Myth: ZMA works, because it is scientifically designed and, to back this up, has a study conducted by Dr. Brilla on June 2, 1999 which showed it to increase free testosterone by 30% compared to up to 10% loss on non ZMA group.
Truth: ZMA was created by Victor Conte, owner of Balco Labs. Victor Conte is not a scientist. He spent about 15 years playing bass in various rock bands (including Tower of Power), and when money started running out he opened up a holistic health center with wife. He shut this center down after a year and then opened up BALCO (Bay Area Laboratory Co-Operative). At a sports medicine conference in 1997, Conte met Brilla and asked her to conduct a study on SNAC's zinc-magnesium supplement. In November 1998, Brilla and Conte presented their findings on a poster board at a meeting of the Southwest Chapter of the American College of Sports Medicine, in Las Vegas. There were made the claims that ZMA produced 250% greater strength gains compared to placebo, that it created "hormonal increase" on the subjects and that it was the only natural supplement that was clinically proven to increase testosterone.
What the press release didn't say was that Conte owned SNAC and it was simply an affiliate of BALCO. Nor did it reveal that Conte's SNAC had helped pay for the study or that Brilla had been aided by Jim Valente and Dr. Brian Goldman, BALCO's vice president and medical director, respectively. It also didn't report that of the 57 Western Washington University football players who signed up for the study, 30 quit. By the end, only a dozen players were using ZMA while 15 took a placebo.(1) Furthermore, Brilla had in the past conducted studies on magnesium and it's effect on testosterone and strength in athletes and football players in particular. The ZMA study demonstrated results painfully close to the ones of the magnesium-only study she herself had conducted a few years earlier(4). Brilla was simply asked to repeat the study, using this time along with the magnesium some zinc and "surprisingly" the same good results came out.
Myth: ΖΜΑ contains the most bioavailable forms of Zinc available, aspartate and monomethionine.
Truth: Zinc aspartate has been data suggesting it to be an ineffective form of Zinc(5) and surely not any better than Zinc Sulfate, the most commonly used form(6). Zinc monomethionine has no negative studies on it for now, but also no literature proving it to be superior to other Zinc forms that exist. As for magnesium aspartate's bioavailability, it stands in the middle, with other more potent forms existing(7,8)
Myth: "Hey, ZMA worked for me, my buddy, my neighbour and my dog. It made me 10 times stronger and bigger"
Truth: Placebo is priceless. While many ZMA users reported various gains and indeed ZMA can be as beneficial as supplementing with Zinc and Magnesium if you are deficient, ZMA has failed to elevate serum testosterone levels in healthy training males(9). Chances is, if you are a well eating and supplementing average athelete, you are not Zinc deficient and ZMA will do nothing for your testosterone. Another independend study involving 42 trained males that received only ZMA as a supplement showed that "no significant differences were observed between groups in anabolic or catabolic hormone status, body composition, 1-RM bench press and leg press, upper or lower body muscular endurance, or cycling anaerobic capacity. Results indicate that ZMA supplementation during training does not appear to enhance training adaptations in resistance trained populations."(10).
Myth: I don't care anyway. ZMA is cheap like hell and gives me better sleep?
Truth: Magnesium's benefits on mood(11), insomnia(12) and cramping(13) are well documented. Zinc also has various benefits, provided no deficiency exists. The fact however remains that you can buy equal or even better Zinc and Magnesium supplements for 1/3 the cost. If you feel still comfortable dumping 10$ for a name then the author rest's his case.
http://bodyandmind.gr/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1192375134
Bookmarks