Indictment Unsealed Charges Former Ptech President with Dealing in Assets of Specially Designated Global Terrorist
BOSTON?A former resident of Somerville, Mass. who has been living in South Korea was arrested today after arriving at John F. Kennedy Airport in New York.
An indictment, originally returned on March 1, 2007, was unsealed today charging Buford George Peterson and Oussama Abdul Ziade, both former officers of Ptech, Inc., a computer software company that was principally located in Quincy, Mass., with making false statements to the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) in connection with a loan application in the amount of $650,000 for Ptech submitted under a program offered to assist small businesses economically harmed by the attacks of September 11, 2001. The indictment charges Peterson and Ziade with falsely representing the identities of Ptech?s major shareholders in this loan application to conceal the ownership interest in Ptech held by a Specially Designated Global Terrorist, Yassin Kadi aka Yassin Al-Kadi aka Yassin Al-Qadi aka Yassin Qadi (Kadi) through Sarmany Limited, a company Kadi owned and controlled. Ziade served as Ptech?s President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of its Board of Directors from February 1994 to 2003 while Peterson served as Ptech?s Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer from February 2001 to August 2002.
Acting U.S. Attorney Michael K. Loucks; Bruce M. Foucart, Special Agent in Charge of Immigration and Customs Enforcement - Office of Investigations in Boston; Warren T. Bamford, Special Agent in Charge of the Federal Bureau of Investigation - Boston Field Office; and Susan Dukes, Special Agent in Charge of the Internal Revenue Service, Criminal Investigation - Boston Field Office, announced today that a seven-count indictment, originally returned on March 1, 2007, was unsealed charging Peterson and Ziade with making false statements to the SBA in Ptech?s loan application in January 2002 when they falsely represented the identity of the major stockholders of Ptech (those owning 20 percent or more of stock) by omitting in Ptech?s stock ownership table any reference to Sarmany Limited, a company owned and controlled by Kadi. The indictment also charges Ziade with engaging in transactions involving, and dealing in, the property of Kadi, a Specially Designated Global Terrorist, and making false statements to law enforcement during the investigation of Ptech.
According to the indictment, beginning in or about 1994 and continuing until or about 2001, Kadi, a Saudi Arabian national, invested approximately $10 million dollars in Ptech through companies he owned, controlled or in which he held a beneficial interest. On Oct. 12, 2001, pursuant to Executive Order 13224, entitled ?Blocking Property and Prohibiting Transactions with Persons who Commit, Threaten to Commit, or Support Terrorism,? which was issued in response to the attacks of September 11, 2001, the United States government designated Kadi as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist. As a result, any transaction involving, or dealing in, any interest in any property, direct or indirect, held by Kadi, and subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, was prohibited.
As of Oct. 12, 2001, the date of Kadi?s designation, Kadi owned and controlled a large percentage of Ptech common shares. The indictment alleges that ?Kadi held that interest in the names of [foreign] entities he owned and controlled or in which he held a beneficial interest... At the time of his designation, Ziade knew that Kadi held an interest in Ptech stock issued in the names of Kadi?s entities.? According to the indictment, ?on or about Nov. 29, 2001, Ziade drafted a capitalization table identifying Kadi as the owner of approximately 9.9 million dollars worth of Ptech common shares, which had been issued by Ptech in the names of Kadi?s entities.? The indictment further alleges that Ziade ?engaged in transactions designed in whole or in part to conceal the source and ownership of Ptech's assets and common stock.?
If convicted on these charges, Peterson faces up to 30 years in prison, to be followed by five years of supervised release and a $1 million fine.
Also unsealed today was a criminal complaint issued on July 27, 2005 charging Ziade with attempting to engage in transactions involving, and dealing in, the property of Kadi, a Specially Designated Global Terrorist; knowingly making false statements to the SBA in a loan application submitted on behalf of Ptech; and making false statements to law enforcement. Ziade, a Lebanese national, has been living outside of the country since 2005.
If arrested and convicted of the charges in the indictment, Ziade also faces up to 30 years in prison, to be followed by five years supervised release and a $1 million fine.
The case was jointly investigated by Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Internal Revenue Service, Criminal Investigation. The Medford Police Department, Massachusetts State Police, U.S. Secret Service, Office of Foreign Asset Control of the U.S. Department of Treasury, and U.S. Small Business Administration also provided assistance in the investigation. It is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorneys B. Stephanie Siegmann and Jeffrey Auerhahn of Loucks? Anti-Terrorism and National Security Unit.
