|
Thread: filling out chest...
-
04-29-2009, 06:09 AM #31
-
04-29-2009, 06:24 AM #32
-
-
04-29-2009, 06:25 AM #33
-
04-29-2009, 06:29 AM #34
-
04-29-2009, 06:43 AM #35
-
04-29-2009, 06:54 AM #36
- Join Date: Nov 2007
- Location: United States
- Age: 40
- Posts: 657
- Rep Power: 412
After awhile I think it's just a matter of size & bodyfat...then you can start worrying about inner, outer, upper & lower. At your height & weight category I think the only way to have a great chest would be having a very low bodyfat percentage.
So I would say focus on gaining mass, then reducing your bodyfat a bit. The lines that were covered up by fat start to show it was there all along. I think the training specific regions of chest & biceps would be for more advanced categories. Adding fifteen or twenty pounds of muscle over your whole body & emphasizing this area with a variety of exercises I believe will do better for your titties, arms(or any muscle) than any wonder exercise.
However, I think its ridiculous to say you can't emphasize certain parts of a muscle, like many people who follow the pure, dry sciency methods in the forums. Far too many real life experiences seem to negate those ideas. Why is it that doing certain angles, exercises & variations shift the tension & burning sensation to different portions of the same muscle(and by that I mean I'm not talking about something broad like "Legs", but a specific muscle group)?? I think there is a place for this type of training, but its more for people who are at or near competition level bodybuilding.Last edited by Saku39; 04-29-2009 at 06:59 AM.
Freeourhealthcarenow.org
Be Pro-Choice! Contribute your signature, while you still can, to your natural right to Choose your Medical Treatments without Government intrusion or bureaucratic panels. As of now, over 1.3 million signed!
www.randpaul2010.com
-
-
04-29-2009, 06:54 AM #37
You may be over training your chest. This is about twice as much work as I do for my chest on Monday's.
Just my opinion but if you're doing the pec deck you don't need the cable crossovers and vice versa.
here's what mine looks like:
(First you must know that before I started this routine I had just finished a 12 wk routine that was similar but I needed to switch up some of the exercises and the amount of sets.)
FB- 7x5
Dec B- 3x8-12(failure)
Inc Fly- 3x8-12(failure)
13 sets, and still that is pushing it.
this workout is for strength first, then hypertrophy. In the past 8 wks I've seen my bench rise almost 15 lbs.
happy lifting
-
04-29-2009, 07:28 AM #38
do a search, read the science, youll soon find out that youre wrong. compartmentalization hypothesis. and as soon as i switched from DB flies to cable flies, my middle chest started to fill in, why? because there was resistance at the end of the move, where i really had to just squeeze it.
absolutely agree.
-
04-29-2009, 10:27 AM #39
- Join Date: Feb 2009
- Location: West Frankfort, Illinois, United States
- Age: 55
- Posts: 2
- Rep Power: 0
I am fairly new to body building. This is my first post, so I'm hoping I don't come across as an idiot.
Speaking from my personal experience, I have noticed while doing incline that if the angle is too steep, it works the shoulders more than the upper chest. If the bench is adjustable, I suggest lowering it a notch and giving that a whirl. This worked wonders for me.'The dictionary is the only place where success comes before work.' -- Vince Lombardi
-
04-29-2009, 10:32 AM #40
- Join Date: Jan 2004
- Location: New York, New York, United States
- Age: 58
- Posts: 3,707
- Rep Power: 3128
I'd recommend any single-arm fly where your arm crosses the middle of your pecs at the peak contraction. Always helps bring out that inner separation on me. I prefer cable or machine flies for this as there's a lot of tension at the peak; I can't recreate that sensation nearly as effectively when using a dumbbell.
Keep on hulkin'.
I won't quit till no shirt will fit.
-
-
04-29-2009, 11:09 AM #41
-
04-29-2009, 11:17 AM #42
-
04-29-2009, 11:06 PM #43
-
04-29-2009, 11:42 PM #44
From your picture I think your chest overall lacks size, no one point seems to stand out, lower or upper. I think instead of focusing on one part of your chest you should just keep focusing your efforts on building your whole chest. Once you reach your goal weight than I belive you should start focusing on bringing up the lagging parts of your chest. Thats just my opinion take it for what its worth.
-
-
04-30-2009, 07:08 AM #45
id have to disagree here, the chest is a smaller muscle when you compare it to your back, legs etc. IMO most people can do chest 2x a week, personally i dont like to because it messes with the whole schedule. it also depends what your rep scheme is, if youve got high volume then 2x a week may not be the way to go, if your going for strength, low reps, then ya, 2x a week is often possible.
and i train my calves every other day lol...
-
04-30-2009, 08:03 AM #46
-
04-30-2009, 08:52 AM #47
-
04-30-2009, 10:48 AM #48
inner and upper
http://gasparinutrition.chapmanmedia.../episode1.html
starts about 1:50
-
-
05-01-2009, 11:25 PM #49
I have been experiencing the same issue with my inner chest. I saw one of the pro bodybuilders (can't remember who) doing cable flys without the handles... I tried it, and all I can say is WOW! you get great range of motion, it burns like hell and it hits the inner peck with furry... I have seen great results doing it this way... You can't go to heavy because you are just holding the ends of the cables, but man the pump you get... Give it a try and let me know how it feels...
-
05-02-2009, 02:31 AM #50
-
05-02-2009, 11:53 AM #51
Bookmarks