Reply
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 110
  1. #1
    Registered User pk16's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2006
    Age: 39
    Posts: 0
    Rep Power: 0
    pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10)
    pk16 is offline

    How can you not believe in God??? For the non-believers

    1.) Law of Cause and Effect: For every material effect, there has to be a cause. There has to be some casual agent that began the process and set the universe in motion. The only possible explanation is a higher being that even man will never fully understand. That is God. Even Sir Isaac Newton stated, " This most beautiful system of the sun, planets, and comets could only proceed from the counsel and domination of an intelligent and powerful being."

    You may find it harder to believe that God could make everything out of nothing, but the alternative is that nothing turned itself into everything. Which takes more faith to believe?

    2.) Our universe had to be desgined. Every little detail had to be absolutly perfect or life on our earth would not exsist.

    If you placed all the pieces of a watch into a shoe box and shook it for 10 minutes, do u believe it would shake into a functioning watch? Of course not. What if you shook it for a year? Say you could do it for 10 billion years; would you then have a functioning watch? There is no possible way for that to happen. And if it couldnt happen by chance to something relatively as simple like a watch, it most certainly couldnt happen by chance to our magnificently complex universe! And the sad thing is, most non believers think this is true. It just somehow formed just like a watch in a shoe box.

    3.) Moral Law: Evolution can not explain where our sense of mortality comes from. How can we know that something is wrong if there is not a right? Why do right and wrong even exsist?

    4.) Law of Probablitly: Dr. Harold Morowitz who was a former professor of biophysics at Yale estimated that the probability of life evolving on any single planet, including Earth, is one chance in 10 to the 2,000,000,000 power! Do you realize how big that number really is? It would take 6,000 books with 300 pages each just to write that number out. So if ever anything were impossible, spontaneous generation would have to be it. And thats just for a single molecule to come to life. How would you explain the complexity of life forms, or the formation of the extreamly detailed DNA code? Human DNA has over 3 billion peices of information.

    5.) You can not create life from non life. It has never been done before and it will never be done. Even if some scientist was somehow able to do it, it still would not be natural. It was still created in a lab under just the right conditions.

    6.) How can you say the bible is made up stories?

    Consider for a moment the sheer miracle of the bible. It was written by over 40 writers during the span of more then 60 generations. ( around 1,600 years). These writers were from a variety of backgrounds: kings, herdsman, soldiers, fisherman, poets, etc. The writers wrote on the contients of asia, africa, and europe in the languages of hebrew, greek, and aramaic. Yet the bible manages to present one unfolding drama of redemtion. How is it possible that the bible could have been written in the most complex and counterprotuctive way imaginable, and yet manage to fit togather so accurately?

    The bible is the best selling book of all time. Bible sales are about 150 million per year with over 4 billion bibles in print in over 2,000 languages. No other book even comes close. There is something about it that draws people to want to read it. Something special had to have happened for one single book to influence so many people for century after century.

    Historical evidence supports the bible...

    The bible has over 24,000 ancient copies of portions of the new testiment The next closest in all of antiquity is Homers Iliad, of which we have 643 ancient copies.

    There has been over 25,000 archaeological finds that provide support regarding people, their titles, and their locations mentioned in the bible.

    The bible contains over 2,000 detailed prophercies in the old testiment alone. And except for the prophercies that tell about the end of time return of Jesus, every single prophecy including those about political, religious, intellectual, and geographic events leading up to the return of Jesus Christ to earth- has been fullfilled down to the smallest detail.

    The Bible even talks about the earth being round and not flat and that the Earth was supported by nothing way way before science told us so.

    So I do not understand how you can say the Bible is not accurate.

    Anyways, I know this was long but I was just wondering what some of you have to say. Im not trying to be stubborn in anyway. I respect the beliefs of everyone.
    Reply With Quote

  2. #2
    Registered User gata35's Avatar
    Join Date: Jul 2007
    Posts: 340
    Rep Power: 320
    gata35 will become famous soon enough. (+50) gata35 will become famous soon enough. (+50) gata35 will become famous soon enough. (+50) gata35 will become famous soon enough. (+50) gata35 will become famous soon enough. (+50) gata35 will become famous soon enough. (+50) gata35 will become famous soon enough. (+50) gata35 will become famous soon enough. (+50) gata35 will become famous soon enough. (+50) gata35 will become famous soon enough. (+50) gata35 will become famous soon enough. (+50)
    gata35 is offline
    well said
    Reply With Quote

  3. #3
    Registered User fenixzona's Avatar
    Join Date: Feb 2008
    Location: United States
    Age: 48
    Posts: 2,824
    Rep Power: 677
    fenixzona has a spectacular aura about. (+250) fenixzona has a spectacular aura about. (+250) fenixzona has a spectacular aura about. (+250) fenixzona has a spectacular aura about. (+250) fenixzona has a spectacular aura about. (+250) fenixzona has a spectacular aura about. (+250) fenixzona has a spectacular aura about. (+250) fenixzona has a spectacular aura about. (+250) fenixzona has a spectacular aura about. (+250) fenixzona has a spectacular aura about. (+250) fenixzona has a spectacular aura about. (+250)
    fenixzona is offline
    Originally Posted by pk16 View Post
    1.) Law of Cause and Effect: For every material effect, there has to be a cause. There has to be some casual agent that began the process and set the universe in motion. The only possible explanation is a higher being that even man will never fully understand. That is God. Even Sir Isaac Newton stated, " This most beautiful system of the sun, planets, and comets could only proceed from the counsel and domination of an intelligent and powerful being."

