**This might be a repost but I can't find the 'repost'** Anyways I want to know people's opinion on it. SRS, cause idk if I should lift for size or for strength. Give me some of your perspectives, please.
Would you rather have the body of Ronnie Coleman but you can't even curl a 40lb dumbbell? or would you rather have the body of skinny prick shown below and bench 315.
|
|
View Poll Results: Yes roids and no str?
- Voters
- 16. You may not vote on this poll
-
HELL NO
3 18.75% -
Yes, we have intelligent nerbs who do it.
4 25.00% -
I just lift, sir.
9 56.25%
Results 1 to 4 of 4
-
05-14-2009, 01:21 PM #1Banned
- Join Date: Mar 2009
- Age: 29
- Posts: 2,407
- Rep Power: 0
You are swole but can't bench the bar? Do you even lift, son?
-
05-14-2009, 01:22 PM #2Rep Power: 696969
- Join Date: Oct 2006
- Location: Manhattan, Kansas, United States
- Age: 33
- Posts: 25,718
- Rep Power: 53416
until you are super strong lift for strength
-
05-14-2009, 01:24 PM #3Fappacino
- Join Date: Dec 2008
- Location: East Sussex, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Age: 34
- Posts: 403
- Rep Power: 196
I would rather have my body than either of those two.
But srs i lift for looks, i dont give a fk how much i lift.This is England.
-
05-14-2009, 01:24 PM #4Dropped out of the comp
- Join Date: Apr 2009
- Age: 30
- Posts: 1,060
- Rep Power: 251
do 5-8 reps per set. You'll get the best of both worlds(which you, evidently need.)
Bookmarks