i've ran 2 week SD cycles back in the day, and my blood work and overall recovery was always fine, even though i did experience the temporary side effects from teh cycle. A bodybuilder told me that short cycles are a good idea bc the less the PH or steroid is in your body the better. Plus with every cycle i've ever done i always stopped making gains after the first 2-3weeks.
Or is pulse cycling safer due to less temporary side effects, but less gains as well?
|
Thread: short cycles vs pulse cycles?
-
10-03-2008, 02:49 PM #1
short cycles vs pulse cycles?
-
10-03-2008, 07:16 PM #2
Bookmarks