The details contained in the indictment are allegations. The defendants are presumed to be innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.
__________________________________________________ _______________________ Feds: Former Quincy execs hid ties to man on terror list http://www.bostonherald.com/news/reg...osition=recent
By Associated Press Wednesday, July 15, 2009 - Added 1h ago
Federal authorities have accused two former executives of a Massachusetts software company of concealing financial ties to a man on the government?s terrorism list. The Quincy office of PTech, Inc., was raided by federal agents in the aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks. [ Indictments were unsealed Wednesday against PTech?s former chief executive, Oussama Ziade, and former chief financial officer Buford George Peterson. They are accused of trying to conceal in a loan application an approximately $10 million financial interest in the company held by Yassin Kadi (KAH?-dee). Kadi is a Saudi Arabian on the Treasury Department?s list of Specially Designated Global Terrorists. The U.S. Attorney?s office says Peterson was arrested Wednesday after arriving at New York?s Kennedy Airport. It wasn?t known if he has an attorney. Prosecutors said Ziade is living overseas.
Grassley Worried about "Not My Job, Not My Problem" Mentality at FBI
WASHINGTON ? In a letter to the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Sen. Chuck Grassley today expressed concern about the continued investigation of Ptech Software Company in Quincy, Massachusetts.
Grassley said he was concerned that the FBI may not have done enough to ensure the computers and networks of the government and private sector are free of vulnerabilities which might arise from using Ptech software.
"In the case of Ptech and the potential for widespread vulnerability in government computers and systems, I fear some at FBI Headquarters may be suffering from a 'not my job, not my problem' attitude that focuses only on the vulnerability of the FBI itself rather than the federal government at large ? not to mention the private sector," Grassley said.
Here is Grassley's letter to Mueller.
January 22, 2003
The Honorable Robert S. Mueller, III
Director
Federal Bureau of Investigation
935 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20535
Dear Director Mueller:
I am writing to you regarding the government's investigation of Ptech, a software company in Quincy, Massachusetts.
First, I want to commend you and the FBI, particularly the Boston Division, for taking this investigation seriously in regard to terrorism. It is my understanding that the FBI did not drop the ball in the way some early media reports had indicated.
I appreciate that FBI officials recognized the seriousness of most of the issues involved in the Ptech investigation and acted accordingly.
However, I am concerned that the FBI may not have done enough to ensure the computers and networks of the government and private sector are free of vulnerabilities which might arise from using Ptech software.
Until the National Infrastructure and Protection Center (NIPC) moves to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), it is still the FBI's responsibility, through NIPC, "to serve as the U.S. government's focal point for threat assessment, warning, investigation, and response for threats or attacks against our critical infrastructures," as NIPC's web site states.
In the case of Ptech and the potential for widespread vulnerability in government computers and systems, I fear some at FBI Headquarters may be suffering from a "not my job, not my problem" attitude that focuses only on the vulnerability of the FBI itself rather than the federal government at large ? not to mention the private sector.
I urge you to make sure that the FBI and NIPC, rather than only the bureau's counter-terrorism division, address this issue in a global way. I also urge you to ensure that NIPC's detection, analysis and prevention functions continue during its transfer to the DHS.
As a senior member of the Judiciary Committee, which has oversight of the FBI, I know we both take these issues seriously. I appreciate the briefings FBI officials have been providing to my staff, and I look forward to continued cooperation.
Where did those letters mention anything about Ptech being involved in the largest conspiracy of treason and mass murder in world history?
And, back to your OP... Why in the world would the NWO allow one of their key operatives to be arrested by the very agencies they allegedly control, to be followed by a very public press release?
__________________
"The deadliest weapon in the world is a Marine and his rifle". - Gen. John "Black Jack" Pershing, U.S. Army
"How do those guys on submarines hold their breath for so long?" - Kelly Bundy
I am NOT a Marine. Just a Sailor who had the awesome opportunity to work with Marines for several years.
Where did those letters mention anything about Ptech being involved in the largest conspiracy of treason and mass murder in world history?
Go and read the hundreds of sourced news articles that I and others have posted here that have been posted about this. A thread title doesn't have to be a verbatim derivation from a specific source like the FBI. Go listen to some real investigative work done by whistleblower Indira Singh. Far as your other comment, to deny you the use of multiple straw man angles by making an analogy: Why did the NWO allow German Intelligence to get caught carrying out a false flag if the NWO controls German intelligence?
