Reply
Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 90 of 198
  1. #61
    Banned Superfecta's Avatar
    Join Date: Dec 2007
    Posts: 843
    Rep Power: 0
    Superfecta is not very helpful. (-500) Superfecta is not very helpful. (-500) Superfecta is not very helpful. (-500) Superfecta is not very helpful. (-500) Superfecta is not very helpful. (-500) Superfecta is not very helpful. (-500) Superfecta is not very helpful. (-500) Superfecta is not very helpful. (-500) Superfecta is not very helpful. (-500) Superfecta is not very helpful. (-500) Superfecta is not very helpful. (-500)
    Superfecta is offline
    Originally Posted by skinnycalves View Post
    lol Tyson is not 5'11"
    Um, yes he is.

    Back to the OP, I think it goes both ways to be honest. I know a lot of tall people who think they are tough because they are tall. I also know a lot of short people who think they have to prove something.

    Fighting has to do with experience for the most part. Two guys, one 5'9", one 6'3" in a fight who have never fought before? Flip a coin.
    Reply With Quote

  2. #62
    Registered User loseyourself's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2009
    Age: 35
    Posts: 1,422
    Rep Power: 186
    loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0)
    loseyourself is offline
    tyson's 5'10, 5'11'' boys, he did mess up alot of tall dudes though.
    Reply With Quote

  3. #63
    Registered User ezjax's Avatar
    Join Date: Dec 2008
    Age: 41
    Posts: 3,115
    Rep Power: 3355
    ezjax is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) ezjax is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) ezjax is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) ezjax is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) ezjax is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) ezjax is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) ezjax is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) ezjax is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) ezjax is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) ezjax is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) ezjax is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500)
    ezjax is offline
    all depends on who gets hit square first. a fight is not what you can give its what you can take...
    you can get hit 5 or 6 times and hit a guy once or twice and Daze them...

    just cuz you get hit by a stronger fellow doesnt mean you are going out right away.


    and besides when a tall guy loses a fight to a short guy they look really dumb because of obvious physical advantages..

    ive seen pitbulls destroy great danes and vice verrsa depends on the person.

    why do tall guys always pick fights with short guys?
    Reply With Quote

  4. #64
    Banned skinnycalves's Avatar
    Join Date: Oct 2006
    Age: 35
    Posts: 10,948
    Rep Power: 0
    skinnycalves is a name known to all. (+5000) skinnycalves is a name known to all. (+5000) skinnycalves is a name known to all. (+5000) skinnycalves is a name known to all. (+5000) skinnycalves is a name known to all. (+5000) skinnycalves is a name known to all. (+5000) skinnycalves is a name known to all. (+5000) skinnycalves is a name known to all. (+5000) skinnycalves is a name known to all. (+5000) skinnycalves is a name known to all. (+5000) skinnycalves is a name known to all. (+5000)
    skinnycalves is offline
    Originally Posted by DaPlasurNDaPain View Post
    It doesn't work like that in a street fight. You've clearly never been in a fight dude. Listen to those more experienced than you.




    Eh, no. Taller people have longer muscles, they are easily stronger than shorter people. Try fighting a 5 years old, you'll see what I mean
    Too bad mechanical strength is directly related to cross sectional area running perpendicular to the bone. Shorten the muscle on shorter frame, means bigger cross sectional area.
    Reply With Quote

  5. #65
    Registered User ezjax's Avatar
    Join Date: Dec 2008
    Age: 41
    Posts: 3,115
    Rep Power: 3355
    ezjax is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) ezjax is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) ezjax is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) ezjax is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) ezjax is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) ezjax is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) ezjax is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) ezjax is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) ezjax is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) ezjax is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) ezjax is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500)
    ezjax is offline
    all depends on who gets hit square first. a fight is not what you can give its what you can take...
    you can get hit 5 or 6 times and hit a guy once or twice and Daze them...

    just cuz you get hit by a stronger fellow doesnt mean you are going out right away.


