|
-
03-11-2009, 07:20 PM #1
-
03-12-2009, 05:26 AM #2
-
03-12-2009, 05:29 AM #3
-
03-12-2009, 05:33 AM #4
- Join Date: Sep 2007
- Location: Florida, United States
- Age: 51
- Posts: 22,582
- Rep Power: 91685
It is nice to see a thread like this. Maybe it will help a few people get rid of the broscience that gets passed around. Tanulean's right, this is discussed plenty on these boards, but old habits die hard, and many bodybuilders tend to be stubborn to change...and in case you didn't know, that sentence that he typed just above his fat loss log, is sarcasm.
-
-
03-12-2009, 05:44 AM #5
-
03-12-2009, 06:19 AM #6
- Join Date: Jun 2006
- Location: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
- Age: 43
- Posts: 301
- Rep Power: 237
Not saying there is no impact but the bigger issue is total calories.
_________________________________________
Actual:
September 1, 2008: 170 lbs and 15% bf
December 31, 2008: 190 lbs and 18% bf
April 30, 2009: 165 lbs and 11% bf
Goals:
June 23, 2009: 155 lbs and 9% bf
July 2009 = Maintenance phase
August 2009 to December 2009 = Bulking
January 2010 to May 2010 = Cutting
-
03-12-2009, 06:35 AM #7
-
03-12-2009, 06:48 AM #8
-
-
03-12-2009, 07:21 AM #9Additionally, monkeys that showed the greatest nighttime calorie intake did not gain more weight (p = 0.94) than monkeys that showed the least nighttime calorie intake. DISCUSSION: These results show that eating at night is not associated with an increased propensity to gain weight, suggesting that individuals trying to lose weight should not rely on decreasing evening calorie intake as a primary strategy for promoting weight loss.
-
03-12-2009, 08:07 AM #10
-
03-12-2009, 08:45 AM #11
-
03-12-2009, 08:56 AM #12
-
-
03-12-2009, 09:01 AM #13
-
03-12-2009, 09:03 AM #14
- Join Date: Mar 2008
- Location: United States
- Age: 38
- Posts: 2,037
- Rep Power: 2435
-
03-12-2009, 09:04 AM #15
-
03-12-2009, 09:05 AM #16
- Join Date: Jan 2009
- Location: New York, United States
- Age: 37
- Posts: 1,143
- Rep Power: 246
-
-
03-12-2009, 09:39 AM #17
Hmmm.. well let's see.. 200lb person burns roughly 50-70cals per hour when sleeping and roughly 80-100 per hour while awake and doing nothing. So, you can come to your own conclusions with that.
See above. While it's not enough to gain a lot of weight(if any) it could make a difference if you were cutting to be in a show where you need to be at a certain BF%. Yep, and that article is just a theory as is your opinion.
It also been proven true, so what's your point other than showing your ignorance? Eating at night, while still under/at your calories for the day won't make a significant difference in "average joe" .. however people with GERD, Diabetics and some other problems will gain weight. Also, eating food high in sugar at night isn't a good idea. You go to bed your body is in a resting state and the body can't burn the food off as quick. When you eat food, your body changes the food you eat into sugar and uses the sugar for energy. Energy not there where do you think it goes?Gamecocks/Broncos/Braves
Wherever you go, there you are.
Squatchin' ain't easy.
-
03-12-2009, 09:47 AM #18
-
03-12-2009, 09:50 AM #19
- Join Date: Jan 2009
- Location: New York, United States
- Age: 37
- Posts: 1,143
- Rep Power: 246
So let's see how much sense this make and if I understand this correctly.
You are saying avg. person burns 80-100 cals / hr.
You are saying avg. person burns 50-70 cals / hr.
So let's say I do weight training at 5:00 pm and burn 500 cals / hr doing this.
The conclusion I get from this is that I should eat the biggest portion of my calories around the time of my workout?
This does make sense, but it will have no effect whatsoever on body composition.
The body does not work like a machine that revolves around a 24 hour period.add me : http://www.********.com/mbobilin
fat loss log : http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=128202591
Bookmarks