German Intelligence Agents Caught Staging False Flag Terror
Kosovan leaders rejected UN-mandated deployment of EU police before bombing attempt
Here's a HINT: If someone GETS CAUGHT, then guess what? That means IT EXISTS (the fact that FALSE FLAG terror attacks are carried out).
"It's way past the time when the citizens of western countries wake up to the fact that YOU CANNOT TRUST OUR GOVERNMENTS! All governments have been corrupted by those with a global agenda and they routinely stage what are known as "false flag events" to fool everyone into accepting measures we would not ordinarily accept or concede to. (False flag mean you stage an act of violence and blame it on someone else). This story highlights yet another example of it, this time implemented by the German government."
"Hi, my name is nutsy54, and if I post the exact same line in hundreds of posts, it will have the psychological effect on my readers of discrediting the threads I pretend to question in a non-disingenuous fashion, by making it sound incredulous by being grandiose. I am achieving the same thing as Cointelpro or a government op even if I am not officially one in real life":
Quote:
Originally Posted by nutsy54
the largest conspiracy of treason and mass murder in world history?
Yeah, the same people who have carried out the largest financial conspiracy in world history which will drastically lower everyone's standard of living via "bailouts" and "cap and trade", are the same people who also carried out the 9/11 attacks so that they would have a militarized law enforcement surveillance infrastructure in place to prevent the American people from bringing the financial conspirators to justice at the barrel of a gun after being convicted of high treason in a court of law, or when they attack the people with physical force first.
Last edited by Anti_Illuminati; 07-18-2009 at 03:52 PM.
I tried to be polite and asked a simple question directly related to your posts. You responded with more cut & paste bull**** and abusive attacks because someone dared to expect proof instead of blindly believing whatever you and Alex Jones tell us to be terrified of this week. (How's martial law, and Bush's endless presidency as dictator coming along?)
THAT is why you're a hated laughingstock on this board. Goodbye.
__________________
"The deadliest weapon in the world is a Marine and his rifle". - Gen. John "Black Jack" Pershing, U.S. Army
"How do those guys on submarines hold their breath for so long?" - Kelly Bundy
I am NOT a Marine. Just a Sailor who had the awesome opportunity to work with Marines for several years.
I tried to be polite and asked a simple question directly related to your posts. You responded with more cut & paste bull****
Where do you get off saying its Copy and Paste BS? What AI is giving you is RESEARCH and documents he has compiled himself. He is giving you his own research
Quote:
Originally Posted by nutsy54
and abusive attacks because someone dared to expect proof instead of blindly believing whatever you and Alex Jones tell us to be terrified of this week.
Ummm.... No one believes Alex Jones Blindly 100%. We all have our disagreements with Alex Jones and AI is no different. The information AI gives u is hardcore research he has done. AI has researched the issues and confirmed what Alex talks about.
I tried to be polite and asked a simple question directly related to your posts.
Your question is not a simple question because a simple answer would never cut it, and would be wholly inadequate and subject to yet more endless incendiary condescending, and loaded "questions"--have you ever considered trying to answer questions for yourself instead of pretending that someone else is going to ever convince you on this topic--where you can just label anything you wish as "not-proof" to never get to the bottom of anything but be stuck in a permanent loop of unfruitful controversy? It requires a fairly extensive amount of research to arrive to a true understanding of what happened, no different than an elaborate homicide case that takes years of piecing together multitudes of evidence in order to even bring charges against someone to be able to arrest them and indict them on charges so they can be tried in a court of law.
Quote:
Originally Posted by nutsy54
You responded with more cut & paste bull**** and abusive attacks because someone dared to expect proof instead of blindly believing whatever you and Alex Jones tell us to be terrified of this week. (How's martial law, and Bush's endless presidency as dictator coming along?)
The proof is in all of the research done by Indira Singh, who has absolutely nothing to do with Alex Jones, as well as my research which stemmed from and is a vast expansion of the criminality and real terror ties that she uncovered. YOu also falsely claim that I want people to be terrified. I want people to be extremely PISSED off so that they demand a new real investigation, not one where you have criminals investigating criminals like the 9/11 commission facade.
Quote:
Originally Posted by nutsy54
THAT is why you're a hated laughingstock on this board. Goodbye.
The facts are the facts regardless of the source, this was never about me, this was always about getting others to read and think for themselves instead of blindly accepting EITHER what I say, OR what you say. "Goodbye", as if your "departure" is even remotely significant from a thread, no one cares, stop trying to make people think that it does. Maybe people will get it through their heads that if I am correct on my assessment in the pump action shotgun thread, that I would also have the astuteness to apply the same reality-based discernment regarding the fact that 911 was a black op to facilitate and accelerate a globalist agenda for world government--or "global governance" where all of our rights are rescinded in order to "keep us safe from whoever the govt. tells us to be afraid of".
You endlessly accuse anyone saying that 911 is a black op as fearmongering, but have never said that the US govt. has and is fearmongering about Al-Qaeda, or any other terrorist group--where the result of believing that fearmongering, is submission to further govt/military industrial complex surveillance of everyone's lives globally, and conversely, where the result of our waking people up to the truth, results in people adamantly rejecting government constitutional violations, intrusion via illegal checkpoints in the US far from the borders, military working with police domestically, the CDC's tyrannical agenda of trying to implement mandatory vaccines in the near future, face scanning AI cameras on the streets, and many more things.
Shame on me and others for trying to empower people with the strength of the knowledge of the truth to have the incentive to resist government's desired unprecedented tyranny over our lives, shame on me.
Last edited by Anti_Illuminati; 07-18-2009 at 05:25 PM.
I tried to be polite and asked a simple question directly related to your posts. You responded with more cut & paste bull**** and abusive attacks because someone dared to expect proof instead of blindly believing whatever you and Alex Jones tell us to be terrified of this week. (How's martial law, and Bush's endless presidency as dictator coming along?)
THAT is why you're a hated laughingstock on this board. Goodbye.
If you click that prisonplanet.com link, its riddled with sources. Just sayin' since it seems you're under the impression they're just making this up.
__________________
"The idea is quite unfounded that on entering into society we give up any natural rights." --Thomas Jefferson
"Why are the conservative leaders all have questionable intelligence? " - againstall0dds
In before Austrian(economics) Conspiracy Theories - gjohnson5
P.A.T.R.I.O.T. Act Disclaimer: This post is satire, all prior and future posts are also satire
Research eh? Would that be the same research that led you to the undeniable truth of Bush's dictatorship?! The same undeniable truth of FEMA camps last October?!?! The very same undeniable truth of Hillary Clinton as president?!?!?!
Nutsy's right... you're a joke.
__________________
All those who believe in psychokinesis raise my hand.
Would that be the same research that led you to the undeniable truth of Bush's dictatorship?!
The dictatorship exercised through the puppet office of the Presidency as per National Security Presidential Directive 51. Unlike you, some people recognize the the presidency is an OFFICE, and that items that are signed into law affect SUBSEQUENT presidents.
"The Bush administration has released a directive called the National Security and Homeland Security Presidential Directive. The directive released on May 9th, 2007 has gone almost unnoticed by the mainstream and alternative media. This is understandable considering the huge Ron Paul and immigration news but this story is equally as huge. In this directive, Bush declares that in the event of a "Catastrophic Emergency" the President will be entrusted with leading the activities to ensure constitutional government. The language in this directive would in effect make the President a dictator in the case of such an emergency.
The directive defines a "Catastrophic Emergency" as the following.
"Catastrophic Emergency" means any incident, regardless of location, that results in extraordinary levels of mass casualties, damage, or disruption severely affecting the U.S. population, infrastructure, environment, economy, or government functions;
So what does this mean? This is entirely subjective and doesn't provide any real concrete definition of what such an emergency would entail. Assuming that it means a disaster on the scale of the 9/11 attacks or Katrina, there is no question that the United States at some point in time will experience an emergency on par with either of those events. When one of those events takes place, the President will be a dictator in charge of ensuring a working constitutional government.
The language written in the directive is disturbing because it doesn't say that the President will work with the other branches of government equally to ensure a constitutional government is protected. It says clearly that there will be a cooperative effort among the three branches that will be coordinated by the President. If the President is coordinating these efforts it effectively puts him in charge of every branch. The language in the directive is entirely Orwellian in nature making it seem that it is a cooperative effort between all three branches but than it says that the President is in charge of the cooperative effort.
The directive defines Enduring Constitutional Government as the following.
"Enduring Constitutional Government," or "ECG," means a cooperative effort among the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of the Federal Government, coordinated by the President, as a matter of comity with respect to the legislative and judicial branches and with proper respect for the constitutional separation of powers among the branches, to preserve the constitutional framework under which the Nation is governed and the capability of all three branches of government to execute constitutional responsibilities and provide for orderly succession, appropriate transition of leadership, and interoperability and support of the National Essential Functions during a catastrophic emergency;
Further on in the document it states the following.
The President shall lead the activities of the Federal Government for ensuring constitutional government.
This directive on its face is unconstitutional because each branch of government the executive, legislative and judicial are supposed to be equal in power. By putting the President in charge of coordinating such an effort to ensure constitutional government over all three branches is effectively making the President a dictator allowing him to tell all branches of government what to do.
Even worse is the fact that the directive states that the Secretary of Homeland Security will serve as the lead for coordinating overall continuity operations. We already know that the Homeland Security department is not really working to secure the homeland. Instead the Homeland Security department is really working to enslave the homeland just like the Home Office over in the United Kingdom has made that country an Orwellian hell of closed-circuit TV spy cameras. If such an emergency is declared, we can only guess what sort of surprises the Homeland Enslavement department will have for us.
The directive itself recognizes that each branch is already responsible for directing their own continuity of government procedures. If that's the case than why does the President need to coordinate these procedures for all of the branches? This is nothing more than a power grab that centralizes power and will make the President a dictator in the case of a so called "Catastrophic Emergency".
It is insane that this directive claims that its purpose is to define procedures to protect a working constitutional government when the very language in the document destroys what a working constitutional government is supposed to be. A working constitutional government contains a separation of powers between three equally powerful branches and this directive states that the executive branch has the power to coordinate the activities of the other branches. This directive is a clear violation of constitutional separation of powers and there should be angry protests from our legislators about this anti-American garbage that came from the President.
The same undeniable truth of FEMA camps last October?!?!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Weightaholic
Look at me, using a complete straw man fake argument claiming AI said anything about FEMA camps in October--replete with FEIGNED OUTRAGE by using two question marks and two exclamation points to try to convince people that I have a point when I have none whatsoever because straw men cannot be used to prove points other than the perpetrator of using the straw man is a disgusting lying piece of filth. "Northcom goon squads hitting the streets Oct1" means exactly that, they were hitting the streets in whatever areas they decided to deploy for their illegitimate exercises for fake terror scenarios that will never happen unless they stage them themselves as an excuse to take away more freedom and increase tyrannical unconstitutional surveillance.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Weightaholic
The very same undeniable truth of Hillary Clinton as president?!?!?!
OMFG, now its THREE questions marks and exclamation points!-- someone is wrong about one thing, and therefore it flat out discredits everything. Nevermind that the Hillary claim I made wasn't supported by ANY sources whatsoever--UNLIKE ALL of my information regarding 9/11 being a black op. BIG DIFFERENCE. You are not disagreeing with me, you are disagreeing with HUNDREDS of corroborating articles from sources all over the world.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Weightaholic
Nutsy's right...So I am going to forfeit thinking for myself or dare exposing my brain to his hundreds of sourced articles and documents because it might shatter my cozy little world where I can live vicariously through others fighting fake wars that I want to believe are real because if the government really was so evil that they were involved in executing 911 I might have to get off my fat ass and take responsibility for it by helping to expose corruption just like the criminal financial takeover of over $15 trillion stolen. I love the fake little world I live in and I can't wait to stop at Homeland Security checkpoints with bomb sniffing dogs to keep me safe from Al-Qaeda in America, because I guess we failed, after all, to "fight (and defeat) them over there, so that we didn't have to fight them over here."
Last edited by Anti_Illuminati; 07-18-2009 at 08:40 PM.
The dictatorship exercised through the puppet office of the Presidency as per National Security Presidential Directive 51. Unlike you, some people recognize the the presidency is an OFFICE, and that items that are signed into law affect SUBSEQUENT presidents.
"The Bush administration has released a directive called the National Security and Homeland Security Presidential Directive. The directive released on May 9th, 2007 has gone almost unnoticed by the mainstream and alternative media. This is understandable considering the huge Ron Paul and immigration news but this story is equally as huge. In this directive, Bush declares that in the event of a "Catastrophic Emergency" the President will be entrusted with leading the activities to ensure constitutional government. The language in this directive would in effect make the President a dictator in the case of such an emergency.
The directive defines a "Catastrophic Emergency" as the following.
"Catastrophic Emergency" means any incident, regardless of location, that results in extraordinary levels of mass casualties, damage, or disruption severely affecting the U.S. population, infrastructure, environment, economy, or government functions;
So what does this mean? This is entirely subjective and doesn't provide any real concrete definition of what such an emergency would entail. Assuming that it means a disaster on the scale of the 9/11 attacks or Katrina, there is no question that the United States at some point in time will experience an emergency on par with either of those events. When one of those events takes place, the President will be a dictator in charge of ensuring a working constitutional government.
The language written in the directive is disturbing because it doesn?t say that the President will work with the other branches of government equally to ensure a constitutional government is protected. It says clearly that there will be a cooperative effort among the three branches that will be coordinated by the President. If the President is coordinating these efforts it effectively puts him in charge of every branch. The language in the directive is entirely Orwellian in nature making it seem that it is a cooperative effort between all three branches but than it says that the President is in charge of the cooperative effort.
The directive defines Enduring Constitutional Government as the following.
"Enduring Constitutional Government," or "ECG," means a cooperative effort among the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of the Federal Government, coordinated by the President, as a matter of comity with respect to the legislative and judicial branches and with proper respect for the constitutional separation of powers among the branches, to preserve the constitutional framework under which the Nation is governed and the capability of all three branches of government to execute constitutional responsibilities and provide for orderly succession, appropriate transition of leadership, and interoperability and support of the National Essential Functions during a catastrophic emergency;
Further on in the document it states the following.
The President shall lead the activities of the Federal Government for ensuring constitutional government.
This directive on its face is unconstitutional because each branch of government the executive, legislative and judicial are supposed to be equal in power. By putting the President in charge of coordinating such an effort to ensure constitutional government over all three branches is effectively making the President a dictator allowing him to tell all branches of government what to do.
Even worse is the fact that the directive states that the Secretary of Homeland Security will serve as the lead for coordinating overall continuity operations. We already know that the Homeland Security department is not really working to secure the homeland. Instead the Homeland Security department is really working to enslave the homeland just like the Home Office over in the United Kingdom has made that country an Orwellian hell of closed-circuit TV spy cameras. If such an emergency is declared, we can only guess what sort of surprises the Homeland Enslavement department will have for us.
The directive itself recognizes that each branch is already responsible for directing their own continuity of government procedures. If that?s the case than why does the President need to coordinate these procedures for all of the branches? This is nothing more than a power grab that centralizes power and will make the President a dictator in the case of a so called "Catastrophic Emergency".
It is insane that this directive claims that its purpose is to define procedures to protect a working constitutional government when the very language in the document destroys what a working constitutional government is supposed to be. A working constitutional government contains a separation of powers between three equally powerful branches and this directive states that the executive branch has the power to coordinate the activities of the other branches. This directive is a clear violation of constitutional separation of powers and there should be angry protests from our legislators about this anti-American garbage that came from the President.
OMFG, someone is wrong about one thing, and therefore it flat out discredits everything. nevermind that the Hillary claim I made wasn;t supported by ANY sources whatsoever--UNLIKE ALL of my information regarding 9/11 being a black op. BIG DIFFERENCE. You are not disagreeing with me, you are disagreeing with HUNDREDS of corroborating articles from sources all over the world.
Blah blah blah blah.
Point is, none of the things you keep predicting have happened at all, let alone within the time frame that you specified, with all your "extensive research".
Here's a pro-tip for you champ. Visiting prison-planet and reading what other whack-jobs think about whatever inanity you think is not research, but is instead merely reinforcing your insanity.
I repeat, you're a joke.
__________________
All those who believe in psychokinesis raise my hand.
Point is, none of the things you keep predicting have happened at all, let alone within the time frame that you specified, with all your "extensive research".
Just give up. Every time his predictions fail miserably, he just changes the story. No matter how many direct quotes we can cite from Alex Jones himself about an endless Bush dictatorship, or all the staged events that would lead to a McCain presidency, he just rewrites history so that, conveniently, ANYONE who was elected president is in on the great deception, and therefore that was really the NWO's plan all along.
His level of denial when faced with the blatant lies he's believed and spread in the past is amazing. And his only response: Attack and falsely quote those who point it out, and call them blind sheep for daring to question his great insights... that always end in failure.
I wonder what it's like to live your life, fixated on being terrified of a great evil... Which never comes.
__________________
"The deadliest weapon in the world is a Marine and his rifle". - Gen. John "Black Jack" Pershing, U.S. Army
"How do those guys on submarines hold their breath for so long?" - Kelly Bundy
I am NOT a Marine. Just a Sailor who had the awesome opportunity to work with Marines for several years.
Linear Mode
