View Poll Results: Good idea?

Voters
9. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    5 55.56%
  • No

    4 44.44%
Reply
Results 1 to 20 of 20
  1. #1
    Registered User Deathhawk's Avatar
    Join Date: Dec 2005
    Location: United States
    Posts: 3,003
    Rep Power: 277
    Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50) Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50) Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50) Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50) Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50) Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50) Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50) Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50) Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50) Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50) Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50)
    Deathhawk is offline

    Question Is this a good idea (reps for serious answers)?

    *sigh* Well I'm presently just under 220 pounds at 5'7". I still feel small though. I know I'm ****ed in the head, but who cares. The things is that I'm starting to platough. I mean the gains are really coming along slowly. I'm thinking about this: bulk to either 225 or 230 and then spend about 2-3 months just cutting and going much lighter than usually with perfect form to kinda change it up. Maybe every few workouts I'd go heavy to retain strength, but it'd generally be considerably lighter. I've read that cycling weight like that can be great - that your body will eventually stop responding to just constantly getting pounded.

    Good idea?

    BTW who else here always feels like they're shrinking even though the scale and weights you're using suggest otherwise?

    *edit* I should specify that when I refer to a "serious" answer I mean one that's actually decent volume. Nothing like "Yeah."

    kthnx
    Last edited by Deathhawk; 03-03-2009 at 09:44 PM.
    This account now only serves as an archive.
    Reply With Quote

  2. #2
    Registered User WorkoutKid02's Avatar
    Join Date: Nov 2007
    Location: Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States
    Age: 35
    Posts: 417
    Rep Power: 202
    WorkoutKid02 has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) WorkoutKid02 has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) WorkoutKid02 has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) WorkoutKid02 has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) WorkoutKid02 has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) WorkoutKid02 has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) WorkoutKid02 has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) WorkoutKid02 has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) WorkoutKid02 has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) WorkoutKid02 has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) WorkoutKid02 has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0)
    WorkoutKid02 is offline
    kids a monster..bulk away bro
    Reply With Quote

  3. #3
    Registered User Deathhawk's Avatar
    Join Date: Dec 2005
    Location: United States
    Posts: 3,003
    Rep Power: 277
    Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50) Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50) Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50) Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50) Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50) Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50) Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50) Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50) Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50) Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50) Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50)
    Deathhawk is offline
    Originally Posted by WorkoutKid02 View Post
    kids a monster..bulk away bro
    Bulk to 230 then cut and go light like I said in the OP?
    This account now only serves as an archive.
    Reply With Quote

  4. #4
    Ex-Teen BBer of the Week DieselFella's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2004
    Location: New York, New York, United States
    Age: 35
    Posts: 3,506
    Rep Power: 500
    DieselFella has a spectacular aura about. (+250) DieselFella has a spectacular aura about. (+250) DieselFella has a spectacular aura about. (+250) DieselFella has a spectacular aura about. (+250) DieselFella has a spectacular aura about. (+250) DieselFella has a spectacular aura about. (+250) DieselFella has a spectacular aura about. (+250) DieselFella has a spectacular aura about. (+250) DieselFella has a spectacular aura about. (+250) DieselFella has a spectacular aura about. (+250) DieselFella has a spectacular aura about. (+250)
    DieselFella is offline
    cut asap
    Reply With Quote

  5. #5
    Registered User Deathhawk's Avatar
    Join Date: Dec 2005
    Location: United States
    Posts: 3,003
    Rep Power: 277
    Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50) Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50) Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50) Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50) Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50) Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50) Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50) Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50) Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50) Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50) Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50)
    Deathhawk is offline
    Originally Posted by DieselFella View Post
    cut asap
    Really? Why so urgent?

    BTW if you're thinking about my avatar pic that's ancient.
    This account now only serves as an archive.
    Reply With Quote

  6. #6
    Banned Iaskwhynot's Avatar
    Join Date: Nov 2008
    Age: 33
    Posts: 3,070
    Rep Power: 0
    Iaskwhynot is just really nice. (+1000) Iaskwhynot is just really nice. (+1000) Iaskwhynot is just really nice. (+1000) Iaskwhynot is just really nice. (+1000) Iaskwhynot is just really nice. (+1000) Iaskwhynot is just really nice. (+1000) Iaskwhynot is just really nice. (+1000) Iaskwhynot is just really nice. (+1000) Iaskwhynot is just really nice. (+1000) Iaskwhynot is just really nice. (+1000) Iaskwhynot is just really nice. (+1000)
    Iaskwhynot is offline
    What BF% are you now?
    Reply With Quote

  7. #7
    Registered User Deathhawk's Avatar
    Join Date: Dec 2005
    Location: United States
    Posts: 3,003
    Rep Power: 277
    Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50) Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50) Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50) Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50) Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50) Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50) Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50) Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50) Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50) Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50) Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50)
    Deathhawk is offline
    Originally Posted by Iaskwhynot View Post
    What BF% are you now?
    Not sure. I'm 217 now and when I was 195 I had visible abs but not real detailed.It si pretty high though. I'm trying to gain .5 pounds/week. Maybe I'm.....18%. **** IDK.
    This account now only serves as an archive.
    Reply With Quote

  8. #8
    Registered User warman2442's Avatar
    Join Date: Apr 2008
    Age: 34
    Posts: 63
    Rep Power: 0
    warman2442 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) warman2442 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) warman2442 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) warman2442 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) warman2442 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) warman2442 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) warman2442 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) warman2442 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10)
    warman2442 is offline
    Cut asap as the other guy said
    Reply With Quote

  9. #9
    ¯\o_(ツ)_o/¯ av1atic's Avatar
    Join Date: Dec 2007
    Location: California, United States
    Age: 32
    Posts: 5,240
    Rep Power: 2114
    av1atic is just really nice. (+1000) av1atic is just really nice. (+1000) av1atic is just really nice. (+1000) av1atic is just really nice. (+1000) av1atic is just really nice. (+1000) av1atic is just really nice. (+1000) av1atic is just really nice. (+1000) av1atic is just really nice. (+1000) av1atic is just really nice. (+1000) av1atic is just really nice. (+1000) av1atic is just really nice. (+1000)
    av1atic is offline
    lol its a good idea bro but im havin the exact opposite problem
    im getting alot bigger/stronger but the scale isnt moving haha
    please respond
    Reply With Quote

  10. #10
    Registered User timothybryce's Avatar
    Join Date: Feb 2009
    Age: 34
    Posts: 121
    Rep Power: 188
    timothybryce has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) timothybryce has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) timothybryce has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) timothybryce has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) timothybryce has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) timothybryce has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) timothybryce has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) timothybryce has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) timothybryce has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) timothybryce has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) timothybryce has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0)
    timothybryce is offline
    just my opinion, but I would clean bulk for the next month or two and then start a good cut. I don't know about you but it's gonna be summer here in 2-3 months so I'm gonna start a cut soon so I have good defintion without a shirt on
    Reply With Quote

  11. #11
    Registered User GLHF's Avatar
    Join Date: Oct 2008
    Posts: 2,902
    Rep Power: 0
    GLHF is the lowest scum of the boards. (Worst Rank) GLHF is the lowest scum of the boards. (Worst Rank) GLHF is the lowest scum of the boards. (Worst Rank) GLHF is the lowest scum of the boards. (Worst Rank) GLHF is the lowest scum of the boards. (Worst Rank) GLHF is the lowest scum of the boards. (Worst Rank) GLHF is the lowest scum of the boards. (Worst Rank) GLHF is the lowest scum of the boards. (Worst Rank) GLHF is the lowest scum of the boards. (Worst Rank) GLHF is the lowest scum of the boards. (Worst Rank) GLHF is the lowest scum of the boards. (Worst Rank)
    GLHF is offline
    why cut "asap" that makes no sense...
    just bulk up to 230, then go down to w/e u want.
    Reply With Quote

  12. #12
    Banned Iaskwhynot's Avatar
    Join Date: Nov 2008
    Age: 33
    Posts: 3,070
    Rep Power: 0
    Iaskwhynot is just really nice. (+1000) Iaskwhynot is just really nice. (+1000) Iaskwhynot is just really nice. (+1000) Iaskwhynot is just really nice. (+1000) Iaskwhynot is just really nice. (+1000) Iaskwhynot is just really nice. (+1000) Iaskwhynot is just really nice. (+1000) Iaskwhynot is just really nice. (+1000) Iaskwhynot is just really nice. (+1000) Iaskwhynot is just really nice. (+1000) Iaskwhynot is just really nice. (+1000)
    Iaskwhynot is offline
    Originally Posted by Deathhawk View Post
    Not sure. I'm 217 now and when I was 195 I had visible abs but not real detailed.It si pretty high though. I'm trying to gain .5 pounds/week. Maybe I'm.....18%. **** IDK.
    By wanting to go to lighter weights your currently doing high intensity low volume mostly then?

    And i wouldnt want to be bulking if i was 18% and had plans on competing anytime soon. If your using gear (which i doubt with the weight gain estimate) then i would say go for as clean a bulk as possible then cut. But if your not like i expect, i would say maybe just cut down to something like 12-14% keep it reasonable and then bulk back up to 18% at 235 or w/e.
    Reply With Quote

  13. #13
    Banned Iaskwhynot's Avatar
    Join Date: Nov 2008
    Age: 33
    Posts: 3,070
    Rep Power: 0
    Iaskwhynot is just really nice. (+1000) Iaskwhynot is just really nice. (+1000) Iaskwhynot is just really nice. (+1000) Iaskwhynot is just really nice. (+1000) Iaskwhynot is just really nice. (+1000) Iaskwhynot is just really nice. (+1000) Iaskwhynot is just really nice. (+1000) Iaskwhynot is just really nice. (+1000) Iaskwhynot is just really nice. (+1000) Iaskwhynot is just really nice. (+1000) Iaskwhynot is just really nice. (+1000)
    Iaskwhynot is offline
    Originally Posted by GLHF View Post
    why cut "asap" that makes no sense...
    just bulk up to 230, then go down to w/e u want.
    yeah except that it would be easier to get to his goal weight and BF if he clean bulks at a good starting point. Plus it would feel like **** to see yourself lose a lot of strength gains cutting from a 235 bulk to 210lbs or w/e instead of seeing your strength increasing from a clean bulk at 205 to 235.

    Just my opinion though, plus he gets to look better longer
    Reply With Quote

  14. #14
    Registered User Deathhawk's Avatar
    Join Date: Dec 2005
    Location: United States
    Posts: 3,003
    Rep Power: 277
    Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50) Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50) Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50) Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50) Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50) Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50) Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50) Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50) Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50) Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50) Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50)
    Deathhawk is offline
    Originally Posted by Iaskwhynot View Post
    By wanting to go to lighter weights your currently doing high intensity low volume mostly then?

    And i wouldnt want to be bulking if i was 18% and had plans on competing anytime soon. If your using gear (which i doubt with the weight gain estimate) then i would say go for as clean a bulk as possible then cut. But if your not like i expect, i would say maybe just cut down to something like 12-14% keep it reasonable and then bulk back up to 18% at 235 or w/e.
    Essentially my plan is to implement periodization and presently I'm doing the heavy, low volume portion.

    What you're saying makes sense. I'm trying to gain really slow now. No more than .5 pounds/week.

    *repped for good reply*

    Originally Posted by timothybryce View Post
    just my opinion, but I would clean bulk for the next month or two and then start a good cut. I don't know about you but it's gonna be summer here in 2-3 months so I'm gonna start a cut soon so I have good defintion without a shirt on
    Outta reps. Sorry, dude. Remind me tomorrow or any other time.
    This account now only serves as an archive.
    Reply With Quote

  15. #15
    Fist Pumping dimasso69's Avatar
    Join Date: Feb 2009
    Age: 31
    Posts: 4,139
    Rep Power: 3163
    dimasso69 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) dimasso69 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) dimasso69 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) dimasso69 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) dimasso69 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) dimasso69 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) dimasso69 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) dimasso69 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) dimasso69 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) dimasso69 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) dimasso69 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500)
    dimasso69 is offline
    well at 18% bodyfat that's not low..but u do make best gains between 14-18% well at least ive been told that by my older cousin who's a beast..but are u in a rush? i mean if u think ur fat then cut down if u want more mass do a nice clean bulk like u said steady slowly as long as ur in no rush to be lean otherwise id cut..im bulking prob through summer cuz ima twig i made a big mistake of "cutting" too early and i hated it. So my advice bulk up to ur goal then cut down, but that's just me.
    "Whether you think you can, or you think you can't, you're right!"-Henry Ford
    Reply With Quote

  16. #16
    Registered User visionz1234's Avatar
    Join Date: Dec 2007
    Location: California, United States
    Posts: 2,095
    Rep Power: 1567
    visionz1234 is just really nice. (+1000) visionz1234 is just really nice. (+1000) visionz1234 is just really nice. (+1000) visionz1234 is just really nice. (+1000) visionz1234 is just really nice. (+1000) visionz1234 is just really nice. (+1000) visionz1234 is just really nice. (+1000) visionz1234 is just really nice. (+1000) visionz1234 is just really nice. (+1000) visionz1234 is just really nice. (+1000) visionz1234 is just really nice. (+1000)
    visionz1234 is offline
    The "weight cycling" idea sounds awful unless it's a brief de-load. Why do something stupid and change up what got you to where you are? Minor tweaks to your present/past plan.
    Reply With Quote

  17. #17
    Registered User WorkoutKid02's Avatar
    Join Date: Nov 2007
    Location: Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States
    Age: 35
    Posts: 417
    Rep Power: 202
    WorkoutKid02 has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) WorkoutKid02 has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) WorkoutKid02 has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) WorkoutKid02 has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) WorkoutKid02 has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) WorkoutKid02 has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) WorkoutKid02 has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) WorkoutKid02 has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) WorkoutKid02 has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) WorkoutKid02 has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) WorkoutKid02 has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0)
    WorkoutKid02 is offline
    like I said b4 man...bulk, its way more fun nehow, your big as it stands right now and x2 about getting your best results between 14-18%BF, bulk to 230 as plan and then decide what you want to do from there, if you still think your small at 5 ft 7 230, you may have to look at yourself in the mirror again bro..haha, goodluck with the decision tho
    Reply With Quote

  18. #18
    Registered User Alex_M.'s Avatar
    Join Date: Aug 2008
    Age: 32
    Posts: 873
    Rep Power: 339
    Alex_M. will become famous soon enough. (+50) Alex_M. will become famous soon enough. (+50) Alex_M. will become famous soon enough. (+50) Alex_M. will become famous soon enough. (+50) Alex_M. will become famous soon enough. (+50) Alex_M. will become famous soon enough. (+50) Alex_M. will become famous soon enough. (+50) Alex_M. will become famous soon enough. (+50) Alex_M. will become famous soon enough. (+50) Alex_M. will become famous soon enough. (+50) Alex_M. will become famous soon enough. (+50)
    Alex_M. is offline
    Yeah, I don't see how it can be a bad idea!

    I have no scientific proof to back me, but I remember an accomplished friend (much older than me, and very built) saying that your body naturally stores fat in winter and loses it easier in summer, so it might follow logically for you to cut in the summer.

    Just saying, you'd look jacked as fcuk.
    Reply With Quote

  19. #19
    WNBF Pro OoFaP's Avatar
    Join Date: Mar 2007
    Location: New York, United States
    Posts: 10,365
    Rep Power: 13584
    OoFaP is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) OoFaP is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) OoFaP is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) OoFaP is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) OoFaP is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) OoFaP is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) OoFaP is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) OoFaP is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) OoFaP is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) OoFaP is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) OoFaP is a splendid one to behold. (+10000)
    OoFaP is offline
    Half bad idea. I agree with the cutting but DO NOT go lighter while doing it. Your muscle needs a reason to stay there. If you are eating a caloric deficit AND doing less weight than before, then your muscle has no reason to maintain what it was at before and you will lose some.

    I would cut now though to be honest. Everyone is a higher body fat than they think so if you think you are 18 then I bet you are like 23. Any extra muscle you add now will most likely be lost in a cut anyway so I would just start now.
    Reply With Quote

  20. #20
    Registered User Deathhawk's Avatar
    Join Date: Dec 2005
    Location: United States
    Posts: 3,003
    Rep Power: 277
    Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50) Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50) Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50) Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50) Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50) Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50) Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50) Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50) Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50) Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50) Deathhawk will become famous soon enough. (+50)
    Deathhawk is offline
    Originally Posted by visionz View Post
    The "weight cycling" idea sounds awful unless it's a brief de-load. Why do something stupid and change up what got you to where you are? Minor tweaks to your present/past plan.
    Periodization is a tried and proven method though. Essentially that's what I'd be doing. And it's just cuz I'm starting to platough and I'm gonna cut soon. Two birds with one stone I figured.

    Originally Posted by OoFaP View Post
    Half bad idea. I agree with the cutting but DO NOT go lighter while doing it. Your muscle needs a reason to stay there. If you are eating a caloric deficit AND doing less weight than before, then your muscle has no reason to maintain what it was at before and you will lose some.

    I would cut now though to be honest. Everyone is a higher body fat than they think so if you think you are 18 then I bet you are like 23. Any extra muscle you add now will most likely be lost in a cut anyway so I would just start now.
    That's what I always tell people. But really I think 18% is about right. And regarding the first thing you said: that's why I'm hesitant. But couldn't I implement periodization along with some heavy days to combat that and retain mass?
    Last edited by Deathhawk; 03-05-2009 at 12:21 AM.
    This account now only serves as an archive.
    Reply With Quote

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts