Reply
Results 1 to 17 of 17
  1. #1
    Registered User SportScience's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2006
    Posts: 20
    Rep Power: 0
    SportScience has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) SportScience has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) SportScience has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) SportScience has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) SportScience has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) SportScience has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) SportScience has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) SportScience has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) SportScience has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0)
    SportScience is offline

    Some vertical jump tips from the book "Science of Sports Training" by Thomas Kurz

    ?To decide where to start work, this question has to be answered: Is the athlete?s maximal strength much lower than that of leading athletes who display adequate explosive strength in the given sport and in the athlete?s weight class? If yes, then the athlete may have to first increase his or her maximal strength?

    ?Poor results in a reach jump done from standing still indicate low explosive strength, especially if the athlete?s maximal strength in a squat is high. Short sets of squats and half squats performed very fast develop explosive strength of the legs.?

    ?If the athlete has good results in a reach jump done from standing still but exhibits a long support phase during takeoff in the sports technique, this call for plyometrics.?

    ?Practicing jumps from a landing increases the height of a jump from standing much more than the other way around.?

    ?Fast squats and half squats are less intensive efforts and put less stress on the body than full force jumps and depth jumps and therefore should constitute the bulk of an athlete?s work on developing explosive strength. The exception to this is when his or her explosive strength as measured by the reach jump is fine but the takeoffs are too long.?

    ?The amount and intensity of plyometrics should be gradually increased at the expense of other resistance exercises as the competitive season approaches.?

    ?Plyometrics should be introduced into training gradually, starting with such low-intensity exercises as jumping rope, hops-in-place and clap push-ups, and then progressing through more intensive bounds, jumps and medicine ball catches to high-intensity plyometric exercises such as depth jumps, reactive jumps, and swinging suspending heavy weights with the arms.?

    Source:

    http://www.athletic-preparation.com/?p=38
    Reply With Quote

  2. #2
    work in progress IGF-WON's Avatar
    Join Date: Apr 2008
    Posts: 2,751
    Rep Power: 1902
    IGF-WON is just really nice. (+1000) IGF-WON is just really nice. (+1000) IGF-WON is just really nice. (+1000) IGF-WON is just really nice. (+1000) IGF-WON is just really nice. (+1000) IGF-WON is just really nice. (+1000) IGF-WON is just really nice. (+1000) IGF-WON is just really nice. (+1000) IGF-WON is just really nice. (+1000) IGF-WON is just really nice. (+1000) IGF-WON is just really nice. (+1000)
    IGF-WON is offline
    Originally Posted by SportScience View Post
    ?Fast squats and half squats are less intensive efforts and put less stress on the body than full force jumps and depth jumps and therefore should constitute the bulk of an athlete?s work on developing explosive strength. The exception to this is when his or her explosive strength as measured by the reach jump is fine but the takeoffs are too long.?

    [/url]
    half squats can be done with more weight than full squats, and also put incredible pressure on the knees, making them an easier way to injure yourself.
    Dude your sig is so cool. - xl achilles lx

    Journal:
    http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=118731061
    Reply With Quote

  3. #3
    Registered User SportScience's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2006
    Posts: 20
    Rep Power: 0
    SportScience has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) SportScience has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) SportScience has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) SportScience has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) SportScience has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) SportScience has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) SportScience has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) SportScience has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) SportScience has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0)
    SportScience is offline
    Originally Posted by IGF-WON View Post
    half squats can be done with more weight than full squats, and also put incredible pressure on the knees, making them an easier way to injure yourself.
    I agree to some extent about that, but it's also important to consider how exactly they are used (in terms of the intensities used, in which phases (GPP? SPP?), purpose, and so on and for which type of athletes. This is also something even the experts can't agree with. I think it's a complicated topic that has already been discussed on this board.

