertaining health-care opus, which tops 1,900 pages.



So curl up by a fire with a fifth of whiskey and just dive in.

But drink quickly. In the new world, your insurance choices will be tethered to decisions made by people with Orwellian titles ("1984" was only 268 pages!) like the "Health Choices Commissioner" or "Inspector General for the Health Choices Administration."

You will, of course, need to be plastered to buy Pelosi's fantastical proposition that 450,000 words of new regulations, rules, mandates, penalties, price controls, taxes and bureaucracy will have the transformative power to "provide affordable, quality health care for all Americans and reduce the growth in health care spending . . . ."

It's going to take some time to deconstruct this lengthy masterpiece, but as you flip through the pages of the House bill, you will notice the word "regulation" appears 181 times. "Tax" is there 214 times. "Fees," 103 times. As we all know, nothing says "affordability" like higher taxes and fees.

The word "shall" - as in "must" or "required to" - appears over 3,000 times. The word, alas, is never preceded by the patriotic phrase "mind our own freaking business." Not once.

To vote for the bill, a legislator must believe a $1 trillion price tag is "revenue neutral," or that it alleviates any of the pain higher costs bring to the average American. This would require alcohol.

Real competition, as far as anyone can tell, is antithetical to the authors of this bill. Remember, you can purchase oranges from Florida and whiskey from Kentucky, yet you're prohibited from buying health insurance from anywhere outside your state . . . so sayeth Nancy Pelosi.

Instead of creating a new market with interstate trade, what we get is the institution of the pleasant-sounding "Health Insurance Exchange," which exists, it seems, only to accommodate a non-competitive, government-run insurance option.

Now, finding a name for a state-run program without offending the lingering capitalistic sensibilities of bourgeoisie has been problematic. So Pelosi went with the innocuous "consumer option" - known for a fleeting moment as the "competitive option" and popularly as the "public option." Whatever your preference is, it's the option that leads to a single-payer insurance program.

Democrats say we can save billions by funding a plan that uses billions of wasted tax dollars from another public plan that we already supplement with billions. Make sense?

In actuality, we pay for all this by "cost sharing," or "sharing the cost" of insuring everyone through higher prices and taxes. But no fear. The legislation taxes "the rich." The bill doesn't index the tax to inflation so more of you will be on the hook as inflation rises due to the tragically irresponsible behavior of Congress and the White House. The rich - many of them small-business owners - are already set to see their rates go up in 2010.

Hey, who needs those jerks to create real jobs when we have Washington pretending to do it?

All of this, as Madame Speaker says, constitutes a "a historic moment for our nation and families." True. No legislation in modern American history compares when in comes to injecting itself into the everyday decisions of the citizen.

And few can compete with its deception. The bill's intentions are cloaked in euphemisms and it is teeming with ulterior motives, all cobbled together in closed-door meetings where industry payoffs are offered using taxpayer dollars to facilitate a power grab of unprecedented cost.

All of it, rolled right into a neat 1,900 pages.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/art...ter_98951.html

[paolo59]

I've purchased a wonderful Glenlivet to sip as I watch the Democrat majority slip away in November of 2010! Once the American public sees what's in this House legislation on health care, Democrat representatives will be running for cover. Nancy Pelosi won't be able to cover their respective ******in the elections. Oh, wait, once members of Congress finally read what they've voted for! God, what have we ever done to deserve the likes of what occupies the House of Representatives of the United States?

[ElMariachi]

Originally Posted by paolo59

I've purchased a wonderful Glenlivet to sip as I watch the Democrat majority slip away in November of 2010! Once the American public sees what's in this House legislation on health care, Democrat representatives will be running for cover. Nancy Pelosi won't be able to cover their respective ******in the elections. Oh, wait, once members of Congress finally read what they've voted for! God, what have we ever done to deserve the likes of what occupies the House of Representatives of the United States?

Democrats don't seem to realize that they are going to lose the middle for a decade if not longer by this action. They've pushed further to the left then people in a center-right nation are comfortable with and its going to cost them bigtime. With enough independents splitting from the Democrats and the Republicans, maybe we can get a real 3rd party option that will get the government off our backs and empty out the DC cesspool that seemingly can't be satiated with enough money nor power.

[leafs43]

Originally Posted by ElMariachi

Democrats don't seem to realize that they are going to lose the middle for a decade if not longer by this action. They've pushed further to the left then people in a center-right nation are comfortable with and its going to cost them bigtime. With enough independents splitting from the Democrats and the Republicans, maybe we can get a real 3rd party option that will get the government off our backs and empty out the DC cesspool that seemingly can't be satiated with enough money nor power.

Wrong.


They do understand they are going to lose. Their numbers are unsustainable as is and the pendulum always swings back the other way. But they are pushing this health care bill based on the "It will be history.." before they lose. People like Pelosi, Waxman, etc.. are safe however so they just throw more fuel onto the fire urging moderate democrats to jump of the cliff like nice lemmings.

[ElMariachi]

The worst part for the Democrats is yet to come.


A. They didn't allow people the time to read through this legislation as promised. No 72 hours, nada. But now it will be at least a month if not longer before the Senate takes up a vote and people WILL have a chance to read. Read they will, this bill will be dissected and every single legislative horror will be exposed in daylight for all to see. The true implications of this bill, the fact that this is a coup for the insurance industry by forcing millions of Americans to purchase insurance or face fines/jailtime will be made clear.


B. Now that the bill has been passed, there are millions of Americans around the country who are outraged. If Obama thought he had a bad summer, he hasn't seen anything yet. Passing a bill without reading it is pretty bad normally, passing a bill of this magnitude, forcing it down people's throats is a grave strategical error and there will be repercussions to this, thats for damn sure.

[ElMariachi]

Originally Posted by leafs43

Wrong.


They do understand they are going to lose. Their numbers are unsustainable as is and the pendulum always swings back the other way. But they are pushing this health care bill based on the "It will be history.." before they lose. People like Pelosi, Waxman, etc.. are safe however so they just throw more fuel onto the fire urging moderate democrats to jump of the cliff like nice lemmings.

The Senate is a whole different matter and unlike lesser Congressional Representatives, there are Senators who will refuse to jump on the proverbial sword just to appease Pelosi and Reid(who is a goner in 2010 as well).