has anyone ever heard of this?
This works: Chew your food 30-80 times. Your food will be mostly digested in your mouth so your body absorbs hardly any of it. AND your jaw will be hella tired once your halfway thru your meal.
wonder if it really works.... maybe it'll help my weight loss
Thread: chewing food 30-80 times?
05-23-2009, 12:15 AM #1
chewing food 30-80 times?
05-23-2009, 12:17 AM #2
05-23-2009, 12:32 AM #3
05-23-2009, 12:35 AM #4
- Join Date: Apr 2008
- Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
- Age: 33
- Posts: 1,143
- Rep Power: 477
05-23-2009, 12:38 AM #5
05-23-2009, 04:27 AM #6
- Join Date: May 2009
- Location: Leeds, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Age: 26
- Posts: 11,937
- Rep Power: 17842
05-23-2009, 04:45 AM #7
it is not as stupid as it sounds guys.
-- >> http://www.ajcn.org/cgi/content/short/89/3/794?rss=1
Am J Clin Nutr 89: 794-800, 2009.
Mastication of almonds: effects of lipid bioaccessibility, appetite, and hormone response
Bridget A Cassady1,2,3, James H Hollis1,2,3, Angie D Fulford1,2,3, Robert V Considine1,2,3 and Richard D Mattes1,2,3
1 From the Department of Foods and Nutrition, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN (BAC, JHH, and RDM), and the Department of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN (ADF and RVC).
2 Supported by a research grant from the Almond Board of California, which also donated the almonds.
3 Reprints not available. Address correspondence to RD Mattes, Purdue University, Department of Foods and Nutrition, Stone Hall, Room 212, 700 W State Street, West Lafayette, IN 47907-2059. E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org.
Background: Epidemiologic and clinical data indicate that nuts can be incorporated into the diet without compromising body weight. This has been attributed to strong satiety properties, increased resting energy expenditure, and limited lipid bioaccessibility.
Objective: The role of mastication was explored because of evidence that the availability of nut lipids is largely dependent on the mechanical fracture of their cell walls.
Design: In a randomized, 3-arm, crossover study, 13 healthy adults (body mass index, in kg/m2: 23.1 ? 0.4) chewed 55 g almonds 10, 25, or 40 times. Blood was collected and appetite was monitored during the following 3 h. Over the next 4 d, all foods were provided, including 55 g almonds, which were consumed under the same chewing conditions. Complete fecal samples were collected.
Results: Hunger was acutely suppressed below baseline (P < 0.05), and fullness was elevated above baseline longer (P < 0.05) after 40 chews than after 25 chews. Two hours after consumption, fullness levels were significantly lower and hunger levels were significantly higher after 25 chews than after 10 and 40 chews (P < 0.05). Initial postingestive glucagon-like peptide-1 concentrations were significantly lower after 25 chews than after 40 chews (P < 0.05), and insulin concentrations declined more rapidly after 25 and 40 chews than after 10 chews (both P < 0.05). Fecal fat excretion was significantly higher after 10 chews than after 25 and 40 chews (both P < 0.05). All participants had higher fecal energy losses after 10 and 25 chews than after 40 chews (P < 0.005).
Conclusion: The results indicate important differences in appetitive and physiologic responses to masticating nuts and likely other foods and nutrients. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00768417*perfer et obdura; dolor hic tibi proderit olim*
"The greatest rewards are always reserved for those who bring great value to themselves and the world around them as a result of whom and what they have become." - Jim Rohn
It's your call. DRIV.... E.
Reps for protein powder, puppies, or anyone who buys me a house.
05-23-2009, 05:01 AM #8
- Join Date: Sep 2007
- Location: Florida, United States
- Age: 44
- Posts: 22,748
- Rep Power: 89529
05-23-2009, 06:43 AM #9
05-23-2009, 07:41 AM #10
05-23-2009, 08:33 AM #11
I'm not an expert in the matter, but logically to me this doesn't make sense. Sure the food will be further broken down in your math, but the nutrients don't suddenly disappear. It would seem to me the only change is that the food will spend less time being digested. In a way that would always make me believe that it will actually get absorbed FASTER than just eating it normally.
05-23-2009, 08:37 AM #12
05-23-2009, 08:43 AM #13
- Join Date: Mar 2008
- Location: Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States
- Age: 28
- Posts: 9,504
- Rep Power: 10949
dont you only have enzymes to break down certain macronutrients in your saliva though? and that study was kinda all over the place with its results.
-they were less hungry after 10 chews (less) and 40 chews (more) when compared to 25 chews? thats pretty much a no result?
-Insulin declined slower after the higher number of chews (this supports OP's idea)
-fat in the feces was higher when you chewed less (doesnt this actually go against the OPs idea and say chewing less would be better for fat loss?)
i have semi-limited experience with reading abstracts so correct me if i'm wrong on any of that!WWJD-What Would Jesus Deadlift?
May God bless you with enough foolishness to believe that you really CAN make a difference in this world, so that you are able, with God's grace, to do what others claim cannot be done. -From the Four-Fold Franciscan Blessing
Who Says I Can't Pack on Mass (my log)?
richbodyfit.com<--- awesome trainer and workout partner!
05-23-2009, 08:49 AM #14
Fecal fat excretion was significantly higher after 10 chews than after 25 and 40 chews (both P < 0.05). All participants had higher fecal energy losses after 10 and 25 chews than after 40 chews (P < 0.005).**Best Android Apps with Pics and Description** - http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=132508573
- Join Date: Mar 2009
- Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Age: 28
- Posts: 1,276
- Rep Power: 4448
**No Clean-up Crew**
05-23-2009, 08:50 AM #15
05-23-2009, 09:22 AM #16
- Join Date: Oct 2005
- Location: New York, United States
- Posts: 24,701
- Rep Power: 34044
05-23-2009, 09:56 AM #17
- Join Date: Mar 2009
- Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
- Age: 30
- Posts: 1,381
- Rep Power: 1183
you guys chew your food?
****.ahhh... moderation you've gotten the best of me.
Personal log "The backwards experiment" - Experiment in "raising my g-flux levels"
I will be changing my fitness level around weight gain/loss, NOT my diet.
05-23-2009, 10:00 AM #18
05-23-2009, 10:08 AM #19
05-23-2009, 10:12 AM #20
MET-Rx/Pure Protein Board Rep
- Join Date: Aug 2006
- Location: Erie, Pennsylvania, United States
- Age: 28
- Posts: 22,445
- Rep Power: 34841
*Disclaimer: The thoughts and opinions of this rep are of his own and does not reflect MET-Rx/Pure Protein as a company. This user is a Bodybuilding.com board representative and is not an employee of MET-Rx/Pure Protein.*
Iron Mulisha Athlete
05-23-2009, 10:19 AM #21
- Join Date: Feb 2009
- Location: Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
- Age: 33
- Posts: 2,057
- Rep Power: 1014
05-23-2009, 10:29 AM #22
05-23-2009, 10:32 AM #23
By IwantTMacsbody in forum NutritionReplies: 8Last Post: 08-27-2007, 04:28 PM
By jughead4466 in forum NutritionReplies: 3Last Post: 07-26-2006, 09:01 PM
By therock003 in forum NutritionReplies: 5Last Post: 09-25-2005, 09:25 PM
By ClassClown in forum NutritionReplies: 7Last Post: 03-01-2005, 10:25 AM
By strongerone1 in forum NutritionReplies: 5Last Post: 08-27-2003, 02:22 PM