    I agree the most with Professor Verkhoshansky's opinion about full vs. half squats. His points really make sense:

    I put it on my blog so you can read about it here: http://www.athletic-preparation.com/?p=52

    On the other hand you have coaches (including really successful ones) who seem to use it all year round without any injuries happen. But they sure don't do maximal intensities all year (85-100% of 1RM)
    Reply With Quote

  4. #4
    work in progress IGF-WON's Avatar
    Join Date: Apr 2008
    Posts: 2,751
    Rep Power: 1902
    IGF-WON is just really nice. (+1000) IGF-WON is just really nice. (+1000) IGF-WON is just really nice. (+1000) IGF-WON is just really nice. (+1000) IGF-WON is just really nice. (+1000) IGF-WON is just really nice. (+1000) IGF-WON is just really nice. (+1000) IGF-WON is just really nice. (+1000) IGF-WON is just really nice. (+1000) IGF-WON is just really nice. (+1000) IGF-WON is just really nice. (+1000)
    IGF-WON is offline
    Originally Posted by SportScience View Post
    I agree to some extent about that, but it's also important to consider how exactly they are used (in terms of the intensities used, in which phases (GPP? SPP?), purpose, and so on and for which type of athletes. This is also something even the experts can't agree with. I think it's a complicated topic that has already been discussed on this board.

    I agree the most with Professor Verkhoshansky's opinion about full vs. half squats. His points really make sense:

    I put it on my blog so you can read about it here: http://www.athletic-preparation.com/?p=52

    On the other hand you have coaches (including really successful ones) who seem to use it all year round without any injuries happen. But they sure don't do maximal intensities all year (85-100% of 1RM)
    I agree, when you use them correctly, they can be great, but im sure many people would see that and combine it with the "more is better" mentality and start maxing and doing 3RM with half squats, and loose their knees/back.

    Im not disagreeing, just making a cautionary point.
    Dude your sig is so cool. - xl achilles lx

    Journal:
    http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=118731061
    Reply With Quote

  5. #5
    Registered User SportScience's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2006
    Posts: 20
    Rep Power: 0
    SportScience has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) SportScience has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) SportScience has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) SportScience has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) SportScience has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) SportScience has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) SportScience has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) SportScience has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) SportScience has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0)
    SportScience is offline
    Hey, an update on the full and half squat discussion. I found something written by Charles Poliquin on this topic. He is a huge advocate on full squats and I agree with alot of his points.

    http://www.athletic-preparation.com/?p=101

    Tell me what you think.

    I personally think some of his points are questionable.
    Reply With Quote

  6. #6
    work in progress IGF-WON's Avatar
    Join Date: Apr 2008
    Posts: 2,751
    Rep Power: 1902
    IGF-WON is just really nice. (+1000) IGF-WON is just really nice. (+1000) IGF-WON is just really nice. (+1000) IGF-WON is just really nice. (+1000) IGF-WON is just really nice. (+1000) IGF-WON is just really nice. (+1000) IGF-WON is just really nice. (+1000) IGF-WON is just really nice. (+1000) IGF-WON is just really nice. (+1000) IGF-WON is just really nice. (+1000) IGF-WON is just really nice. (+1000)
    IGF-WON is offline
    theres also a large body of evidence that says the closer you can mimic the actual movement and ROM of a sport, the better. no one does a full squat before jumping in a game.
    Dude your sig is so cool. - xl achilles lx

    Journal:
    http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=118731061
    Reply With Quote

  7. #7
    Oops back to cutting PowerBuilder08's Avatar
    Join Date: Nov 2006
    Location: Tennessee, United States
    Age: 39
    Posts: 5,433
    Rep Power: 30126
    PowerBuilder08 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PowerBuilder08 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PowerBuilder08 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PowerBuilder08 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PowerBuilder08 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PowerBuilder08 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PowerBuilder08 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PowerBuilder08 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PowerBuilder08 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PowerBuilder08 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PowerBuilder08 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000)
    PowerBuilder08 is offline

    Thumbs up

    Originally Posted by IGF-WON View Post
    theres also a large body of evidence that says the closer you can mimic the actual movement and ROM of a sport, the better. no one does a full squat before jumping in a game.
    Box Squats ftw
    Reply With Quote

  8. #8
    Registered User bbbball's Avatar
    Join Date: Aug 2008
    Age: 35
    Posts: 277
    Rep Power: 0
    bbbball is not very well liked. (-100) bbbball is not very well liked. (-100) bbbball is not very well liked. (-100) bbbball is not very well liked. (-100) bbbball is not very well liked. (-100) bbbball is not very well liked. (-100) bbbball is not very well liked. (-100) bbbball is not very well liked. (-100) bbbball is not very well liked. (-100) bbbball is not very well liked. (-100) bbbball is not very well liked. (-100)
    bbbball is offline
    I went to that blog and watched a vid about plyo's which I used to do...and something he said made sense to me. When you first start working out you get great gains in strength, then as you get stronger and lift heavier and heavier weight you life a lot slower because it's hard and thus you get slower....i was sold. I'm lifting explosively at all times now, with EVERY exercise...but should I be super slow on the negative?
    Reply With Quote

  9. #9
    Oops back to cutting PowerBuilder08's Avatar
    Join Date: Nov 2006
    Location: Tennessee, United States
    Age: 39
    Posts: 5,433
    Rep Power: 30126
    PowerBuilder08 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PowerBuilder08 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PowerBuilder08 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PowerBuilder08 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PowerBuilder08 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PowerBuilder08 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PowerBuilder08 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PowerBuilder08 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PowerBuilder08 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PowerBuilder08 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) PowerBuilder08 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000)
    PowerBuilder08 is offline
    Originally Posted by bbbball View Post
    I went to that blog and watched a vid about plyo's which I used to do...and something he said made sense to me. When you first start working out you get great gains in strength, then as you get stronger and lift heavier and heavier weight you life a lot slower because it's hard and thus you get slower....i was sold. I'm lifting explosively at all times now, with EVERY exercise...but should I be super slow on the negative?
    Lifting light weight, even fast, is just your muscles doing a submaximal contraction repeatedly. This is the same that jogging is, a submaximal contraction repeatedly. Lifting heavy is a maximal contraction over a short period of time. Sprinting is a maximal contraction over a short period of time. You figure it out.
    Reply With Quote

  10. #10
    Ballerrrr! Shawdowfox's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2007
    Location: Australia
    Posts: 973
    Rep Power: 283
    Shawdowfox will become famous soon enough. (+50) Shawdowfox will become famous soon enough. (+50) Shawdowfox will become famous soon enough. (+50) Shawdowfox will become famous soon enough. (+50) Shawdowfox will become famous soon enough. (+50) Shawdowfox will become famous soon enough. (+50) Shawdowfox will become famous soon enough. (+50) Shawdowfox will become famous soon enough. (+50) Shawdowfox will become famous soon enough. (+50) Shawdowfox will become famous soon enough. (+50) Shawdowfox will become famous soon enough. (+50)
    Shawdowfox is offline
    Originally Posted by acbrits08 View Post
    Lifting light weight, even fast, is just your muscles doing a submaximal contraction repeatedly. This is the same that jogging is, a submaximal contraction repeatedly. Lifting heavy is a maximal contraction over a short period of time. Sprinting is a maximal contraction over a short period of time. You figure it out.
    i think you are on to something but please explain further lol im too dumb
    current/ goals by christmas break
    bench - 155/185
    squat - 205/225
    deadlift - 305/385
    military press - 110/135
    bb row - 140/155
    shoulder press - 50/70
    Reply With Quote

  11. #11
    Certified Sickkunt roid_monkey's Avatar
    Join Date: Feb 2007
    Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
    Posts: 3,537
    Rep Power: 1009
    roid_monkey is a jewel in the rough. (+500) roid_monkey is a jewel in the rough. (+500) roid_monkey is a jewel in the rough. (+500) roid_monkey is a jewel in the rough. (+500) roid_monkey is a jewel in the rough. (+500) roid_monkey is a jewel in the rough. (+500) roid_monkey is a jewel in the rough. (+500) roid_monkey is a jewel in the rough. (+500) roid_monkey is a jewel in the rough. (+500) roid_monkey is a jewel in the rough. (+500) roid_monkey is a jewel in the rough. (+500)
    roid_monkey is offline
    Originally Posted by IGF-WON View Post
    theres also a large body of evidence that says the closer you can mimic the actual movement and ROM of a sport, the better. no one does a full squat before jumping in a game.
    theres also a large body with larger vertical leaps than your said large body that say full range of motion is better due to the exercise recruiting more muscle fiber.
    Negs current month join date's on sight crew
    Reply With Quote

  12. #12
    Registered User bbbball's Avatar
    Join Date: Aug 2008
    Age: 35
    Posts: 277
    Rep Power: 0
    bbbball is not very well liked. (-100) bbbball is not very well liked. (-100) bbbball is not very well liked. (-100) bbbball is not very well liked. (-100) bbbball is not very well liked. (-100) bbbball is not very well liked. (-100) bbbball is not very well liked. (-100) bbbball is not very well liked. (-100) bbbball is not very well liked. (-100) bbbball is not very well liked. (-100) bbbball is not very well liked. (-100)
    bbbball is offline
    Originally Posted by acbrits08 View Post
    Lifting light weight, even fast, is just your muscles doing a submaximal contraction repeatedly. This is the same that jogging is, a submaximal contraction repeatedly. Lifting heavy is a maximal contraction over a short period of time. Sprinting is a maximal contraction over a short period of time. You figure it out.
    explain further bro
    Reply With Quote

  13. #13
    Certified Sickkunt roid_monkey's Avatar
    Join Date: Feb 2007
    Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
    Posts: 3,537
    Rep Power: 1009
    roid_monkey is a jewel in the rough. (+500) roid_monkey is a jewel in the rough. (+500) roid_monkey is a jewel in the rough. (+500) roid_monkey is a jewel in the rough. (+500) roid_monkey is a jewel in the rough. (+500) roid_monkey is a jewel in the rough. (+500) roid_monkey is a jewel in the rough. (+500) roid_monkey is a jewel in the rough. (+500) roid_monkey is a jewel in the rough. (+500) roid_monkey is a jewel in the rough. (+500) roid_monkey is a jewel in the rough. (+500)
    roid_monkey is offline
    Originally Posted by bbbball View Post
    explain further bro
    you heard him, figure it out. No matter how fast you can squat the bar, you will be doing more for your vertical by doing HEAVY squats.
    Negs current month join date's on sight crew
    Reply With Quote

  14. #14
    Registered User bballvertical's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2008
    Age: 33
    Posts: 55
    Rep Power: 197
    bballvertical has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) bballvertical has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) bballvertical has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) bballvertical has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) bballvertical has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) bballvertical has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) bballvertical has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) bballvertical has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) bballvertical has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) bballvertical has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) bballvertical has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0)
    bballvertical is offline
    Originally Posted by bbbball View Post
    explain further bro
    Ok dude. Let me explain this to you. If you want to get stronger in the legs, do heavy powerful squats (3-8 rep range). Engaging in slow, endurance type movements will prevent you from reaching your maximum potential in limit strength, explosive strength, and starting strength. If all you have been doing is slow, continuous tension movements you should take careful look at the research. Remember, it's the white fibers, the ones that contract fast that will give you the greatest returns in speed-strength as well as in limit strength.
    Reply With Quote

  15. #15
    Registered User bballvertical's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2008
    Age: 33
    Posts: 55
    Rep Power: 197
    bballvertical has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) bballvertical has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) bballvertical has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) bballvertical has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) bballvertical has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) bballvertical has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) bballvertical has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) bballvertical has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) bballvertical has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) bballvertical has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) bballvertical has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0)
    bballvertical is offline
    Originally Posted by bbbball View Post
    I went to that blog and watched a vid about plyo's which I used to do...and something he said made sense to me. When you first start working out you get great gains in strength, then as you get stronger and lift heavier and heavier weight you life a lot slower because it's hard and thus you get slower....i was sold. I'm lifting explosively at all times now, with EVERY exercise...but should I be super slow on the negative?

    Until you have a really good base of strength in place you will get faster with light weights by increasing the poundage on your max lifts. Let me explain:
    Just for the sake of argument let's say that the guy who can throw around 100 pounds the fastest will have a superior vertical jump. Who's gonna throw around 100 pounds faster - The guy with a max squat of 135 pounds, or the guy with a max squat of 300 pounds. Definitely the guy with the 300 pound squat. But if we were to compare a 600 pound squatter to an 800 pound squatter in the same task the answer may not be so clear cut.
    The main point is, unless you're already stronger than an ox, the fastest way to improve your ability to lift light weights is to increase your maxes, and the best way to do that is to lift fairly heavy with reps between 3 and 8 with weights between 70 and 100% of your 1 rep max. Lifting light loads will not improve max strength. When lifting heav weights the load may not move that fast but it doesn't need to move that fast.
    As for heavy weights making you slow, this is only true of people who carry strength training to the extreme. Even then, it's not the strength or heavy weight that creates slowness, it is the excessive muscular bodyweight that can develop. To verify this all you have to do is look at olympic weightlifters. Their entire sport is based on lifting heavy weights, yet they have the best vertical jumps of all athletes and are as fast as sprinters out to 30 meters.
    Some people are sometimes under the misguided assumption that strength training with heavy weights makes one slow because it can create a temporary state of fatigue and soreness in the muscles. That fatigue will sometime temporarily "mask" explosiveness. The solution to that is very simple: Take some occassional downtime and let that fatigue dissipate.
    Reply With Quote

  16. #16
    Registered User lukeridnour08's Avatar
    Join Date: Sep 2007
    Age: 33
    Posts: 1,752
    Rep Power: 505
    lukeridnour08 has a spectacular aura about. (+250) lukeridnour08 has a spectacular aura about. (+250) lukeridnour08 has a spectacular aura about. (+250) lukeridnour08 has a spectacular aura about. (+250) lukeridnour08 has a spectacular aura about. (+250) lukeridnour08 has a spectacular aura about. (+250) lukeridnour08 has a spectacular aura about. (+250) lukeridnour08 has a spectacular aura about. (+250) lukeridnour08 has a spectacular aura about. (+250) lukeridnour08 has a spectacular aura about. (+250) lukeridnour08 has a spectacular aura about. (+250)
    lukeridnour08 is offline
    Originally Posted by bballvertical View Post
    Until you have a really good base of strength in place you will get faster with light weights by increasing the poundage on your max lifts. Let me explain:
    Just for the sake of argument let's say that the guy who can throw around 100 pounds the fastest will have a superior vertical jump. Who's gonna throw around 100 pounds faster - The guy with a max squat of 135 pounds, or the guy with a max squat of 300 pounds. Definitely the guy with the 300 pound squat. But if we were to compare a 600 pound squatter to an 800 pound squatter in the same task the answer may not be so clear cut.
    The main point is, unless you're already stronger than an ox, the fastest way to improve your ability to lift light weights is to increase your maxes, and the best way to do that is to lift fairly heavy with reps between 3 and 8 with weights between 70 and 100% of your 1 rep max. Lifting light loads will not improve max strength. When lifting heav weights the load may not move that fast but it doesn't need to move that fast.
    As for heavy weights making you slow, this is only true of people who carry strength training to the extreme. Even then, it's not the strength or heavy weight that creates slowness, it is the excessive muscular bodyweight that can develop. To verify this all you have to do is look at olympic weightlifters. Their entire sport is based on lifting heavy weights, yet they have the best vertical jumps of all athletes and are as fast as sprinters out to 30 meters.
    Some people are sometimes under the misguided assumption that strength training with heavy weights makes one slow because it can create a temporary state of fatigue and soreness in the muscles. That fatigue will sometime temporarily "mask" explosiveness. The solution to that is very simple: Take some occassional downtime and let that fatigue dissipate.
    Damn. Good ****. How are you in the red??
    Reply With Quote

  17. #17
    Registered User mpls28allday's Avatar
    Join Date: Jan 2008
    Age: 35
    Posts: 163
    Rep Power: 205
    mpls28allday has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) mpls28allday has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) mpls28allday has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) mpls28allday has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) mpls28allday has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) mpls28allday has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) mpls28allday has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) mpls28allday has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) mpls28allday has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) mpls28allday has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) mpls28allday has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0)
    mpls28allday is offline
    Originally Posted by lukeridnour08 View Post
    Damn. Good ****. How are you in the red??
    Because that's straight out of Kelly Baggett's book.
    Reply With Quote

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts