**Bodybuilding.com Powerlifting Section Lifter Rankings**

[Freddie Beef]

I really dont post in this section alot, but used to be a powerlifter so to speak, and read a lot of stuff in here.

toobigfred.....410.....300/390/505.....total:1195.....raw

My squat is weak due to an old injury, it will be up soon. I am shooting for 325 next week, then 350 the week after.

[Jason2459]

275.5 .......705/518/617.....1840......single ply....6.67xbw
wilks 475.6294

once we get a list we can put all of the names and stuff into this table:
http://tsampa.org/training/scripts/relative_strength/
and it'll give relative rankings, very very easily.
would just need to do one list for equipped lifters, and one for raw.

as it is, i did it for everyone: top 5:
Powerlifter70(230lb version): 558.27 (Powerifter70 at 216lbs came in 4th again w/ 510.54, but I'd say only on the list oncet)
Assasin 529.33
BenBriz 515.99
Isaku900 475.62
Iceman1800 468.94

That is really neet but would take some work. If we want to break down by weight and by wilks we should just have the posters figure their wilks and post it initially then the maintainer of the list can easily arrange it.

[isaku900]

That is really neet but would take some work. If we want to break down by weight and by wilks we should just have the posters figure their wilks and post it initially then the maintainer of the list can easily arrange it.

its actually pretty easy...but i see your point.

[cupcakekid]

im used to times bodyweight for a tool to measure (easier to measure for online comps). but the wilkes does seem pretty good after looking back at the tsampa site. If i get my 405 bench i should be 4th overall. that is until dynamik decides to enter i think his total is over 1457.

[isaku900]

im used to times bodyweight for a tool to measure (easier to measure for online comps). but the wilkes does seem pretty good after looking back at the tsampa site. If i get my 405 bench i should be 4th overall. that is until dynamik decides to enter i think his total is over 1457.

his last meet total isn't b/c he pussed out instead of going for a 600 squat.

[Shanecutler51]

Shanecutler....249....535/405/550.... 1490..... 5.98.... raw

[cupcakekid]

his last meet total isn't b/c he pussed out instead of going for a 600 squat.

yea. he'll get it real soon though. hes going to hit 1500 before me. but im glad for him. he's come a long way

[isaku900]

yea. he'll get it real soon though. hes going to hit 1500 before me. but im glad for him. he's come a long way

he could've done it at the UPA state meet...but instead he took 573.

[squat4speed]

squat4speed....146.......BP 225/SQ 335/DL 305/ Total: 865.....5.93xBW....unequipped

[Jason2459]

its actually pretty easy...but i see your point.

I just added in everyone's wilks. If people do it up front what ever format we use will make it easier to maintain.

[Jason2459]

Okay, seems like wilks has some popularity here. (pukes)

I went ahead and broke down by wilks as well (equipped and unequipped)

http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showpo...1&postcount=33

[Arlecchino]

I am thinking of taking the rankings from here for the PL awards.

[Retardo-pex]

Okay, seems like wilks has some popularity here. (pukes)

I went ahead and broke down by wilks as well (equipped and unequipped)

http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showpo...1&postcount=33

Mine were equipped btw.

[Jason2459]

Mine were equipped btw.

Thanks. I just slapped all the ???'s into the unequipped. will change it.

[Kiknskreem]

How long until we get an official version with the ranks as first post?


BTw great job jason.

[pit stain]

Dont really lift for big numbers or anything but might as well post
Pit Stain bodyweight 226....Bench:405...Squat:505...Deadlift:545 total:1455=6.43*bodyweight. All numbers raw and unassisted. also have vids

[Kiknskreem]

Another idea.... for those that have vids we can make our names a hyperlink to our youtube channels.

[Jason2459]

How long until we get an official version with the ranks as first post?


BTw great job jason.

Thanks, personally I think the list is coming into a pretty good final form. Only thing I'd like to see if either drop xbw or wilks. Seems like it's moving towards dropping xbw and keeping wilks.

I think the next thing is do we just keep it open like it has been and rely on people being honest and no e-stat, which is not likely once this goes official and other sections find it.

Or do we keep it to meet results and gym lifts that have vid. If we also make another criteria to those that mostly post in the PL section with a good rep score then a mod would have to keep watch and would cause more maintanence.

I'd like to keep it open but know e-stats have a good possibility of coming in.

Poll type options I can think of would be?

Keep entries open
Only meet results
Meet results OR gym lifts with those that have vid proof
Meet results OR gym lifts w/ vid OR those with good standing in the PL section

[Jason2459]

Another idea.... for those that have vids we can make our names a hyperlink to our youtube channels.

true. We can also say those that have a PL section consistant Journal running as well.

[btlifter]

this seems cool, although, maybe only meet results should count? but, as that isn't the rule, i'll take advantage: best ever gym lifts

btlifter 545-320-550=1415@270...378.34 Wilkes(single ply gear for squats only, if that matters)

[Arlecchino]

Thanks, personally I think the list is coming into a pretty good final form. Only thing I'd like to see if either drop xbw or wilks. Seems like it's moving towards dropping xbw and keeping wilks.

I think the next thing is do we just keep it open like it has been and rely on people being honest and no e-stat, which is not likely once this goes official and other sections find it.

Or do we keep it to meet results and gym lifts that have vid. If we also make another criteria to those that mostly post in the PL section with a good rep score then a mod would have to keep watch and would cause more maintanence.

I'd like to keep it open but know e-stats have a good possibility of coming in.

Poll type options I can think of would be?

Keep entries open
Only meet results
Meet results OR gym lifts with those that have vid proof
Meet results OR gym lifts w/ vid OR those with good standing in the PL section

Whatever the members of the forum as a group decide is fine with me. And if we compile an initial version, and then later on decide we want to change it, that is not a problem. I see this as a constant work in progress, or, rather, a reflection of our work in progress, and we can change it to suit our needs.

[piszczel]

I don't have a vid of my squat, I only have a vid of my old PR which is ~30lbs lower than my current PR.

I have no reason to lie though, I also have a journal which I update very often.

[Jason2459]

this seems cool, although, maybe only meet results should count? but, as that isn't the rule, i'll take advantage: best ever gym lifts

btlifter 545-320-550=1415@270...378.34 Wilkes(single ply gear for squats only, if that matters)

I like to keep it to include gym lifts as this allows newbies that have never competed or haven't decided yet to participate and possibly get them even more into the sport and compete.

[samsuperjew5]

i think as long as one of the people without vids/meet lifts isn't like in the top 5, its fine

you can usually tell if someone is estatin regaurdless

[SnoCone]

snocone....153.......BP 250/SQ 365/DL 345/ Total 960.....6.27xBW....raw

[Assassin]

Competition lifts are what get you ranked in PLUSA, so I would argue we should follow the same on here. If people get their ranks lowered or what have you, all the more motivation to compete in 2009 and dethrone the champion! Gym lifts are cool, but it's not competition. I hit an 860 squat in training in prep for my last meet, but only hit 804 on the platform. I hit 775 in just briefs and a belt, but again that was training. Then there's the argument of if the plates are real, blah blah blah. Competition takes out the doubt, and puts the verdict up to the judges at the meet rather than the poster.

I think vids would help, but not necessarily required. Unless you have it arranged ahead of time to have someone record your lifts, it can be a mess during the meet if you forgot. Don't think anyone should necessarily be penalized for that unless it's some ridiculous claim.

Here are my lifts:
804 Squat: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=io_RgZ8Ee1s
639 Bench: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AnC73JKKeSU
633 Deadlift: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o47V3MEIT0g

-Ryan

[SnoCone]

oh by the way on http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showpo...1&postcount=33 there is a error, squat4speeds bench/squat should be flip flopped

[Jason2459]

Competition lifts are what get you ranked in PLUSA, so I would argue we should follow the same on here. If people get their ranks lowered or what have you, all the more motivation to compete in 2009 and dethrone the champion! Gym lifts are cool, but it's not competition. I hit an 860 squat in training in prep for my last meet, but only hit 804 on the platform. I hit 775 in just briefs and a belt, but again that was training. Then there's the argument of if the plates are real, blah blah blah. Competition takes out the doubt, and puts the verdict up to the judges at the meet rather than the poster.

I think vids would help, but not necessarily required. Unless you have it arranged ahead of time to have someone record your lifts, it can be a mess during the meet if you forgot. Don't think anyone should necessarily be penalized for that unless it's some ridiculous claim.

Here are my lifts:
804 Squat: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=io_RgZ8Ee1s
639 Bench: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AnC73JKKeSU
633 Deadlift: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o47V3MEIT0g

-Ryan

I agree on this site there can be a lot of lieing that can happen. It can be very restrive like meet only but really I'd like to keep it open to newbies as well get get them more involved and motivated.

Keeping it open to gym lifts allow that. If you hit a squat PR the post up an update to your numbers. I think the list should be of everyones all time PR's no mater of meet or gym.

I think this is where we are at now. Deciding on what goes in.

[Jason2459]

Whatever the members of the forum as a group decide is fine with me. And if we compile an initial version, and then later on decide we want to change it, that is not a problem. I see this as a constant work in progress, or, rather, a reflection of our work in progress, and we can change it to suit our needs.

This is easily changable right now but as it grows it will be harder to change. Will you be making a final decission on what the majority decides?

I started making a final draft back on the original post that can be modified to be the final.

[Arlecchino]

This is easily changable right now but as it grows it will be harder to change. Will you be making a final decission on what the majority decides?

I started making a final draft back on the original post that can be modified to be the final.

Majority decision is fine with me. In terms of what we want as a group, I am a poster just like everyone else here.