*HONEST POLL* Men - What's the lowest you'd go on the looks scale?

**janky** · 05-30-2009, 08:53 AM

Ok, This is for scientific research so DON'T FUCKING LIE!!!

Keep in mind, it's the internet, and no one can see what you voted, so be brutally honest here - not what you'd LIKE to happen, or what you LIKE to admit, but the real truth of the matter...

What is the lowest on the looks scale you would go when BANGING a girl (not dating) ???

Keep in mind -
- Even in a slump
- Lowest you've ever gone
- Be honest, no one can see what you vote
- this is for research
- be realistic, no lulz here - you can't bang only 10s. no one can

(in b4 al pal)
- you dont have to be proud of it or tell your friends
- no one would find out EVER.
- Seriously, no one would ever know - you could bang a fat tranny
- Don't vote what you WISH was true, vote what IS true

If you wanna post that's cool, but poll is totally anonymous and I wanna see who's right about this me or Jaw Knee..

JK believes (correct me if I'm wrong)
- Men will NOT fukk anything that moves

janky believes
- Men like pussie
- Don't give a **** if no ones around
- Wont admit to banging uglies/fatties but will still do it if necessary and no one finds out

Let's not make this a "I like jk better so I agree w him" or "I like janky better so I agree w him" - this is for serious factual research - or well, as serious as any of us can be hahah

**Jaw-Knee** · 05-30-2009, 08:57 AM

Originally Posted by janky

JK believes (correct me if I'm wrong)
- Men will NOT fukk anything
- Men have incredibly high standards and lowering them is awful

Lol, when the hell did I say this?

I said most guys won't just fuck anything that moves--meaning that most guys won't bone 3s.

I said women have incredibly high standards.

As far as the poll goes--why does it drop from 7 to 4? I thought a 5 was the brink of fuckability? What if you've never gone as low as 4?

**janky** · 05-30-2009, 09:05 AM

Originally Posted by Jaw-Knee

Lol, when the hell did I say this?

I said most guys won't just fuck anything that moves--meaning that most guys won't bone 3s.

I said women have incredibly high standards.

As far as the poll goes--why does it drop from 7 to 4? I thought a 5 was the brink of fuckability? What if you've never gone as low as 4?

lulz, well that's what I thought you meant.

OK OK -
jk believes most guys wont bang anything that moves.

better?

Well, I could've said 5... but if I did that I felt like I had 3 options leaning towards high quality women and I wanted it to be a fair poll, this way, you have 2 for "high class bitches only" and two for "I dont care I want veejee"

It made more sense to me this way. Most people lean a little towards one side or the other ya know?
Typically the difference between a 5 and a 4 boils down to whether or not you're getting made fun of for it.

If you banged a 4 and your boys are clownin you cause they found out you go "Aww man come on, she had nice tits - she was at least a FIVE"

**Jaw-Knee** · 05-30-2009, 09:12 AM

Originally Posted by janky

Typically the difference between a 5 and a 4 boils down to whether or not you're getting made fun of for it.

If you banged a 4 and your boys are clownin you cause they found out you go "Aww man come on, she had nice tits - she was at least a FIVE"

Lol, makes sense.

Dunno, though--the more I think about it, the more I start to think that the scale is too subjective. It's like when you walk into the doctor's office and they ask you about how bad the pain is on a scale of 1-10; I always fuck up that part because I just don't know how to answer, lol.

**Al_Pal** · 05-30-2009, 09:17 AM

Zero Standards

**janky** · 05-30-2009, 09:18 AM

Originally Posted by Jaw-Knee

Lol, makes sense.

Dunno, though--the more I think about it, the more I start to think that the scale is too subjective. It's like when you walk into the doctor's office and they ask you about how bad the pain is on a scale of 1-10; I always fuck up that part because I just don't know how to answer, lol.

How would you recommend making it less subjective then?

I just wanted to cover the basic area ya know? I get the feeling a lot of people are gunna just vote 7+ because we're all ballers 10k a day n ****

no elbows too pointy

**DevotedLifter** · 05-30-2009, 09:19 AM

What is a 4+ to you, and how fat are we talking?

**janky** · 05-30-2009, 09:20 AM

Originally Posted by Al_Pal

Zero Standards

Yup. that's where I voted hahah

I mean everyone has "standards" and sets a bar - but REALISTICALLY if you're in a slump and you're drunk and there's a fat girl beggin you to suck it - you start goin "well, she does have nice tits... her eyes are kinda pretty... I mean, I dunno... no one's around... I guess"

Just because you drop below your "standards" once or twice doesn't mean you run around pushing handicaps out of the wheelchairs and fukking them, just means you're realistic about the fact that DESPITE WHAT YOU WANT - SOMETIMES YOU SETTLE FOR LESS IN DIRE CIRCUMSTANCES

**Jaw-Knee** · 05-30-2009, 09:21 AM

Originally Posted by janky

How would you recommend making it less subjective then?

I just wanted to cover the basic area ya know? I get the feeling a lot of people are gunna just vote 7+ because we're all ballers 10k a day n ****
no elbows too pointy

Just looked at the results. Surprise, surprise. Bet they all drive Beemers and are packing 8+" too.

Don't know how to make it less subjective. I don't even really think you can.

What constitutes fatty status, though? What constitutes uggo status?

**DaBurg3r** · 05-30-2009, 09:22 AM

How would you rate a butter face with a toucan sam nose and sand paper skin, but a dancers body? We just call that a brown bag special or something? "Does not rank?"

Help me out here.

**janky** · 05-30-2009, 09:22 AM

Originally Posted by DonaldMcDucks

as long as she has a big ass and titties im ok

lulz. I feel it. In 4 thickness

Originally Posted by DevotedLifter

What is a 4+ to you, and how fat are we talking?

That's up to your standards bro. Vote by your standards.

To me a 4 is less than attractive, but may have one or two redeemable qualities (big ass despite her rat-like face, or incredibly nice tits despite the rest of her being large as well)

Again, up to you - My theory was always "never bang a girl that weighs close to what I do"
but that's MY theory, not yours lol
and unfortunately I have banged girls that were kinda close

**hugs_kisses** · 05-30-2009, 09:22 AM

Originally Posted by DonaldMcDucks

as long as she has a big ass and titties im ok

Lulz pretty typical

**SecretAsnMan92** · 05-30-2009, 09:23 AM

internet.srsbizness

**Jaw-Knee** · 05-30-2009, 09:23 AM

Originally Posted by janky

Yup. that's where I voted hahah

I mean everyone has "standards" and sets a bar - but REALISTICALLY if you're in a slump and you're drunk and there's a fat girl beggin you to suck it - you start goin "well, she does have nice tits... her eyes are kinda pretty... I mean, I dunno... no one's around... I guess"

Just because you drop below your "standards" once or twice doesn't mean you run around pushing handicaps out of the wheelchairs and fukking them, just means you're realistic about the fact that DESPITE WHAT YOU WANT - SOMETIMES YOU SETTLE FOR LESS IN DIRE CIRCUMSTANCES

Nah, dude.

There's your ideal range, then there's what just makes the cut, then there's everything else.

"Standards" are the middle range.

**Al_Pal** · 05-30-2009, 09:25 AM

Originally Posted by janky

Yup. that's where I voted hahah

I mean everyone has "standards" and sets a bar - but REALISTICALLY if you're in a slump and you're drunk and there's a fat girl beggin you to suck it - you start goin "well, she does have nice tits... her eyes are kinda pretty... I mean, I dunno... no one's around... I guess"

Just because you drop below your "standards" once or twice doesn't mean you run around pushing handicaps out of the wheelchairs and fukking them, just means you're realistic about the fact that DESPITE WHAT YOU WANT - SOMETIMES YOU SETTLE FOR LESS IN DIRE CIRCUMSTANCES

i wouldnt even have to be in a slump. i could be ****ing a ten everynight, but if i had the chance to **** and ugly and NO ONE would find out, id still do it.

addicted my friend.

**Al_Pal** · 05-30-2009, 09:26 AM

lol @ "10s only for me. I kick it with al pal." i just seen that.

**janky** · 05-30-2009, 09:26 AM

Originally Posted by Jaw-Knee

Just looked at the results. Surprise, surprise. Bet they all drive Beemers and are packing 8+" too.

Don't know how to make it less subjective. I don't even really think you can.

What constitutes fatty status, though? What constitutes uggo status?

I know right? hahah

It's up to the voter. THEIR standards. I can't impose mine or yours on anyone else - has to be what they think.

And fwiw, I love some chub on a girl. I'll grab a girls belly and shake the **** out of it while I'm hitting it missionary just to freak em out

so to me, that may only drop a point or two (depending on belly size) while in others they'd be like "WHAT SHE DOESNT HAVE A SIX PACK?! SHES NOT GETTIN IN MY BEEMER AND DEFINITELY NOT TOUCHIN MY NASTYSAL PINKY RANG"

Originally Posted by DaBurg3r

How would you rate a butter face with a toucan sam nose and sand paper skin, but a dancers body? We just call that a brown bag special or something? "Does not rank?"

Help me out here.

up to you. Personally, I'd call a chick like that probably a 4/5 depending
Every girl falls on the scale somewhere man.. but it's gotta be by YOUR standards, not mine

Originally Posted by Jaw-Knee

Nah, dude.

There's your ideal range, then there's what just makes the cut, then there's everything else.

"Standards" are the middle range.

ideal = 10s only. I'm channing tatum's knockoff cousin

just makes the cut = whatever puts out for me and isn't hideous, 200+ lbs, handicapped, retarded, or a mutant freak

everything else = ^^^

pretty wide range there broseph.

**Jaw-Knee** · 05-30-2009, 09:30 AM

Originally Posted by janky

I know right? hahah

It's up to the voter. THEIR standards. I can't impose mine or yours on anyone else - has to be what they think.

And fwiw, I love some chub on a girl. I'll grab a girls belly and shake the **** out of it while I'm hitting it missionary just to freak em out

so to me, that may only drop a point or two (depending on belly size) while in others they'd be like "WHAT SHE DOESNT HAVE A SIX PACK?! SHES NOT GETTIN IN MY BEEMER AND DEFINITELY NOT TOUCHIN MY NASTYSAL PINKY RANG"

LOL

ideal = 10s only. I'm channing tatum's knockoff cousin

just makes the cut = whatever puts out for me and isn't hideous, 200+ lbs, handicapped, retarded, or a mutant freak

everything else = ^^^

pretty wide range there broseph.

Lol, then you have no standards. Gotta have shame to have standards, dude.

**Ibanez** · 05-30-2009, 09:32 AM

Poll already disproved OP.

**Al_Pal** · 05-30-2009, 09:35 AM

most of these guys who would only **** 7s and up are virgins. or the girl they are currently ****ing is a 5.

or 18 years old.

i remember in highschool standards were FUKED! way to high.

anyone with some time in the game 25 and older has ****ed some ugly bitches. it just happens

**NYY** · 05-30-2009, 09:36 AM

I selected 4+.

**janky** · 05-30-2009, 09:51 AM

Originally Posted by Al_Pal

i wouldnt even have to be in a slump. i could be ****ing a ten everynight, but if i had the chance to **** and ugly and NO ONE would find out, id still do it.

addicted my friend.

Yep. I call it "variety" hahah

Originally Posted by Jaw-Knee

LOL
Lol, then you have no standards. Gotta have shame to have standards, dude.

and that is something I lack

Originally Posted by Ibanez

Poll already disproved OP.

How so? The 4s and less are at about 12, the 7s are at 12. And you have to factor in what Al said.
Also, I'm ok with being proven wrong. I just want to know

Originally Posted by Al_Pal

most of these guys who would only **** 7s and up are virgins. or the girl they are currently ****ing is a 5.

or 18 years old.

i remember in highschool standards were FUKED! way to high.

anyone with some time in the game 25 and older has ****ed some ugly bitches. it just happens

EXACTLY. I kinda figured that virgins would vote 7+ because they don't know and havent been out there in the "Trenches" pullin for years.
Again, lol @ the same people who ask "Chick at the gym looked at me what do I do" voting "I only bang 7+"

(no offense guys, just not realistic hahah)

**DevotedLifter** · 05-30-2009, 09:59 AM

Originally Posted by janky

That's up to your standards bro. Vote by your standards.

To me a 4 is less than attractive, but may have one or two redeemable qualities (big ass despite her rat-like face, or incredibly nice tits despite the rest of her being large as well)

Again, up to you - My theory was always "never bang a girl that weighs close to what I do"
but that's MY theory, not yours lol
and unfortunately I have banged girls that were kinda close

Then by your standards i've not only banged a fatty, but I dated her for almost a year. I do have incredibly low standards compared to a lot of guys on this site. But why wouldn't you want to have low standards so that a larger fraction of the girls out there look hot to you? The most attractive girl (pic below) i've ever had sex with could at best be described as average. I'm okay with that because to me she was beautiful. Second from the left...

**janky** · 05-30-2009, 10:13 AM

Originally Posted by DevotedLifter

I'd take the one with the sunglasses on her head first. She's about a 6 in my book. Decent looking, but with tendencies towards bad hygeine and probably not caring how she dresses. None of these girls look very "girly" per se as far as how they're dressed, so to me she's more appealing than the rest. Has the most potential anyway...

Second I'd go with the redhead because I love redheads (its hard to find hot ones), I love librarian glasses, and she could clean up REALLY nicely. If she'd do her hair, wear a cute outfit and not be scared of makeup, she could be a little hottie. Probably another 6 in my book (cleaned up) as she sits prob 4/5 - personality would be the deciding factor on 4 or 5.

Third I'd go with the one you were talking about, 2nd from left - nothing great - nothing super attractive, could possibly clean up ok, just basic girl. Not absolutely hideous, but not attractive either. I'd say 5 on a good day.

The last chick in the blue just looks like a man. That **** bothers me.

None of these girls have a good fashion sense, and I'd feel awkward being dressed better than all of them lol.

**Miz-Zou** · 05-30-2009, 10:14 AM

7+ for me, and I'm not a virgin.

**Vagoda** · 05-30-2009, 10:15 AM

I settled for girls (3-6's) in the past because I felt the need to fuuck something and the fact that I felt I couldn't do better. Not gonna do it again. I wasn't happy, and didn't want to be seen with them.

Now is different. When i date, which isn't that much, the girls tend to be knock outs. I'm weird with standards. It is almost like the girl has to be perfect in every aspect, but they never fullfill what I'm looking for. It's a ****ed up cycle...

**janky** · 05-30-2009, 10:18 AM

Originally Posted by Miz-Zou

7+ for me, and I'm not a virgin.

Cool. I guess you fit into that category then...

Originally Posted by Vagoda

I settled for girls (3-6's) in the past because I felt the need to fuuck something and the fact that I felt I couldn't do better. Not gonna do it again. I wasn't happy, and didn't want to be seen with them.

Now is different. When i date, which isn't that much, the girls tend to be knock outs. I'm weird with standards. It is almost like the girl has to be perfect in every aspect, but they never fullfill what I'm looking for. It's a ****ed up cycle...

Me too.
My gf now is far from ugly lol - Im just saying, every guy at SOME point will bang an ugly if necessary.. at least that's my belief. Maybe thats not the case. Maybe guys will hold out for 7+ even if it means not getting laid for a grip...

Maybe JK was right.

Maybe it's buncha virgins saying "Id never bang anything under 7" lol
Maybe it's people misinterpretting and saying I only WANT to bang 7+ even though I HAVE banged 4s.

Who knows?

Poll in favor of 7+ so far...

**strong_penor** · 05-30-2009, 10:19 AM

What

Da

Fawk

(seriously guys)

**janky** · 05-30-2009, 10:22 AM

Originally Posted by strong_penor

What

Da

Fawk

(seriously guys)

ahaha sup penor?
how you been man?

ALSO - lol @ 3 votes for "10s only" from people on a relationship help forum

**Wimbeast** · 05-30-2009, 10:30 AM

If its sexual purposes only i'd bang a 5 but relationship wise, she better be at least a 7.

View Poll Results: What's the lowest you'd go on the looks scale for banging a girl????

Thread: HONEST POLL Men - What's the lowest you'd go on the looks scale?

Thread Tools

Search Thread