Amino Acid/Whey Isolate Bulking Experiment
by HalleluYAH
All,
In light of recent conversations in the Post Workout Product Comparison & In Between Meal Amino Acid/Protein Supplementation threads, I have decided to create this experiment.
It is with much anticipation and excitement that I embark on this experiment to determine what, if any, significant alterations in bodyweight/lean body mass will be achieved.
The Science and Theoretical Applications:
Part I of III– In Between Meals
Based on research, it is purported that the use of amino acids/protein in between meals can have significant impact on muscle protein synthesis. However, there is an inhibitory mechanism associated with slow releasing protein sources and/or continual intravenous-like feeding (as indicated in excerpt No.1 below; paragraphs 2 & 3). So, I have eliminated the idea of using casein and/or slowly sipping on amino acids in between meals.
Recent research also purports (as indicated in excerpt No.1) that use of a rapidly digesting protein source, in between meals, can promote significant increases in protein synthesis, even when administered 1 hour apart. That said, additional research is needed to determine what the refractory period is for leucine stimulated protein synthesis.
Thus, in light of the aforementioned, I have decided that Whey Protein Isolate will be my in between meal source of Amino Acids, and will be taken 3 x per day at a dose of 33g. These shakes will be taken in addition to my normal dietary baseline, which has remained largely consistent for two years now, thus making any significant changes in bodyweight/lean bodymass easy to measure.
Excerpt No. 1
References Cited in Excerpt No.1:
40. Wolfe RR. Regulation of muscle protein by amino acids. J Nutr. 2002, 132:3219S-24S.
63. Bohe J, Low JF, Wolfe RR, Rennie MJ. Latency and duration of stimulation of human muscle protein synthesis during continuous infusion of amino acids. J Physiol. 2001, 15;532:575-9.
65. Ha E, Zemel MB. Functional properties of whey, whey components, and essential amino acids: mechanisms
underlying health benefits for active people (review). J Nutr Biochem. 2003, 14:251-8.
Full Text Here: http://www.sportsnutritionsociety.or...-1-7-27-06.pdf
Part II of III– Adding Leucine/EAAs to Meals
Next, I have decided to administer 14g mixture of EAA (includes 4.8g Leucine) to each of my 4 primary meals throughout the day. Again, this is added to my normal dietary baseline.
Based on the information presented by Venom (abc bodybuilding; Excerpt No.2 below), it appears that a normal meals consisting of 30g protein from a chicken breast or steak would yield 3g of leucine. 3g of leucine falls short of the desired level of 4g+ as indicated in Excerpt No.3 below. There may also prove to be insufficient amounts of other EAAs in a steak and or chicken meals, and there may be a loss of viable aminos in prepared whole foods due to heat etc (see Excerpt No.4 below). There is also the issue of digestion, and since whole foods have a much lower biological value than free form amino acids, I believe the addition of 14g (includes 4.8g Leucine) EAA mixture will prove beneficial in many ways.
Excerpt No.2
Excerpt No.3Originally Posted by Venom
Excerpt No.4
Originally Posted by By Barry Finnin, PhD, and Samuel Peters
Part III of III – Mid Sleep Meal
Lastly, based on research completed by our very own Layne Norton (str8flexed) as compiled by Jacob Wilson in the excerpt below, it appears that implementation of a mid-sleep meals may have drastic implications on maintaining a positive nitrogen balance, promoting overnight anabolism, and attenuating overnight muscle protein catabolism (see Excerpt No.5)
Thus, I have decided to set a second alarm each night, one for work, the other for my mid-sleep meal. This meal will consist of 14g of EAA/BCAA mixture (includes 10g Leucine) + Glutamine as it is purported that the addition of glutamine may assist the liver in producing glucose during fasting, while sparing BCAAs in muscle tissue.
Excerpt No.5
Originally Posted by Jacob Wilson
The Supplements:
I know, I know, I rep for Scivation/Primaforce, and the supplements used will be our brand, however, it is because of my affiliation that I am able to afford this experiment.