    You may find it harder to believe that God could make everything out of nothing, but the alternative is that nothing turned itself into everything. Which takes more faith to believe?

    2.) Our universe had to be desgined. Every little detail had to be absolutly perfect or life on our earth would not exsist.

    If you placed all the pieces of a watch into a shoe box and shook it for 10 minutes, do u believe it would shake into a functioning watch? Of course not. What if you shook it for a year? Say you could do it for 10 billion years; would you then have a functioning watch? There is no possible way for that to happen. And if it couldnt happen by chance to something relatively as simple like a watch, it most certainly couldnt happen by chance to our magnificently complex universe! And the sad thing is, most non believers think this is true. It just somehow formed just like a watch in a shoe box.

    3.) Moral Law: Evolution can not explain where our sense of mortality comes from. How can we know that something is wrong if there is not a right? Why do right and wrong even exsist?

    4.) Law of Probablitly: Dr. Harold Morowitz who was a former professor of biophysics at Yale estimated that the probability of life evolving on any single planet, including Earth, is one chance in 10 to the 2,000,000,000 power! Do you realize how big that number really is? It would take 6,000 books with 300 pages each just to write that number out. So if ever anything were impossible, spontaneous generation would have to be it. And thats just for a single molecule to come to life. How would you explain the complexity of life forms, or the formation of the extreamly detailed DNA code? Human DNA has over 3 billion peices of information.

    5.) You can not create life from non life. It has never been done before and it will never be done. Even if some scientist was somehow able to do it, it still would not be natural. It was still created in a lab under just the right conditions.

    6.) How can you say the bible is made up stories?

    Consider for a moment the sheer miracle of the bible. It was written by over 40 writers during the span of more then 60 generations. ( around 1,600 years). These writers were from a variety of backgrounds: kings, herdsman, soldiers, fisherman, poets, etc. The writers wrote on the contients of asia, africa, and europe in the languages of hebrew, greek, and aramaic. Yet the bible manages to present one unfolding drama of redemtion. How is it possible that the bible could have been written in the most complex and counterprotuctive way imaginable, and yet manage to fit togather so accurately?

    The bible is the best selling book of all time. Bible sales are about 150 million per year with over 4 billion bibles in print in over 2,000 languages. No other book even comes close. There is something about it that draws people to want to read it. Something special had to have happened for one single book to influence so many people for century after century.

    Historical evidence supports the bible...

    The bible has over 24,000 ancient copies of portions of the new testiment The next closest in all of antiquity is Homers Iliad, of which we have 643 ancient copies.

    There has been over 25,000 archaeological finds that provide support regarding people, their titles, and their locations mentioned in the bible.

    The bible contains over 2,000 detailed prophercies in the old testiment alone. And except for the prophercies that tell about the end of time return of Jesus, every single prophecy including those about political, religious, intellectual, and geographic events leading up to the return of Jesus Christ to earth- has been fullfilled down to the smallest detail.

    The Bible even talks about the earth being round and not flat and that the Earth was supported by nothing way way before science told us so.

    So I do not understand how you can say the Bible is not accurate.

    Anyways, I know this was long but I was just wondering what some of you have to say. Im not trying to be stubborn in anyway. I respect the beliefs of everyone.


    That is all well and good, but can you proove anything? Just because the bible sold a bunch of copies don't make it right. If it's the word of God, then why do I have to pay for it?
    Wise is the bird of prey which does not show its talons.
    Reply With Quote

  4. #4
    Allied Atheist League M-DK's Avatar
    Join Date: Feb 2008
    Location: Denmark
    Age: 38
    Posts: 1,041
    Rep Power: 665
    M-DK has a spectacular aura about. (+250) M-DK has a spectacular aura about. (+250) M-DK has a spectacular aura about. (+250) M-DK has a spectacular aura about. (+250) M-DK has a spectacular aura about. (+250) M-DK has a spectacular aura about. (+250) M-DK has a spectacular aura about. (+250) M-DK has a spectacular aura about. (+250) M-DK has a spectacular aura about. (+250) M-DK has a spectacular aura about. (+250) M-DK has a spectacular aura about. (+250)
    M-DK is offline
    I gotta go to an exam shortly, but ill give it a quick go.

    Originally Posted by pk16 View Post
    1.) Law of Cause and Effect: For every material effect, there has to be a cause. There has to be some casual agent that began the process and set the universe in motion. The only possible explanation is a higher being that even man will never fully understand. That is God. Even Sir Isaac Newton stated, " This most beautiful system of the sun, planets, and comets could only proceed from the counsel and domination of an intelligent and powerful being."

    You may find it harder to believe that God could make everything out of nothing, but the alternative is that nothing turned itself into everything. Which takes more faith to believe?
    Non-answer. Where did god come from?

    Originally Posted by pk16 View Post
    2.) Our universe had to be desgined. Every little detail had to be absolutly perfect or life on our earth would not exsist.

    If you placed all the pieces of a watch into a shoe box and shook it for 10 minutes, do u believe it would shake into a functioning watch? Of course not. What if you shook it for a year? Say you could do it for 10 billion years; would you then have a functioning watch? There is no possible way for that to happen. And if it couldnt happen by chance to something relatively as simple like a watch, it most certainly couldnt happen by chance to our magnificently complex universe! And the sad thing is, most non believers think this is true. It just somehow formed just like a watch in a shoe box.
    If youre referring to evolution, your analogy doesnt work, cause it isnt random.

    If youre talking about the so called "fine-tuning" argument, my counter will be that if the properties of the universe were different, we wouldnt be here to discuss them, so the argument is meaningless.

    Originally Posted by pk16 View Post
    3.) Moral Law: Evolution can not explain where our sense of mortality comes from. How can we know that something is wrong if there is not a right? Why do right and wrong even exsist?
    Yes, evolution can explain morality. Google it.

    Originally Posted by pk16 View Post
    4.) Law of Probablitly: Dr. Harold Morowitz who was a former professor of biophysics at Yale estimated that the probability of life evolving on any single planet, including Earth, is one chance in 10 to the 2,000,000,000 power! Do you realize how big that number really is? It would take 6,000 books with 300 pages each just to write that number out. So if ever anything were impossible, spontaneous generation would have to be it. And thats just for a single molecule to come to life. How would you explain the complexity of life forms, or the formation of the extreamly detailed DNA code? Human DNA has over 3 billion peices of information.
    Assuming those numbers are reasonable (which i doubt), the universe is pretty darn big, and has been around for a long time.

    But ultimately the probability is irrelevant. It happened, or we wouldnt be talking about it. What if there were 1000 parallel universes where it didnt happen? We wouldnt know, or care. This ties in to the fine-tuning argument.

    Originally Posted by pk16 View Post
    5.) You can not create life from non life. It has never been done before and it will never be done. Even if some scientist was somehow able to do it, it still would not be natural. It was still created in a lab under just the right conditions.
    People are working on it. And whats so wrong with it being in a lab? That is the only way to simulate the conditions of the time.


    Im no expert on the bible, so ill leave that to people like Ruhanv. Im in a hurry anyway...
    Reply With Quote

  5. #5
    Registered Nagger DaCougarMech's Avatar
    Join Date: May 2007
    Location: Folsom, California, United States
    Age: 36
    Posts: 16,135
    Rep Power: 3617
    DaCougarMech is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaCougarMech is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaCougarMech is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaCougarMech is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaCougarMech is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaCougarMech is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaCougarMech is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaCougarMech is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaCougarMech is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaCougarMech is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaCougarMech is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500)
    DaCougarMech is offline
    Originally Posted by pk16 View Post
    1.) Law of Cause and Effect: For every material effect, there has to be a cause. There has to be some casual agent that began the process and set the universe in motion. The only possible explanation is a higher being that even man will never fully understand. That is God. Even Sir Isaac Newton stated, " This most beautiful system of the sun, planets, and comets could only proceed from the counsel and domination of an intelligent and powerful being."

    You may find it harder to believe that God could make everything out of nothing, but the alternative is that nothing turned itself into everything. Which takes more faith to believe?
    oh, so:

    1. nothing created god, who created the universe
    2. nothing created the universe

    also, for all time in which there was time, there was matter, for time is a property of matter

    Originally Posted by pk16 View Post
    2.) Our universe had to be desgined. Every little detail had to be absolutly perfect or life on our earth would not exsist.

    If you placed all the pieces of a watch into a shoe box and shook it for 10 minutes, do u believe it would shake into a functioning watch? Of course not. What if you shook it for a year? Say you could do it for 10 billion years; would you then have a functioning watch? There is no possible way for that to happen. And if it couldnt happen by chance to something relatively as simple like a watch, it most certainly couldnt happen by chance to our magnificently complex universe! And the sad thing is, most non believers think this is true. It just somehow formed just like a watch in a shoe box.
    this is the bullseye fallacy. you're drawing the bullseye around the bullethole

    Originally Posted by pk16 View Post
    3.) Moral Law: Evolution can not explain where our sense of mortality comes from. How can we know that something is wrong if there is not a right? Why do right and wrong even exsist?
    evolution doesn not explain right and wrong(at least not intentionally), but neither does the law of gravity

    as far as my humble opinion goes, morality is a collection of taboos gradually accumulated by civilizations that were more successful in establishing them

    furthermore, is there a why about their existence if they dont exist?

    Originally Posted by pk16 View Post
    4.) Law of Probablitly: Dr. Harold Morowitz who was a former professor of biophysics at Yale estimated that the probability of life evolving on any single planet, including Earth, is one chance in 10 to the 2,000,000,000 power! Do you realize how big that number really is? It would take 6,000 books with 300 pages each just to write that number out. So if ever anything were impossible, spontaneous generation would have to be it. And thats just for a single molecule to come to life. How would you explain the complexity of life forms, or the formation of the extreamly detailed DNA code? Human DNA has over 3 billion peices of information.
    so you took a number and say that it's incredible. then offer your opinion that it must be impossible

    Originally Posted by pk16 View Post
    5.) You can not create life from non life. It has never been done before and it will never be done. Even if some scientist was somehow able to do it, it still would not be natural. It was still created in a lab under just the right conditions.
    so you're saying if i do the impossible, it's still impossible.

    Originally Posted by pk16 View Post
    6.) How can you say the bible is made up stories?

    Consider for a moment the sheer miracle of the bible. It was written by over 40 writers during the span of more then 60 generations. ( around 1,600 years). These writers were from a variety of backgrounds: kings, herdsman, soldiers, fisherman, poets, etc. The writers wrote on the contients of asia, africa, and europe in the languages of hebrew, greek, and aramaic. Yet the bible manages to present one unfolding drama of redemtion. How is it possible that the bible could have been written in the most complex and counterprotuctive way imaginable, and yet manage to fit togather so accurately?

    The bible is the best selling book of all time. Bible sales are about 150 million per year with over 4 billion bibles in print in over 2,000 languages. No other book even comes close. There is something about it that draws people to want to read it. Something special had to have happened for one single book to influence so many people for century after century.

    Historical evidence supports the bible...

    The bible has over 24,000 ancient copies of portions of the new testiment The next closest in all of antiquity is Homers Iliad, of which we have 643 ancient copies.

    There has been over 25,000 archaeological finds that provide support regarding people, their titles, and their locations mentioned in the bible.

    The bible contains over 2,000 detailed prophercies in the old testiment alone. And except for the prophercies that tell about the end of time return of Jesus, every single prophecy including those about political, religious, intellectual, and geographic events leading up to the return of Jesus Christ to earth- has been fullfilled down to the smallest detail.

    The Bible even talks about the earth being round and not flat and that the Earth was supported by nothing way way before science told us so.

    So I do not understand how you can say the Bible is not accurate.

    Anyways, I know this was long but I was just wondering what some of you have to say. Im not trying to be stubborn in anyway. I respect the beliefs of everyone.
    no comments. i didnt grow up christian. this is for others to tear apart
    We're All Gonna Make It, Brahs

    RIP Zyzz
    Reply With Quote

  6. #6
    Registered User pk16's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2006
    Age: 39
    Posts: 0
    Rep Power: 0
    pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10)
    pk16 is offline
    well mathematicians say that any event in which the chances are beyond one in 10 to the 50th power is impossible. So I think its safe to say Spontaneous generation could not have happened.
    Reply With Quote

  7. #7
    Registered Nagger DaCougarMech's Avatar
    Join Date: May 2007
    Location: Folsom, California, United States
    Age: 36
    Posts: 16,135
    Rep Power: 3617
    DaCougarMech is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaCougarMech is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaCougarMech is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaCougarMech is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaCougarMech is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaCougarMech is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaCougarMech is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaCougarMech is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaCougarMech is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaCougarMech is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaCougarMech is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500)
    DaCougarMech is offline
    Originally Posted by pk16 View Post
    well mathematicians say that any event in which the chances are beyond one in 10 to the 50th power is impossible. So I think its safe to say Spontaneous generation could not have happened.
    mathematicians have no say in biology

    in addition, they fail to consider that they are talking about specific events with specific players

    it's like saying the chances of you meeting george w bush are improbable, therefore george w bush has never met anyone
    We're All Gonna Make It, Brahs

    RIP Zyzz
    Reply With Quote

  8. #8
    Registered User Shrek_X's Avatar
    Join Date: Nov 2008
    Location: Redmond, Washington, United States
    Age: 59
    Posts: 107
    Rep Power: 239
    Shrek_X will become famous soon enough. (+50) Shrek_X will become famous soon enough. (+50) Shrek_X will become famous soon enough. (+50) Shrek_X will become famous soon enough. (+50) Shrek_X will become famous soon enough. (+50) Shrek_X will become famous soon enough. (+50) Shrek_X will become famous soon enough. (+50) Shrek_X will become famous soon enough. (+50) Shrek_X will become famous soon enough. (+50) Shrek_X will become famous soon enough. (+50) Shrek_X will become famous soon enough. (+50)
    Shrek_X is offline
    Originally Posted by fenixzona View Post
    That is all well and good, but can you proove anything? Just because the bible sold a bunch of copies don't make it right. If it's the word of God, then why do I have to pay for it?
    you dont, about any Church will give you one, and if your local Church wont, shoot me a msg and I will
    Reply With Quote

  9. #9
    Banned Goonmonger's Avatar
    Join Date: Oct 2006
    Posts: 907
    Rep Power: 0
    Goonmonger has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) Goonmonger has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) Goonmonger has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) Goonmonger has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) Goonmonger has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) Goonmonger has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) Goonmonger has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) Goonmonger has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) Goonmonger has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) Goonmonger has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) Goonmonger has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10)
    Goonmonger is offline
    Originally Posted by pk16 View Post
    well mathematicians say that any event in which the chances are beyond one in 10 to the 50th power is impossible. So I think its safe to say Spontaneous generation could not have happened.
    Scientists now say our universe had something like 10E126 tries before this universe came along, something like that. Don't quote me, but you get the idea I hope.
    Reply With Quote

  10. #10
    Registered User gus83's Avatar
    Join Date: Dec 2003
    Location: United States
    Age: 40
    Posts: 581
    Rep Power: 939
    gus83 is a jewel in the rough. (+500) gus83 is a jewel in the rough. (+500) gus83 is a jewel in the rough. (+500) gus83 is a jewel in the rough. (+500) gus83 is a jewel in the rough. (+500) gus83 is a jewel in the rough. (+500) gus83 is a jewel in the rough. (+500) gus83 is a jewel in the rough. (+500) gus83 is a jewel in the rough. (+500) gus83 is a jewel in the rough. (+500) gus83 is a jewel in the rough. (+500)
    gus83 is offline
    Originally Posted by pk16 View Post
    well mathematicians say that any event in which the chances are beyond one in 10 to the 50th power is impossible. So I think its safe to say Spontaneous generation could not have happened.
    No they don't. This is probably one of the most ridiculous comments I've ever read on here. Impossible is 0 chance of it happening. 1 in 10^50 is not 0.

    It's amazing what passes for math education these days.
    Reply With Quote

  11. #11
    Here's beer Mr Beer's Avatar
    Join Date: Nov 2004
    Location: In the bar
    Posts: 37,555
    Rep Power: 141986
    Mr Beer has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Mr Beer has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Mr Beer has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Mr Beer has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Mr Beer has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Mr Beer has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Mr Beer has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Mr Beer has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Mr Beer has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Mr Beer has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Mr Beer has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000)
    Mr Beer is offline
    The numbered ones have already been tackled, so looking at your comments on the Bible:

    1. How is the popularity of a book proof that it's true? If this is proof, then I'm sending my kids to Hogwarts.

    2. 2,000 absolutely 100% fufilled Biblical prophecies? OK, can pick your three favourite non-metaphorical Biblical prophecies that came true in the 20th century and show they were absolutely unambiguously fufilled in a non-coincidental manner and correctly dated?

    3. Please show me where the Bible unambiguously and non-metaphorically stated that the Earth is spherical and surrounded by vacuum and can you also confirm that this statement was not contradicted elsewhere in the Bible?
    Reply With Quote

  12. #12
    come at me bro gotch's Avatar
    Join Date: Sep 2006
    Age: 36
    Posts: 183
    Rep Power: 0
    gotch is the lowest scum of the boards. (Worst Rank) gotch is the lowest scum of the boards. (Worst Rank) gotch is the lowest scum of the boards. (Worst Rank) gotch is the lowest scum of the boards. (Worst Rank) gotch is the lowest scum of the boards. (Worst Rank) gotch is the lowest scum of the boards. (Worst Rank) gotch is the lowest scum of the boards. (Worst Rank) gotch is the lowest scum of the boards. (Worst Rank) gotch is the lowest scum of the boards. (Worst Rank) gotch is the lowest scum of the boards. (Worst Rank) gotch is the lowest scum of the boards. (Worst Rank)
    gotch is offline
    Bro it looks like your problem is that you are being close minded.

    I mean this in the sense that all 6 points you made cannot be proven as laws of nature. Be open that each and everyone of your arguments could be false.

    the weakest argument you make IMO is 6) about the validity of the bible.

    The rest cannot be proven beyond reasonable doubt so its more of your own opinion. Why don't you question your own opinions tho?
    Last edited by gotch; 12-01-2008 at 11:23 PM.
    Reply With Quote

  13. #13
    Registered User pk16's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2006
    Age: 39
    Posts: 0
    Rep Power: 0
    pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10)
    pk16 is offline
    Among the ancient writings, there is no other text that has manuscripts that come as close in timeto the orginal writing as the bible does. We would never dismiss any old texts of the iliad or the odyssey, and we shouldnt dismiss the bible when it has much better documentation to back it up.

    The external evidence for the bible is also amazing. Tacitus a roman historian, and Josephus, a jewish historian both support the historical accuracy of the Bible. For example, there where 17 secular historians who wrote about the death of Jesus by crucifixion. This could not have been concocted by a group of men: External historical records attest to the truth of the bible.

    The bible accurently describes history down to the smallest of details, and history attests to the accuracy of scripture. For example, the rise and fall of great empires like Greece and Rome (Daniel 2:39-40) and the destruction of major cities ( for instance, Tyre, Sidon; Isaiah 23) are described in the bible.

    Tyre's demise is also recored by other ancient historians. They tell how-after King Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon failed in a thirteen year attempt to capture the seacoast city-alexnder the great laid seige to it for seven months and completly destroyed it and its inhabiants.

    Intensive and prolonged studies have shown that the historical accuaracy of the bible is far superior to the written records of Egypt, Assyria, and other early nations.
    Reply With Quote

  14. #14
    Registered Nagger DaCougarMech's Avatar
    Join Date: May 2007
    Location: Folsom, California, United States
    Age: 36
    Posts: 16,135
    Rep Power: 3617
    DaCougarMech is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaCougarMech is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaCougarMech is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaCougarMech is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaCougarMech is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaCougarMech is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaCougarMech is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaCougarMech is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaCougarMech is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaCougarMech is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaCougarMech is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500)
    DaCougarMech is offline
    Originally Posted by pk16 View Post
    Among the ancient writings, there is no other text that has manuscripts that come as close in timeto the orginal writing as the bible does. We would never dismiss any old texts of the iliad or the odyssey, and we shouldnt dismiss the bible when it has much better documentation to back it up.

    The external evidence for the bible is also amazing. Tacitus a roman historian, and Josephus, a jewish historian both support the historical accuracy of the Bible. For example, there where 17 secular historians who wrote about the death of Jesus by crucifixion. This could not have been concocted by a group of men: External historical records attest to the truth of the bible.

    The bible accurently describes history down to the smallest of details, and history attests to the accuracy of scripture. For example, the rise and fall of great empires like Greece and Rome (Daniel 2:39-40) and the destruction of major cities ( for instance, Tyre, Sidon; Isaiah 23) are described in the bible.

    Tyre's demise is also recored by other ancient historians. They tell how-after King Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon failed in a thirteen year attempt to capture the seacoast city-alexnder the great laid seige to it for seven months and completly destroyed it and its inhabiants.

    Intensive and prolonged studies have shown that the historical accuaracy of the bible is far superior to the written records of Egypt, Assyria, and other early nations.
    what does that prove? that it's a history book? so what

    there are history texts and mythology texts all over the place

    besides, it's like harry potter is any more true if i stick a newspaper in between the pages
    Last edited by DaCougarMech; 12-01-2008 at 11:31 PM.
    We're All Gonna Make It, Brahs

    RIP Zyzz
    Reply With Quote

  15. #15
    Registered User pk16's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2006
    Age: 39
    Posts: 0
    Rep Power: 0
    pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10)
    pk16 is offline
    Originally Posted by Mr Beer View Post

    3. Please show me where the Bible unambiguously and non-metaphorically stated that the Earth is spherical and surrounded by vacuum and can you also confirm that this statement was not contradicted elsewhere in the Bible?
    Job 26:7 says of God, " He stretcheth out the north over the empty place, and hangeth the earth upon nothing."

    That statment was written over 3500 years ago. The bible has always said the Earth is hanging in space.
    Reply With Quote

  16. #16
    Banned Lager1's Avatar
    Join Date: Nov 2006
    Age: 35
    Posts: 23,607
    Rep Power: 0
    Lager1 is not very helpful. (-500) Lager1 is not very helpful. (-500) Lager1 is not very helpful. (-500) Lager1 is not very helpful. (-500) Lager1 is not very helpful. (-500) Lager1 is not very helpful. (-500) Lager1 is not very helpful. (-500) Lager1 is not very helpful. (-500) Lager1 is not very helpful. (-500) Lager1 is not very helpful. (-500) Lager1 is not very helpful. (-500)
    Lager1 is offline
    Hey guise...some of the "Harry Potter" books mention England, don't they? So they must be true, right?
    Reply With Quote

  17. #17
    Registered Nagger DaCougarMech's Avatar
    Join Date: May 2007
    Location: Folsom, California, United States
    Age: 36
    Posts: 16,135
    Rep Power: 3617
    DaCougarMech is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaCougarMech is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaCougarMech is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaCougarMech is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaCougarMech is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaCougarMech is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaCougarMech is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaCougarMech is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaCougarMech is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaCougarMech is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaCougarMech is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500)
    DaCougarMech is offline
    Originally Posted by Germanic View Post
    Hey guise...some of the "Harry Potter" books mention England, don't they? So they must be true, right?
    i saw bertie botts beans the other day...
    We're All Gonna Make It, Brahs

    RIP Zyzz
    Reply With Quote

  18. #18
    Manlet lollercopter's Avatar
    Join Date: Feb 2004
    Location: California, United States
    Age: 36
    Posts: 3,876
    Rep Power: 3055
    lollercopter is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) lollercopter is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) lollercopter is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) lollercopter is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) lollercopter is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) lollercopter is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) lollercopter is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) lollercopter is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) lollercopter is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) lollercopter is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) lollercopter is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500)
    lollercopter is offline
    Originally Posted by Germanic View Post
    Hey guise...some of the "Harry Potter" books mention England, don't they? So they must be true, right?
    Yes, they're all true. What's the problem?
    Reply With Quote

  19. #19
    come at me bro gotch's Avatar
    Join Date: Sep 2006
    Age: 36
    Posts: 183
    Rep Power: 0
    gotch is the lowest scum of the boards. (Worst Rank) gotch is the lowest scum of the boards. (Worst Rank) gotch is the lowest scum of the boards. (Worst Rank) gotch is the lowest scum of the boards. (Worst Rank) gotch is the lowest scum of the boards. (Worst Rank) gotch is the lowest scum of the boards. (Worst Rank) gotch is the lowest scum of the boards. (Worst Rank) gotch is the lowest scum of the boards. (Worst Rank) gotch is the lowest scum of the boards. (Worst Rank) gotch is the lowest scum of the boards. (Worst Rank) gotch is the lowest scum of the boards. (Worst Rank)
    gotch is offline
    Originally Posted by pk16 View Post
    Among the ancient writings, there is no other text that has manuscripts that come as close in timeto the orginal writing as the bible does. We would never dismiss any old texts of the iliad or the odyssey, and we shouldnt dismiss the bible when it has much better documentation to back it up.

    The external evidence for the bible is also amazing. Tacitus a roman historian, and Josephus, a jewish historian both support the historical accuracy of the Bible. For example, there where 17 secular historians who wrote about the death of Jesus by crucifixion. This could not have been concocted by a group of men: External historical records attest to the truth of the bible.

    The bible accurently describes history down to the smallest of details, and history attests to the accuracy of scripture. For example, the rise and fall of great empires like Greece and Rome (Daniel 2:39-40) and the destruction of major cities ( for instance, Tyre, Sidon; Isaiah 23) are described in the bible.

    Tyre's demise is also recored by other ancient historians. They tell how-after King Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon failed in a thirteen year attempt to capture the seacoast city-alexnder the great laid seige to it for seven months and completly destroyed it and its inhabiants.

    Intensive and prolonged studies have shown that the historical accuaracy of the bible is far superior to the written records of Egypt, Assyria, and other early nations.
    Do you even acknowledge that it could be a made up story? Or would that viewpoint shatter your reality so completely that you haven't even considered the thought?

    The bible is closer to a fairy tale than anything historical.

    Yes there are historically accurate, non-fictional parts. That being said prove to me that Moses parted the red sea, that Jesus was resurrected, That he gave a blind man sight, that he walked on water, etc.

    In the past two centuries has anything happened that even comes close to those "miracles". Isn't it funny that as we get better at observing and recording the world around us events like that become less plausible.
    Reply With Quote

  20. #20
    ............ revkins's Avatar
    Join Date: Feb 2008
    Age: 34
    Posts: 4,465
    Rep Power: 0
    revkins is not very well liked. (-100) revkins is not very well liked. (-100) revkins is not very well liked. (-100) revkins is not very well liked. (-100) revkins is not very well liked. (-100) revkins is not very well liked. (-100) revkins is not very well liked. (-100) revkins is not very well liked. (-100) revkins is not very well liked. (-100) revkins is not very well liked. (-100) revkins is not very well liked. (-100)
    revkins is offline
    pk16, the logic behind every one of your arguments for the existence of God has already been proven to be faulty by countless threads here in the R/P.

    You are not providing anything new.

    Do a search.

    EDIT: Honestly, this is a Grade 2 level of theistic reasoning.
    Last edited by revkins; 12-01-2008 at 11:43 PM.
    Reply With Quote

  21. #21
    Registered User pk16's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2006
    Age: 39
    Posts: 0
    Rep Power: 0
    pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10)
    pk16 is offline
    The amazing description of the physical effects of execution by crucifixtion was written hundreds of years before it was used by the Romans. It was first practiced about 200 BC and first practiced in a jewish providence in 63 BC. Yet it was predicted in detail in Psalm 22, written by King David, who was born more then a 1000 years before Jesus. And yes it was predicted the messiah would die that way and he did. The fact that his hands and feet would be peirced and that his garmets would be gambled for are also striking prophetic details in Psalm 22.

    There were over 300 prophecys fulfilled just in Jesus's life! This doesnt just happen by chance to a normal person. All these things were told hundereds of years before they happened and are backed up by historic documents!
    Reply With Quote

  22. #22
    ............ revkins's Avatar
    Join Date: Feb 2008
    Age: 34
    Posts: 4,465
    Rep Power: 0
    revkins is not very well liked. (-100) revkins is not very well liked. (-100) revkins is not very well liked. (-100) revkins is not very well liked. (-100) revkins is not very well liked. (-100) revkins is not very well liked. (-100) revkins is not very well liked. (-100) revkins is not very well liked. (-100) revkins is not very well liked. (-100) revkins is not very well liked. (-100) revkins is not very well liked. (-100)
    revkins is offline
    Originally Posted by pk16 View Post
    The amazing description of the physical effects of execution by crucifixtion was written hundreds of years before it was used by the Romans. It was first practiced about 200 BC and first practiced in a jewish providence in 63 BC. Yet it was predicted in detail in Psalm 22, written by King David, who was born more then a 1000 years before Jesus. And yes it was predicted the messiah would die that way and he did. The fact that his hands and feet would be peirced and that his garmets would be gambled for are also striking prophetic details in Psalm 22.

    There were over 300 prophecys fulfilled just in Jesus's life! This doesnt just happen by chance to a normal person. All these things were told hundereds of years before they happened and are backed up by historic documents!

    This is a serious question:

    Did you graduate high school?
    Reply With Quote

  23. #23
    Registered User pk16's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2006
    Age: 39
    Posts: 0
    Rep Power: 0
    pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10)
    pk16 is offline
    Originally Posted by gotch View Post

    In the past two centuries has anything happened that even comes close to those "miracles". Isn't it funny that as we get better at observing and recording the world around us events like that become less plausible.
    No kidding no one today can preform miracles, Thats the whole point of Jesus. He was able to preform miracles.
    Reply With Quote

  24. #24
    Registered User pk16's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2006
    Age: 39
    Posts: 0
    Rep Power: 0
    pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10)
    pk16 is offline
    Originally Posted by revkins View Post
    This is a serious question:

    Did you graduate highschool?
    Yes I have a Bachelors Degree and I am currently in the process of getting my Masters.
    Reply With Quote

  25. #25
    ............ revkins's Avatar
    Join Date: Feb 2008
    Age: 34
    Posts: 4,465
    Rep Power: 0
    revkins is not very well liked. (-100) revkins is not very well liked. (-100) revkins is not very well liked. (-100) revkins is not very well liked. (-100) revkins is not very well liked. (-100) revkins is not very well liked. (-100) revkins is not very well liked. (-100) revkins is not very well liked. (-100) revkins is not very well liked. (-100) revkins is not very well liked. (-100) revkins is not very well liked. (-100)
    revkins is offline
    Originally Posted by pk16 View Post
    Yes I have a Bachelors Degree and I am currently in the process of getting my Masters.
    In what, and from where?
    Reply With Quote

  26. #26
    Banned Lager1's Avatar
    Join Date: Nov 2006
    Age: 35
    Posts: 23,607
    Rep Power: 0
    Lager1 is not very helpful. (-500) Lager1 is not very helpful. (-500) Lager1 is not very helpful. (-500) Lager1 is not very helpful. (-500) Lager1 is not very helpful. (-500) Lager1 is not very helpful. (-500) Lager1 is not very helpful. (-500) Lager1 is not very helpful. (-500) Lager1 is not very helpful. (-500) Lager1 is not very helpful. (-500) Lager1 is not very helpful. (-500)
    Lager1 is offline
    Originally Posted by revkins View Post
    In what, and from where?
    Bible Study, from Jesus University
    Reply With Quote

  27. #27
    Registered Nagger DaCougarMech's Avatar
    Join Date: May 2007
    Location: Folsom, California, United States
    Age: 36
    Posts: 16,135
    Rep Power: 3617
    DaCougarMech is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaCougarMech is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaCougarMech is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaCougarMech is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaCougarMech is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaCougarMech is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaCougarMech is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaCougarMech is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaCougarMech is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaCougarMech is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) DaCougarMech is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500)
    DaCougarMech is offline
    masters in reading guise! masters in reading!
    We're All Gonna Make It, Brahs

    RIP Zyzz
    Reply With Quote

  28. #28
    Registered User pk16's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2006
    Age: 39
    Posts: 0
    Rep Power: 0
    pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) pk16 has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10)
    pk16 is offline
    Univeristy of Pittsburgh

    Kinesiology
    Reply With Quote

  29. #29
    Banned Lager1's Avatar
    Join Date: Nov 2006
    Age: 35
    Posts: 23,607
    Rep Power: 0
    Lager1 is not very helpful. (-500) Lager1 is not very helpful. (-500) Lager1 is not very helpful. (-500) Lager1 is not very helpful. (-500) Lager1 is not very helpful. (-500) Lager1 is not very helpful. (-500) Lager1 is not very helpful. (-500) Lager1 is not very helpful. (-500) Lager1 is not very helpful. (-500) Lager1 is not very helpful. (-500) Lager1 is not very helpful. (-500)
    Lager1 is offline
    Originally Posted by pk16 View Post
    Univeristy of Pittsburgh

    Kinesiology
    Hey sweet! What do you do?
    Reply With Quote

  30. #30
    ............ revkins's Avatar
    Join Date: Feb 2008
    Age: 34
    Posts: 4,465
    Rep Power: 0
    revkins is not very well liked. (-100) revkins is not very well liked. (-100) revkins is not very well liked. (-100) revkins is not very well liked. (-100) revkins is not very well liked. (-100) revkins is not very well liked. (-100) revkins is not very well liked. (-100) revkins is not very well liked. (-100) revkins is not very well liked. (-100) revkins is not very well liked. (-100) revkins is not very well liked. (-100)
    revkins is offline
    Originally Posted by DaCougarMech View Post
    masters in reading guise! masters in reading!

    Was it Hokie that said that, and was he serious?

    I'm unaware.
    Reply With Quote

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts