The guy is very experienced too, 10 years in the special forces and it was his major in college plus he has that (forgot name, 1000 dollar certification?) Starts with the letter "I" I believe
Anyway, I've been doing a ketogenic diet lately, a CKD (Cyclical Keto Diet) where you eat very low carbs (5%) and high fats through the week, then on the weekend you "Carb Up"
He told me that while tihs is effective, it's VERY unhealthy and started in bodybuilding where bodybuilders cut out carbs right before contests. He told me to eat 50-70% carbs and the rest is protein and low to moderate fats.
I told him I'm an endomorph and my body hates carbs, that I get fat off them very easily and he said it doesn't matter, it's all about portion control, so yeah I don't know who to believe anymore...
P.S. He also said that eat carbs about 2 hours before workout and then 2 hours after workout with protein.
|
-
07-19-2009, 10:01 AM #1
A personal trainer told me this...
-
07-19-2009, 10:29 AM #2
First problem is you body type if your a true endomorph, you need to hit the weights and get some cardio in since your all fat no muscle .bone or connective tissues.
Don't know of any cert thats a grand way to much money for a cert.
Some people do very well on keto diets but most don't. You have to monitor your body very closly until you get the hang of low carbs.
Hsi carb befdore and after workouts is correct the only thig you should add is protien carb mix before not just carbs preworkout.
One question comes up, how do you know your body hates carbs?
-
07-19-2009, 10:57 AM #3
-
07-19-2009, 10:58 AM #4
i HIGHLY doubt your body "hates" carbs.
I am the same as you. I am an endomorph but also believed that my body "hated" carbs.
Fact is, it is not the actual carbs that is making you fat, its the portion that you eat (ie overeating).
I, as well as many others, tend to over eat on carbohydrate meals (bread/pastas) quite easily because......well just look at a nutrition fact of 2 slices of bread or 1/4 cup of a bowl of pasta. Now times that with the amount that you would realistically eat (i can easily eat 3/4 of a loaf of bread or 3 cups of pasta in one sitting because its just so good )http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?p=9087539#post9087539
-
-
07-19-2009, 11:10 AM #5
Portion control = self discipline
Someone in the special forces for 10 years would have very good self discipline & less problems with portion control than the average person who grabs a pint of Ben & Jerry's at the first sugar craving.
Just though I'd point that outContact me about our author Program
www.AskTheTrainer.com | Twitter.com/AskTheTrainer | ********.com/askthetrainercom
-
07-20-2009, 11:44 AM #6
If your interested in finding out this sort of information for yourself I would check out a book called "The Metabolic Typing Diet By William Wolocott and Trish Fahey"
Try not to worry so much about how much you eat I.E Portion sizes.
If you concentrate more on eating correctly for your type and are geting the right macronutrient profiles you will be satisfied or full up on an average amount of food and you wont eat more because you wont be hungry.
If your eating the wrong food your body cant convert it into energy and thats when its getting converted into fat.
-
07-21-2009, 12:06 AM #7
-
07-21-2009, 12:24 AM #8
- Join Date: Aug 2004
- Location: Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Age: 39
- Posts: 5,657
- Rep Power: 6910
Both matter.
However it depends also on the person and the goal when it comes to the "strictness" let's say for nutrition in this instance. Someone purely looking to drop weight, whom doesn't really care about their physique from an aesthetics and "vain" p.o.v etc. can get away with just practising the "calories are all that matters" mentality.
But if you, like many of us guys, are looking to actually do a bit of bodybuilding and wanna pursue physique development as well as worrying purely about a number on a scale, the whole kit n caboodle matters in the grand scheme of things. That's where all the macro % variances and all the little personal tendencies become more important. Fine tuning things in order to bring forward your best body possible.
It's just the context in which one is referring to, that's all. A lot of confusion in this business stems from when people don't explain themselves fully and their perspective in which they're speaking from.Last edited by Simmo0508; 07-21-2009 at 12:26 AM.
advertising/self-promotion not permitted
-
-
07-21-2009, 12:26 AM #9
-
07-21-2009, 12:28 AM #10
-
07-21-2009, 12:30 AM #11
- Join Date: Jun 2009
- Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Posts: 9,482
- Rep Power: 0
That's when you go and do your own research. Set aside the broscience, and go and do your own research.
Don't trust everything you read on a forum, and don't trust everything told you by people with letters after their name. On the one hand, some people got their qualifications from a PhD, while others got it from a cornflakes packet (not so much in Australia, but certainly in the US). And even the PhDs argue with each-other. So do your own research, and experiment a bit on yourself - try a diet for a month or two, see how you feel, what the tape measure tells you, then try something else.
For research, I googled "effects of macronutrient mix on weight loss gain", and the first link is to an abstract of a paper saying,
Low carbohydrate diets are gaining popularity, however there is no clear consensus regarding their safety and efficacy for weight loss. Proponents of these diet plans advocate dramatic reductions in carbohydrate intake to combat insulin resistance and hyperinsulinaemia, which they claim are responsible for obesity. There are no long-term studies that directly compare the weight loss potential of low versus higher carbohydrate diets. Evidence from randomized controlled trials suggests that low carbohydrate diets may enable short-term weight loss by facilitating reduced energy intakes, however poor dietary compliance may prevent long-term success. Unbalanced nutrient profiles may increase the risk of adverse health consequences in adherents. Low carbohydrate diets should not be recommended at this time due to a lack of adequate long-term follow up data. Successful weight loss occurs through the creation of a sustained energy deficit, and should be achieved through a combination of exercise and a nutritionally balanced and varied diet.
Then you see a bunch of other links. And they say different things, but... each time you look at the link, consider the source. Okay, you read an article on bb.com, and bb.com makes money by... supplements sales. So if that article looks at supplements - surprise! surprise! - they tell you supplements are great and we should all have some. Always consider the source. If it's a medical journal, and six papers in medical journals say the same thing, that's good enough for me. "But this guy on a forum said..." Yeah, rightyo. Consider the source.
Do your own research, and use your own judgment.
-
07-21-2009, 12:34 AM #12
- Join Date: May 2008
- Location: Massachusetts, United States
- Posts: 43,940
- Rep Power: 991154
Your diet is the most important part of any program for getting results. Getting the right amount of calories will get you good results. But if you want to get the absolute best results then yes you need to take it one step further and figure out your macro breakdown. Which macro breakdown will work best all depends on the individual. You need to try different ones because it's all about trial and error. As for keto diets I've never been a fan...not for long term. Carbs are a very important part of a diet and they're actually good for you. It's all about finding the right balance of protein, clean carbs and healthy fats.
Good luck.National Level Competitor (Female BB)
-
-
07-21-2009, 12:34 AM #13
- Join Date: Feb 2005
- Location: Red Deer, Alberta, Canada
- Age: 38
- Posts: 2,901
- Rep Power: 741
thats a terrible paper... no offense... but low carb diets are insanely "sound" i don't know why/where the paper's authors are saying there aren't any "long term data" thats very humerous.
Certified Personal Trainer
Certified Precision Nutritionist
Always be learning.
Knowledge < Intelligence < Wisdom
-
07-21-2009, 11:06 AM #14
Come on mah, you're only 19. Eat meat like a tiger and bust your ass in the gym, you have plenty of time to worry about getting fat and all that ****. BTW, don't even think about taking any supps other than normal multi-v, fish oil, and protien. Don't be afraid to eat a pizza or a couple cheezeburgers after a leg/back day either.
-
07-21-2009, 11:41 AM #15
There is no universally healthy diet that is going to work for everyone! Cutting carbs will work for one person and not another. This is why a friend for example may lose weight on a particular diet whilst you may not.
The trick to metabolic typing is finding out what works for you as an individual! What foods will work for you and in what proportion you should be eating them. The sicence behind metabolic typing is all there and is what most experianced nutrition practitioners are using now. It is also what they teach in the Chek Institute.
Heres a link for you to take a free metabolic typing test https://www.chekconnect.com
-
07-21-2009, 08:20 PM #16
- Join Date: Jun 2009
- Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Posts: 9,482
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
07-21-2009, 11:51 PM #17
-
07-22-2009, 05:09 AM #18
-
07-22-2009, 01:36 PM #19
- Join Date: Jul 2003
- Location: Sylva, North Carolina, United States
- Age: 47
- Posts: 622
- Rep Power: 0
He's absolutely right about ketogenic diets. They are the worst diets you can go on as its very unhealthy and usually will cause you to lose a lot of muscle and not be able to train as hard as you could.
I will disagree however about the amount of carbs recommended unless that person is a runner or swimmer but he is definitely correct about those keto diets. Stay away from them
-
07-22-2009, 11:08 PM #20
- Join Date: Nov 2006
- Location: Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
- Age: 50
- Posts: 492
- Rep Power: 1889
I am not educated on keto diets so I won't comment on that. But I would say that eating alot of fat is not the best idea. If you honestly feel you put on weight that easily from carbs, do keep in mind one thing; stored carbohydrates (glycogen) must carry with them a certain number of molecules of water per molecule of glycogen to be stored. Thus it may not be fat you are storing, but water weight. That's why dropping your carbs makes you lose so much weight so quickly.. it's mostly water weight.
That strategy is common amongst bodybuilders prepping for contest; I know, I've applied it to my a couple of clients for photoshoots to plump up their muscles. We call it carb depleting then carb loading.
As for eating 2 hours before and then 2 hours after a workout... if this works for you, then great. You can experiment with as low as half an hour before then after a workout too, depending on how much you consume at each given time and what your goal is.
I strongly beleive as well that proportion control is crucial. If you don't know the size of proportions you should be eating, how can you ever know you are consuming less calories than your body needs, to lose fat.
And just so you know; I have actually trained people who suffer from damaged metabolisms due to years of yo yo dieting, who also complained that they gained weight very easily eating carbs and was able to successfully get them on carbs permanently. And not via a keto type diet, or Adkins type. It might take some time, but your body can adapt to changes in diet.Josie "TRAINER JO" Dalton
Site: http://www.TrainerJo.com
Talk Show: coming back soon
FB: http://www.********.com/lasvegastrainerjo
IG: @Ms.Trainer.Jo
Google Plus: COMING SOON
Pinterest: http://www.pinterest.com/trainerjo
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/mstrainerjo
-
-
07-22-2009, 11:41 PM #21
-
07-23-2009, 12:50 AM #22
- Join Date: Apr 2009
- Location: Auckland, New Zealand
- Posts: 11,254
- Rep Power: 61044
Probally ISSA (International Sports Science Association)
Why are you doing a CKD diet instead of just a straight keto diet? It takes like 3-4 days for your body to get into a ketosis state, if you are carbing up ever weekend isnt it just defeating the purpose or using keto? Im not a fan of keto diets but if it was me i would deffently just use straight keto rules instead of CKD.
Yeah im not a fan of keto diets either i would just recomend using a 60/20/20 and eating a calorie deflict. But if you relly want to do a keto diet i recomend to follow Dave Palumbo's outline for his cutting keto diet.
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=5899101
Dont do your CKD (Cyclical Keto Diet) sounds stupid to me.
Yea eat carbs pre and post workout, for energy before your workout, and to replenish your glycogen stores when you have semi-depleted from weight training.
Similar Threads
-
'Personal Trainer' Told Me How To Do Bent Rows....
By Jack Slater in forum ExercisesReplies: 15Last Post: 03-22-2007, 04:51 PM -
Expensive Personal Trainer gave me this workout.
By Goodfellow in forum Workout ProgramsReplies: 21Last Post: 09-14-2006, 08:13 AM -
What my personal trainer told me (Please Read! Especially Personal Trainers!)
By quickups in forum ExercisesReplies: 118Last Post: 01-24-2006, 09:51 AM -
A trainer told me this. What do you think?
By BigD11 in forum Workout ProgramsReplies: 10Last Post: 11-23-2004, 02:49 PM -
A trainer told me this. What do you think?
By BigD11 in forum NutritionReplies: 9Last Post: 11-22-2004, 02:31 PM
Bookmarks