...old country onto their new countries. If you wanted sharia law, if you wanted people to be lynched for drawing a cartoon, if you wanted people to be tortured for saying meaningless words.... Why the FOKK did you leave your previous country?
|
Closed Thread
Results 1 to 30 of 46
-
03-06-2009, 10:17 PM #1
I've never understood while Muslim immigrants force the backwards ways of their....
-
03-06-2009, 10:19 PM #2
Because as I understand islam requires that all become believers or die.
It's not enough for them to have their belief, you must have it as well, or you will die.
Pretty basic facet of religion. Christianity is no different. these laws are parts of the religion that ensure it flourishes in the face of opposition. The christian time was a few hundred years ago. Now it seems as though islam believes it is their time.
Thankfully some people have 'reason' with which to battle the incredulity of others.Last edited by geeseman; 03-06-2009 at 10:22 PM.
-
03-06-2009, 10:20 PM #3
*crickets chirping*
Not many of the kooks that support sharia law will reply here.
-
03-06-2009, 10:21 PM #4
We'll the whole wanting wanting sharia law in britain thing is really not understood. Muslims wanted to be judged by sharia law ruling on events like divorces. They dint want sharia law for all of britain. But sharia law for the muslim population in britain.
About the cartoons, lets just put it this way. If someone went up to your mom and spit in her face. Youd wanna beat the crap outa him.
The words meaningless to you, but not too us.
-
-
03-06-2009, 10:23 PM #5
-
03-06-2009, 10:23 PM #6
-
03-06-2009, 10:23 PM #7
-
03-06-2009, 10:24 PM #8
-
-
03-06-2009, 10:26 PM #9
-
03-06-2009, 10:26 PM #10
- Join Date: Jan 2009
- Location: Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Age: 39
- Posts: 1,050
- Rep Power: 314
That's a physical threat.
If someone was saying things I didn't like to my Mum I would get angry but so long as they didn't breach the line of intimidation (which is a type of force) I would have no right to respond with force.
I can't say if I would or would not react badly, now I can say I wouldn't, but in that situation who can know. What I do know, is to retaliate to someone's speech with violence is wrong.
No one spat in your Mum's face. They made a cartoon about a dead guy.
-
03-06-2009, 10:27 PM #11
-
03-06-2009, 10:30 PM #12
Well when those cartoons came it. It was like you spat in every Muslims face. Thats why we ragged.
But don't think Muslims agree with how far the protests went. We had protests here in Canada too. But no one got arrested. There was protests all over the world. What happened in Britain was the only place were it went out of control.
-
-
03-06-2009, 10:30 PM #13
Why wouldn't they?
Civilizations die from suicide, not by murder. - Arnold J. Toynbee
"Death of the West:How Dying Populations and Immigrant Invasions Imperil Our Country and Civilization", -Patrick Buchanan.
I have AWMNS(angry white male nerd syndrome), its an offshoot of AWMS(angry white male syndrome) but incorporates my nerdy demeanor.
-
03-06-2009, 10:32 PM #14
-
03-06-2009, 10:33 PM #15
-
03-06-2009, 10:35 PM #16
-
-
03-06-2009, 10:40 PM #17
-
03-06-2009, 10:41 PM #18
-
03-06-2009, 10:42 PM #19
-
03-06-2009, 10:44 PM #20
Dont assume.
No they don't have the right. But chances are they will harm you.
Why? Because you insulted there people. Different people take insults differently. For example you can insult me all you want, but insult my family and i get pissed. You are different. Everyone's different. Everyone has a limit. On the day the cartoons came out, you crossed that limit. We were pissed.
Muslims everywhere being hated on even though they don't support terrorism. My grandma got yelled to go back to her own country, shes a 4th generation Canadian. But on top of that you decide to piss us off even more and expect us to sit there and take it. The world doesn't work that way. For every action there's a reaction.
-
-
03-06-2009, 10:45 PM #21
- Join Date: Jan 2009
- Location: Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Age: 39
- Posts: 1,050
- Rep Power: 314
That's exactly why you shouldn't beat them up, by doing so you're taking away the right that guy fought to protect.
There are limits to freedom of speech, harassment/intimidation is one. If it's some parade and they are protesting against veterens, people who are unhappy can leave, they can free themselves of the speech they don't want to hear.
If people protest outside a veterens home, and get in his face whenever he comes outside, he should call the police.
Also free speech is also only something the Government has to adhere to. I don't have to allow free speech in my home, it's my property. BB.com doesn't have to allow free speech here, it's their forum.
But no law should restrict free speech.
-
03-06-2009, 10:46 PM #22Civilizations die from suicide, not by murder. - Arnold J. Toynbee
"Death of the West:How Dying Populations and Immigrant Invasions Imperil Our Country and Civilization", -Patrick Buchanan.
I have AWMNS(angry white male nerd syndrome), its an offshoot of AWMS(angry white male syndrome) but incorporates my nerdy demeanor.
-
03-06-2009, 10:48 PM #23
- Join Date: Jan 2009
- Location: Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Age: 39
- Posts: 1,050
- Rep Power: 314
I do not think that Muslims should not have got angry, by any means. You are allowed to be angry, and you're allowed to yell in anger, at people who make you angry.
But you have no right to physically harm someone's person or property on the bases of something they said or picture they drew.
-
03-06-2009, 10:50 PM #24
Im leaving but on a last note im ganna say what i said in my last post.
You dont know what it feels like to say the N word to a black guy.
and you dont know what if feels like to have those cartoons everywere to a muslim.
-
-
03-06-2009, 10:51 PM #25
-
03-06-2009, 10:52 PM #26
-
03-06-2009, 10:53 PM #27
-
03-06-2009, 11:01 PM #28
-
-
03-06-2009, 11:08 PM #29
-
03-06-2009, 11:14 PM #30
Bookmarks