    and besides when a tall guy loses a fight to a short guy they look really dumb because of obvious physical advantages..

    ive seen pitbulls destroy great danes and vice verrsa depends on the person.

    why do tall guys always pick fights with short guys?
    if you never been hurt in a fight you never fought anyone tough
    Reply With Quote

  6. #66
    King of the misc Metal Jerk's Avatar
    Join Date: Jan 2008
    Location: Texas, United States
    Age: 32
    Posts: 11,231
    Rep Power: 7461
    Metal Jerk is a name known to all. (+5000) Metal Jerk is a name known to all. (+5000) Metal Jerk is a name known to all. (+5000) Metal Jerk is a name known to all. (+5000) Metal Jerk is a name known to all. (+5000) Metal Jerk is a name known to all. (+5000) Metal Jerk is a name known to all. (+5000) Metal Jerk is a name known to all. (+5000) Metal Jerk is a name known to all. (+5000) Metal Jerk is a name known to all. (+5000) Metal Jerk is a name known to all. (+5000)
    Metal Jerk is offline
    All i know is i can **** a guy up.
    Reply With Quote

  7. #67
    *Quality Poser* DaPlasurNDaPain's Avatar
    Join Date: Dec 2007
    Posts: 3,125
    Rep Power: 4698
    DaPlasurNDaPain is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaPlasurNDaPain is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaPlasurNDaPain is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaPlasurNDaPain is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaPlasurNDaPain is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaPlasurNDaPain is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaPlasurNDaPain is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaPlasurNDaPain is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaPlasurNDaPain is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaPlasurNDaPain is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaPlasurNDaPain is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500)
    DaPlasurNDaPain is offline
    Originally Posted by .PeTeR. View Post
    You cant compare a child to a adult you moron.
    Alot of angry tall people that cant accept that long limbs suck for strength, deal with it!
    Of course you can, it's just at the extreme ends of the spectrum. You don't know what you're talking about. Long limbs suck for strenght?? lol I have never heard that **** before. You must be trollin. Unless you put up some proof, which will no doubt be some retarded website anyways, you'll get negged.
    Reply With Quote

  8. #68
    Registered User .PeTeR.'s Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2009
    Age: 35
    Posts: 2,404
    Rep Power: 0
    .PeTeR. is not very helpful. (-500) .PeTeR. is not very helpful. (-500) .PeTeR. is not very helpful. (-500) .PeTeR. is not very helpful. (-500) .PeTeR. is not very helpful. (-500) .PeTeR. is not very helpful. (-500) .PeTeR. is not very helpful. (-500) .PeTeR. is not very helpful. (-500) .PeTeR. is not very helpful. (-500) .PeTeR. is not very helpful. (-500) .PeTeR. is not very helpful. (-500)
    .PeTeR. is offline
    Originally Posted by Misc. View Post
    According to BBC's tale of the tape: Height 5ft11.5in

    u mad?
    he's 5'9''

    theres a whole forum discussing his height, with peope who have had there picture take with him that are only 5'10'' and he is shorter. There's even a video of him on youtube where he said he was 5'6'' when he was 17.
    Mod Negged on 29/11/09 Arlecchino
    Mod Negged on 01/12/09 COUNTRYMIKE



    Lift Lulz Lesbian <3
    Reply With Quote

  9. #69
    Registered User PaulG's Avatar
    Join Date: Feb 2007
    Posts: 10,786
    Rep Power: 9961
    PaulG is a name known to all. (+5000) PaulG is a name known to all. (+5000) PaulG is a name known to all. (+5000) PaulG is a name known to all. (+5000) PaulG is a name known to all. (+5000) PaulG is a name known to all. (+5000) PaulG is a name known to all. (+5000) PaulG is a name known to all. (+5000) PaulG is a name known to all. (+5000) PaulG is a name known to all. (+5000) PaulG is a name known to all. (+5000)
    PaulG is offline
    Weight is more important in a street fight by far. Fatties don't count.

    Theres nothing wrong with being 5'8" unless you're fighting a professional.


    Point is,
    Everyone has equal opportunity in a fight. Who ever utilizes opportunity the best wins.
    Reply With Quote

  10. #70
    Registered User loseyourself's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2009
    Age: 35
    Posts: 1,422
    Rep Power: 186
    loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0)
    loseyourself is offline
    Originally Posted by .PeTeR. View Post
    he's 5'9''

    theres a whole forum discussing his height, with peope who have had there picture take with him that are only 5'10'' and he is shorter. There's even a video of him on youtube where he said he was 5'6'' when he was 17.
    your point? my brother was 6'0'' at 17 and balooned up to 6'4'' by 21, so there goes your theory........
    Reply With Quote

  11. #71
    Registered User 100whey's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2009
    Location: New Zealand
    Age: 35
    Posts: 2,706
    Rep Power: 407
    100whey will become famous soon enough. (+50) 100whey will become famous soon enough. (+50) 100whey will become famous soon enough. (+50) 100whey will become famous soon enough. (+50) 100whey will become famous soon enough. (+50) 100whey will become famous soon enough. (+50) 100whey will become famous soon enough. (+50) 100whey will become famous soon enough. (+50) 100whey will become famous soon enough. (+50) 100whey will become famous soon enough. (+50) 100whey will become famous soon enough. (+50)
    100whey is offline
    Yet another short vs tall thread. Strong insecurity issues in the misc. Gonna start comparing penis size next?
    Reply With Quote

  12. #72
    Registered User Frog.'s Avatar
    Join Date: Oct 2007
    Age: 35
    Posts: 3,467
    Rep Power: 1382
    Frog. is just really nice. (+1000) Frog. is just really nice. (+1000) Frog. is just really nice. (+1000) Frog. is just really nice. (+1000) Frog. is just really nice. (+1000) Frog. is just really nice. (+1000) Frog. is just really nice. (+1000) Frog. is just really nice. (+1000) Frog. is just really nice. (+1000) Frog. is just really nice. (+1000) Frog. is just really nice. (+1000)
    Frog. is offline
    as mcuh as i want to bash on the manlets and side with the taller ppl because im 6'1", i'd have to say weight and knowing how to fight is much more important than height.
    Reply With Quote

  13. #73
    Registered User cinemod's Avatar
    Join Date: May 2007
    Posts: 6,379
    Rep Power: 768
    cinemod is a jewel in the rough. (+500) cinemod is a jewel in the rough. (+500) cinemod is a jewel in the rough. (+500) cinemod is a jewel in the rough. (+500) cinemod is a jewel in the rough. (+500) cinemod is a jewel in the rough. (+500) cinemod is a jewel in the rough. (+500) cinemod is a jewel in the rough. (+500) cinemod is a jewel in the rough. (+500) cinemod is a jewel in the rough. (+500) cinemod is a jewel in the rough. (+500)
    cinemod is offline
    you aint gonna stop a dwarf man...... there center of gravity is way to low. They will run at you and drop ur high center of gravity ass down, then once your on the ground, your in their world. Thats where they spend all of their time.



    Reply With Quote

  14. #74
    отличнo! Maestro's Avatar
    Join Date: Oct 2002
    Location: New Mexico, United States
    Posts: 48,681
    Rep Power: 187712
    Maestro has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Maestro has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Maestro has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Maestro has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Maestro has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Maestro has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Maestro has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Maestro has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Maestro has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Maestro has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Maestro has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000)
    Maestro is online now
    Originally Posted by Angry Manlet View Post
    All i know is i can **** a guy up.


    Reply With Quote

  15. #75
    Banned Makaveli0's Avatar
    Join Date: May 2007
    Posts: 1,750
    Rep Power: 0
    Makaveli0 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Makaveli0 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Makaveli0 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Makaveli0 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Makaveli0 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Makaveli0 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Makaveli0 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Makaveli0 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Makaveli0 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Makaveli0 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Makaveli0 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500)
    Makaveli0 is offline
    why is it the manlets that try to act the toughest? It's like they're out there trying to prove something trying to compensate for their lack of height.

