Show me a single sentence in any of my posts where I indicated that my position was anything other than my personal opinion. Show me one post where I suggested such behavior should be prohibited or limited in any way. You seemingly can't handle someone else expressing a personal opinion on without responding with wild accusations and personal attacks. Once again, the irony of you being offended by my position and then launching a personal attack on me and those that share my position is quite staggering. How do you fail to recognize this very basic fact?
|
-
10-10-2008, 03:18 PM #211
-
10-10-2008, 03:20 PM #212
-
-
10-10-2008, 03:22 PM #213
-
10-10-2008, 03:26 PM #214
-
10-10-2008, 03:35 PM #215
-
10-10-2008, 03:41 PM #216
Posting is now forcing my opinion on people? Last I checked unless I physically push someone against the wall and spew my words at them that they don't want to hear, nothing is being forced. I have never, check all my posts on bb.com, insulted anyone (including any ad hominem) unless they tried it on me themselves, frankly once they do that the conversation is over so at least I can tell them how hypocritical they are.
As for judging, I don't judge, I have no reason to, I am not hiring you.
Wait isn't being intolerant telling people how wrong and weird it is to breastfeed in public? Isn't it telling people how wrong having a faith is?
Probably not haha! You are so right!
If you can disprove me here, (and please don't take anything out of context like quoting a single post or less) then go ahead.
-
-
10-10-2008, 03:42 PM #217
check it, this guy hates terrorists and can't wait to join so he can take some OUT!!!
USA!!!!
USA!!!!
http://www.funnyordie.com/videos/d1a27c4315
USA!!!!
USA!!!!
GO TROOPS!!!
-
10-10-2008, 04:21 PM #218
Nice cop out dimwit, too bad you can't find one homeless person who cares about your opinions.
Just keep your tits out of my visual while I'm riding the train.
I work hard all day and that's all I'm asking since I pay for public transit you could show a little godamn consideration instead of subjecting everyone on the train to the horrors of your allegedly female anatomy.
Thanks.Last edited by drstrangepimp; 10-10-2008 at 04:27 PM.
"I sincerely believe, with you, that banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies" - Thomas Jefferson
-
10-10-2008, 04:29 PM #219
-
10-10-2008, 04:39 PM #220
-
-
10-10-2008, 04:42 PM #221
-
10-10-2008, 04:46 PM #222
-
10-10-2008, 04:54 PM #223
- Join Date: Feb 2006
- Location: New York, United States
- Age: 51
- Posts: 2,054
- Rep Power: 1712
You have attempted to establish yourself as some kind of expert in multiple posts. Your opinion of BFing in public is not backed by law or the marjority of modern society. You have stated that you deem BFing post infancy is among other things, bizzare.
See post 165(links) to dispute your "opinion" In the dark ages folks still had an "opinion" that the world was flat. What was there opinion worth?
"wierd" Flat Earth society anyone? See post 165(links)
It seems you are presenting this as some sort of unofficial halfass study. So, how exactly do we know with any measure of certainty that your sister would not have had a 150 IQ if she was BFed longer? I think this post went way beyond what you had measured as just your opinion.
Please link at least one shred of supposed evidence. I see that you structured your sentence to suggest it is not required to be healthy as opposed to being superior. I think most women choose to BF longer to get extra benefits and go beyond the minimum reccomended time.
It seems you are once again trying to establish yourself as some sort of expert, which you are not. You are a person with an opinion. An opinion that chooses to ignore countless studies to the contrary.
One does not have to be a mother to have read and not ignored the countless literature in support of longterm BFing as well as your opinion that BFibg in public is somehow unhealthy for a child. You also have attempted to sound like an expert multiple times. There is countless evidence contrary to your "opinion". Much of it linked in this post. When somebody in her argues citing scientific evidence against your "opinion", they win every time unless you can cite a study to the contrary.
The minimum reccomended time is 12 months but you keep throwing 9-12 out there. As a bodybuilder who pushes his body beyond minimum expectations, why would you limit a child to a minimum guideline that was probbaly decided on to appease the less then committed of our society.
Here again you attempt to establish yourself as an expert of sort. Opinion?
Your one attempt at citing anyone or anything that might count as a source. Very poor attempt.It is universally well known, that in digesting our common food, there is created or produced in the bowels of human creatures, a great quantity of wind. That the permitting this air to escape and mix with the atmosphere, is usually offensive to the company, from the fetid smell that accompanies it. That all well-bred people therefore, to avoid giving such offence, forcibly restrain the efforts of nature to discharge that wind.
Ben Franklin Essay about "Trouser Coughs" 1781-
-
10-10-2008, 05:00 PM #224
-
-
10-10-2008, 05:06 PM #225
-
10-10-2008, 05:08 PM #226
-
10-10-2008, 05:09 PM #227
You forgot to say why dip****.
Other than your personal opinion of why your desire to do something trumps common courtesy.
And yes if I see tits I'm going to see that as a green light to blow my milky white load all over them.
Because if you don't like that you must be afraid of sex and therefore gay.
I also forgot to mention that it's good for getting my heart rate up.
I can quote several studies that say sex is beneficial for my heart.
Once I can show it's beneficial to me I can do anything I want or so the logic goes...Last edited by drstrangepimp; 10-10-2008 at 05:15 PM.
"I sincerely believe, with you, that banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies" - Thomas Jefferson
-
10-10-2008, 05:24 PM #228
-
-
10-10-2008, 05:27 PM #229
-
10-10-2008, 05:28 PM #230
-
10-10-2008, 05:29 PM #231
-
10-10-2008, 05:32 PM #232
-
-
10-10-2008, 05:33 PM #233
-
10-10-2008, 05:34 PM #234
-
10-10-2008, 05:34 PM #235
Children have to eat. The act of feeding a child is not a sexual act. Laws prohibit sexual acts in public, but they do not prohibit the feeding of children in public.
Breasts are not genitals, and are not required for the act of reproduction. Their sole scientific purpose is the feeding of offspring. Because society has perverted the real purpose of breasts doesn't actually CHANGE that real purpose of breasts. Therefor, all of your arguments are absurd, at best.
The law does not support your absurdities. It does not support sexual acts in public, so if you decide to whip your penis out, you will be rightfully arrested.
Because you think that breasts' real purpose is only sex doesn't change the science or facts behind the situation. Nursing is not a sexual act, and one can not be arrested for ****philia because of nursing an infant. However, if you whip your penis out and decided to "dump your load" on the breasts of a nursing mother or whatever the feck you said, you WILL go to jail for ****philia, and again, rightfully so.
One is a sexual act, one is not. To claim otherwise proves YOUR perversity, and nothing else.
-
10-10-2008, 05:35 PM #236
-
-
10-10-2008, 05:38 PM #237
-
10-10-2008, 05:46 PM #238
-
10-10-2008, 05:48 PM #239
-
10-10-2008, 06:32 PM #240
Bookmarks