Part I – In Between Meals
1.5 Servings Substance WPI (33g Whey Isolate)
Part II – Adding Leucine/EAAs to Meals
1 Serving Primal EAA (14g of EAA; include 4.8g Leucine)
Part III – Mid Sleep Meal
1.5 Servings Xtend + .5 Serving Primal EAA (EAAs + Glutamine; includes 10g Leucine)
Note: I am currently running a postWO log for Designer Supplements Replenish™, and will continue using this product, postWO, for the duration of this log. I lift 2-3 times per week, utilizing full body routines.
Other:
All of these products taste great and have excellent mixability, and thus will be a pleasure to implement, convenient to use and very practical (except for waking up at 3:30 in the AM for the mid-sleep meal ).
The experiment will begin on Thursday, January 25, 2007 and will continue until Friday February 28th. Let’s see what a little over one months does.
Before pics will be posted this week, and my starting bodyweight is 188lbs.
|
-
01-23-2007, 06:45 AM #1
HalleluYAH's Amino Acid/Whey Isolate Bulking Experiment
Last edited by HalleluYAH; 01-23-2007 at 05:59 PM.
Psalms 51:10-13
-
01-23-2007, 07:09 AM #2
-
01-23-2007, 07:17 AM #3
-
01-23-2007, 07:39 AM #4
-
-
01-23-2007, 07:44 AM #5
- Join Date: Jul 2004
- Location: Burlington, North Carolina, United States
- Posts: 26,552
- Rep Power: 23155
-
01-23-2007, 07:47 AM #6
-
01-23-2007, 07:50 AM #7
Any chance this is going to interfere with the Replenish log? Good experiment, regardless.
My place in here at bb.com is as a fitness enthusiast and recommendations do not represent medical advice. Please consult your examining physician for all medical concerns.
I'm not a "rep," and most "reps":
1) are no more credentialed than you. 2) have no input and no understanding of their product formulations. 3) are merely paid in free product from the company they represent.
http://www.drivensports.co.uk/
http://www.getds.com/
-
01-23-2007, 07:51 AM #8
- Join Date: Jun 2003
- Location: New York, United States
- Posts: 34,428
- Rep Power: 275265
-
-
01-23-2007, 07:52 AM #9
-
01-23-2007, 07:54 AM #10
-
01-23-2007, 07:55 AM #11
Thanks naturalguy.
Excellent questions, and the answer is yes, I will be lowering kcals to compensate for the additional 99g of protein. Thus, I will lover total kcals by approx. 400 caloried per day. This will be easy, I will cut out my nightly bowl of cereal that I should not be eating anyways.Psalms 51:10-13
-
01-23-2007, 07:58 AM #12
-
-
01-23-2007, 07:59 AM #13
-
01-23-2007, 08:04 AM #14
-
01-23-2007, 08:47 AM #15
-
01-23-2007, 08:48 AM #16
-
-
01-23-2007, 08:50 AM #17
-
01-23-2007, 09:03 AM #18
-
01-23-2007, 09:05 AM #19
-
01-23-2007, 11:09 AM #20
- Join Date: Oct 2001
- Location: Florida, United States
- Age: 42
- Posts: 30,600
- Rep Power: 72795
very cool, let me know how it goes. Though I believe the work has been somewhat misinterpreted by the reviewers who said leucine won't stimulate protein synthesis without taking it with protein. All studies done on leucine are done in a fasted state... thus your amino acid levels are low anyway... when you give leucine you stimulate protein synthesis and your body starts incooperating all amino acids into whole proteins in the cell... in order to do this it needs MORE of the other amino acids to continue protein synthesis, well in a fasted state you just don't have that many plasma amino acids and thus protein synthesis grinds to a hault. Bodybuilders are almost NEVER in a fasted state (maybe after an overnight sleep), so as long as you've had some protein source within around 4-5 hours of taking leucine chances are you will NOT experience a problem with limiting synthesis.
I also vehemetely disagree with the reviewer who believes that the precurser pool for protein synthesis is extracellular amino acids; Garlick has repeatedly shown in his stable isotope work that this is not the case.
-Layne
-
-
01-23-2007, 11:16 AM #21
-
01-24-2007, 06:12 AM #22
-
01-24-2007, 09:41 AM #23
A follow up on the science behind the above rationale...
Full Text Here: http://jn.nutrition.org/cgi/content/full/132/10/3219S
Bolus versus constant infusion
The response of MPS to a bolus of amino acids is quite different from the response to a constant infusion. There is a rapid increase in MPS in conjunction with the rise in EAA concentration, and an equally rapid fall as the EAA concentrations begin to decrease (Fig. 3 ). However, the rate of MPS returned to the basal value well before the concentration fell to the basal level. In fact, in the example shown in Figure 3 , after ingestion of 15 g of EAA, net balance (as well as the rate of MPS) had returned to the basal rate when the plasma concentration was still more than double the basal value. In contrast, when plasma concentrations were increased to a steady-state concentration for 3 h at a value twice above the basal value, the maximal stimulation of MPS was achieved (17 ). Furthermore, whereas the response to a bolus is transient, the peak response may be 6- to 10-fold the basal value. Nonetheless, because of the transient nature of the response, the total synthetic response (area under curve of synthesis vs. time) was less than when similar doses of amino acids were taken in the constant intake mode as opposed to the bolus ingestion (Fig. 4 ). Thus, different mechanisms appear to be operative in response to the mode of ingestion. Clarification of these mechanisms could lead to amplifying the response to a given amount of intake.
Figure 3
Figure 4
Last edited by HalleluYAH; 01-24-2007 at 09:48 AM.
Psalms 51:10-13
-
01-25-2007, 06:08 AM #24
Update:
While the main emphasis of Part I of III in this experiment is administering protein every 90minutes throughout the day is to increase MPS and gauge the AA/Leucine refractory period, I have some concerns regarding increased protein oxidation resulting from the increased intake. Thus, in effort to hinder this, I have decided to take 1.5 tbsp of Natural Peanut Butter with each of the (3) above WPI shakes.
I will be eliminating the 1.5tbsp of natty PB from each of my first 3 meals of the day to compensate.
Last edited by HalleluYAH; 01-25-2007 at 06:11 AM.
Psalms 51:10-13
-
-
01-25-2007, 06:37 AM #25
-
01-25-2007, 06:55 AM #26
That's good to hear.
Adding the kcals from CHO/FAT to the WPI shakes should prevent the PRO from oxidizing, however if my diet consists of oats at 3 hours intervals, then blood sugar should be high/steady enough to inhibit the WPI from oxidizing.
Is this what you mean?Last edited by HalleluYAH; 01-25-2007 at 07:05 AM.
Psalms 51:10-13
-
01-25-2007, 07:51 AM #27
- Join Date: Oct 2001
- Location: Florida, United States
- Age: 42
- Posts: 30,600
- Rep Power: 72795
this is actually something my professor & i discussed, just because something gets oxidized does not make it physiological irrelevent... who says that molecule of leucine that gets oxidized didn't activate mTOR beforehand. People make a big deal out of whey having higher oxidation than casein, but whey has a higher BV than casein and BV is a measure of how much protein is retained overall compared to how much is absorbed BV= (total nitrogen intake-urinary loss)/(total nitrogen intake - urine losses & fecal losses) which means =amount of nitrogen retained/amount of nitrogen absorbed. If oxidation really meant so much wouldn't you think casein would lead to a greater total protein retention? But it doesn't workout that way, I suspect because whey has almost 75% greater leucine content than casein
-
01-25-2007, 08:00 AM #28
this log is not going fast enough.. I want the end results NOW
On a side note, my DOMS have been almost entirely blunted by the infusion of EAAs/BCAAs taken in between meals.. When I was not doing this, DOMS lingered around for much longer... Taking EAAs have enabled me to train more frequently and still reap the benefits.. I don't know if this is relevant to the discussion.
-
-
01-25-2007, 08:07 AM #29
-
01-25-2007, 08:08 AM #30
Bookmarks