    5'9", 204 lbs

    you're 18, therefore most likely not jacked, but a fat manlet that looks like humpty dumpty.
    Reply With Quote

  16. #76
    Registered User .PeTeR.'s Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2009
    Age: 35
    Posts: 2,404
    Rep Power: 0
    .PeTeR. is not very helpful. (-500) .PeTeR. is not very helpful. (-500) .PeTeR. is not very helpful. (-500) .PeTeR. is not very helpful. (-500) .PeTeR. is not very helpful. (-500) .PeTeR. is not very helpful. (-500) .PeTeR. is not very helpful. (-500) .PeTeR. is not very helpful. (-500) .PeTeR. is not very helpful. (-500) .PeTeR. is not very helpful. (-500) .PeTeR. is not very helpful. (-500)
    .PeTeR. is offline
    Originally Posted by loseyourself View Post
    your point? my brother was 6'0'' at 17 and balooned up to 6'4'' by 21, so there goes your theory........
    LOL i like how you picked that only part of my sentence out.

    Like i said there is a forum discussing his height where people have said they have met him and said he is pretty short.They all say he is no way above 5'10''.
    Mod Negged on 29/11/09 Arlecchino
    Mod Negged on 01/12/09 COUNTRYMIKE



    Lift Lulz Lesbian <3
    Reply With Quote

  17. #77
    Registered User Champ3113's Avatar
    Join Date: Mar 2009
    Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    Age: 32
    Posts: 3,205
    Rep Power: 390
    Champ3113 will become famous soon enough. (+50) Champ3113 will become famous soon enough. (+50) Champ3113 will become famous soon enough. (+50) Champ3113 will become famous soon enough. (+50) Champ3113 will become famous soon enough. (+50) Champ3113 will become famous soon enough. (+50) Champ3113 will become famous soon enough. (+50) Champ3113 will become famous soon enough. (+50) Champ3113 will become famous soon enough. (+50) Champ3113 will become famous soon enough. (+50) Champ3113 will become famous soon enough. (+50)
    Champ3113 is offline
    just fking bull tackle the tall guy to the ground and start giving him shots to the face. then you will see if his reach and tall advantage helps him.
    Reply With Quote

  18. #78
    Banned skinnycalves's Avatar
    Join Date: Oct 2006
    Age: 35
    Posts: 10,948
    Rep Power: 0
    skinnycalves is a name known to all. (+5000) skinnycalves is a name known to all. (+5000) skinnycalves is a name known to all. (+5000) skinnycalves is a name known to all. (+5000) skinnycalves is a name known to all. (+5000) skinnycalves is a name known to all. (+5000) skinnycalves is a name known to all. (+5000) skinnycalves is a name known to all. (+5000) skinnycalves is a name known to all. (+5000) skinnycalves is a name known to all. (+5000) skinnycalves is a name known to all. (+5000)
    skinnycalves is offline
    Originally Posted by DaPlasurNDaPain View Post
    Of course you can, it's just at the extreme ends of the spectrum. You don't know what you're talking about. Long limbs suck for strenght?? lol I have never heard that **** before. You must be trollin. Unless you put up some proof, which will no doubt be some retarded website anyways, you'll get negged.
    Dude are you ****ing retarded, have you not taken a simple high school physics class, holy **** balls. Take a 6'8" guy who weighs 240 and lean and compare him to a 5'9" guy who is 240 and lean, who will move more weight. Holy **** balls.

    I love how you completely skipped over my post that talks about cross sectional area of the muscle perpendicular to the bone being directly related to strength. Guess what the 5'9" guy will have a larger perpendicular cross sectional area because his length running parallel to the bone will be shortened.

    I think its stupid to talk about who would win in a fight. But to argue that shorter people pound for pound are weaker than taller people pound for pound is just godamn retarded.

    Wow strong knowledge of physics. idiot.
    Reply With Quote

  19. #79
    Banned Superfecta's Avatar
    Join Date: Dec 2007
    Posts: 843
    Rep Power: 0
    Superfecta is not very helpful. (-500) Superfecta is not very helpful. (-500) Superfecta is not very helpful. (-500) Superfecta is not very helpful. (-500) Superfecta is not very helpful. (-500) Superfecta is not very helpful. (-500) Superfecta is not very helpful. (-500) Superfecta is not very helpful. (-500) Superfecta is not very helpful. (-500) Superfecta is not very helpful. (-500) Superfecta is not very helpful. (-500)
    Superfecta is offline
    Originally Posted by Misc. View Post
    So I'm supposed to trust some random people on the internet over official measurements?
    That's exactly what he's saying.
    Reply With Quote

  20. #80
    Registered User loseyourself's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2009
    Age: 35
    Posts: 1,422
    Rep Power: 186
    loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0)
    loseyourself is offline
    Originally Posted by skinnycalves View Post
    Dude are you ****ing retarded, have you not taken a simple high school physics class, holy **** balls. Take a 6'8" guy who weighs 240 and lean and compare him to a 5'9" guy who is 240 and lean, who will move more weight. Holy **** balls.

    I love how you completely skipped over my post that talks about cross sectional area of the muscle perpendicular to the bone being directly related to strength. Guess what the 5'9" guy will have a larger perpendicular cross sectional area because his length running parallel to the bone will be shortened.

    I think its stupid to talk about who would win in a fight. But to argue that shorter people pound for pound are weaker than taller people pound for pound is just godamn retarded.
    dude, tall people generally weigh more then short people. your logic fails in that regard......jesus christ bro.
    Reply With Quote

  21. #81
    Registered User .PeTeR.'s Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2009
    Age: 35
    Posts: 2,404
    Rep Power: 0
    .PeTeR. is not very helpful. (-500) .PeTeR. is not very helpful. (-500) .PeTeR. is not very helpful. (-500) .PeTeR. is not very helpful. (-500) .PeTeR. is not very helpful. (-500) .PeTeR. is not very helpful. (-500) .PeTeR. is not very helpful. (-500) .PeTeR. is not very helpful. (-500) .PeTeR. is not very helpful. (-500) .PeTeR. is not very helpful. (-500) .PeTeR. is not very helpful. (-500)
    .PeTeR. is offline
    Originally Posted by DaPlasurNDaPain View Post
    Of course you can, it's just at the extreme ends of the spectrum. You don't know what you're talking about. Long limbs suck for strenght?? lol I have never heard that **** before. You must be trollin. Unless you put up some proof, which will no doubt be some retarded website anyways, you'll get negged.
    LOL i suggest you do some research into why this is true.
    Mod Negged on 29/11/09 Arlecchino
    Mod Negged on 01/12/09 COUNTRYMIKE



    Lift Lulz Lesbian <3
    Reply With Quote

  22. #82
    Registered User loseyourself's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2009
    Age: 35
    Posts: 1,422
    Rep Power: 186
    loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0)
    loseyourself is offline
    Originally Posted by .PeTeR. View Post
    LOL i suggest you do some research into why this is true.
    why are you talking about weight lifting strength though? of course taller people cant lift as much as shorter folks generally, thats simple physics.....but does that make them weaker....well not it doesn't dip****.
    Reply With Quote

  23. #83
    *Quality Poser* DaPlasurNDaPain's Avatar
    Join Date: Dec 2007
    Posts: 3,125
    Rep Power: 4698
    DaPlasurNDaPain is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaPlasurNDaPain is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaPlasurNDaPain is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaPlasurNDaPain is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaPlasurNDaPain is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaPlasurNDaPain is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaPlasurNDaPain is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaPlasurNDaPain is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaPlasurNDaPain is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaPlasurNDaPain is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaPlasurNDaPain is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500)
    DaPlasurNDaPain is offline
    Originally Posted by skinnycalves View Post
    Dude are you ****ing retarded, have you not taken a simple high school physics class, holy **** balls. Take a 6'8" guy who weighs 240 and lean and compare him to a 5'9" guy who is 240 and lean, who will move more weight. Holy **** balls.

    I love how you completely skipped over my post that talks about cross sectional area of the muscle perpendicular to the bone being directly related to strength. Guess what the 5'9" guy will have a larger perpendicular cross sectional area because his length running parallel to the bone will be shortened.

    I think its stupid to talk about who would win in a fight. But to argue that shorter people pound for pound are weaker than taller people pound for pound is just godamn retarded.

    Wow strong knowledge of physics. idiot.
    no body is saying pound for pound you idiot. If you have two guys of the same weight, then the taller one is going to have less muscle mass, because his weight is mostly his bones. read the ****ing thread. You're not going to find a 6'4" who is acting all tough and weight 160 and is trying to fight the op
    Reply With Quote

  24. #84
    Banned skinnycalves's Avatar
    Join Date: Oct 2006
    Age: 35
    Posts: 10,948
    Rep Power: 0
    skinnycalves is a name known to all. (+5000) skinnycalves is a name known to all. (+5000) skinnycalves is a name known to all. (+5000) skinnycalves is a name known to all. (+5000) skinnycalves is a name known to all. (+5000) skinnycalves is a name known to all. (+5000) skinnycalves is a name known to all. (+5000) skinnycalves is a name known to all. (+5000) skinnycalves is a name known to all. (+5000) skinnycalves is a name known to all. (+5000) skinnycalves is a name known to all. (+5000)
    skinnycalves is offline
    And to the guy who is not convinced that Mike Tyson is 5'9" know this. The Georgia Bull dogs list Rennie Curran at 5'11" and he has admitted that he is 5'8" and he makes one hell of a linebacker. He has never been officially measured for his height because it pisses him off that people would judge him on his height and not on his ability.
    Reply With Quote

  25. #85
    Registered Goomba gmenfan40's Avatar
    Join Date: Mar 2007
    Location: New York, United States
    Posts: 26,667
    Rep Power: 144791
    gmenfan40 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) gmenfan40 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) gmenfan40 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) gmenfan40 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) gmenfan40 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) gmenfan40 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) gmenfan40 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) gmenfan40 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) gmenfan40 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) gmenfan40 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) gmenfan40 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000)
    gmenfan40 is offline
    Originally Posted by Makaveli0 View Post
    why is it the manlets that try to act the toughest? It's like they're out there trying to prove something trying to compensate for their lack of height.

    5'9", 204 lbs

    you're 18, therefore most likely not jacked, but a fat manlet that looks like humpty dumpty.
    LOL i'm fat because i'm 18? BRB running faster, jumping higher, benching more, squatting more, deadlifting more, cleaning more, being more agile, etc than you. STFU ******. Did it ever cross your retarded mind that maybe that i bust my fawking ass every single day to be the way i am?
    TRUMP 2024

    ALL libtards are f@gg0ts (Ded fkn Srs)

    Toxic Masculinity

    MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN

    United States Army Veteran

    White Conservative Heterosexual Male who is not a White Supremecist (Ded fkn Srs)
    Reply With Quote

  26. #86
    Registered User .PeTeR.'s Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2009
    Age: 35
    Posts: 2,404
    Rep Power: 0
    .PeTeR. is not very helpful. (-500) .PeTeR. is not very helpful. (-500) .PeTeR. is not very helpful. (-500) .PeTeR. is not very helpful. (-500) .PeTeR. is not very helpful. (-500) .PeTeR. is not very helpful. (-500) .PeTeR. is not very helpful. (-500) .PeTeR. is not very helpful. (-500) .PeTeR. is not very helpful. (-500) .PeTeR. is not very helpful. (-500) .PeTeR. is not very helpful. (-500)
    .PeTeR. is offline
    Originally Posted by loseyourself View Post
    why are you talking about weight lifting strength though? of course taller people cant lift as much as shorter folks generally, thats simple physics.....but does that make them weaker....well not it doesn't dip****.
    Im not saying a tall person cant be Strong.

    But a shorter person has a bigger advantage in strength over taller people.
    Mod Negged on 29/11/09 Arlecchino
    Mod Negged on 01/12/09 COUNTRYMIKE



    Lift Lulz Lesbian <3
    Reply With Quote

  27. #87
    Banned skinnycalves's Avatar
    Join Date: Oct 2006
    Age: 35
    Posts: 10,948
    Rep Power: 0
    skinnycalves is a name known to all. (+5000) skinnycalves is a name known to all. (+5000) skinnycalves is a name known to all. (+5000) skinnycalves is a name known to all. (+5000) skinnycalves is a name known to all. (+5000) skinnycalves is a name known to all. (+5000) skinnycalves is a name known to all. (+5000) skinnycalves is a name known to all. (+5000) skinnycalves is a name known to all. (+5000) skinnycalves is a name known to all. (+5000) skinnycalves is a name known to all. (+5000)
    skinnycalves is offline
    Originally Posted by loseyourself View Post
    dude, tall people generally weigh more then short people. your logic fails in that regard......jesus christ bro.
    It doesn't fail, if tall people have the same BMI, then they have the same relative cross sectional area. I should have mentioned that it is relative cross sectional area not just cross sectional area.
    Reply With Quote

  28. #88
    Registered User .PeTeR.'s Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2009
    Age: 35
    Posts: 2,404
    Rep Power: 0
    .PeTeR. is not very helpful. (-500) .PeTeR. is not very helpful. (-500) .PeTeR. is not very helpful. (-500) .PeTeR. is not very helpful. (-500) .PeTeR. is not very helpful. (-500) .PeTeR. is not very helpful. (-500) .PeTeR. is not very helpful. (-500) .PeTeR. is not very helpful. (-500) .PeTeR. is not very helpful. (-500) .PeTeR. is not very helpful. (-500) .PeTeR. is not very helpful. (-500)
    .PeTeR. is offline
    Originally Posted by skinnycalves View Post
    And to the guy who is not convinced that Mike Tyson is 5'9" know this. The Georgia Bull dogs list Rennie Curran at 5'11" and he has admitted that he is 5'8" and he makes one hell of a linebacker. He has never been officially measured for his height because it pisses him off that people would judge him on his height and not on his ability.
    exactly, they exaggerate peoples heights.
    Mod Negged on 29/11/09 Arlecchino
    Mod Negged on 01/12/09 COUNTRYMIKE



    Lift Lulz Lesbian <3
    Reply With Quote

  29. #89
    Registered User loseyourself's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2009
    Age: 35
    Posts: 1,422
    Rep Power: 186
    loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0)
    loseyourself is offline
    Originally Posted by gmenfan40 View Post
    LOL i'm fat because i'm 18? BRB running faster, jumping higher, benching more, squatting more, deadlifting more, cleaning more, being more agile, etc than you. STFU ******. Did it ever cross your retarded mind that maybe that i bust my fawking ass every single day to be the way i am?
    still 5'9'' at the end of the day, what sports can you play at that weak ass weight, even linebackers today alot are 6'0'' and above.
    Reply With Quote

  30. #90
    Registered User loseyourself's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2009
    Age: 35
    Posts: 1,422
    Rep Power: 186
    loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) loseyourself has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0)
    loseyourself is offline
    Originally Posted by skinnycalves View Post
    It doesn't fail, if tall people have the same BMI, then they have the same relative cross sectional area. I should have mentioned that it is relative cross sectional area not just cross sectional area.
    STFU kinesiology *******.

    shorter people are not "stronger" then taller people, maybe in a weight lifting sense in terms of "numbers", but in terms of brute force mano on mano.....you're just talking ****.
    Reply With Quote

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 118
    Last Post: 01-03-2008, 07:06 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts