|
-
05-27-2009, 09:44 AM #31
-
05-27-2009, 09:48 AM #32
A nantional sales tax is blatantly unconstitutional. The 16th amendment specifically only gives congress the right to an income tax. If they pass the sales tax, I'll sue immediately, after I collect donations from other business owners.
As for the budget deficit, there is a much easier solution: cut spending.
-
-
05-27-2009, 10:01 AM #33
-
05-27-2009, 10:01 AM #34
-
05-27-2009, 10:02 AM #35
-
05-27-2009, 10:04 AM #36
-
-
05-27-2009, 10:11 AM #37
You're trying to invalidate the list of taxes because you disapprove of a statement in the post. If you're unable to prove that the list of taxes is inaccurate then perhaps you should keep your opinions to yourself of the other clowns wearing the fur hats at GulagOnline or whatever Soviet site you frequent.
My Goals:
For to make the heavy weights light and the baggy clothes tight.
-
05-27-2009, 10:17 AM #38
-
05-27-2009, 10:18 AM #39
-
05-27-2009, 10:18 AM #40
-
-
05-27-2009, 10:20 AM #41
-
05-27-2009, 10:38 AM #42
-
05-27-2009, 10:41 AM #43
-
05-27-2009, 10:58 AM #44
-
-
05-27-2009, 11:00 AM #45
-
05-27-2009, 11:01 AM #46
-
05-27-2009, 11:15 AM #47
- Join Date: Mar 2007
- Location: Texas, United States
- Age: 37
- Posts: 18,933
- Rep Power: 31858
Because someone posts an opinion that you disagree with doesn't mean facts posted previously become wrong.
Come on man you know this. You are just trying to be 100% right so much you can't see what's right in front of you.
If I say 2 +2 = 4, followed my "all Jews suck," my crappy opinion on Jews doesn't mean 2 + 2 =/= 4.Don't complain about the results you didn't get from the work you didn't do.
-
05-27-2009, 11:30 AM #48
-
-
05-27-2009, 11:42 AM #49
-
05-27-2009, 12:11 PM #50
If it makes you feel better I do support a flat tax. It would take away the incentives of being poor and Americans would start becoming more competitive towards one another which is better for the country as a whole.
Even people with sub-par intelligence can make it good in America simply because the the will for others to strive is mising from the equation.
-
05-27-2009, 12:13 PM #51
- Join Date: Jul 2002
- Location: Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
- Age: 45
- Posts: 9,342
- Rep Power: 4846
Wow. Just wow. So a national sales tax is being proposed to pay for universal healthcare. Oh wait, no forget that. I thought we'd pay for universal healthcare (socialized medicine) with letting the "Bush tax cuts" expire and improvements in Medicare cost cutting. That's what we were told just a few months ago:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/200...co/19334/print
I see deception run amok here.---ATTENTION ALL FATASSES: stop whining and put the fork down!!
Trying to cure poverty with government is like trying to sober up with whiskey shots.
-
05-27-2009, 12:21 PM #52
In Idaho we would have National Income Tax + National Sales Tax + State Income Tax + State Sales Tax.
Just what we need in a weakened economy - EVEN LESS BUYING POWER than we already have.
btw - Currently we pay a 6.5% sales tax and I pay more in state income taxes annually than I do on federal income taxes, so in retrospect it sounds like Texas is 'dirt cheap' in comparison.
The 'change' Obama was talking about is the 'change' that he has taken out of my pockets.Last edited by IdahoViking; 05-27-2009 at 12:24 PM.
-
-
05-27-2009, 12:31 PM #53
-
05-27-2009, 12:42 PM #54
- Join Date: Oct 2003
- Location: New York, United States
- Age: 68
- Posts: 19,925
- Rep Power: 10376
A national sales tax is unconstitutional. But who pays attention to a 200 year old living document!
Amendment 16 - Status of Income Tax Clarified. Ratified 2/3/1913.
The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration
History
16th Amendment
In 1895, in the Supreme Court case of Pollock v Farmer's Loan and Trust (157 U.S. 429), the Court disallowed a federal tax on income from real property. The tax was designed to be an indirect tax, which would mean that states need not contribute portions of a whole relative to its census figures. The Court, however, ruled that the tax was a direct tax and subject to apportionment. This was the last in a series of conflicting court decisions dating back to the Civil War. Between 1895 and 1909, when the amendment was passed by Congress, the Court began to back down on its position, as it became clear not only to accountants but to everyone that the solvency of the nation was in jeopardy. In a series of cases, the definition of "direct tax" was modified, bent, twisted, and coaxed to allow more taxation efforts that approached an income tax.
Finally, with the ratification of the 16th Amendment, any doubt was removed. The text of the Amendment makes it clear that though the categories of direct and indirect taxation still exist, any determination that income tax is a direct tax will be irrelevant, because taxes on incomes, from salary or from real estate, are explicitly to be treated as indirect. The Congress passed the Amendment on July 12, 1909, and it was ratified on February 3, 1913 (1,302 days).
-
05-27-2009, 12:47 PM #55
-
05-27-2009, 12:49 PM #56
-
-
05-27-2009, 12:50 PM #57
-
05-27-2009, 12:52 PM #58
-
05-27-2009, 12:58 PM #59
-
05-27-2009, 12:59 PM #60
Similar Threads
-
The shock of being considered "Old"
By Mango7 in forum Over Age 35Replies: 49Last Post: 12-26-2006, 09:27 AM
Bookmarks